Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 Aug;50(457):635–639.

Management of urinary tract infection in general practice: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

E A Fenwick 1, A H Briggs 1, C I Hawke 1
PMCID: PMC1313774  PMID: 11042915

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptoms associated with urinary tract infection (UTI) are common in women in general practice and represent a significant burden for the National Health Service. There is considerable variation among general practitioners in the management of patients presenting with these symptoms. AIM: To identify the most appropriate patient management strategy given current information for non-pregnant, adult women presenting in general practice with symptoms of uncomplicated UTI. METHOD: A decision analytic model incorporating a variety of patient management strategies was constructed using available published information and expert opinion. This model was able to provide guidance on current best practice based upon cost-effectiveness (cost per symptom-free day). RESULTS: Empiric treatment was found to be the least costly strategy available. It saved two days of symptoms per episode of UTI at a cost of 14 Pounds. The empiric-and-laboratory strategy involves an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 215 Pounds per symptom day averted per episode of UTI. The remaining patient management strategies are never optimal. CONCLUSION: Empiric treatment of patients presenting with symptoms of UTI was found to be cost-effective under a range of assumptions for this patient group. However, recognition of the impact of this strategy upon antibiotic resistance may lead to the dipstick strategy being considered a superior strategy overall.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (53.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abbasi K. Report calls for action on antibiotic resistance. BMJ. 1998 Apr 25;316(7140):1261–1261. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7140.1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baerheim A., Digranes A., Hunskaar S. Equal symptomatic outcome after antibacterial treatment of acute lower urinary tract infection and the acute urethral syndrome in adult women. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1999 Sep;17(3):170–173. doi: 10.1080/028134399750002593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barry H. C., Ebell M. H., Hickner J. Evaluation of suspected urinary tract infection in ambulatory women: a cost-utility analysis of office-based strategies. J Fam Pract. 1997 Jan;44(1):49–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brumfitt W., Hamilton-Miller J. M. The appropriate use of diagnostic services: (XII). Investigation of urinary infections in general practice: are we wasting facilities? Health Bull (Edinb) 1987 Jan;45(1):5–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carlson K. J., Mulley A. G. Management of acute dysuria. A decision-analysis model of alternative strategies. Ann Intern Med. 1985 Feb;102(2):244–249. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-102-2-244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coast J., Smith R. D., Millar M. R. Superbugs: should antimicrobial resistance be included as a cost in economic evaluation? Health Econ. 1996 May-Jun;5(3):217–226. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199605)5:3<217::AID-HEC200>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huovinen P., Cars O. Control of antimicrobial resistance: time for action. The essentials of control are already well known. BMJ. 1998 Sep 5;317(7159):613–614. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7159.613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jolleys J. V. The reported prevalence of urinary symptoms in women in one rural general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Aug;40(337):335–337. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karlsson G., Johannesson M. The decision rules of cost-effectiveness analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Feb;9(2):113–120. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199609020-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kiel D. P., Moskowitz M. A. The urinalysis: a critical appraisal. Med Clin North Am. 1987 Jul;71(4):607–624. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30830-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Livermore D. M., Macgowan A. P., Wale M. C. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance. Centralised surveys to validate routine data offer a practical approach. BMJ. 1998 Sep 5;317(7159):614–615. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7159.614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Norrby S. R. Short-term treatment of uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections in women. Rev Infect Dis. 1990 May-Jun;12(3):458–467. doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.3.458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Olesen F., Oestergaard I. Patients with urinary tract infection: proposed management strategies of general practitioners, microbiologists and urologists. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Nov;45(400):611–613. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pfaller M., Ringenberg B., Rames L., Hegeman J., Koontz F. The usefulness of screening tests for pyuria in combination with culture in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1987 Mar;6(3):207–215. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Turnidge J. What can be done about resistance to antibiotics? BMJ. 1998 Sep 5;317(7159):645–647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7159.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vernon S., Foo C. K., Coulthard M. G. How general practitioners manage children with urinary tract infection: an audit in the former Northern Region. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 May;47(418):297–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weinstein M. C., Stason W. B. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. N Engl J Med. 1977 Mar 31;296(13):716–721. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197703312961304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wise R., Hart T., Cars O., Streulens M., Helmuth R., Huovinen P., Sprenger M. Antimicrobial resistance. Is a major threat to public health. BMJ. 1998 Sep 5;317(7159):609–610. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7159.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES