Abstract
BACKGROUND: Primary health care receptionists are increasingly expected to be involved in research. However, little is known about receptionists' attitudes to research or health programmes. AIM: To examine changes in receptionists' attitudes, with different levels of training and support, towards involvement in a general practice-based trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention. METHOD: Subjects were 84 receptionists, one per practice, who assisted in the implementation of a screening and brief alcohol intervention programme. Receptionists were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: control (no training or support), training alone, and training plus ongoing telephone support. Baseline and follow-up questionnaires were used to assess changes in receptionists' attitudes. RESULTS: Of 40 items that measured receptionists' attitudes to involvement in the programme, 70% had deteriorated after three months, 20% significantly so. There was no effect of training and support condition. Receptionists' and GPs' attitudes to research and health programmes conflicted. CONCLUSION: Receptionists developed more negative views about involvement in research and health programmes over the three-month study period, regardless of level of training and support.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (49.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Anderson R., Steel R. The general practitioner and the receptionist. Practitioner. 1979 Nov;223(1337):603–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arai Y., Farrow S. Access, expectations and communication: Japanese mothers' interaction with GPs in a pilot study in North London. Public Health. 1995 Sep;109(5):353–361. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(95)80007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arber S., Sawyer L. The role of the receptionist in general practice: a 'dragon behind the desk'? Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(9):911–921. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90347-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brierley D. M. In defence of the receptionist. Br Med J. 1978 Apr 1;1(6116):860–860. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6116.860-c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell A., Edgar S. Teenage screening in a general practice setting. Health Visit. 1993 Oct;66(10):365–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carnegie M. A., Gomel M. K., Saunders J. B., Britt H., Burns L. General practice receptionists' attitudes and beliefs towards preventive medicine before and after training and support interventions. Fam Pract. 1996 Dec;13(6):504–510. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.6.504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castledine G. What a reception! Nurs Mirror. 1984 Mar 28;158(13):11–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deehan A., Marshall E. J., Strang J. Tackling alcohol misuse: opportunities and obstacles in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Nov;48(436):1779–1782. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drury M., Kuenssberg E. V. Inquiry into administrative activities in general practice. Br Med J. 1970 Oct 3;4(5726):42–44. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5726.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisner M., Britten N. What do general practice receptionists think and feel about their work? Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Feb;49(439):103–106. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Essex B., Bate J. Audit in general practice by a receptionist: a feasibility study. BMJ. 1991 Mar 9;302(6776):573–576. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6776.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hannay D. R., Maddox E. J. The use and perception of a health centre. Practitioner. 1977 Feb;218(1304):260–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Israel Y., Hollander O., Sanchez-Craig M., Booker S., Miller V., Gingrich R., Rankin J. G. Screening for problem drinking and counseling by the primary care physician-nurse team. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1996 Nov;20(8):1443–1450. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1996.tb01147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaner E. F., Lock C. A., McAvoy B. R., Heather N., Gilvarry E. A RCT of three training and support strategies to encourage implementation of screening and brief alcohol intervention by general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):699–703. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lock C. A., Kaner E. F., Heather N., McAvoy B. R., Gilvarry E. A randomized trial of three marketing strategies to disseminate a screening and brief alcohol intervention programme to general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):695–698. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mallett J., Woolwich C. Triage in accident and emergency departments. J Adv Nurs. 1990 Dec;15(12):1443–1451. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1990.tb01787.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan D. R., Lamont T. J., Dawson J. D., Booth C. Decontamination of instruments and control of cross infection in general practice. BMJ. 1990 May 26;300(6736):1379–1380. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6736.1379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy E., Spiegal N., Kinmonth A. L. 'Will you help me with my research?' Gaining access to primary care settings and subjects. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Apr;42(357):162–165. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wadland W. C., Hughes J. R., Secker-Walker R. H., Bronson D. L., Fenwick J. Recruitment in a primary care trial on smoking cessation. Fam Med. 1990 May-Jun;22(3):201–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ward J. When research involves your receptionist. A checklist for GPs and staff. Aust Fam Physician. 1992 Aug;21(8):1184-7, 1190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams P. T., Eckert G., Epstein A., Mourad L., Helmick F. In-office cancer-screening education of primary care physicians. J Cancer Educ. 1994 Summer;9(2):90–95. doi: 10.1080/08858199409528278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]