Abstract
BACKGROUND: The burden of cancer care in general practice is increasing. Patient-held records may facilitate effective, coordinated care, but no randomised controlled trials of their use in cancer care have been conducted, and concerns about possible negative effects remain. AIM: To evaluate the use of a supplementary patient-held record in cancer care. METHOD: Six hundred and fifty radiotherapy outpatients with any form of cancer were randomised either to hold a supplementary record or to receive normal care. It was explained to record holders that the supplementary record was intended to improve communication with health professionals and act as an aide memoire. After three months, patients' satisfaction with communication and with participation in their own care were assessed. Global health status, emotional functioning, and cognitive functioning were measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between groups in any of the outcome measures. Patients in both groups expressed a high level of satisfaction with communication and participation in their care. Mean (SD) scores in the intervention and control groups were: global health status, 66.8 (24.2) and 65.3 (23.7); emotional functioning, 75.0 (24.6) and 77.4 (22.8); cognitive functioning, 84.5 (21.0) and 84.0 (21.3). CONCLUSION: A supplementary patient-held record for radiotherapy outpatients appears to have no effect on satisfaction with communication, participation in care, or quality of life.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (53.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aaronson N. K., Ahmedzai S., Bergman B., Bullinger M., Cull A., Duez N. J., Filiberti A., Flechtner H., Fleishman S. B., de Haes J. C. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365–376. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baldry M., Cheal C., Fisher B., Gillett M., Huet V. Giving patients their own records in general practice: experience of patients and staff. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 1;292(6520):596–598. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6520.596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blanchard C. G., Labrecque M. S., Ruckdeschel J. C., Blanchard E. B. Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(11):1139–1145. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90343-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cassileth B. R., Zupkis R. V., Sutton-Smith K., March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980 Jun;92(6):832–836. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Derdiarian A. K. Informational needs of recently diagnosed cancer patients. Nurs Res. 1986 Sep-Oct;35(5):276–281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elbourne D., Richardson M., Chalmers I., Waterhouse I., Holt E. The Newbury Maternity Care Study: a randomized controlled trial to assess a policy of women holding their own obstetric records. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Jul;94(7):612–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03165.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fallowfield L. Giving sad and bad news. Lancet. 1993 Feb 20;341(8843):476–478. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90219-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilhooly M. L., McGhee S. M. Medical records: practicalities and principles of patient possession. J Med Ethics. 1991 Sep;17(3):138–143. doi: 10.1136/jme.17.3.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Higginson I., Wade A., McCarthy M. Palliative care: views of patients and their families. BMJ. 1990 Aug 4;301(6746):277–281. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6746.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Latimer E. J., Porterfield P., Roberts J. G. A patient care travelling record for palliative care: a feasibility study. J Palliat Care. 1991 Summer;7(2):30–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Livaniou E., Mihelic M., Evangelatos G. P., Haritos A., Voelter W. A thymosin beta 4 ELISA using an antibody against the N terminal fragment thymosin beta 4 [1-14]. J Immunol Methods. 1992 Apr 8;148(1-2):9–14. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(92)90152-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lovell A., Zander L. I., James C. E., Foot S., Swan A. V., Reynolds A. The St. Thomas's Hospital maternity case notes study: a randomised controlled trial to assess the effects of giving expectant mothers their own maternity case notes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1987 Apr;1(1):57–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1987.tb00090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meredith C., Symonds P., Webster L., Lamont D., Pyper E., Gillis C. R., Fallowfield L. Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views. BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):724–726. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson L., Stacy R. Palliative care in the community: setting practice guidelines for primary care teams. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Oct;44(387):461–464. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saffin K., Macfarlane A. How well are parent held records kept and completed? Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Jun;41(347):249–251. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seale C. Communication and awareness about death: a study of a random sample of dying people. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(8):943–952. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90249-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]