Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 Oct;50(459):791–793.

Lay beliefs of patients using domiciliary oxygen: a qualitative study from general practice.

C S Cornford 1
PMCID: PMC1313818  PMID: 11127167

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oxygen, given for 15 hours a day to certain patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, is known to reduce mortality and improve morbidity. There is, however, an apparent mismatch in provision--some patients who would potentially benefit are not receiving it and, conversely, other patients may be receiving it 'inappropriately'. AIM: To investigate lay beliefs about oxygen therapy of patients receiving domiciliary treatment. METHOD: Twenty-four patients receiving domiciliary oxygen therapy from three general practices in Middlesbrough were interviewed using qualitative, semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: There were two contradictory approaches to oxygen use. On the one hand, oxygen helped the individual maintain mastery and self-control over illness by relieving symptoms, thus enabling daily activities and roles to continue, and by the reassurance that it was available, even if not used. In addition, self-control over the illness was maintained by individual experimentation with the best ways to use oxygen, which increased personal involvement in treatment. On the other hand, there were concerns that oxygen should not master the individual through inducing dependency on its use. CONCLUSIONS: These ambivalent ideas about oxygen should be considered when assessing patients for use of domiciliary oxygen and by general practitioners maintaining treatment. Some patients who according to medical criteria would benefit from domiciliary oxygen may wish to restrict its use because of worries about dependency and these worries may need addressing. Other patients using domiciliary oxygen who do not meet medical criteria for long-term use may nevertheless gain benefits, including improved self-control over their illnesses.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (34.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams S., Pill R., Jones A. Medication, chronic illness and identity: the perspective of people with asthma. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jul;45(2):189–201. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00333-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson J. M., Blue C., Lau A. Women's perspectives on chronic illness: ethnicity, ideology and restructuring of life. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(2):101–113. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baudouin S. V., Waterhouse J. C., Tahtamouni T., Smith J. A., Baxter J., Howard P. Long term domiciliary oxygen treatment for chronic respiratory failure reviewed. Thorax. 1990 Mar;45(3):195–198. doi: 10.1136/thx.45.3.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Becker G., Janson-Bjerklie S., Benner P., Slobin K., Ferketich S. The dilemma of seeking urgent care: asthma episodes and emergency service use. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Aug;37(3):305–313. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90262-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charmaz K. Loss of self: a fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociol Health Illn. 1983 Jul;5(2):168–195. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10491512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Conrad P. The meaning of medications: another look at compliance. Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(1):29–37. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90308-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerhardt U. Qualitative research on chronic illness: the issue and the story. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(11):1149–1159. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kagawa-Singer M. Redefining health: living with cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Aug;37(3):295–304. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90261-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leach R. M., Bateman N. T. Domiciliary oxygen therapy. 1994 Jan 19-Feb 1Br J Hosp Med. 51(1-2):47–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McLaughlin J., Zeeberg I. Self-care and multiple sclerosis: a view from two cultures. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Aug;37(3):315–329. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90263-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Okubadejo A. A., Paul E. A., Wedzicha J. A. Domiciliary oxygen cylinders: indications, prescription and usage. Respir Med. 1994 Nov;88(10):777–785. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(05)80201-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robinson I. Personal narratives, social careers and medical courses: analysing life trajectories in autobiographies of people with multiple sclerosis. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(11):1173–1186. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90257-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Swinburn C. R., Mould H., Stone T. N., Corris P. A., Gibson G. J. Symptomatic benefit of supplemental oxygen in hypoxemic patients with chronic lung disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 May;143(5 Pt 1):913–915. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.5_Pt_1.913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wynne A. Is it any good? The evaluation of therapy by participants in a clinical trial. Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(11):1289–1297. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90069-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES