Skip to main content
General Psychiatry logoLink to General Psychiatry
. 2026 May 4;39:e70019. doi: 10.1002/gps3.70019

Global burden, risk factors and projections of self‐harm mortality in adults aged 65+ years: A 60‐year trend analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

Jinjie Xu 1, Yiman Guo 1, Zizhao Feng 1, Meiti Wang 2,✉, Chengwei Guo 1,✉, Yuan Feng 1,✉
PMCID: PMC13137939  PMID: 42089096

ABSTRACT

Background

Epidemiological research on self‐harm in older adults (aged 65+ years) remains scarce despite its growing public health significance amid global ageing.

Aims

This study aimed to analyse the global burden, risk factors and projections of self‐harm mortality in adults aged 65+ years from 1990 to 2050.

Methods

Utilising data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021, this research examined the spatiotemporal patterns of self‐harm mortality and years of life lost by age, gender and socio‐demographic index (SDI) in adults aged 65+ across 204 countries and territories (grouped into 21 regions) from 1990 to 2021. It also explored the changes during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, identified key risk factors and projected the future burden of self‐harm mortality through 2050.

Results

Global self‐harm deaths among older adults increased from 116 642 in 1990 to 167 920 in 2021, a rise of 43.96%. However, the age‐standardised mortality rate (ASMR) decreased by 39.56%, from 36.83 to 22.26 per 100 000. In 2021, central sub‐Saharan Africa had the highest ASMR at 61.35 per 100 000, while North Africa and the Middle East recorded the lowest at 4.88 per 100 000. Male ASMR was 2.5 times as high as that of females (33.61 vs. 13.58 per 100 000), and adults aged 85 years and older were at particularly elevated risk. High alcohol use was identified as a major risk factor, especially for males. A U‐shaped relationship between ASMR and the SDI was observed, with the lowest point at an SDI of approximately 0.70. Projections indicate a further 46.05% decline in ASMR to 12.01 per 100 000 by 2050.

Conclusions

These results highlight complex global trends in self‐harm mortality and associated risk factors among older adults, emphasising the urgent need for sex‐, age‐, and region‐specific interventions, enhanced social support and systematic risk monitoring to inform age‐friendly self‐harm prevention policies, and sustainable development support goals.

Keywords: Global Burden of Disease, older adults, projections, risk factors, self‐harm


WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

  • Self‐harm is a leading global cause of mortality, with particularly high rates among older adults. Despite the rapidly ageing global population, the self‐harm burden and trends in older adults remain insufficiently documented.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

  • Over the past three decades, the global number of self‐harm deaths among older adults increased, yet the global age‐standardised mortality rate (ASMR) declined.

  • The decline in the global estimated annual percentage change of the ASMR for self‐harm among older adults slowed after the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

  • The burden of self‐harm in older males was significantly higher than that in females, with the risk notably elevated in individuals aged 85 years and older.

  • There were significant differences in self‐harm mortality among older adults across different countries and socioeconomic status.

  • High alcohol use was a leading risk factor for self‐harm mortality in older males.

  • The ASMR among older adults is projected to continue declining through 2050.

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

  • The study highlights the need for sex‐, age‐ and region‐specific interventions.

  • It emphasises enhancing social support and risk monitoring for older adults, informing age‐friendly self‐harm prevention policies.

  • It contributes to the progress towards the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal of reducing self‐harm rates by one‐third by 2030.

INTRODUCTION

Self‐harm, including both nonfatal intentional self‐injury and suicide, represents a leading cause of global mortality, accounting for over 700 000 deaths annually and imposing substantial public health and socioeconomic burdens. 1 Older adults (aged 65 years and older) are disproportionately affected: Despite constituting only 9% of the global population, 2 older adults exhibit the highest self‐harm mortality rate among all age groups, with rates escalating markedly with age. 3 , 4 Concurrently, the global population aged 65 years and older has increased from 6.6% in 1990 to 9.6% in 2021, a figure projected to reach 16% (1.6 billion individuals) by 2050. 5 , 6 This demographic shift poses a formidable challenge to achieving the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.4, which aims to reduce global self‐harm rates by one‐third by 2030. 7

Despite the growing public health urgency of self‐harm in older adults, four critical research gaps persist. First, existing studies often overlook the elevated lethality in this population. 8 Older adults engaging in self‐harm face a 67‐fold increased suicide risk compared to their age‐matched peers. 9 Second, previous studies have shown that 73% of global self‐harm deaths occur in low‐ and middle‐income countries, with males exhibiting higher mortality than females; however, national and regional variations lack granular characterisation. 10 Third, the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic on self‐harm among older adults is underexplored, despite emerging evidence associating lockdowns with exacerbated loneliness and suicidal ideation in this population. 11 Finally, risk factors for fatal self‐harm in older adults remain unidentified.

This study aims to analyse age‐standardised mortality rates (ASMR) and years of life lost (YLL) among older adults from 1990 to 2021 across geographic, demographic and socioeconomic strata using Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 data to map spatiotemporal disparities. Secondary objectives include (1) assessing pandemic‐related shifts in self‐harm ASMR and YLL, (2) exploring modifiable risk factors for self‐harm and (3) projecting ASMR and YLL trends to 2050. These findings aim to inform evidence‐based, age‐sensitive self‐harm prevention strategies and support progress towards SDG 3.4. This study hypothesises that the ASMR and age‐standardised YLL attributable to self‐harm among individuals aged 65 years and older decreased from 1990 to 2021 but rose following the COVID‐19 pandemic.

METHODS

Data sources

Data were obtained from the GBD 2021 database (https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd‐results/), which employs standardised models to estimate the incidence, prevalence, mortality and risk factors of 371 diseases and injuries across 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2021. The database integrates diverse data sources, including national censuses, civil registration systems, disease registries, household surveys and verbal autopsy records. 12 Data validation and visualisation were performed using the Global Health Data Exchange (https://www.healthdata.org/). We analysed the self‐harm‐related disease burden in adults aged 65 years and older across 204 countries and territories (grouped into 21 regions). This study adheres to the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting. 13 Figure 1 depicts the study flowchart.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Study flowchart. ASMR, age‐standardised mortality rate; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease 2019; SDI, socio‐demographic index; YLL, years of life lost.

Study definitions

Self‐harm

Self‐harm encompasses self‐injurious or self‐poisoning behaviours intentionally undertaken by individuals, irrespective of intent, manifesting in forms such as ingesting harmful substances, medication overdoses, burning, cutting or striking the body. 14 These behaviours are categorised into suicidal and non‐suicidal self‐injury. The 2024 Lancet Commission on self‐harm defined self‐harm behaviours resulting in death as suicidal. 15 This study focuses on fatal self‐harm (i.e., suicide), corresponding to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD‐10) X60–X84 coding categories. 16

Age‐standardised mortality rate

Self‐harm mortality is defined as the annual number of self‐harm‐related deaths per 100 000 population. ASMR enables comparisons across regions by accounting for variations in age and sex distribution. This study calculated ASMR for individuals aged 65 years and older using the GBD world population as a standard reference. ASMR was determined by direct standardisation, multiplying the crude mortality rates in each 5‐year age group by the proportion of that age group in the standard population, and summing these products. Sex differences were analysed using the female‐to‐male ASMR ratio.

Years of life lost

YLL serves as a crucial metric in the burden of disease studies, quantifying life lost due to premature mortality and representing disease‐specific mortality impacts. YLL is calculated as YLL = N × L, where N represents the number of deaths from a specific disease in an age group over a defined period (usually 1 year), and L denotes the standardised life expectancy for that age group. Age‐adjusted YLL calculations account for regional variations in population age structures, enabling more precise comparisons of disease burden across populations. 17

Estimated annual percentage change

The estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) quantifies temporal trends of disease indicators, representing the annual rate of increase or decrease over a defined period. 18 It is derived from a linear regression model expressed as follows: Y = α + βΧ + ϵ, where Y is the natural logarithm of the age‐standardised rate (ASR), X is the calendar year, α is the intercept, β is the slope and ϵ is the error term. The EAPC is calculated as EAPC = (e β−1) × 100, which indicates the annual percentage change. A linear regression model was employed to estimate the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the EAPC. An upward trend was defined as a 95% CI with a lower bound > 0, while a declining trend was defined as a 95% CI with an upper bound below 0. A 95% CI containing 0 indicates a stable ASR trend. 19

Socio‐demographic index

The socio‐demographic index (SDI) is a composite indicator that reflects the health‐related level of development of a country or a region based on birth rate, education level and economic status. SDI ranges from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating greater socio‐demographic development. Based on SDI scores, the 204 countries and territories (grouped into 21 regions) included in this study were classified into five groups: high (0.81–1), high–moderate (0.69–0.81), moderate (0.61–0.69), low–moderate (0.45–0.61) and low (0–0.45). 12

Risk factors

Estimates of attributable burden from risk factors in GBD 2021 followed the comparative risk assessment framework established in 2002. 3 This study included all self‐harm risk factors available in the GBD 2021 database, encompassing primary, secondary and tertiary categories. In instances of overlap between factors at different hierarchical levels, data from the lower hierarchical level were retained. The risk factors for self‐harm as stipulated in GBD 2021 are high temperature, low temperature, drug use and high alcohol use. In the GBD 2021, high temperature is defined as a daily average temperature surpassing the theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL). TMREL represents the exposure level of a risk factor that corresponds to the lowest burden of disease or mortality risk for a particular population at a specific time and location. 20 The population‐weighted average high temperature is 25.6°C, with a range from 21.3°C to 26.6°C. Low temperature is defined relative to the local TMREL and lacks a fixed value. Any daily average temperature below the TMREL is considered low‐temperature exposure. 21 , 22 In GBD 2021, the prevalence of opioid, amphetamine and cocaine use disorders served as exposure indicators for self‐harm risk. These disorders were defined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the ICD diagnostic criteria. The TMREL for drug use was set at zero exposure. 21 High alcohol use is defined as alcohol consumption in excess of the TMREL, the level of alcohol consumption at which all‐cause risk is minimised. 21

Bayesian age‐period‐cohort model

The Bayesian age‐period‐cohort (BAPC) model is a statistical approach used to analyse and forecast demographic and epidemiological data, particularly accounting for age, period and cohort effects. 23 Due to the inherent linear dependency among these three dimensions, individually isolating their effects is challenging. 24 Bayesian modelling techniques incorporate prior information with empirical data, enabling robust uncertainty quantification. Furthermore, the BAPC model effectively manages complex data structures, generates probabilistic prediction intervals, evaluates uncertainty in projections and analyses temporal variations in outcomes. 25 This study applied a hierarchical Bayesian framework to assess age, period and cohort effects on self‐harm mortality variability. 26 Parameters were estimated using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations with 100 000 iterations, discarding the initial 20% as burn‐in. Model fit was assessed using the Watanabe–Akaike Information Criterion. 27

The BAPC model was structured as follows: 28 , 29 Yapc ∼ Poisson (λapc·Napc), where Yapc represents the number of self‐harm deaths in age group a, period p and cohort c. λapc is the predicted rate, and Napc is the exposed population size stratified by sex.

The linear part of the model can be written as follows: log(μa, p, c) = αa + βp + γc, where αa denotes the age effect, βp the period effect and γc the cohort effect.

Statistical analysis

We evaluated ASMR and age‐standardised YLL due to self‐harm among individuals aged 65 years and older, stratified by geographic region, sex and age group. Temporal trends were analysed using Descriptive Epidemiological Meta‐Regression (DisMod‐MR), with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) computed based on the 25th and 975th values of the posterior distribution containing 1000 ordered level estimates. 1 Spatial trends were assessed annually across 204 countries and territories, and we explored the global association between SDI and self‐harm burden among older adults. The roles of risk factors influencing sex‐ and age‐specific self‐harm mortality and YLL were investigated. Future projections of ASMR and YLL rates for the period from 2022 to 2050 were generated using the BAPC model. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software (Version 4.2.2). Custom code was employed to produce the core results of this study. The BAPC model was constructed using the ‘BAPC’ package (0.0.36). Detailed analytical methods have been reported previously. 12

RESULTS

Global trends

From 1990 to 2021, global self‐harm‐related deaths among older adults increased by 43.96%, rising from 116 642 (95% UI 97 598–125 024) to 167 920 (95% UI 147 406–185 284). Despite this rise, the ASMR declined significantly by 39.56%, from 36.83 per 100 000 (95% UI 30.81–39.48) to 22.26 per 100 000 (95% UI 19.50–24.58) (table S1). Concurrently, self‐harm‐related YLL increased from 2 139 965 (95% UI 1 790 923–2 294 742) to 2 957 164 (95% UI 2 615 626–3 255 254), while age‐standardised YLL rates decreased by 40.79%, from 646.80 per 100 000 (95% UI 541.09–693.60) to 382.97 per 100 000 (95% UI 338.17–421.78) (table S2).

Regional trends

In 2021, the ASMR in central sub‐Saharan Africa, eastern sub‐Saharan Africa and western sub‐Saharan Africa ranked among the top three of the 21 GBD regions. In contrast, North Africa and the Middle East exhibited the lowest ASMR, followed by Andean Latin America and Central Latin America (table S1). The regional distribution of age‐standardised YLL rates mirrored ASMR patterns (table S2).

National trends

In 2021, ASMR for self‐harm among older adults varied substantially across 204 countries and territories. The Republic of Mozambique, the Republic of South Sudan and the Central African Republic reported the highest ASMR, while the Lebanese Republic, the Syrian Arab Republic and Palestine recorded the lowest (table S3A). National trends in age‐standardised YLL rates aligned with ASMR findings (table S3B). From 1990 to 2021, ASMR decreased in 156 countries, with Qatar, Sri Lanka and Jordan showing the most pronounced reductions. ASMR remained stable in 20 countries (e.g., Djibouti) and increased in 28 countries, notably the Republic of Korea, Ecuador and Honduras (table S3C). Trends in age‐standardised YLL rates corresponded closely with ASMR patterns (table S3D).

Self‐harm burden changes before and after COVID‐19

Globally, the EAPC in ASMR was −1.92 (−2.09 to −1.76) for 1990–2021 and −0.70 (−0.87 to −0.52) for 2019–2021. During the COVID‐19 pandemic (2019–2021), 10 of 21 GBD regions experienced slower annual declines in ASMR. High‐income Asia Pacific, Central Latin America and central sub‐Saharan Africa shifted from negative to positive EAPC trends (table S1). Similarly, 9 of 21 GBD regions showed reduced declines in age‐standardised YLL rates, with Central Latin America and central sub‐Saharan Africa transitioning to positive EAPC values (table S2).

Sex and age trends

In 2021, the ASMR for self‐harm in older females was 40% of that in males globally (ratio: 0.40), with notable regional variations. Central Latin America demonstrated the largest sex gap (ratio: 0.13), whereas East Asia had the smallest (ratio: 0.59) (table S1). ASMR peaked in the 85–89 age group globally (figure 2A; table S4A). YLL age distributions differed slightly, peaking among males aged 85–89 years and females aged 70–74 years (figure 2B; table S4B).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Age‐specific mortality (A) and YLL rates (B) from self‐harm in older adults, by the region and sex, 2021. YLL, years of life lost.

SDI regional trends

The ASMR for self‐harm in older adults demonstrated a significant negative correlation with the SDI (r = −0.32 and p < 0.001). ASMR reached its minimum at SDI ≈ 0.70 but increased when SDI > 0.70 (figure 3A; table S5A). Age‐standardised YLL rates exhibited a similar SDI relationship (figure 3B; table S5B). Distinct ASMR‐SDI patterns emerged across GBD regions: stable (East Asia and South Asia), consistent decline (eastern sub‐Saharan Africa, Andean Latin America and high‐income Asia Pacific), increase (North Africa and Middle East), fluctuating (Central Latin America), U‐shaped (Eastern Europe) and inverted U‐shaped (southern sub‐Saharan Africa) (figure 4A; table S6A). Age‐standardised YLL rate patterns matched ASMR trends (figure 4B; table S6B).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

SDI stratified age‐standardised mortality (A) and YLL rates (B) for self‐harm in older adults, 2021. SDI, socio‐demographic index; YLL, years of life lost.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Age‐standardised mortality (A) and YLL rates (B) for self‐harm in older adults across 21 GBD regions by SDI, 1990–2021. GBD, Global Burden of Disease; SDI, socio‐demographic index; YLL, years of life lost.

Attributable burden by risk factors

In 2021, low temperature acted as a protective factor for ASMR and age‐standardised YLL rates, with no significant sex differences (figure S1A, B; table S7A, B). High alcohol use emerged as the primary risk factor for self‐harm mortality, disproportionately affecting males. High temperature and drug use also contributed to risk but lacked sex‐specific significance (figure S1C, D; table S7C, D).

Prediction of the self‐harm mortality burden

BAPC model projections indicate continued global declines in ASMR and age‐standardised YLL rates from 2022 to 2050. By 2050, the ASMR is projected to reach 12.01 (95% UI 9.82–14.20) per 100 000 population, representing a 46.05% reduction from 2021 levels (figure S2A; table S8A). Similarly, age‐standardised YLL rates are expected to decline to 206.35 (95% UI 162.95–249.74) per 100 000 population, reflecting a 46.12% decrease (figure S2D; table S8D). Comparable trends were observed for males and females (figure S2B, C, E, F; table S8B, C, E, F).

DISCUSSION

Main findings

This study reveals a dual trend in global self‐harm mortality among older adults from 1990 to 2021: a 43.96% increase in absolute deaths alongside a 39.56% decline in ASMR. This divergence reflects the interplay between population ageing and effective public health interventions. According to Kirk's demographic transition theory, global populations have entered Stage IV, characterised by low fertility and mortality. 30 Over this period, the proportion of older adults rose from 6.6% to 9.6%, while the global population grew from 5.30 to 7.92 billion, 31 driving higher absolute self‐harm deaths. Conversely, the reduced ASMR reflects advancements in self‐harm prevention. Between 1990 and 2021, changes have occurred in firearm control, psychotropic drug use and geriatric depression screening. Firearms remain the predominant method of self‐harm among older adults. In 2021, firearms were involved in 78.4% of self‐harm deaths among men and 37.9% among women in this age group in the United States. 32 Firearm control policies, such as Australia's 1996 National Firearms Accord, have been associated with a 50% reduction in firearm‐related self‐harm. 33 In addition, the increase in the utilisation rate of psychotropic drugs reflects improvements in mental health treatment. Between 2008 and 2019, psychotropic drug usage increased across 65 countries and regions, with an average annual growth rate of 4.08%. The usage of antidepressants exhibited the most rapid increase at 3.5%, followed by antipsychotics at 2.49%. 34 Moreover, widespread geriatric depression screening, exemplified by Japan's ‘Healthy Japan 21’ programme, 35 is a key intervention that has significantly mitigated self‐harm risks.

Regional analysis identified marked disparities: Central sub‐Saharan Africa exhibited the highest ASMR in 2021, whereas North Africa and the Middle East showed the lowest rates. Such variations reflect global inequities in mental health resource distribution. In sub‐Saharan Africa, severe resource shortages—approximately one psychiatrist per 500 000 people, far below World Health Organization recommendations—combined with cultural stigma, significantly restrict timely professional intervention. 36 , 37 , 38 Conversely, North Africa and the Middle East benefit from Islamic teachings discouraging self‐harm 39 and strong intergenerational support systems, 40 with Saudi studies showing that religious leader involvement reduces suicidal ideation. 41

The COVID‐19 pandemic led to a slowdown in the decline rate of ASMR among older adults compared with pre‐pandemic levels. Evidence suggests heightened suicidal ideation among patients with COVID‐19 and their close contacts relative to the general population. 42 Older adults face amplified vulnerability due to weakened immunity, multiple chronic conditions and increased social isolation. Additionally, insufficient healthcare resources in rural and remote areas impeded timely mental health interventions, further exacerbating self‐harm risk among older populations. 11 , 43

This study confirmed a significantly higher self‐harm ASMR among older males than females globally, with an overall sex ratio of 2.5:1. However, substantial regional variation exists. In Latin America, self‐harm mortality among males is up to 7.7 times as high as that among females, while East Asia exhibits a more balanced sex ratio. These disparities reflect intricate interactions between sociocultural norms and biological factors. The prevailing ‘machismo’ culture in Latin America discourages males from seeking mental health support, exacerbating self‐harm risk. 44 Additionally, alcohol use disorders are 1.7 times more prevalent among males than females, further amplifying self‐harm risk. 45 Sex differences in self‐harm methods also play a role, with males more likely to select highly lethal methods, such as firearms, while females more commonly use overdose. 46 , 47 Age‐specific analyses revealed that mortality rates peaked among individuals aged 85 years and older, aligning with the cumulative disadvantage theory, which posits the accumulation and intensification of psychosocial and physical adversities in an advanced age. 48 Chronic pain, affecting 27.5% of older adults globally, 49 along with multiple bereavements—where nearly a quarter of widowed older adults experience prolonged grief or chronic depression 50 —and cognitive decline, which is associated with a 1.66–1.73‐fold increase in suicidal ideation among individuals with mild cognitive impairment, collectively form a ‘despair triad’. 51 This triad initiates the ‘loneliness–hopelessness–self‐harm’ behavioural chain. 52 , 53 The German young–old shared housing programme has demonstrated efficacy in reducing self‐harm risk in this demographic. 54 Additionally, a combined psychological pain management programme, utilising non‐opioid analgesics and cognitive behavioural therapies, effectively alleviates the psychophysiological burden among individuals aged 85 years and older. 55

The study identified a U‐shaped relationship between the SDI and ASMR attributable to self‐harm among older adults, with the lowest risk observed at an SDI of approximately 0.70. This non‐linear pattern highlights increased vulnerability during social transitions. Countries with a medium SDI, such as China and Brazil, may experience a ‘golden equilibrium’, where traditional family support coexists with emerging welfare systems. In these contexts, intergenerational family support remains robust, with over 80% of middle‐aged and older adults providing support to at least one generation. 56 , 57 Concurrently, primary healthcare coverage is extensive (e.g., China's health insurance participation rate exceeds 95%), and community mental health services, like Brazil's ‘Family Health Programme’, increasingly complement existing systems. 58 , 59 Conversely, high SDI countries, such as Japan, encounter the combined challenges of hyper‐ageing and individualised societies. These findings underscore that social development is non‐linear, necessitating tailored protection networks for various transitional vulnerabilities. For instance, in low SDI countries, reinforcing traditional support systems and expanding basic mental health services are crucial. Middle SDI countries may benefit from policies aimed at preventing concurrent gaps in family and institutional support systems. In high SDI countries, reducing social isolation and rebuilding social connections should be prioritised, potentially through technology‐enabled interventions.

This study identified alcohol use as a significant risk factor for self‐harm ASMR among older adults, particularly in males, aligning with previous research. 60 Alcohol use is known to interact synergistically with depressive disorders and adverse life events, exacerbating self‐harm risk. 61 These findings underscore the need to address modifiable risk factors, including alcohol use, in self‐harm prevention strategies. 62 The alcohol‐attributable burden was significantly higher in males than females, consistent with prior research indicating that the ASMR of males with high alcohol use disorders was approximately 2.88 times that of females. 63 Interestingly, this analysis also suggested a protective effect associated with low temperature. Although this finding appears contradictory to documented increases in self‐harm rates during winter months in colder regions, such as Northern Europe, it likely reflects the complexity inherent in macroecological relationships influencing self‐harm risk.

Using the BAPC model, this study projects a continued decline in the global ASMR attributable to self‐harm among older adults, reaching 12.01 per 100 000 by 2050, representing a 46.05% reduction relative to 2021. However, emerging factors such as climate change and artificial intelligence (AI)‐based interventions may substantially alter this trajectory. Evidence suggests that global average temperatures could increase by 2°C–4°C over the next two decades. 64 Additionally, each additional heatwave (defined as a daily maximum temperature exceeding 35°C) is associated with a 3.5% increase in self‐harm rates. 65 , 66 Heatwaves can elevate the risk of self‐harm among older adults by triggering delirium. 67 Current forecasting models do not incorporate this climate‐sensitive variable, potentially leading to an underestimation of ASMR under high‐emission scenarios. Simultaneously, the rapid integration of AI‐based interventions has been linked to reductions in impulsive self‐harm, 68 , 69 , 70 although such technologies may also exacerbate health disparities across regions with varying SDI levels. 16 , 71

Limitations

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the GBD study utilised diverse data sources, such as national health surveys, disease surveillance systems and relevant literature, which may be incomplete or inaccurate. Self‐harm, particularly when associated with suicidal intent, is often stigmatised due to religious, cultural and legal factors, leading to under‐reporting, especially in regions where self‐harm is criminalised. Second, despite employing the latest GBD 2021 estimates, inherent limitations in the GBD data could influence our conclusions. The restricted time span (1990–2021) requires caution when generalising findings beyond this period. Moreover, the limitations in the GBD data restricted this study from thoroughly analysing several common factors influencing self‐harm, such as childhood experiences, mental health and family dynamics. Third, the GBD study's definitions and categorisations of self‐harm may not align with clinical diagnoses, potentially impacting the interpretation of results. Lastly, the cross‐sectional nature of our study precludes establishing causal relationships. Future research should consider individual‐level cohort studies to validate these associations.

Implications

The study observed a 43.96% rise in the absolute number of global self‐harm deaths among older adults alongside a 39.56% reduction in ASMR from 1990 to 2021, underscoring the impact of ageing and improvements in prevention. Significant regional disparities exist, with central sub‐Saharan Africa experiencing the highest burden and North Africa and the Middle East the lowest. Males exhibited a mortality rate 2.5 times higher than females, with the risk notably elevated among individuals aged 85 years and older. High alcohol use emerged as a key risk factor, with a greater attributable burden in males. Projections indicate that ASMR will continue to decline through 2050. These findings underscore the urgent need for developing a tiered intervention system that addresses sex, age and regional characteristics while enhancing social support and risk monitoring for older adults.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Jinjie Xu: Conceptualization; formal analysis; methodology; software; supervision; visualization; funding acquisition; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Yiman Guo: Conceptualization; formal analysis; methodology; software; writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. Zizhao Feng: Supervision; writing—review and editing. Meiti Wang: Supervision; writing—review and editing. Chengwei Guo: Supervision; writing—review and editing. Yuan Feng: Conceptualization; funding acquisition; project administration; supervision; writing—review and editing. Yuan Feng is responsible for the overall content as the guarantor, accepts full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, has access to the data, and controls the decision to publish.

FUNDING

This study was funded by Capital Health Research Development Special Project (2024‐2‐2124), Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program (PX2024068) and Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University (2024, No. 23).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

Data were obtained from the GBD 2021 database (https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd‐results/). Data validation and visualisation were performed using the Global Health Data Exchange (https://www.healthdata.org/). Therefore, ethical approval documents are not required for this study.

PATIENT CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

Supporting information

Figures S1 and S2

GPS3-39-e70019-s001.docx (1.3MB, docx)

Tables S1–S8

GPS3-39-e70019-s002.xlsx (292.7KB, xlsx)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We appreciate the excellent work of the GBD 2021 collaborators.

Biography

Jinjie Xu earned her master's degree from Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China and is currently a psychiatrist at Beijing Anding Hospital in China. Her main research interests include mood disorders and public mental health.

graphic file with name GPS3-39-e70019-g004.gif

Contributor Information

Meiti Wang, Email: 15216651601@163.com.

Chengwei Guo, Email: gcw817gcw817@163.com.

Yuan Feng, Email: 19558051@qq.com.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data in this article were collected from the Global Health Data Exchange (https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd‐results/).

REFERENCES

  • 1. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators . Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1204–1222. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Jarzebski MP, Elmqvist T, Gasparatos A, Fukushi K, Eckersten S, Haase D, et al. Ageing and population shrinking: implications for sustainability in the urban century. npj Urban Sustain. 2021;1:1–11. 10.1038/s42949-021-00023-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators . Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392:1923–1994. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Shah A, Bhat R, Zarate‐Escudero S, DeLeo D, Erlangsen A. Suicide rates in five‐year age‐bands after the age of 60 years: the international landscape. Aging Ment Health. 2016;20(2):131–138. 10.1080/13607863.2015.1055552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. UN. Population Division. World population ageing 2019‐report. Available from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3907988 (2020). Accessed 27 Apr 2025.
  • 6. World population ageing 2019 | population division. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/news/world‐population‐ageing‐2019. Accessed 27 Apr 2025.
  • 7. World Health Organization . UN sustainable development goals report 2017. Available from: https://www.undp.org/publications/un‐sustainable‐development‐goals‐report‐2017 (2017). Accessed 14 Feb 2025.
  • 8. Xu S, Ju Y, Wei X, Ou W, Ma M, Lv G, et al. Network analysis of suicide ideation and depression‐anxiety symptoms among Chinese adolescents. Gen Psychiatr. 2024;37(2):e101225. 10.1136/gpsych-2023-101225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dennis MS, Owens DW. Self‐harm in older people: a clear need for specialist assessment and care. Br J Psychiatr. 2012;200(5):356–358. 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.104109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. World Health Organization . Suicide. Available from: https://www.who.int/news‐room/fact‐sheets/detail/suicide (2024). Accessed 2 Mar 2025.
  • 11. Shah SM, Sun T, Xu W, Jiang W, Yuan Y. The mental health of China and Pakistan, mental health laws and COVID‐19 mental health policies: a comparative review. Gen Psychiatr. 2022;35(5):e100885. 10.1136/gpsych-2022-100885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. GBD 2021 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators . Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability‐adjusted life‐years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403:2133–2161. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00757-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Stevens GA, Alkema L, Black RE, Boerma JT, Collins GS, Ezzati M, et al. Guidelines for accurate and transparent health estimates reporting: the GATHER statement. Lancet. 2016;388(10062):e19–e23. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30388-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Self‐harm: assessment, management and preventing recurrence. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK588208/ (2022). Accessed 4 Mar 2025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Moran P, Chandler A, Dudgeon P, Kirtley OJ, Knipe D, Pirkis J, et al. The lancet commission on self‐harm. Lancet. 2024;404(10461):1445–1492. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01121-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. World Health Organization . Global internet use continues to rise but disparities remain | division for inclusive social development (DISD). Available from: https://social.desa.un.org/sdn/global‐internet‐use‐continues‐to‐rise‐but‐disparities‐remain (2024). Accessed 4 Mar 2025.
  • 17. GBD 2019 Demographics Collaborators . Global age‐sex‐specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1160–1203. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30977-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hankey BF, Ries LA, Kosary CL, Feuer EJ, Merrill RM, Clegg LX, et al. Partitioning linear trends in age‐adjusted rates. Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11(1):31–35. 10.1023/a:1008953201688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Clegg LX, Hankey BF, Tiwari R, Feuer EJ, Edwards BK. Estimating average annual per cent change in trend analysis. Stat Med. 2009;28(29):3670–3682. 10.1002/sim.3733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Burkart KG, Brauer M, Aravkin AY, Godwin WW, Hay SI, He J, et al. Estimating the cause‐specific relative risks of non‐optimal temperature on daily mortality: a two‐part modelling approach applied to the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2021;398(10301):685–697. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01700-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. GBD 2021 Risk Factors Collaborators . Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403:2162–2203. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00933-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. GBD 2021 Causes of Death Collaborators . Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403:2100–2132. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00367-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Chen J, Li C, Bu CLN, Wang Y, Qi M, Fu P, et al. Global burden of non‐communicable diseases attributable to kidney dysfunction with projection into 2040. Chin Med J. 2024;138(11):1334–1344. 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Fannon Z, Nielsen B. Age‐period‐cohort models. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedias , editor. Oxford research encyclopedia of economics and finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.495 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Li S, Chen H, Man J, Zhang T, Yin X, He Q, et al. Changing trends in the disease burden of esophageal cancer in China from 1990 to 2017 and its predicted level in 25 years. Cancer Med. 2021;10(5):1889–1899. 10.1002/cam4.3775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. GBD 2021 Forecasting Collaborators . Burden of disease scenarios for 204 countries and territories, 2022–2050: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024;403:2204–2256. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00685-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bell A, Jones K. Bayesian informative priors with yang and land’s hierarchical age‐period‐cohort model. Qual Quant. 2015;49(1):255–266. 10.1007/s11135-013-9985-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Chen W‐Q, Zheng R‐S, Zeng H‐M. Bayesian age‐period‐cohort prediction of lung cancer incidence in China. Thorac Cancer. 2011;2(4):149–155. 10.1111/j.1759-7714.2011.00062.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pan Y, Liu Q, Zhang N, Peng S, Li X, Zhou F. Global assessment of leukemia care quality: insights from the quality of care index (QCI) from 1990 to 2021. EClinicalMedicine. 2025;79:102996. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kirk D. Demographic transition theory. Popul Stud. 1996;50(3):361–387. 10.1080/0032472031000149536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. World Health Organization . World population 1950–2025. Available from: https://www.macrotrends.net/global‐metrics/countries/WLD/world/population (2025). Accessed 2 Mar 2025.
  • 32. Xuan Z, Xuan WY, Kaplan MS. Sex differences in trends of firearm suicide among older adults, 2014 to 2023. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8:e2528709. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Chapman S, Stewart M, Alpers P, Jones M. Fatal firearm incidents before and after Australia’s 1996 national firearms agreement banning semiautomatic rifles. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(1):62–64. 10.7326/M18-0503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Brauer R, Alfageh B, Blais JE, Chan EW, Chui CSL, Hayes JF, et al. Psychotropic medicine consumption in 65 countries and regions, 2008–19: a longitudinal study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(12):1071–1082. 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00292-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wada Y. Start of the 12‐year initiative for the third term of health Japan 21. J Natl Inst Public Health. 2024;73:68–78. 10.20683/jniph.73.2_68 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Knettel BA, Knippler E, Martinez A, Sardana S, Agor D, Mwobobia J, et al. A scoping review of counseling interventions for suicide prevention in Africa: few studies address this life‐saving aspect of mental health treatment. J Affect Disord. 2023;328:183–190. 10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. World Health Organization . Barriers to mental health care in Africa | WHO | regional office for Africa. Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/news/barriers‐mental‐health‐care‐africa (2022). Accessed 3 Mar 2025.
  • 38. World Health Organization . Reversing suicide, mental health crisis in Africa | WHO | regional office for Africa. Available from: https://www.afro.who.int/news/reversing‐suicide‐mental‐health‐crisis‐africa (2022). Accessed 3 Mar 2025.
  • 39. Awaad R, Durrani Z, Quadri Y, Sifat MS, Hussein A, Kouser T, et al. Developing a suicide crisis response team in America: an Islamic perspective. J Relig Health. 2024;63(2):985–1001. 10.1007/s10943-023-01993-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Seff I, Gillespie A, Bennouna C, Hassan W, Robinson MV, Wessells M, et al. Psychosocial well‐being, mental health, and available supports in an Arab enclave: exploring outcomes for foreign‐born and U.S.‐born adolescents. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:632031. 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.632031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Zia B, Kouser T, Helal H, Awaad R. A brief overview of the Islamic ethics of suicide and suicide‐related contemporary issues from a Sunnī perspective: a primer for clinicians and researchers. J Relig Health. 2024;63(2):968–984. 10.1007/s10943-024-02007-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Urdiales‐Claros R, Sánchez‐Álvarez N. Sintomatología depresiva e ideación suicida como consecuencia de la pandemia de COVID‐19. Escr Psicol. 2021;14(2):134–144. 10.24310/espsiescpsi.v14i2.12901 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Que J, Lu L, Shi L. Development and challenges of mental health in China. Gen Psychiatr. 2019;32(1):e100053. 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Brady JP, Kimball D, Mendenhall B, Blashill AJ. Machismo and anabolic steroid misuse among young Latino sexual minority men. Body Image. 2019;30:165–169. 10.1016/j.bodyim.2019.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Hagen D, Bambra C, Ompad DC, Goldmann E. Macro‐level determinants of gender differences in the prevalence of major depression and alcohol use disorder in the United States and across Europe. J Affect Disord. 2025;370:301–312. 10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Tripodi IJ, Buda G, Török L, Meagher M, Olson EA. Planned suicide methods in crisis conversations: effects of age and gender. JAACAP Open. 2024;3(4):996–1005. 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Choi NG, Marti CN, Choi BY. Three leading suicide methods in the United States, 2017–2019: associations with decedents’ demographic and clinical characteristics. Front Public Health. 2022;10:955008. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.955008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Dannefer D. Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: cross‐fertilizing age and social science theory. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003;58(6):S327–S337. 10.1093/geronb/58.6.s327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Zimmer Z, Fraser K, Grol‐Prokopczyk H, Zajacova A. A global study of pain prevalence across 52 countries: examining the role of country‐level contextual factors. Pain. 2022;163(9):1740–1750. 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Davidow JB, Zide BS, Levin LL, Biddle KD, Urizar JC, Donovan NJ. A scoping review of interventions for spousal bereavement in older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022;30(3):404–418. 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Günak MM, Barnes DE, Yaffe K, Li Y, Byers AL. Risk of suicide attempt in patients with recent diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(6):659–666. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Saito M, Watanabe R, Tamada Y, Takeuchi K, Tani Y, Kondo K, et al. Social disconnection and suicide mortality among Japanese older adults: a seven‐year follow‐up study. Soc Sci Med. 2024;347:116778. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Freichel R, Nock MK, O’Shea BA. A network outcome analysis of psychological risk factors driving suicide risk in emergency department patients. Nat Mental Health. 2025;3:346–353. 10.1038/s44220-025-00389-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Werdin S, Wyss K. Challenges in the evaluation of suicide prevention measures and quality of suicide data in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: findings from qualitative expert interviews. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):2209. 10.1186/s12889-024-19726-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Dey S, Sanders AE, Martinez S, Kopitnik NL, Vrooman BM. Alternatives to opioids for managing pain. In: Vrooman BM, editor. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Margolis R, Wright L. Older adults with three generations of kin: prevalence, correlates, and transfers. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017;72:1067–1072. 10.1093/geronb/gbv158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Reyes AM. Intergenerational support and retirement timing among older men and women by race/ethnicity. Soc Sci Res. 2023;109:102783. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Lee D‐C, Wang J, Shi L, Wu C, Sun G. Health insurance coverage and access to care in China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):140. 10.1186/s12913-022-07498-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Macinko J, Dourado I, Aquino R, Bonolo PF, Lima‐Costa MF, Medina MG, et al. Major expansion of primary care in Brazil linked to decline in unnecessary hospitalization. Health Aff. 2010;29(12):2149–2160. 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Kar N. Factors associated with suicides in Wolverhampton: relevance of local audits exploring preventability. Med Sci Law. 2016;56(4):245–251. 10.1177/0025802416657761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Yim M, Kim H, Kim G, Hur JW. Acute alcohol use and suicide. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(2):e2461409. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Xiao Y, Bi K, Yip PS‐F, Cerel J, Brown TT, Peng Y, et al. Decoding suicide decedent profiles and signs of suicidal intent using latent class analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2024;81(6):595–605. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Karaye IM, Maleki N, Hassan N, Yunusa I. Trends in alcohol‐related deaths by sex in the US, 1999–2020. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(7):e2326346. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Ramadan AMH, Ataallah AG. Are climate change and mental health correlated? Gen Psychiatr. 2021;34(6):e100648. 10.1136/gpsych-2021-100648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Liu J, Varghese BM, Hansen A, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Dear K, et al. Is there an association between hot weather and poor mental health outcomes? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Environ Int. 2021;153:106533. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Florido Ngu F, Kelman I, Chambers J, Ayeb‐Karlsson S. Correlating heatwaves and relative humidity with suicide (fatal intentional self‐harm). Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22175. 10.1038/s41598-021-01448-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Wong AYS, Iwagami M, Taniguchi Y, Kawamura C, Suzuki A, Douglas IJ, et al. The role of psychotropics on the associations between extreme temperature and heat‐related outcomes among people with mental health conditions: population‐based study. Psychol Med. 2024;54(16):1–7. 10.1017/S0033291724002824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Ding Z, Zhou Y, Dai A‐J, Qian C, Zhong BL, Liu CL, et al. Speech based suicide risk recognition for crisis intervention hotlines using explainable multi‐task learning. J Affect Disord. 2025;370:392–400. 10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Maples B, Cerit M, Vishwanath A, Pea R. Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3‐enabled chatbots. npj Mental Health Res. 2024;3:1–6. 10.1038/s44184-023-00047-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Dehbozorgi R, Zangeneh S, Khooshab E, Nia DH, Hanif HR, Samian P, et al. The application of artificial intelligence in the field of mental health: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2025;25(1):132. 10.1186/s12888-025-06483-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Yang R, Gao S, Jiang Y. Digital divide as a determinant of health in the U.S. older adults: prevalence, trends, and risk factors. BMC Geriatr. 2024;24(1):1027. 10.1186/s12877-024-05612-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figures S1 and S2

GPS3-39-e70019-s001.docx (1.3MB, docx)

Tables S1–S8

GPS3-39-e70019-s002.xlsx (292.7KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in a public, open access repository. Data in this article were collected from the Global Health Data Exchange (https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd‐results/).


Articles from General Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Shanghai Mental Health Center

RESOURCES