Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conducting a pragmatic randomised trial in primary care is often accompanied by practical problems. Such problems are seldom reported and may constitute useful lessons for researchers planning future trials. AIM: To address the difficulties involved in patient recruitment and to present measures to minimise bias during outcome assessment. METHOD: A recently conducted trial comparing the effects of corticosteroid injections and physiotherapy for painful stiff shoulder was used to illustrate problems related to patient recruitment and outcome assessment. RESULTS: Recruitment of patients was not without difficulties despite careful preparation. Recruitment was discontinued after 20 months, when 109 of the intended 120 patients had been admitted to the trial. The shoulder trial mainly included patient-oriented subjective outcome measures. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that patient preferences might have had some influence on outcome. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners might be willing or unwilling to participate in research for many reasons. The researcher should take these motivations into account when inviting physicians to take part in research. Strategies to enhance enrolment should be prepared before the start of the trial. When blinding of patients is problematic, patient preferences should be assessed before randomisation and their influence on the outcome studied. Although involving a blinded independent observer enables a more objective assessment of outcome, the success of blinding should be clearly evaluated.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (43.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Borgiel A. E., Dunn E. V., Lamont C. T., MacDonald P. J., Evensen M. K., Bass M. J., Spasoff R. A., Williams J. I. Recruiting family physicians as participants in research. Fam Pract. 1989 Sep;6(3):168–172. doi: 10.1093/fampra/6.3.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlton B. G. Understanding randomized controlled trials: explanatory or pragmatic? Fam Pract. 1994 Sep;11(3):243–244. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.3.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deyo R. A., Walsh N. E., Schoenfeld L. S., Ramamurthy S. Can trials of physical treatments be blinded? The example of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Feb;69(1):6–10. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199002000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gore S. M. Assessing clinical trials--first steps. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 May 16;282(6276):1605–1607. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6276.1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jonker P. L., Sumajow C. A. Randomised clinical trials in general practice. BMJ. 1992 Feb 22;304(6825):508–508. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6825.508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy E., Spiegal N., Kinmonth A. L. 'Will you help me with my research?' Gaining access to primary care settings and subjects. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Apr;42(357):162–165. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peto V., Coulter A., Bond A. Factors affecting general practitioners' recruitment of patients into a prospective study. Fam Pract. 1993 Jun;10(2):207–211. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.2.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rabkin J. G., Markowitz J. S., Stewart J., McGrath P., Harrison W., Quitkin F. M., Klein D. F. How blind is blind? Assessment of patient and doctor medication guesses in a placebo-controlled trial of imipramine and phenelzine. Psychiatry Res. 1986 Sep;19(1):75–86. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(86)90094-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulz K. F., Chalmers I., Hayes R. J., Altman D. G. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408–412. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silagy C. A., Carson N. E. Factors affecting the level of interest and activity in primary care research among general practitioners. Fam Pract. 1989 Sep;6(3):173–176. doi: 10.1093/fampra/6.3.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutton-Tyrrell K., Crow S., Hankin B., Trudel J., Faille C. Communication during the recruitment phase of a multicenter trial: the recruitment hotline. Control Clin Trials. 1996 Oct;17(5):415–422. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(95)00153-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor K. M., Kelner M. Interpreting physician participation in randomized clinical trials: the Physician Orientation Profile. J Health Soc Behav. 1987 Dec;28(4):389–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tognoni G., Alli C., Avanzini F., Bettelli G., Colombo F., Corso R., Marchioli R., Zussino A. Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure. BMJ. 1991 Oct 19;303(6808):969–971. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6808.969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Windt D. A., Koes B. W., Boeke A. J., Devillé W., De Jong B. A., Bouter L. M. Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Sep;46(410):519–523. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Windt D. A., Koes B. W., Devillé W., Boeke A. J., de Jong B. A., Bouter L. M. Effectiveness of corticosteroid injections versus physiotherapy for treatment of painful stiff shoulder in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1292–1296. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7168.1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Windt D. A., Koes B. W., de Jong B. A., Bouter L. M. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Dec;54(12):959–964. doi: 10.1136/ard.54.12.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]