Introduction
Cancer remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, demanding continuous innovation in biological understanding, technological development, and clinical practice. Progress in oncology increasingly depends on the integration of fundamental discoveries with translational research and data-driven clinical decision-making. The eighteen contributions assembled in this Research Topic Collection for National Cancer Research Month 2025 reflect this integrative momentum, spanning molecular mechanisms foundations of tumor biology advances in radiotherapy and computational science, innovations in surgical and locoregional management, and insights from population genomics and rare tumor studies. Together, these studies illustrate how multidisciplinary research continues to shape a more precise and biologically informed approach to cancer care.
Biological mechanisms and molecular insights
Understanding how tumors arise, adapt, and evade therapy remains central to modern oncology. Conceptual frameworks such as the Hallmarks of Cancer, introduced by Douglas Hanahan and Robert A. Weinberg and recently revisited by Douglas Hanahan, provide a unifying perspective for interpreting the biological processes that drive tumorigenesis and therapeutic resistance (1–3). Several contributions in this Research Topic build on this conceptual foundation to deepen the mechanistic understanding of cancer development and treatment response.
Brahme presents a comprehensive review of quantum scale radiation interactions describing how low-energy delta rays can produce concentrated DNA damage that influences biological effectiveness and informs future optimization of fractionation strategies and linear energy transfer selection in clinical radiotherapy. Complementing this perspective, Liu et al. explore how RNA methylation marks such as m6A, m5C, and m7G regulate gene expression and contribute to radioresistance, outlining potential strategies for targeting these pathways to increase therapeutic sensitivity. Hormone signaling and receptor conformation also feature prominently in this Research Topic. Saha and Lukong provide a detailed structural and functional overview of ERα signaling, ESR1 mutations, and GPER activity in endocrine-resistant breast cancer and highlight the need for therapeutic strategies that address both nuclear and membrane mediated signaling. Moreover, Ji et al. expanded the biomarker landscape by reviewing claudin family proteins, describing their roles as modulators of cell adhesion, invasion, and metastasis, and discussing the emergence of claudin targeted therapies across multiple cancer types.
Other mechanistic work focuses on pathways not traditionally centered in oncology. Meyer et al. examine the role of the coagulation factors FXa and PAR2 in colon cancer progression and reveal how FXa signaling enhances tumor proliferation and migration, providing a novel axis for potential intervention. Akhtar et al. study several microRNAs in leiomyosarcoma and confirm their upregulation in tumor tissue while noting their limited predictive value for metastatic risk, which is important for future biomarker validation. In addition, Ma et al. address a long standing clinical problem by reviewing high risk contributors to radioiodine refractoriness in differentiated thyroid cancer. Their analysis includes demographic factors, genetic mutations such as BRAF and RAS, histopathological patterns, serum markers, and comorbidity related influences on iodine uptake. These papers collectively show how a deeper molecular understanding provides the foundation for more precisely targeted and biologically informed therapies.
Technological innovation, clinical translation, and decision support
Technological innovation continues to reshape oncology by translating biological knowledge into improved diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Large-scale cancer genomics initiatives such as The Cancer Genome Atlas and the International Cancer Genome Consortium have revealed the genomic heterogeneity of tumors and identified actionable molecular alterations across numerous cancer types (4–6). These advances underpin the emergence of precision oncology and increasingly data-driven clinical decision-making.
Several contributions highlight how evolving technologies and analytical methods are reshaping treatment design and clinical decision making. Amin et al. analyze survival outcomes in more than 117,000 sarcoma patients in the United States National Cancer Database and report that compared with photon therapy, proton beam therapy is associated with improved overall survival in several clinically important histologies. Sun et al. review international experience with boron neutron capture therapy for melanoma and outline recent improvements in accelerator systems and boron delivery agents that support continued development. On the other hand, Aigner et al. introduce a regional treatment approach for anal squamous cell carcinoma that uses isolated hypoxic pelvic perfusion with or without reversible electroporation. Their reported cases show complete clinical and pathological remissions with minimal toxicity, demonstrating a promising alternative for select patients.
Precision oncology also benefits from advances in molecular profiling. Erices et al. produce an ancestry informed genomic map of gallbladder cancer in Chile, identifying actionable alterations in genes including ATM, BRCA1/2, EGFR, and ERBB2. They also report an association between Mapuche ancestry and TP53 mutations, underscoring the value of population specific genomic evidence. Hofmann et al. present a case of colorectal cancer with an ALK CEP44 fusion that initially responds to ALK inhibition before the rapid development of multiple resistance mutations, illustrating the dynamic nature of tumor evolution and the need for serial molecular assessment.
Machine learning is represented by Antysheva et al. who develop a single sample molecular classifier for cancer grading that operates without batch correction and provides reliable risk stratification for intermediate grade tumors, an important step toward real world applicability. Important insights into surgical practice and outcome prediction are also included in this group. Yumak and Demir report that lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, poor differentiation, R1 resection, emergency surgery, and subsequent metastasis are dominant predictors of mortality in patients with rectal cancer. Furthermore, Lin et al. evaluate risk factors for contralateral central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer and show that microcalcification and Hashimoto thyroiditis are strong predictors that support selective contralateral dissection. These papers collectively demonstrate how technologies such as particle therapy, machine learning, advanced profiling, and carefully analyzed clinical data are transforming how clinicians tailor treatment for specific patients and settings.
Rare cancers, clinical insight, and conceptual framing
Rare cancers collectively represent a substantial yet often underrecognized portion of the global cancer burden, accounting for approximately 20–25% of malignancies (7, 8). Their study provides unique opportunities to uncover novel biological mechanisms and refine clinical management strategies through collaborative research networks and shared data resources.
In this Research Topic, several case-based contributions illustrate the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges posed by uncommon malignancies. Yu et al. report a case of recurrent mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate, emphasizing the diagnostic reliance on pathology and the multimodal treatment required for this very uncommon disease. Li et al. present a case of breast carcinosarcoma and highlight the challenges of diagnosing tumors with nonspecific clinical findings, reinforcing the importance of comprehensive pathology and coordinated therapy. Finally, Bredberg offers a broader perspective on cancer complexity and argues that cancer should be viewed as a complex adaptive system that requires conceptual tools from complexity science in addition to traditional target based strategies. His commentary encourages the field to recognize the nonlinear and multiscale behavior inherent to cancer progression.
Conclusion
Together, these eighteen studies presented in this Research Topic reflect the dynamic and multidisciplinary nature of contemporary cancer research. They illustrate progress across molecular biology, precision radiotherapy, genomic profiling, machine learning, surgical decision-making, and the clinical understanding of rare cancers. More broadly, they highlight how progress in cancer research increasingly emerges from the integration of biological insight, technological innovation, and clinical expertise. Continued collaboration across disciplines will be essential to translate these advances into more effective, personalized, and equitable cancer care.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Frontiers in Oncology Editorial Team members for their continuous, valuable and helpful support given to us for this research topic.
Editorial on the Research Topic National Cancer Research Month 2025: Advances in Detection, Treatment and Therapies in Oncology
Funding Statement
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for this work and/or its publication.
Footnotes
Edited and reviewed by: Tao Liu, University of New South Wales, Australia
Author contributions
JC: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. DB: Writing – review & editing. VC: Writing – review & editing. TK: Writing – review & editing. MK: Writing – review & editing. CS: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Correction note
A correction has been made to this article. Details can be found at: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1867092.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. (2000) 100:57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. (2011) 144:646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer-Then and now, and beyond. Cell. (2026). doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.12.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hudson TJ, Anderson W, Artez A, Barker AD, Bell C, Bernabé RR. International network of cancer genome projects. Nature. (2010) 464:993–8. doi: 10.1038/nature08987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cancer Genome Atlas Network . Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. (2012) 490:61–70. doi: 10.1038/nature11412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Shin SH, Bode AM, Dong Z. Precision medicine: the foundation of future cancer therapeutics. NPJ Precis Oncol. (2017) 1:12. doi: 10.1038/s41698-017-0016-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gatta G, van der Zwan JM, Casali PG, Siesling S, Dei Tos AP, Kunkler I, et al. Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer. (2011) 47:2493–511. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Komatsubara KM, Carvajal RD. The promise and challenges of rare cancer research. Lancet Oncol. (2016) 17:136–8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00485-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
