Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1999 Oct;49(447):796–800.

What do patients want from doctors? Content analysis of written patient agendas for the consultation.

R K McKinley 1, J F Middleton 1
PMCID: PMC1313530  PMID: 10885083

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although much has been written about what patients want when they contact their general practitioner (GP), there are no published data from large cohort studies of what patients expect. AIM: To describe the expectations of a large group of patients who consulted with their GPs. METHOD: A GP and a social sciences graduate carried out a content analysis of written agenda forms completed by 819 patients who consulted 46 randomly selected GPs. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were confirmed. RESULTS: A total of 756 (92%) agenda forms were returned. Inter-rater reliability was satisfactory (kappa > 0.6 for all but two main themes). Almost all patients had requests they wished to make of their doctor, 60% had their own ideas about what was wrong, and 38% had considered explanations about why they were unwell. Forty-two per cent and 24% of patients had consulted because they had reached the limit of their anxiety or tolerance respectively. Seven per cent, 4%, and 2% had comments, which were usually negative, to make about previous management, communication with doctors, or time in the consultation. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that most patients come to the consultation with a particular agenda. Failure to address this agenda is likely to adversely affect the outcome of many consultations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (47.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Becker M. H., Drachman R. H., Kirscht J. P. A new approach to explaining sick-role behavior in low-income populations. Am J Public Health. 1974 Mar;64(3):205–216. doi: 10.2105/ajph.64.3.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beckman H. B., Frankel R. M. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Nov;101(5):692–696. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-5-692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertakis K. D., Roter D., Putnam S. M. The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction. J Fam Pract. 1991 Feb;32(2):175–181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cromarty I. What do patients think about during their consultations? A qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Sep;46(410):525–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cunningham-Burley S., Allbutt H., Garraway W. M., Lee A. J., Russell E. B. Perceptions of urinary symptoms and health-care-seeking behaviour amongst men aged 40-79 years. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jun;46(407):349–352. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Helman C. G. Disease versus illness in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Sep;31(230):548–552. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kettell J., Jones R., Lydeard S. Reasons for consultation in irritable bowel syndrome: symptoms and patient characteristics. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Nov;42(364):459–461. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Like R., Zyzanski S. J. Patient requests in family practice: a focal point for clinical negotiations. Fam Pract. 1986 Dec;3(4):216–228. doi: 10.1093/fampra/3.4.216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lydeard S., Jones R. Factors affecting the decision to consult with dyspepsia: comparison of consulters and non-consulters. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Dec;39(329):495–498. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marteau T. M., Kinmonth A. L., Pyke S., Thompson S. G. Readiness for lifestyle advice: self-assessments of coronary risk prior to screening in the British family heart study. Family Heart Study Group. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jan;45(390):5–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mayer R., Graham H., Schuberth C., Launer J., Tomson D., Czauderna J. Family systems ideas in the 10-minute consultation: using a reflecting partner or observing team in a surgery. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Apr;46(405):229–230. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Middleton J. F. Asking patients to write lists: feasibility study. BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):34–34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Middleton J. F. The exceptional potential of the consultation revisited. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Sep;39(326):383–386. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mushlin A. I., Appel F. A. Testing an outcome-based quality assurance strategy in primary care. Med Care. 1980 May;18(5 Suppl):1–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peppiatt R. Eliciting patients' views of the cause of their problem: a practical strategy for GPs. Fam Pract. 1992 Sep;9(3):295–298. doi: 10.1093/fampra/9.3.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stewart M. A., McWhinney I. R., Buck C. W. How illness presents: a study of patient behavior. J Fam Pract. 1975 Dec;2(6):411–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stott N. C., Davis R. H. The exceptional potential in each primary care consultation. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1979 Apr;29(201):201–205. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Williams S. J., Calnan M. Key determinants of consumer satisfaction with general practice. Fam Pract. 1991 Sep;8(3):237–242. doi: 10.1093/fampra/8.3.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wyke S., Hewison J., Russell I. T. Respiratory illness in children: what makes parents decide to consult? Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Jun;40(335):226–229. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. van de Kar A., Knottnerus A., Meertens R., Dubois V., Kok G. Why do patients consult the general practitioner? Determinants of their decision. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Aug;42(361):313–316. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES