Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 Sep;50(458):712–715.

Observed changes in the lipid profile and calculated coronary risk in patients given dietary advice in primary care.

D Price 1, S Ramachandran 1, T Knight 1, P W Jones 1, R H Neary 1
PMCID: PMC1313799  PMID: 11050787

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dietary advice is usually the first-line treatment for increased blood cholesterol in primary care with a reduction in levels as the expected response. In practice, the diet adopted by the patient may lead to changes in blood lipids characterised by a greater decrease in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) than total cholesterol. The ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol is an important factor in calculated coronary risk using the Framingham model, from which most risk tables currently in use have been derived. This suggests that either coronary risk may increase after dietary advice or that risk should always be assessed on measurements made before any intervention has taken place. AIM: To report observed changes in blood lipids and calculated coronary risk following dietary advice in primary care. METHOD: Subjects with at least one coronary risk factor and baseline cholesterol above 5.2 mmol/l from an inner-city general practice had cardiovascular risk factors, including fasting lipids, recorded before receiving dietary advice. At follow-up several months later, risk factor measurements were repeated. Ten-year coronary risk was calculated using the Framingham model. Lipid levels and coronary risk at baseline and follow-up were compared. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in both total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol in both sexes. However, in 56% of subjects, HDL decreased by a greater proportion than the total cholesterol. These subjects showed a highly significant increase in the total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio (median = 0.8 [semi-interquartile range = 1.5], P < 0.001, which was correlated with a change in triglycerides (rs = 0.309, P < 0.001). In those who had an increase in the total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio, calculated coronary risk increased from 5.45% (13.2) at baseline to 7.25% (15.5) (P < 0.001). In all subjects, the change in calculated coronary risk associated with dietary advice ranged from -15% to 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Low fat dietary advice in this primary care setting was frequently associated with undesirable changes in the lipid profile. The majority of subjects showed an increase in the total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio, owing primarily to a decrease in HDL. Consequently, calculated coronary risk increased in over one-half of the subjects. Owing to our incomplete understanding of HDL metabolism, it is unclear whether the fall in HDL is actually detrimental; however, it seems prudent to give dietary advice to patients to avoid excess simple carbohydrate as a fat substitute. This helps avoid a rise in triglycerides, which appears to be associated with an increase in the ratio. These results confirm that coronary risk should always be calculated using measurements made before intervention.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (44.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Acton S., Rigotti A., Landschulz K. T., Xu S., Hobbs H. H., Krieger M. Identification of scavenger receptor SR-BI as a high density lipoprotein receptor. Science. 1996 Jan 26;271(5248):518–520. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5248.518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson K. M., Wilson P. W., Odell P. M., Kannel W. B. An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation. 1991 Jan;83(1):356–362. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.83.1.356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arai T., Wang N., Bezouevski M., Welch C., Tall A. R. Decreased atherosclerosis in heterozygous low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice expressing the scavenger receptor BI transgene. J Biol Chem. 1999 Jan 22;274(4):2366–2371. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.4.2366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Betteridge D. J., Dodson P. M., Durrington P. N., Hughes E. A., Laker M. F., Nicholls D. P., Rees J. A., Seymour C. A., Thompson G. R., Winder A. F. Management of hyperlipidaemia: guidelines of the British Hyperlipidaemia Association. Postgrad Med J. 1993 May;69(811):359–369. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.69.811.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hooper L., Summerbell C. D., Higgins J. P., Thompson R. L., Clements G., Capps N., Davey Smith G., Riemersma R. A., Ebrahim S. Reduced or modified dietary fat for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD002137–CD002137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kannel W. B. Metabolic risk factors for coronary heart disease in women: perspective from the Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1987 Aug;114(2):413–419. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90511-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Krieger M. Charting the fate of the "good cholesterol": identification and characterization of the high-density lipoprotein receptor SR-BI. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999;68:523–558. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morgan S. A., O'Dea K., Sinclair A. J. A low-fat diet supplemented with monounsaturated fat results in less HDL-C lowering than a very-low-fat diet. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997 Feb;97(2):151–156. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(97)00770-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Neil H. A., Roe L., Godlee R. J., Moore J. W., Clark G. M., Brown J., Thorogood M., Stratton I. M., Lancaster T., Mant D. Randomised trial of lipid lowering dietary advice in general practice: the effects on serum lipids, lipoproteins, and antioxidants. BMJ. 1995 Mar 4;310(6979):569–573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6979.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pietinen P., Huttunen J. K. Dietary determinants of plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Am Heart J. 1987 Feb;113(2 Pt 2):620–625. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90643-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ramachandran S., French J. M., Vanderpump M. P., Croft P., Neary R. H. Using the Framingham model to predict heart disease in the United Kingdom: retrospective study. BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):676–677. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7236.676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sacks F. M., Handysides G. H., Marais G. E., Rosner B., Kass E. H. Effects of a low-fat diet on plasma lipoprotein levels. Arch Intern Med. 1986 Aug;146(8):1573–1577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sacks F. M., Willett W. W. More on chewing the fat. The good fat and the good cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 1991 Dec 12;325(24):1740–1742. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199112123252411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schaefer E. J., Lichtenstein A. H., Lamon-Fava S., McNamara J. R., Schaefer M. M., Rasmussen H., Ordovas J. M. Body weight and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol changes after consumption of a low-fat ad libitum diet. JAMA. 1995 Nov 8;274(18):1450–1455. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530180044028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Spady D. K., Kearney D. M., Hobbs H. H. Polyunsaturated fatty acids up-regulate hepatic scavenger receptor B1 (SR-BI) expression and HDL cholesteryl ester uptake in the hamster. J Lipid Res. 1999 Aug;40(8):1384–1394. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Turley M. L., Skeaff C. M., Mann J. I., Cox B. The effect of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998 Oct;52(10):728–732. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES