Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1999 Sep;49(446):695–698.

A randomized trial of three marketing strategies to disseminate a screening and brief alcohol intervention programme to general practitioners.

C A Lock 1, E F Kaner 1, N Heather 1, B R McAvoy 1, E Gilvarry 1
PMCID: PMC1313495  PMID: 10756609

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research findings are of little benefit to patients or society if they do not reach the audience they are intended to influence. A dissemination strategy is needed to target new findings at its user group and encourage a process of consideration and adoption or rejection. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different marketing strategies for the dissemination of a screening and brief alcohol intervention (SBI) programme to general practitioners (GPs). METHOD: Seven hundred and twenty-nine GPs, one per practice, from the former Northern and Yorkshire Regional Health Authority were randomly assigned to one of three marketing strategies: postal marketing (mailing a promotional brochure to GPs), telemarketing (following a script to market the programme over the telephone), and personal marketing (following the same script during face-to-face marketing at GPs' practices). GPs who took up the programme were asked if they would agree to use it. Outcome measures included the proportions of GPs who took up the programme and agreement to use it. RESULTS: Of the 614 GPs eligible for the study, 321 (52%) took the programme. There was a significant difference in the proportions of GPs from the three marketing strategies who took the programme (82% telemarketing, 68% personal marketing, and 22% postal marketing). Of the 315 GPs who took the programme and were eligible to use it, 128 (41%) agreed to use the programme for three months. GPs in the postal marketing group were more likely to agree to use the programme (55% postal marketing, 44% personal marketing, and 34% telemarketing). Personal marketing was the most effective overall dissemination strategy; however, economic analysis revealed that telemarketing was the most cost-effective strategy. Costs for dissemination per GP were: 13 Pounds telemarketing, 15 Pounds postal marketing, and 88 Pounds personal marketing. CONCLUSION: Telemarketing appeared to be the most cost-effective strategy for dissemination of SBI to GPs.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (44.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Calnan M., Williams S. Coronary heart disease prevention: the role of the general practitioner. Fam Pract. 1993 Jun;10(2):137–151. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cockburn J., Ruth D., Silagy C., Dobbin M., Reid Y., Scollo M., Naccarella L. Randomised trial of three approaches for marketing smoking cessation programmes to Australian general practitioners. BMJ. 1992 Mar 14;304(6828):691–694. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6828.691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fleming M. F., Barry K. L., Manwell L. B., Johnson K., London R. Brief physician advice for problem alcohol drinkers. A randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care practices. JAMA. 1997 Apr 2;277(13):1039–1045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fowler G., Mant D., Fuller A., Jones L. The "Help Your Patient Stop" initiative. Evaluation of smoking prevalence and dissemination of WHO/UICC guidelines in UK general practice. Lancet. 1989 Jun 3;1(8649):1253–1255. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92342-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gomel M. K., Wutzke S. E., Hardcastle D. M., Lapsley H., Reznik R. B. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to market and train primary health care physicians in brief intervention techniques for hazardous alcohol use. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jul;47(2):203–211. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00063-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haines A., Donald A. Making better use of research findings. BMJ. 1998 Jul 4;317(7150):72–75. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7150.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Israel Y., Hollander O., Sanchez-Craig M., Booker S., Miller V., Gingrich R., Rankin J. G. Screening for problem drinking and counseling by the primary care physician-nurse team. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1996 Nov;20(8):1443–1450. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1996.tb01147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaner E. F., Lock C. A., McAvoy B. R., Heather N., Gilvarry E. A RCT of three training and support strategies to encourage implementation of screening and brief alcohol intervention by general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):699–703. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kiernan G. N., Frame P. S. Cancer occurrence and screening in family practice. A 20-year experience. J Fam Pract. 1996 Jul;43(1):49–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kottke T. E., Solberg L. I., Conn S., Maxwell P., Thomasberg M., Brekke M. L., Brekke M. J. A comparison of two methods to recruit physicians to deliver smoking cessation interventions. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Jul;150(7):1477–1481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Richmond R. L., Anderson P. Research in general practice for smokers and excessive drinkers in Australia and the UK. III. Dissemination of interventions. Addiction. 1994 Jan;89(1):49–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Richmond R., Heather N., Wodak A., Kehoe L., Webster I. Controlled evaluation of a general practice-based brief intervention for excessive drinking. Addiction. 1995 Jan;90(1):119–132. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.90111915.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES