Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1999 Oct;49(447):793–795.

Supporting practice-based audit: a price to be paid for collecting data.

J R Lough 1, M Willmot 1, T S Murray 1
PMCID: PMC1313529  PMID: 10885082

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been considerable investment by health authorities in the funding of support staff whose job is to collect data for audit purposes. It is important to understand what costs are involved in such a data collection exercise. The cost advantages of using existing practice staff or externally funded staff are not known. AIM: To assess the cost of transposing data on workload to computer software for audit purposes and retrieving data on five chronic diseases from case records. METHOD: Four audit support staff monitored the time taken to collect specific data as part of a broad audit programme in 12 training practices within one health board area in the West of Scotland in 1997. The time taken was used to estimate comparative costs for using a receptionist or practice nurse for carrying out a similar exercise. RESULTS: Average costs for collecting data per 1000 patients for waiting time, appointments, recall, and telephone audits were 5.24 Pounds for reception staff, 5.64 Pounds for audit support staff, and 9.68 Pounds for a practice nurse. The average cost for collecting data per patient with diabetes, asthma, epilepsy, hypertension, or rheumatoid arthritis was 1.48 Pounds for reception staff, 1.60 Pounds for audit support staff, and 2.74 Pounds for a practice nurse. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of collecting data varies considerably depending on which staff are chosen for the purpose. Practices should consider carefully how best to collect data for audit in terms of cost.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (39.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker R., Thompson J. Innovation in general practice: is the gap between training and non-training practices getting wider? Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jun;45(395):297–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hearnshaw H. M., Baker R. H., Robertson N. Multidisciplinary audit in primary healthcare teams: facilitation by audit support staff. Qual Health Care. 1994 Sep;3(3):164–168. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.3.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Miles A., Bentley P., Polychronis A., Price N., Grey J. Clinical audit in the National Health Service: fact or fiction? J Eval Clin Pract. 1996 Feb;2(1):29–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1996.tb00026.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nygren E., Wyatt J. C., Wright P. Helping clinicians to find data and avoid delays. Lancet. 1998 Oct 31;352(9138):1462–1466. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08307-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES