Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 Feb;50(451):116–120.

The process of outpatient referral and care: the experiences and views of patients, their general practitioners, and specialists.

A Bowling 1, J Redfern 1
PMCID: PMC1313628  PMID: 10750208

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary care system in the United Kingdom, involving the general practitioner (GP) as gatekeeper to further services, has helped to keep health care costs down. Despite this, unexplained variation in referral rates and increasing health care costs have led to the search for methods of improving efficiency. There is relatively little recent descriptive data on the processes of care at the primary-secondary care interface. The study reported here provides information about this. AIM: To analyse the patterns and process of care for the referral of outpatients, together with the views of patients, their GPs, and specialists. METHOD: A questionnaire survey of outpatients, their hospital specialists, and GPs in randomly sampled district health authorities in the North Thames Region. The measures included items and scales measuring satisfaction and processes. RESULTS: Almost all of the outpatients thought that their consultation with the specialist was 'necessary' and 'worthwhile'. Most of the GPs felt that they could not have given the study patients the care, treatment, and investigations they received in hospital, and most of the sampled patients' attendances were rated by the specialists as 'appropriate'. However, for just over one-fifth of new patients, the specialists reported that the GP could have done more tests and examinations prior to referring the study patient. Large proportions of GPs in this survey also reported having technical equipment in their practices, as well as direct access to a range of services and hospital-based facilities. CONCLUSION: A large amount of work is carried out in general practice prior to the hospital referral of patients, and GPs have direct access to some technologies and services that can act to reduce the burden on hospitals. The discrepancy between GPs' and specialists, perceptions about the potential for further investigative work prior to patient referral merits further investigation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (48.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bowling A., Stramer K., Dickinson E., Windsor J., Bond M. Evaluation of specialists' outreach clinics in general practice in England: process and acceptability to patients, specialists, and general practitioners. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Feb;51(1):52–61. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.1.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coulter A., Bradlow J. Effect of NHS reforms on general practitioners' referral patterns. BMJ. 1993 Feb 13;306(6875):433–437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6875.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coulter A. Shifting the balance from secondary to primary care. BMJ. 1995 Dec 2;311(7018):1447–1448. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7018.1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Faulkner A., Saltrese-Taylor A., O'Brien J., Williams M., Collins C. D., Frankel S. Outpatients revisited: subjective views and clinical decisions in the management of general surgical outpatients in south west England. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Dec;49(6):599–605. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.6.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Graham H. J., Firth J. Home accidents in older people: role of primary health care team. BMJ. 1992 Jul 4;305(6844):30–32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6844.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harrison R., Clayton W., Wallace P. Can telemedicine be used to improve communication between primary and secondary care? BMJ. 1996 Nov 30;313(7069):1377–1381. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hippisley-Cox J., Hardy C., Pringle M., Fielding K., Carlisle R., Chilvers C. The effect of deprivation on variations in general practitioners' referral rates: a cross sectional study of computerised data on new medical and surgical outpatient referrals in Nottinghamshire. BMJ. 1997 May 17;314(7092):1458–1461. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7092.1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leese B., Bosanquet N. Family doctors and change in practice strategy since 1986. BMJ. 1995 Mar 18;310(6981):705–708. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6981.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Starfield B. Is primary care essential? Lancet. 1994 Oct 22;344(8930):1129–1133. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90634-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Surender R., Bradlow J., Coulter A., Doll H., Brown S. S. Prospective study of trends in referral patterns in fundholding and non-fundholding practices in the Oxford region, 1990-4. BMJ. 1995 Nov 4;311(7014):1205–1208. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7014.1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Weingarten M. A. Telephone consultations with patients: a brief study and review of the literature. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1982 Dec;32(245):766–770. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES