Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 Mar;50(452):188–193.

A competency model for general practice: implications for selection, training, and development.

F Patterson 1, E Ferguson 1, P Lane 1, K Farrell 1, J Martlew 1, A Wells 1
PMCID: PMC1313648  PMID: 10750226

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of the general practitioner (GP) has changed significantly over the past decade. This problem is compounded by growing concern over postgraduate attrition rates from medicine, with current estimates as high as 19%. AIM: To define a comprehensive model of the competencies required for the job role of GP. METHOD: Three independent studies were conducted to define GP competencies including (1) critical incidents focus groups with GPs, (2) behavioural coding of GP-patient consultations, and (3) critical incidents interviews with patients. Study 1 was conducted with GPs (n = 35) from the Trent region. Study 2 involved observation of GP-patient consultations (n = 33 consultations), and Study 3 was conducted with patients (n = 21), all from a Midlands-based medical practice. RESULTS: The data collected from the three studies provided strong evidence for a competency model comprising 11 categories with a summary of the associated behavioural descriptions. Example competencies included empathy and sensitivity, communication skills, clinical knowledge and expertise, conceptual thinking, and coping with pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Triangulation of results was achieved from three independent studies. The competencies derived imply that a greater account of personal attributes needs to be considered in recruitment and training, rather than focusing on academic and clinical competency alone. The model could be employed for future research in design of selection techniques for the role of GP.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (52.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradley C. P. Turning anecdotes into data--the critical incident technique. Fam Pract. 1992 Mar;9(1):98–103. doi: 10.1093/fampra/9.1.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Diamond M. R., Kamien M., Sim M. G., Davis J. A critical incident study of general practice trainees in their basic general practice term. Med J Aust. 1995 Mar 20;162(6):321–324. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb139913.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dunn W. R., Hamilton D. D. The critical incident technique--a brief guide. Med Teach. 1986;8(3):207–215. doi: 10.3109/01421598609036857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FLANAGAN J. C. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954 Jul;51(4):327–358. doi: 10.1037/h0061470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fatovich B. The star of general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 1995 May;24(5):804–808. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frederikson L., Bull P. An appraisal of the current status of communication skills training in British medical schools. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Mar;34(5):515–522. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90207-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenhalgh T., Taylor R. Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research) BMJ. 1997 Sep 20;315(7110):740–743. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7110.740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lambert T. W., Goldacre M. J., Parkhouse J., Edwards C. Career destinations in 1994 of United Kingdom medical graduates of 1983: results of a questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1996 Apr 6;312(7035):893–897. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7035.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Merrill J. M., Camacho Z., Laux L. F., Lorimor R., Thornby J. I., Vallbona C. Uncertainties and ambiguities: measuring how medical students cope. Med Educ. 1994 Jul;28(4):316–322. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02719.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nelson M. A first aid and CPR course for first-year medical students. Med Educ. 1982 Jan;16(1):7–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1982.tb01211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Newble D. I., Swanson D. B. Psychometric characteristics of the objective structured clinical examination. Med Educ. 1988 Jul;22(4):325–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tutton P. J. Medical school entrants: semi-structured interview ratings, prior scholastic achievement and personality profiles. Med Educ. 1993 Jul;27(4):328–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1993.tb00277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Weatherall D. J. The inhumanity of medicine. BMJ. 1994 Dec 24;309(6970):1671–1672. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6970.1671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES