Abstract
Iron-ion batteries represent a compelling energy storage solution due to the cost-effectiveness, suitable redox potential, and high capacity of Fe negative electrodes. Polyaniline positive electrodes for iron-ion batteries have demonstrated promising electrochemical redox properties, but face limited redox-accessible groups and unstable −NH− sites. Here we show phosphorus redox activity in a carboxyl small molecule electrode. 4,4′,4″-phosphanetriyltribenzoic acid and 4,4′,4″-nitrilotribenzoic acid are designed via modulating the electron-donating P and tert-N motifs, showing tuned charge distributions and energy levels. With the decrease of the electronegativity and energy barrier (N > P), 4,4′,4″-phosphanetriyltribenzoic acid exhibits stronger Fe2+ coordination with carboxyl sites, and brings closed CF3SO3− proximity to P centers. This feature ensures high activity of carboxyl/phosphorus sites with low activation energy (0.24 vs. 0.29 eV for 4,4′,4″-nitrilotribenzoic acid). 4,4′,4″-phosphanetriyltribenzoic acid with P-extended conjugated structure achieves low energy gap (2.28 eV) compared to its individual carboxyl or P-containing counterparts (2.71/3.16 eV), thereby enabling high utilization of carboxyl/P motifs (98.5%) and enhanced redox voltage (0.8 V). A stable 4 e− Fe2+/CF3SO3− storage of 4,4′,4″-phosphanetriyltribenzoic acid positive electrode endows Fe battery with high specific capacity (276 mAh g−1) and cycling stability (60,000 cycles). This work highlights the potential of phosphorus-active organic materials toward iron-ion batteries.
Subject terms: Batteries, Batteries
Aqueous iron-ion batteries represent a compelling energy storage solution due to the cost-effectiveness, suitable redox potential, and high capacity of Fe negative electrodes. This study activates phosphorus redox activity in a carboxyl small molecule positive electrode for iron-ion batteries.
Introduction
The rapid development of sustainable energy storage technologies has accelerated the research on next-generation rechargeable aqueous batteries, which offer inherent safety, environmental sustainability and cost-effectiveness1–6. Among various aqueous batteries employing multivalent transition metal negative electrodes (such as Zn, Mg, Al, Fe)7–11, zinc-ion batteries are prevailing systems owing to their high theoretical specific capacity (820 mAh g−1/5855 mAh cm⁻3), low redox potential (−0.76 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode) and relatively low cost (~2.5 USD per kg) of Zn negative electrodes12,13. In contrast, iron-ion batteries (IIBs) represent a compelling avenue for energy storage solutions, benefiting from the even higher theoretical specific capacity (960 mAh g⁻1/7557 mAh cm⁻3), moderate Fe2+/Fe redox potential (−0.44 V vs. SHE) and lower cost (about 40 times cheaper than Zn) of Fe negative electrodes14,15. Thus, the rational design of well-matched positive electrode materials is a crucial task to fully unleash the potential of IIBs. Currently, inorganic positive electrode materials have been reported for IIBs, such as V2O5, VOPO4 ∙ 2H2O, LiFePO4 and Prussian blue analogs16–18, which generally face sluggish kinetics and poor cyclic stability caused by the strong electrostatic interactions between Fe2+ ions and hosting lattices.
Beyond inorganic compounds, π-aromatic organic materials exhibit great potential as positive electrodes for propelling iron-organic batteries (IOBs) owing to their flexible molecular configurations and effective structural/functional tunability15,19. Consequently, designing suitable and robust organic positive electrodes to efficiently store Fe2+ ions is essential for IOBs. To this end, there have been a few preliminary investigations on organic positive electrode materials for IOBs. For example, the Li group reported a cross-linked polyaniline positive electrode with enhanced electronic conductivity and stability for activating IOBs, affording high specific capacity (209 mAh g−1) and cycling durability (39,000 cycles)15. Furthermore, the Yu group developed a sandwich-type polyaniline positive electrode to demonstrate high specific capacity (225 mAh g−1) and long lifespan (27,000 cycles)19. Despite these promising achievements made in broadening the battery horizons, the twisted polymeric chains and unstable structural linkages often result in disordered stacking structures, limiting the full utilization of redox-active motifs and the cycling durability of polymer positive electrodes20–24. Therefore, more attempts are still needed to unlock the electrochemical limitations of IOBs by strategic structural engineering.
As is well-established, designing multiple redox-active sites in organic small molecule positive electrodes that permit more electron transfer is key to boosting the capacity of IOBs25–29. Meanwhile, tuning the π-conjugated electronic structures of organic skeletons can regulate electron delocalization and structural robustness by lowering energy levels to afford stable charge storage30–33. Currently, polyanilines as prevailing positive electrodes have exhibited promising redox electrochemical performances, but are hindered by the limited redox accessibility and inherent instability of p-type −NH− sites due to twisted structure and high energy barrier, which restrict both capacity and cycling durability15,19. These limitations motivate us to explore better small molecules with high activity and stability of p-type sites for IIBs through rational structure engineering. Featured with strong electroactivity, desirable redox kinetics, and anion-coupling sensitivity of π−conjugated electron-donating C−P sites in aromatic rings, p-type phosphorus compounds represent promising stable positive electrode candidates, yet remain underexplored in battery fields. However, the intrinsically low density of redox-active phosphorus units in organics inevitably limits the capacity of IOBs. Grafting multi-electron-withdrawing n-type carboxyl motifs (−COOH) into phosphorus compounds can effectively tune the electronic structure and delocalization behaviors, thereby boosting electrochemical activity and durability34–36. Considering the complementary advantages of multi-active carboxyl and stable phosphorus motifs, designing phosphorus-activated carboxyl molecules with easy-accessible redox sites and stable structures will exhibit a synergistic vitality to achieve high specific capacity and durable IOBs, but have not yet been reported.
In this work, we unlock phosphorus redox chemistry in a small molecule carboxyl positive electrode for IOBs. 4,4′,4″-Phosphanetriyltribenzoic acid (PTBA) and 4,4′,4″-nitrilotribenzoic acid (NTBA) organic molecules are designed by modulating the electron-donating P and tert-N groups, which show tuned charge distributions and energy levels. The lower electronegativity and energy barrier (N > P) in PTBA strengthen low-potential Fe2+-carboxyl coordination and activate high-potential CF3SO3−-phosphorus reaction. This feature ensures high redox activity of carboxyl/phosphorus sites with a low activation energy (0.24 vs. 0.29 eV for NTBA). PTBA with P-extended conjugated structure shows the lowest energy gap (2.28 eV) compared to its individual carboxyl or P-containing counterparts (2.71/3.16 eV), thus giving high utilization of carboxyl/P motifs (98.5%) and enhanced redox voltage (0.8 V). Besides, the phosphorus-linked π-extended aromatic framework effectively suppresses the dissolution of the PTBA positive electrode in aqueous electrolytes to achieve stable 4 e− Fe2+/CF3SO3− storage. Fe | |PTBA battery harvests the enhanced performance in terms of high specific capacity, high-rate capability and durable lifespan. This study opens good avenues for designing phosphorus-functionalized organic materials with favorable redox activity and stability for next-generation iron batteries.
Results and discussion
Materials characterization
Figure 1a illustrates the π-conjugated bipolar molecule skeletons of PTBA and NTBA, which share similar aromatic triple-carboxyl structures but different p-type centers (C−P vs. C−N). For comparison, 1,3,5-tris(4-carboxyphenyl)benzene (TCB) with electron-accepting n-type carboxyl groups and triphenylphosphorus (TPP) with electron-donating p-type phosphorus species were selected as the model molecules to evaluate their electrochemical behaviors (Supplementary Fig. 1). The morphological and structural properties of the four organic molecules were analysed by Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR, Supplementary Fig. 2), scanning electron microscopy images (SEM, Supplementary Fig. 3), elemental maps (Supplementary Fig. 4), and X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD, Supplementary Fig. 5). Additionally, optimized molecular geometries37,38, were achieved through computational simulations to further investigate their electronic configurations and redox properties (Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Data 1).
Fig. 1. Material characterizations.
a Bipolar molecular structures. b Molecular electrostatic potentials maps. Colors of elements: C, gray; O, red; H, white; P, blue; N, yellow. c LUMO/HOMO energy levels. Blue regions: positive phase of the orbital wave function; Green regions: negative phase of the orbital wave function. d FT-IR spectra. e Calculated energy gaps. f Electronic conductivities were tested at 4 different points on PTBA and NTBN positive electrodes with an RTS-8 four-point probe.
By modeling the charge distribution of molecular electrostatic potentials (MEP)39–41, the redox-bipolar-active centers of PTBA and NTBA can be identified. MEP distribution shows that the three carboxyl groups with electronegative potentials (red regions) are n-type motifs capable of chelating cations. Conversely, C−P or C−N centers with electropositive potentials (blue regions) serve as p-type sites for anion coordination (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 7). Notably, comparative MEP analysis indicates that the C−P center in PTBA possesses more negative MEP values compared to C−N in NTBA, suggesting enhanced redox activity and good ion-coupling capability. The energy gap (ΔE) between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) is a crucial indicator for evaluating molecular electronic properties42–44. Of note, PTBA exhibits a narrow ΔE of 3.75 eV, which is lower than that of NTBA (4.16 eV, Fig. 1c) and unipolar TCB/TPP molecules (4.66/4.63 eV, Supplementary Fig. 8). Such a result indicates the good structural stability and charge-transfer efficiency of PTBA.
FT-IR spectra exhibit the presence of C−P groups at 745 cm−1, and the asymmetric/symmetric stretching vibrations of C=O/−COO at 1685/1410 cm−1 in PTBA, indicating its redox bipolarity (Fig. 1d). Moreover, the optical energy gaps (Eg) were calculated to be 2.28 and 2.52 eV for PTBA and NTBA (Fig. 1e, 2.71/3.16 eV for TCB/TPP, Supplementary Fig. 9), signifying their high electron conductivity to propel high-kinetics redox reactions45,46. Compared with NTBA (7.80 × 10−9 S cm−1), PTBA with the extended π-conjugated aromatic structure shows an enhanced electrical conductivity (8.49 × 10−9 S cm−1, Supplementary Fig. 10). It is further boosted to 27.05 S cm−1 with the addition of 30 wt% acetylene black conductive agent (Fig. 1f, Supplementary Fig. 11), facilitating efficient electron transfer. Furthermore, UV-Vis spectroscopy measurements reveal no absorption signals for PTBA after immersion in Fe(OTF)2/H2O electrolyte (OTF⁻ = CF3SO3−), demonstrating strong resistance to dissolution (Supplementary Fig. 12). Overall, PTBA integrates rich carboxyl/phosphorus motifs, good coordination capability, low energy barriers, and robust π-conjugated frameworks, making it an ideal positive electrode candidate for Fe batteries.
Electrochemical performance
The Fe||PTBA cell was further assembled by using PTBA positive electrode paired with Fe metal negative electrode in aqueous 1 mol L−1 Fe(OTF)2 electrolyte (Supplementary Figs. 13–15). Three identical Fe||PTBA cells were tested for a single electrochemical experiment. Acetylene black as conductive additive demonstrates a negligible specific capacity (8 mAh g−1) for Fe||PTBA battery (Supplementary Fig. 16). Two well-defined redox peaks in cyclic voltammetry (CV) profiles signify a two-step redox reaction of PTBA positive electrode (Fig. 2a). Notably, owing to the favorable LUMO-HOMO gap and high electronic conductivity, PTBA positive electrode demonstrates enhanced redox potentials compared to NTBA positive electrode, resulting in an elevated average discharge voltage of 0.8 V. Galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) profiles of Fe||PTBA battery exhibit obvious two discharge voltage plateaus consistent with the two-step redox behavior (Fig. 2b, c), providing good reversible capacities (276 mAh g−1@0.5 A g−1 and 141 mAh g−1@20 A g−1), which exceed that of Fe||NTBA battery (237 mAh g−1@0.5 A g−1 and 106 mAh g−1@20 A g−1).
Fig. 2. Electrochemical performances.
All electrochemical tests were conducted at 25 ± 0.5 °C under ambient pressure. a CV profiles at 1 mV s−1 within the potential range of 0−1.2 V, b GCD curves, c rate capacities of Fe||PTBA and Fe||NTBA batteries. d CV profiles at different scan rates of 1−10 mV s−1, e peak voltages at various scan rates, f GCD curves of Fe||PTBA battery. g Cycling performance at low specific current. h Long-term cycling stability at high specific current.
Furthermore, the almost constant quasi-rectangular CV profiles exhibit minimal peak voltage shifts as the scan rate increases (Fig. 2d, e), signifying the low polarization of Fe||PTBA battery47–49. Besides, the PTBA positive electrode demonstrates highly reversible (dis)charge capacities and negligible voltage drops at various specific currents (Fig. 2f, Supplementary Fig. 17), highlighting the bipolar multi-redox structure advantages and favorable electrochemical reversibility of PTBA. Fe||PTBA battery delivers good cycling stability with 90.9% capacity retention after 5000 cycles at 0.5 A g−1 (0.00182% per cycle, Fig. 2g), far surpassing other Fe | |NTBA, Fe||TCB and Fe||TPP cells (Supplementary Figs. 18, 19). Even at a high specific current of 10 A g−1, Fe||PTBA battery reaches an electrochemical lifespan of 60,000 cycles with 77.6% remaining capacity (0.00037% per cycle, Fig. 2h). SEM images and XPS analysis reveal that PTBA positive electrode maintains nearly identical morphologies and redox-active functional groups after prolonged cycling (Supplementary Figs. 20, 21), confirming its favorable structural stability and electrochemical reversibility.
Additionally, UV–Vis spectra analysis of Fe(OTF)2/H2O electrolyte after soaking cycled PTBA positive electrode shows no obvious absorption peak (Supplementary Fig. 22), indicating the resistance to dissolution of PTBA in aqueous electrolyte, thereby contributing to durable redox activity. Meanwhile, after experiencing repeated plating/stripping behavior during long-term cycling, the Fe negative electrode exhibits a relatively rough surface morphology (Supplementary Fig. 23). Therefore, the stable conjugated structure of the PTBA positive electrode is the reason for the durable operation of the Fe||PTBA battery. Furthermore, high-capacity-voltage PTBA positive electrode endows Fe||PTBA cell with a high specific energy of 217 Wh kg−1 (based on the mass loading of PTBA in the positive electrode, 3 mg cm−2, Supplementary Fig. 24). Fe||PTBA battery with 10.2 mg cm−2PTBA still achieves high capacities of 229 mAh g−1 at 1 A g−1 and 147 mAh g−1 at 10 A g−1 (Supplementary Fig. 25), which is competitive compared to some recent relevant reports (120/53 mAh g−1 at 1/10 A g−1 under ~8 mg cm−2)15. The desirable electrochemical performances highlight the electrochemical practical potential of phosphorus-engineered redox-active and stable organic materials towards better aqueous iron batteries. Besides, the assembled Fe | |PTBA pouch-type cell, even at a high mass loading of 10.7 mg cm−2 PTBA, demonstrates a high areal specific capacity of 2.25 mAh cm−2 with 91.3% capacity retention after 1000 cycles at 1 A g−1 (Supplementary Fig. 26), demonstrating its potential for practical applications. The comprehensively improved electrochemical metrics give the PTBA positive electrode the potential to compete with recently reported organics used for aqueous multivalent metal batteries (Supplementary Table 1).
Structural evolution and mechanism analysis
The charge storage mechanism was investigated through systematic characterization using FT-IR spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Five distinct (dis)charged states (A–E) in GCD curves of Fe||PTBA cell were analyzed to trace structural variation of PTBA positive electrodes during electrochemical reactions (Fig. 3a). The two-dimensional IR contour map reveals two characteristic absorption peaks at 1410 and 1685 cm−1, corresponding to vibrational signals of −COO species and C=O species50,51, maintaining relatively stable intensity during the initial discharge stage (states A to B, Fig. 3b). Then these characteristic peaks gradually diminish as the discharge process deepens (states B to C), indicating n-type redox activity of carboxyl groups by coordinating with cations in the low potential area. Conversely, the C−P vibrational signal at 745 cm−1 begins to appear from states A to B, and then remains constant during the following discharge (states B to C), confirming that phosphorus sites exhibit p-type redox behavior by removing anions in the high potential region. During the subsequent recharging process (states C to E), all absorption peaks reversibly return to the initial state A, which corresponds to the coupling reaction between carboxyl sites and Fe2+ cations, as well as the decoordination process between phosphorus centers and OTF− anions.
Fig. 3. Structural evolution of PTBA electrode during electrochemical reactions.
a A GCD curve. b Overview of FT-IR spectra. XPS spectra of c C 1 s, d Fe 2p, and e S 2p corresponding to the selected voltages marked in the GCD curve. For ex situ spectrum analysis, cells were cycled at 0.5 A g−1 for 3 cycles at 25 ± 0.5 °C under ambient pressure, and terminated at designated states of charge/discharge before disassembly.
To further probe the chemical bonding properties between Fe2+/OTF− ions and carboxyl/phosphorus groups during (dis)charging, high-resolution XPS was employed to detect the C 1 s signal of the PTBA positive electrode (Fig. 3c). At the initial state A, the deconvolution signal at 285.8 eV belonging to C=P+ species, indicating p-type redox activity of C−P groups. Subsequently, during discharging (states A to B), the disappearance of C=P+ species and the emergence of C−P bonds (states B to C) indicate the occurrence of a high-potential redox process involving the release of OTF− anions at phosphorus sites. In the continuous discharging process (states B to C), C=O species gradually decrease due to their participation in the reduction reaction at low potential, resulting in the formation of C−O‧‧‧Fe moieties at 283.6 eV. Correspondingly, during the reverse charging process (states C to E), all species show reversible changes attributed to the removal of Fe2+ cations from n-type carboxyl groups and the coordination between OTF− anions and p-type phosphorus sites. Furthermore, XPS spectra of O 1 s and P 2p species exhibit evolution trends consistent with C 1 s spectra (Supplementary Fig. 27), collectively confirming the highly reversible redox activity of C=O and C−P groups in the PTBA positive electrode. Besides, the Fe 2p and S 2p spectra were employed to track the evolution of Fe2+ cations and OTF⁻ anions in the PTBA positive electrode during battery operation. Upon discharging (state B to C), the Fe 2p signal gradually strengthens, reflecting the incorporation of Fe2+ cations into the PTBA positive electrode. Then during charging (state C to D), Fe signal diminishes, demonstrating that Fe2+ cations are reversibly removed to its initial state (Fig. 3d). In comparison, the S 2p peak intensity, which correlates with OTF⁻ transformation52,53, exhibits an inverse trend relative to the Fe signal during (dis)charging (Fig. 3e), confirming the reversible coordination/decoordination of OTF⁻. Overall, benefiting from the bipolar redox activity of n-type carboxyl groups and p-type phosphorus moieties in the PTBA electrode, hybrid anion–cation co-storage with the high utilization of active-sites is achieved.
To further eliminate interference from other ions and identify the active ions in Fe(OTF)2/H2O electrolyte, the electrochemical performance of Fe | |PTBA battery was compared across various electrolytes. In the FeSO4/H2O electrolyte, the PTBA positive electrode shows moderate specific capacity (181 mAh g−1 at 0.5 A g−1) and cycling performance (84.6% capacity retention over 10000 cycles, Supplementary Fig. 15), demonstrating that Fe2+ cations play a critical role in the whole charge storage process. Besides, the PTBA positive electrode in HOTF/H2O electrolyte (similar pH to Fe(OTF)2/H2O electrolyte) exhibits fundamentally distinct electrochemical behavior with low specific capacity output (14 mAh g−1, Supplementary Fig. 28), indicating that H+ ions are hardly involved in the redox process of Fe||PTBA battery. The weak acidity and insufficient anions of the HOTF/H2O electrolyte are unable to liberate the redox activity of p-type phosphorus groups, leading to insignificant capacity storage. Therefore, Fe2+ rather than H+ ions are the active cations that dominate the energy storage of the PTBA positive electrode.
Kinetics simulation and theoretical calculation
The kinetics behavior of Fe||PTBA battery in Fe(OTF)2/H2O electrolyte was further assessed through Dunn’s analysis54,55. By applying the power-law relationship of i = kvb between the peak current (i) and scan rate (v)56–58, all four cathodic/anodic peaks of CV profiles exhibit high b-values approaching 1 (Fig. 4a), suggesting that the PTBA positive electrode exhibits rapid surface-dominant capacitive behavior (80.6−95.9% contribution) along with negligible diffusion-limited process across all scan rates (Fig. 4b, c). Temperature-dependent electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements of the PTBA positive electrode reveal characteristic Nyquist plots consisting of semicircular high-frequency regions and linear low-frequency tails59–61. Analysis of the Nyquist plots using the equivalent circuit model (Fig. 4d, e) exhibits low interfacial Rct values (12.5 ~ 42.0 Ω) for PTBA during Fe2+/OTF⁻ coordination (Supplementary Tables 2, 3). Arrhenius analysis of temperature-dependent electrochemical behavior62–64, demonstrating that lower interfacial activation energies (Ea) of PTBA (0.24 eV) compared to NTBA (0.29 eV, Fig. 4f), implying the fast ion transport kinetics and low energy barriers for charge storage of the PTBA positive electrode. Overall, Fe||PTBA battery demonstrates enhanced electrochemical performance metrics (e.g., specific capacity, rate performance, specific energy, and cycle life), which stems from the multiple bipolar redox centers, extended π-conjugated skeleton and low-steric-hindrance configuration of the PTBA positive electrode.
Fig. 4. Kinetics simulation of PTBA.
a Evaluated b values. b Capacitive contribution at 1 mV s−1. c Capacitive contribution ratios at different scan rates. d EIS results of the PTBA electrode at various temperatures. e Corresponding Rct values of PTBA and NTBA electrodes. Inset: the equivalent circuit of Nyquist plots (Rs: equivalent series resistance; Rct: charge transfer resistance; Zw: Warburg impedance; CPE: constant phase element). f Calculated Ea values. g Schematic diagram of anion-cation hybrid storage in the PTBA electrode during redox processes.
Given the negligible specific capacity contributions from acetylene black (8 mAh g−1, Supplementary Fig. 16), the real specific capacity of the PTBA positive electrode of 268 mAh g−1 is calculated to be approximately 4e− redox reactions, corresponding to an actual utilization efficiency of 98.5% for n–p fused carboxyl/phosphorus motifs. In a word, these experimental results shed light on the fact that Fe2+/OTF− co-coordination with carboxyl/phosphorus sites of PTBA positive electrode via a successive two-step four-electron bipolar redox mechanism to achieve fast and stable hybrid storage energy (Fig. 4g).
Density functional theory (DFT) simulations provided further insights into the structural changes and electron configuration of PTBA positive electrodes during battery operation. The optimized geometry of PTBA indicates the charges of −COOH and C−P groups are approximately −0.476 and −0.651 a.u., respectively, highlighting their strong coordination ability (Fig. 5a). The continuous ELF-π isosurfaces across PTBA framework indicate efficient π-electron delocalization and π-aromaticity along the extended conjugation structure (Fig. 5b). In the reduced density gradient (RDG) plots (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Data 2), the green signature (−0.02 ~ 0.00 a.u.) and blue spike (−0.04 ~ −0.02 a.u.) reveal the strong hydrogen bonds and π-π stacking interactions between PTBA molecules. The anisotropy of the induced current density (ACID) analysis demonstrates persistent current flowing throughout the entire PTBA backbone, confirming its global π-aromatic nature (Supplementary Fig. 29). During charging, an OTF− anion binds to the phosphorus site of pristine PTBA with a calculated binding energy (∆E1) of −1.23 eV, facilitating the formation of the anion-doped PTBA-OTF⁻ complex (state I). Subsequently, during discharging, Fe2+ cations coordinate with carboxyl sites of PTBA, where the associated ∆E2 of −0.43 eV further promotes the generation of cation-coordinated PTBA-1.5Fe2+ products (state II, Fig. 5d, Supplementary Data 3). Consequently, the synergistic anion-cation binding configuration enables rapid and stable hybrid energy storage in PTBA during the operation of IOBs. This is evidenced by MEP distribution, which confirms the structural stability of both PTBA-OTF⁻ and PTBA-1.5Fe2+ (Fig. 5e).
Fig. 5. Theoretical simulations of BTPA.
a Charge sum of active sites. b ELF-π image and c RDG plots of PTBA. d Binding energy, e structural changes and MEP distribution, f charge density difference analysis of PTBA-OTF⁻ and PTBA-1.5Fe2+. Colors of elements: C, gray; O, red; H, white; P, blue; N, yellow.
The charge-density difference isosurface analysis was performed to elucidate the bonding characteristics of the anion/cation-coordinated PTBA complexes (Fig. 5f). The observed charge redistribution, characterized by charge depletion around charge carriers and charge accumulation near −COOH/C−P moieties, reveals strong redox interactions that facilitate structural stabilization. The quantitative analysis of Bader charge further reveals significant charge transfer between charge carriers and bipolar redox-active sites (State I: 0.53 e; State II: 0.27 e), implying the high redox activity of electron-donating n-type carboxyl motifs and electron-accepting p-type phosphorus moieties. The alternating cation-anion storage (Fe2+/OTF⁻) facilitates full utilization of the multi-redox-active carboxyl/phosphorus sites in PTBA, leading to enhanced electrochemical performance.
In conclusion, the phosphorus redox activity is activated in PTBA with a P-extended conjugated structure. By modulating the electron-donating P and tert-N groups, 4,4′,4″-Phosphanetriyltribenzoic acid (PTBA) and 4,4′,4″-nitrilotribenzoic acid (NTBA) are designed, which show various charge distributions and energy levels. With the decline of the electronegativity and energy barrier (N > P), PTBA shows stronger Fe2+ coordination with carboxyl sites, and brings the CF3SO3− proximity to P centers. It ensures high redox activity of carboxyl/phosphorus sites with a low activation energy (0.24 vs. 0.29 eV for NTBA). Furthermore, PTBA shows the low energy gap compared to its individual carboxyl or P-containing counterparts, thus giving high utilization of carboxyl/P motifs (98.5%) and enhanced redox voltage (0.8 V). The phosphorus-linked π-conjugated aromatic framework of PTBA further addresses the dissolution issue, enabling stable 4 e⁻ Fe2+/CF3SO3− storage. The assembled Fe||PTBA battery achieves promising performance metrics, including high specific capacity, rate capability, specific energy and cycling stability, showing good potential for iron-based energy storage. This work broadens the design horizons of phosphorus-engineered organic materials for aqueous iron batteries.
Methods
Materials
All reagents were commercially available and directly used without further purification. 4,4′,4″-phosphanetriyltribenzoic acid (PTBA, 99%), 4,4′,4″-nitrilotribenzoic acid (NTBA, 99%), 1,3,5-tris(4-carboxyphenyl)benzene (TCB, 99%), and triphenylphosphorus (TPP, 99%) were purchased from Jilin Chinese Academy of Sciences-Yanshen Technology Co., Ltd. Polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF, Mw = 1200000 Da, 99.5%), acetylene black (particle size: 40−50 nm, 99.5%), separator (Whatman CF/D, thickness: 675 μm, lateral dimension: 90 mm, porosity: 90 ± 2%, pore size: 2.7 μm, one separator for one battery), coin cell components (CR2032, 316 stainless steel, positive electrode case: 18 × 2.91 mm, negative electrode case: 16 × 2.77 mm, spacer: 15.8 × 1 mm, spring: 15.6 × 1.1 × 0.25 mm) were purchased from the Guangdong Canrd New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Carbon felt (thickness: 0.05 mm) was purchased from Wuhu Eryi Material Technology Co., Ltd. Iron foil negative electrode (>99.99% purity, prepared directly prior to cell assembly), deionized water (H2O, 99.99%), iron(II) trifluoromethanesulfonate (Fe(OTF)2, >97.0%), ferrous sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4·7H2O, >99.0%), trifluoromethanesulfonic acid (HOTF, 99%) and N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.8%) were purchased from Titan Co., Ltd. The electrolyte is freshly prepared and used. After stirring the electrolyte evenly with a glass rod, it is placed in a volumetric flask and transferred for application using a polypropylene pipette. The electrolyte is then placed at room temperature and atmospheric pressure.
Material characterizations
The morphology and elemental composition of organics were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4800) coupled with an X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) instrument. Fourier-transformed infrared spectra (FT-IR) were carried out via a Thermo Nicolet NEXUS spectrometer. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern was monitored by using a Bruker D8 Advance powder diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation source). The ultraviolet visible (UV-Vis) spectra were recorded using a UV-Vis spectrometer (JASCO V-750). The electrical conductivity of PTBA and NTBA positive electrodes was tested at 4 different points on the electrode surface with an RTS-8 four-point probe. An X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS, AXIS Ultra DLD) was applied to study the chemical composition. To explore the dynamic evolution of organic positive electrodes during the (dis)charging process, PTBA positive electrodes were collected by disassembling aqueous Fe-organic batteries at specific (dis)charging voltages at 25 ± 0.5 °C under ambient pressure. Various ex-situ spectroscopic characterizations of PTBA positive electrodes, including FT-IR, XPS and SEM, were investigated.
Fabrication of working electrodes
The working electrodes were prepared by mixing 60 wt. % PTBA (active material), 30 wt. % acetylene black (conductive additive), and 10 wt. % PVDF (binder) by using DMF solvent in a mortar with pestle. The wet slurry was stirred for 2 h to ensure homogeneity and then cast onto a carbon felt current collector using an automatic coating machine (MSK-AFA-III). The coated electrodes were dried at 80 °C for 12 h under vacuum. Subsequently, the electrodes were punched into 14 mm disks using a manual disc cutter (MSK-T10) and further dried at 80 °C overnight under vacuum prior to cell assembly. The areal mass loading of the active material was approximately 3 mg cm−2 (thickness: 90 μm). The working electrode surface was wetted by using a polypropylene pipette to transfer 30 μL Fe(OTF)2 electrolyte.
Cell assembly
To construct aqueous iron-organic batteries (IOBs), PTBA (or NTBA, TCB, TPP) positive electrode (PTBA, 3 mg cm−2, single-side coated, areal capacity: 0.83 mAh cm−2), 1 mol L−1 aqueous Fe(OTF)2 electrolyte (135 μL), Fe metal negative electrode (>99.99% purity, density: 7.87 g cm⁻3, 50 µm in thickness, 1.6 cm in diameter, capacity ratio between Fe negative and PTBA positive electrodes (N/P) is 60:1), and glass fiber separator (Whatman, 18 mm) were packaged into 2032 coin-type cells. The initial cut-off potential of the cell is ~0.7 V for a newly-assembled Fe||PTBA coin cell. For the assembly of single-layer pouch cell, PTBA positive electrode (with carbon felt current collector, mass loading: 10.7 mg cm−2, 8 × 8 cm2), 1 mol L−1 aqueous Fe(OTF)2 electrolyte (3 mL), Fe metal negative electrode (>99.99% purity, 50 µm in thickness, 8 × 8 cm2, capacity ratio between Fe negative and PTBA positive electrodes (N/P) is 13:1, and glass fiber separator (Whatman, 9 × 9 cm2) were packaged. Three identical Fe||PTBA cells were tested for a single electrochemical experiment. The data presented in the manuscript’s plots belong to only a specific selected cell.
Electrochemical tests
Galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) profiles, rate performance and cyclic stability of IOBs were tested on a Neware battery test system (CT-4008Tn-5V10mA-164, Shenzhen, China) within the potential range of 0−1.2 V. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were performed on an electrochemical workstation (CHI660E). For EIS measurements, a potentiostatic perturbation with an amplitude of 5 mV was applied over a frequency range of 0.01 Hz to 100 kHz (with a data density of 12 points per decade). Prior to each EIS measurement, the cells were held at open-circuit potential for 1000 s to establish a quasi-stationary state. All electrochemical tests were conducted at 25 ± 0.5 °C under ambient pressure. The specific capacity (Cm, mAh g−1) was estimated from GCD curves based on the following equations:
| 1 |
where I, Δt, m represents the specific current (A g−1), discharging time (s) and the effective mass loading of active materials in positive electrodes, respectively. When considering the molecular weight of 394.3 g mol−1 and four-electron transfer during the redox process, the theoretical capacity is calculated to be 271.9 mAh g−1 for the PTBA electrode. Similarly, the theoretical capacity of NTBA is 284.1 mAh g−1. The Coulombic efficiency (CE) of PTBA and NTBA positive electrodes was calculated as the ratio of discharge capacity divided by the charge capacity in the preceding charge cycle.
The specific energy (E, Wh kg−1) and specific power (P, W kg−1) of IOBs were calculated according to the following equations:
| 2 |
| 3 |
where ΔV is the voltage window. The electrochemical metrics, including specific capacities and specific energy/power, were estimated based on the effective mass loading of active materials in the positive electrode.
Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculation
The theoretical calculations were performed with the Gaussian 16 software package. Geometrical optimizations were conducted at the B3LYP-D3/ def2-SVP level of theory. The negative molecular electrostatic potentials (MEP) in the red region represent the electrophilic nature, while the positive MEP in the blue region represents the nucleophilic nature. The π-electron localization function (ELF-π) was evaluated via the Multiwfn 3.8 programs. The molecular orbital levels of organics, in terms of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), as well as the charge population sum of PTBA, were studied at the B3LYP-D3/TZVP level of theory. The binding energy between charge carriers and organics was calculated using the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) with the projector augmented wave (PAW) method. The exchange-functional was treated using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with Perdew-Burke-Emzerhof (PBE) functional. The charge density differences were recognized by the VASPKIT code. The charge density differences between charge carriers and organic models were simulated, and the charge transfer level between both was calculated by Bader charge analysis. The anisotropy of the current-induced density (ACID) analysis was realized by the ACID code based on the output file of Gaussian 16, and the maps were finally generated by POV-Ray render.
Optical energy gap
The optical energy gaps (Eg, eV) of organics were calculated from UV-Vis spectra based on the following equations:
| 4 |
| 5 |
where α is the optical absorption coefficient, hv is the photon energy, λ is the wavelength.
Activation energy
The activation energy (Ea, eV) for the charge transfer process was calculated by the Arrhenius equation:
| 6 |
where Rct refers to the charge transfer resistance (Ω), R is the gas constant (8.314 J mol−1 K−1), T is the experimental temperature (K), and k is a constant.
Charge storage kinetics
The charge storage kinetics of IOBs were evaluated by the following equation:
| 7 |
where k and b refer to constants, i and v are specific current and scanning rate, respectively. When the power exponent b value is close to 0.5, it identifies a sluggish diffusion-controlled process, while a b-value of 1.0 suggests a rapid surface-dominated redox reaction process.
The Dunn’s method was applied to analyze the capacitive contribution from the rapid surface redox capacitive process and the diffusion-limited process. Quantitative capacitive contribution can be calculated according to the equation:
| 8 |
where k1 and k2 are constants, k1v and k2v1/2 are the specific current contributed from fast-capacitive process and diffusion-controlled process, respectively.
Redox electron transfer number
The theoretical capacity (Cm, mAh g−1) of an organic positive electrode can be calculated based on the following form:
| 9 |
where F is a constant (96485 C mol−1), M is the molar mass of an organic material (g mol−1).
Supplementary information
Description of Additional Supplementary Files
Source data
Acknowledgments
This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 22272118, M.L.; NO. 22172111, L.G.; NO. 22309134, Z.S. and NO. 22502144, Y.Z.), the Shanghai Rising-Star Program (23YF1449200, Z.S.), the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF (GZC20250749, Y.Z.), the Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Project (NO. 2022C01182, Y.L.), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Z.S.).
Author contributions
Y.Z. conceived the idea and designed the project. M.L. supervised the experiments and edited the paper. Z.S., L.G., Y.L., and P.L. performed the data processing and analysis. Q.H. performed a computational simulation. Y.Z., Z.S., and M.L. contributed to the manuscript review. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the completion of the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
The data generated in this study are provided in the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-026-70800-w.
References
- 1.Ma, Z. et al. Anhydrous fast proton transport boosted by the hydrogen bond network in a dense oxide-ion array of α-MoO3. Adv. Mater.34, 2203335 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee, C. et al. Metal ions versus protons: tracking of charge-carrier insertion into a cathode oxide in aqueous rechargeable batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater.33, 2303763 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhao-Karger, Z. et al. Calcium-tin alloys as anodes for rechargeable non-aqueous calcium-ion batteries at room temperature. Nat. Commun.13, 3849 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ma, T. et al. The Role of the electrolyte in non-conjugated radical polymers for metal-free aqueous energy storage electrodes. Nat. Mater.22, 495–502 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Huang, S. et al. Molecularly engineered multifunctional imide derivatives for practical Zn metal full cells. Energy Environ. Sci.17, 7870–7881 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim, H. J. et al. Gold-nanolayer-derived zincophilicity suppressing metallic zinc dendrites and its efficacy in improving electrochemical stability of aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Adv. Mater.36, 2308592 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang, W. et al. Molecular engineering of covalent organic framework cathodes for enhanced zinc-ion batteries. Adv. Mater.33, 2103617 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li, C. et al. Stabilizing magnesium plating by a low-cost inorganic surface membrane for high-voltage and high-power Mg batteries. Joule7, 2798–2813 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Studer, G. et al. On a high-capacity aluminium battery with a two-electron phenothiazine redox polymer as a positive electrode. Energy Environ. Sci.16, 3760–3769 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jia, B.-E. et al. Laminated tin–aluminum anodes to build practical aqueous aluminum batteries. Energy Storage Mater.65, 103141 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yang, Z. et al. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding networks stabilized organic supramolecular cathode for ultra-high capacity and ultra-long cycle life rechargeable aluminum batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.63, e202403424 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rana, A. et al. Realizing the kinetic origin of hydrogen evolution for aqueous zinc metal batteries. Adv. Energy Mater.14, 2402521 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yan, L. et al. Towards high-performance aqueous zinc batteries via a semi-conductive bipolar-type polymer cathode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.61, e202211107 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen, Z. et al. An air-operated, high-performance Fe-ion secondary battery using acidic electrolyte. Adv. Mater.37, 2502526 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lv, H. et al. Cross-linked polyaniline for production of long lifespan aqueous iron||organic batteries with electrochromic properties. Nat. Commun.14, 3117 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wu, X. et al. A rechargeable battery with an iron metal anode. Adv. Funct. Mater.29, 1900911 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xu, Y. et al. Fe-ion bolted VOPO4∙2H2O as an aqueous Fe-ion battery electrode. Adv. Mater.33, 2105234 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang, Y. et al. Prussian blue and its analogues as cathode materials for Na-, K-, Mg-, Ca-, Zn- and Al-ion batteries. Nano Energy99, 107424 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang, Y. et al. Low-cost, resilient, and non-flammable rechargeable Fe-ion batteries with scalable fabrication and long cycle life. Energy Environ. Sci.18, 1428–1439 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chen, T. et al. High-rate, high-capacity electrochemical energy storage in hydrogen-bonded fused aromatics. Joule7, 986–1002 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Karev, I. et al. Mechanisms of self-discharge and capacity loss in organic electrodes for aqueous batteries. Energy Storage Mater.77, 104215 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang, R. et al. A long-range planar polymer with efficient π-electron delocalization for superior proton storage. Adv. Mater.36, 2402681 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhang, H. et al. A COF-Like N-rich conjugated microporous polytriphenylamine cathode with pseudocapacitive anion storage behavior for high-energy aqueous zinc dual-ion batteries. Adv. Mater.33, 2101857 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhao, L. et al. An ultra-stable 2D linear polymer cathode for high-performance aqueous zinc-organic batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202425082 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen, T. et al. High-energy, high-power sodium-ion batteries from a layered organic cathode. J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 6181–6192 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li, S. et al. Initiating a high-rate and stable aqueous air battery by using an organic N-heterocycle anode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.63, e202318885 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lin, L. et al. Non-conjugated linkage enabling a quinone-based cathode material with long cycle life and high energy density for aqueous zinc batteries. Energy Environ. Sci.17, 6499–6506 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tie, Z. et al. An air-rechargeable Zn/organic battery with proton storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 10301–10308 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang, H. et al. Aromatic organic molecular crystal with enhanced π–π stacking interaction for ultrafast Zn-ion storage. Energy Environ. Sci.13, 2515–2523 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yan, Y. et al. Molecular engineering of N-heteroaromatic organic cathode for high-voltage and highly stable zinc batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2312332 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang, Y. et al. A high-capacity p-type organic cathode material for aqueous zinc batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.63, e202410342 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sun, T. et al. Molecular engineering design for a high-performance aqueous zinc-organic battery. Nano-Micro Lett.15, 36 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yu, J. et al. Donor–acceptor porous aromatic framework cathode with fast redox kinetics for ultralow-temperature (−70 °C) Potassium-organic batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202507570 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang, Y. et al. Fast and stable NH4+/H+ co-coordinated carboxyl-rich N-heterocyclic cathode for high-performance zinc-organic batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2416415 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vadiyar, M. et al. Dual-site dual-charge carrier mechanism for high-energy and long-life metal-free hybrid energy storage devices. Adv. Funct. Mater.35, 2500615 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cui, H. et al. High-voltage organic cathodes for zinc-ion batteries through electron cloud and solvation structure regulation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.61, e202203453 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang, Y. et al. Multiple protophilic redox-active sites in reticular organic skeletons for superior proton storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202423936 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shi, T. et al. Low-Redox-barrier two-electron p-type phenoselenazine cathode for superior zinc-organic batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202501278 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xue, X. et al. Bridged-ring structure facilitating ultrahigh utilization of active sites in organic molecules for high-performance aqueous batteries. Adv. Energy Mater.15, 2405551 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li, H. et al. Design strategy for small-molecule organic cathodes: regulated active groups enable high capacity and voltage in aqueous and seawater aluminium ion batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202508057 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhao, X. et al. Aqueous zinc-bromine battery with highly reversible bromine conversion chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202502386 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Qu, G. et al. A Temperature self-adaptive electrolyte for wide-temperature aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Adv. Mater.36, 2400370 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ge, G. et al. Four-electron-transferred pyrene-4,5,9,10-tetraone derivatives enabled high-energy-density aqueous organic flow batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 4790–4799 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Huang, Z. H. et al. A high-capacity semiconductor organic polymer for stable aqueous ammonium-ion storage. Adv. Mater.37, 2508001 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Song, Z. et al. Multi-N-heterocycle donor-acceptor conjugated amphoteric organic superstructures for superior zinc batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202418237 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Du, W. et al. High-conversion-efficiency and stable six-electron Zn–I2 batteries enabled by organic iodide/thiazole-linked covalent organic frameworks. Energy Environ. Sci.18, 6540–6547 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang, W. et al. p-Type cathode material design guided by material descriptors for high-energy density sodium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.64, e202505831 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tian, Z. et al. Optimized charge storage in aza-based covalent organic frameworks by tuning electrolyte proton activity. ACS Nano17, 13961–13973 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Qian, L. et al. Near-saturated coordinated cations in oxyhalide superionic conductors boost high-rate all-solid-state batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 23170–23179 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gao, Y. et al. A high-performance aqueous rechargeable zinc battery based on organic cathode integrating quinone and pyrazine. Energy Storage Mater.40, 31–40 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Xia, Q. et al. Anionic metal-organic framework as an ultrafast single-ion conductor for exceptional performance rechargeable zinc batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 23331–23338 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang, Y. et al. Alternant p-type/n-type conjugated bipolar copolymer cathodes for advanced aqueous zinc-ion batteries. ACS Nano19, 19116–19125 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Peng, C. et al. Proton-coupled chemistry enabled p–n conjugated bipolar organic electrode for high-performance aqueous symmetric battery. Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2401001 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Song, Y. W. et al. Anion-involved solvation structure of lithium polysulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.63, e202400343 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Liu, P. et al. Multi-H-bonded self-assembled superstructures for ultrahigh-capacity and ultralong-life all-organic ammonium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci.18, 5397–5406 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lee, J. et al. Fluorine-rich covalent organic framework to boost electrochemical kinetics and storage of K+ Ions For Potassium-ion Battery. Adv. Energy Mater.13, 2300442 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tian, Z. et al. An ultrastable aqueous ammonium-ion battery using a covalent organic framework anode. Adv. Mater.36, 2409354 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Patil, N. et al. Advancing polyimide electrodes from half-cells to pouch cells: balancing $/kWh, stability, and scalability for practical Li-ion organic batteries. Energy Storage Mater.78, 104254 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 59.Park, J. B. et al. Designing chemically replaced interfacial layer via unveiling the influence of Zn crystal facets for practical Zn-metal anodes. Adv. Mater.36, 2308684 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Yang, M. et al. Intrinsic ion concentration difference induced antipolyelectrolyte effect for promoting stability of Zn anodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 9294–9303 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chu, J. et al. Boosting H+ storage in aqueous zinc ion batteries via integrating redox-active sites into hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks with strong π-π stacking. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.63, e202314411 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Park, J. H. et al. Fortifying zinc metal anodes against uncontrollable side-reactions and dendrite growth for practical aqueous zinc ion batteries: a novel composition of anti-corrosive and Zn2+ regulating artificial protective layer. Adv. Energy Mater.14, 2302493 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 63.Byun, J. S. et al. Polyoxometalate initiated in situ conformal coating of multifunctional hybrid artificial layers for high-performance zinc metal anodes. Adv. Funct. Mater.35, 2412577 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhao, C. X. et al. Can Aqueous zinc-air batteries work at sub-zero temperatures? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.60, 15281–15285 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Description of Additional Supplementary Files
Data Availability Statement
The data generated in this study are provided in the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.





