Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 Jun;50(455):473–476.

The impact of nursing home patients on general practitioners' workload.

L Groom 1, A J Avery 1, D Boot 1, C O'Neill 1, K Thornhill 1, K Brown 1, R Jones 1
PMCID: PMC1313726  PMID: 10962786

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the number of people in nursing homes has risen substantially in recent years, the shift of responsibility into general practice has rarely been accompanied by extra resources. These patients may be associated with a higher general practitioner (GP) workload than others of similar age and sex. AIM: To assess the GP workload associated with nursing home residents and its associated costs. METHOD: All nursing home residents aged over 65 years and registered with nine Nottinghamshire practices during one year were matched with patients living in the community for general practice, age, and sex. Data were collected retrospectively for both groups on key workload measures. Costs for the workload measures were calculated using published estimates. RESULTS: Data were collected for 270 pairs of patients. Nursing home patients had more face-to-face contacts in normal surgery hours, telephone calls, and out-of-hours visits. The mean workload cost per month of a nursing home patient (assuming that one patient was seen per visit) was estimated to be 18.21 Pounds (10.49 Pounds higher than the cost of controls). A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that potential savings in visiting costs associated with increasing the numbers of patients seen per visit were 27% for one extra patient seen per visit and 44% for four extra patients. CONCLUSION: Nursing home residents were associated with higher workload for GPs than other patients of the same age and sex living in the community. Our costings provide a basis for negotiating suitable reimbursement of GPs for their additional work.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (45.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrew R. A. Analysis of a general practitioner's work in a private nursing home for the elderly. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988 Dec;38(317):546–548. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Graham B., McGregor K. What does a GP consultation cost? Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Mar;47(416):170–172. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grundy E. M. Population review: (5). The population aged 60 and over. Popul Trends. 1996 Summer;(84):14–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kavanagh S., Knapp M. The impact on general practitioners of the changing balance of care for elderly people living in institutions. BMJ. 1998 Aug 1;317(7154):322–327. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7154.322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morrell C. J., Walters S. J., Dixon S., Collins K. A., Brereton L. M., Peters J., Brooker C. G. Cost effectiveness of community leg ulcer clinics: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1998 May 16;316(7143):1487–1491. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7143.1487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pell J., Williams S. Do nursing home residents make greater demands on GPs? A prospective comparative study. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jul;49(444):527–530. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stern M. C., Jagger C., Clarke M., Anderson J., McGrother C., Battock T., McDonald C. Residential care for elderly people: a decade of change. BMJ. 1993 Mar 27;306(6881):827–830. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6881.827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES