Abstract
Diet is important in the aetiology and management of many conditions in primary care. Although valid dietary assessment is required for both clinical work and research, no dietary assessment instruments have been validated among patients seen in primary care. A range of simple self-completion dietary assessment questionnaires and established research instruments were compared with an accepted reference standard, a seven-day weighed record, in 111 subjects assessed in a practice nurse-run treatment room. Simple self-completion tools based on food groups and portion sizes perform as well (likelihood ratios for a positive test = 2 to 3) as much more time-consuming instruments. The error in using such instruments is comparable with the error of the standard itself. There is little justification for using time-consuming dietary assessment questionnaires, since simple tools are accurate enough to be clinically useful--to allow practice nurses to target patients for counselling and waste less time on inappropriate counselling--and also useful for research.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (36.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bingham S. A., Gill C., Welch A., Day K., Cassidy A., Khaw K. T., Sneyd M. J., Key T. J., Roe L., Day N. E. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. Br J Nutr. 1994 Oct;72(4):619–643. doi: 10.1079/bjn19940064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bingham S. A. Limitations of the various methods for collecting dietary intake data. Ann Nutr Metab. 1991;35(3):117–127. doi: 10.1159/000177635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldberg G. R., Black A. E., Jebb S. A., Cole T. J., Murgatroyd P. R., Coward W. A., Prentice A. M. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1991 Dec;45(12):569–581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little P., Barnett J., Margetts B., Kinmonth A. L., Gabbay J., Thompson R., Warm D., Warwick H., Wooton S. The validity of dietary assessment in general practice. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Mar;53(3):165–172. doi: 10.1136/jech.53.3.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little P., Margetts B. Dietary and exercise assessment in general practice. Fam Pract. 1996 Oct;13(5):477–482. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.5.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little P., Margetts B. The importance of diet and physical activity in the treatment of conditions managed in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Mar;46(404):187–192. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Livingstone M. B., Prentice A. M., Strain J. J., Coward W. A., Black A. E., Barker M. E., McKenna P. G., Whitehead R. G. Accuracy of weighed dietary records in studies of diet and health. BMJ. 1990 Mar 17;300(6726):708–712. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6726.708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roe L., Strong C., Whiteside C., Neil A., Mant D. Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for diet assessment. Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):375–381. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wonderling D., Langham S., Buxton M., Normand C., McDermott C. What can be concluded from the Oxcheck and British family heart studies: commentary on cost effectiveness analyses. BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1274–1278. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]