Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 Sep;50(458):730–731.

The work commitments of British general practitioners: a national survey.

M Baker 1, A Flett 1, J Williams 1
PMCID: PMC1313803  PMID: 11050791

Abstract

Many qualified general practitioners (GPs) are choosing not to become principals. With the current problems in recruitment and retention of GPs, workforce planning for the future of general practice is contingent upon the work commitments of both GP principals and non-principals. A questionnaire survey of 5966 vocationally trained doctors in the UK suggests that shortfalls in the GP workforce will not be alleviated by relying on the non-principal pool increasing their time commitment to general practice work.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (29.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker M., Williams J., Petchey R. GPs in principle but not in practice: a study of vocationally trained doctors not currently working as principals. BMJ. 1995 May 20;310(6990):1301–1304. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6990.1301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Taylor D. H., Jr, Leese B. Recruitment, retention, and time commitment change of general practitioners in England and Wales, 1990-4: a retrospective study. BMJ. 1997 Jun 21;314(7097):1806–1810. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7097.1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES