Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 May;50(454):361–365.

GP frequent attendance in Liverpool and Granada: the impact of depressive symptoms.

C F Dowrick 1, J A Bellón 1, M J Gómez 1
PMCID: PMC1313698  PMID: 10897531

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frequent attendance in general practice increases workload and affects doctor-patient relationships. It is a complex phenomenon, but patients' psychological problems appear to be important. AIM: To assess whether frequent attendance is more likely to be associated with depressive symptoms than with physical health problems. METHOD: The study was carried out in two general practices: one in Liverpool and one in Granada. Subjects comprised 127 frequent attenders (FAs) plus 175 matched controls, stratified by age and sex. Measures included demographic factors, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), self-reported health, and current health problems classified by ICHPPC-2 criteria. RESULTS: Seventy-five (59%) FAs had a BDI score > or = 13, compared with 9 (5%) controls (odds ratio [OR] = 26.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.4 to 56.8, P < 0.001). A total of 136 (78%) controls reported their health to be good or excellent, compared with 40 (31%) FAs (OR = 7.6, 95% CI = 4.5 to 12.7, P < 0.001). Respiratory problems were present in 50 (39%) FAs and 47 (27%) controls (chi 2 = 6.992, P < 0.03). Depression rates were similar in Liverpool and Granada, although Liverpool subjects were less likely to report good health. On logistic regression, BDI status was the major predictor of frequent attendance (OR = 17.18, 95% CI = 7.54 to 39.01). Self-reported ill health (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 1.40 to 5.10) and respiratory problems (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.11 to 4.37) were also associated with frequent attendance. CONCLUSION: Depressive symptoms were the major predictor of frequent attendance in this study. Clinical and research activity should therefore concentrate on the identification and management of psychological problems among FAs in general practice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (52.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen R., Newman J. F. Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973 Winter;51(1):95–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bellón J. A., Delgado A., Luna J. D., Lardelli P. Psychosocial and health belief variables associated with frequent attendance in primary care. Psychol Med. 1999 Nov;29(6):1347–1357. doi: 10.1017/s0033291799008995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Browne G. B., Humphrey B., Pallister R., Browne J. A., Shetzer L. Prevalence and characteristics of frequent attenders in a prepaid Canadian family practice. J Fam Pract. 1982 Jan;14(1):63–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Báez K., Aiarzaguena J. M., Grandes G., Pedrero E., Aranguren J., Retolaza A. Understanding patient-initiated frequent attendance in primary care: a case-control study. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Dec;48(437):1824–1827. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Callahan C. M., Hui S. L., Nienaber N. A., Musick B. S., Tierney W. M. Longitudinal study of depression and health services use among elderly primary care patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Aug;42(8):833–838. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Conde López V., Esteban Chamorro T., Useros Serrano E. Estudio crítico de la fiabilidad y validez de la E.E.C. de Beck para la medida de la depresión. Arch Neurobiol (Madr) 1976 Sep-Oct;39(5):313–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dowrick C., Buchan I. Twelve month outcome of depression in general practice: does detection or disclosure make a difference? BMJ. 1995 Nov 11;311(7015):1274–1276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7015.1274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dowrick C., May C., Richardson M., Bundred P. The biopsychosocial model of general practice: rhetoric or reality? Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Feb;46(403):105–107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dowrick C. Why do the O'Sheas consult so often? An exploration of complex family illness behaviour. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Mar;34(5):491–497. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90204-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Freeborn D. K., Pope C. R., Mullooly J. P., McFarland B. H. Consistently high users of medical care among the elderly. Med Care. 1990 Jun;28(6):527–540. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199006000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gill D., Dawes M., Sharpe M., Mayou R. GP frequent consulters: their prevalence, natural history, and contribution to rising workload. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Dec;48(437):1856–1857. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hart J. T. Primary medical care in Spain. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Jun;40(335):255–258. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hibbard J. H., Pope C. R. Age differences in the use of medical care in an HMO. An application of the behavioral model. Med Care. 1986 Jan;24(1):52–66. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198601000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hulka B. S., Wheat J. R. Patterns of utilization. The patient perspective. Med Care. 1985 May;23(5):438–460. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198505000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hurley J., Woodward C., Brown J. Changing patterns of physician services utilization in Ontario, Canada, and their relation to physician, practice, and market-area characteristics. Med Care Res Rev. 1996 Jun;53(2):179–206. doi: 10.1177/107755879605300204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Karlsson H., Lehtinen V., Joukamaa M. Frequent attenders of Finnish public primary health care: sociodemographic characteristics and physical morbidity. Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):424–430. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Karlsson H., Lehtinen V., Joukamaa M. Psychiatric morbidity among frequent attender patients in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1995 Jan;17(1):19–25. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(94)00059-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Katon W., Von Korff M., Lin E., Lipscomb P., Russo J., Wagner E., Polk E. Distressed high utilizers of medical care. DSM-III-R diagnoses and treatment needs. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1990 Nov;12(6):355–362. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(90)90002-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Neal R. D., Heywood P. L., Morley S., Clayden A. D., Dowell A. C. Frequency of patients' consulting in general practice and workload generated by frequent attenders: comparisons between practices. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Jan;48(426):895–898. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nielsen A. C., 3rd, Williams T. A. Prevalence by Self-report questionnaire and recognition by nonpsychiatric physicians. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980 Sep;37(9):999–1004. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780220037003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. O'Dowd T. C. Five years of heartsink patients in general practice. BMJ. 1988 Aug 20;297(6647):528–530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6647.528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Robinson J. O., Granfield A. J. The frequent consulter in primary medical care. J Psychosom Res. 1986;30(5):589–600. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(86)90032-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rose G., Barker D. J. Epidemiology for the uninitiated. What is a case? Dichotomy or continuum? Br Med J. 1978 Sep 23;2(6141):873–874. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6141.873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schrire S. Frequent attenders--a review. Fam Pract. 1986 Dec;3(4):272–275. doi: 10.1093/fampra/3.4.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Simpson R. J., Kazmierczak T., Power K. G., Sharp D. M. Controlled comparison of the characteristics of patients with panic disorder. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Aug;44(385):352–356. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith G. R., Jr, Monson R. A., Ray D. C. Patients with multiple unexplained symptoms. Their characteristics, functional health, and health care utilization. Arch Intern Med. 1986 Jan;146(1):69–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Stefansson C. G., Svensson C. Identified and unidentified mental illness in primary health care--social characteristics, medical measures and total care utilization during one year. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1994 Mar;12(1):24–31. doi: 10.3109/02813439408997053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wan T. T. The effect of managed care on health services use by dually eligible elders. Med Care. 1989 Nov;27(11):983–1001. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198911000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ward A. M., Underwood P., Fatovich B., Wood A. Stability of attendance in general practice. Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):431–437. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Westhead J. N. Frequent attenders in general practice: medical, psychological and social characteristics. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 Jul;35(276):337–340. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wolinsky F. D. Assessing the effects of predisposing, enabling, and illness-morbidity characteristics on health service utilization. J Health Soc Behav. 1978 Dec;19(4):384–396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES