Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2026 Feb 26;37(2):231–244. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2026.01.003

Relationship Between Spinal Reflexes and Spastic Movement Disorders

Aiko K Thompson 1, Thomas Sinkjær 2
PMCID: PMC13138439  NIHMSID: NIHMS2158732  PMID: 42062016

Introduction

Spasticity could affect up to 65–78% of people after SCI1–3 and impair their sensorimotor control and quality of life4,5. While different symptoms are likely reported as spasticity in clinical practice, tonic (e.g., hypertonia) and/or phasic (e.g., clonic) hyperactivity of muscles below the injury level1,6 is often observed in spastic individuals with SCI7–9. Current common spasticity treatments aim to pharmacologically disable spastic reflex hyperexcitability and/or abnormal muscle contraction (e.g., baclofen, botulinum toxin)1,10–21; this could, unfortunately, cause an unwanted side effect of muscle weakness15,22,23. Towards exploring a potential new therapeutic strategy to alleviate spasticity, this chapter will discuss the involvement of spinal reflexes in spastic movement disorders in chronic SCI, focusing on plantarflexors. Spinal reflexes are an effective means to excite or inhibit motoneurons directly or indirectly24–27. Thus, it is important to understand how spinal reflexes originated from sensory afferents function and contribute to movement generation and motor control28,29.

During walking, muscle afferents Ia, II, and Ib likely contribute differently to the activation of plantarflexors26,27,30–34. Short latency reflexes originated from Ia excitation triggers corrective reaction to rapid perturbation, whereas feedback from Ib and/or II afferents likely serve as main afferent contributors to the soleus activation in unperturbed steps30. In particular, force sensitive Ib afferent pathways have been indicated as key pathways for activating the plantarflexors during the propulsive force generation phase of walking26,31–36. The Ia-mediated stretch reflex pathways are accessible on a moment-to-moment basis when there is a need to adjust the plantarflexor activity36 (e.g., in response to an unexpected perturbation), but normally the soleus activation during the stance phase of walking relies on load sensitive afferent mediated pathways33. While keeping this in mind, this chapter will discuss, primarily, the Ia-mediated stretch reflex pathways in spastic movement caused by SCI.

Modulation of spinal reflexes in normal and spastic movement control

Task- and posture-dependent modulation.

Reflexes are functionally useful and meaningful when the excitability of their pathways and behaviors can be modulated (Figure 1B). Normally, the excitability of spinal reflex pathways is modulated according to the task being performed. For example, the excitability of the soleus H-reflex (a partial electrical analog of the spinal short-latency stretch reflex) pathway decreases from standing to walking to running37–39, which helps to prevent saturation of this pathway38, and further modulated to more specialized skills such as ballet dancing, jumping and kicking a ball (Figure. 1B) such that this pathway can function appropriately in each of these motor skills and behaviors. In people with chronic SCI, regardless of the activity performed, the excitability of this reflex pathway can be stuck high and not modulated (Figure. 1C), and therefore, the reflex could be detrimental and a part of problematic spasticity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Spinal stretch reflex and H-reflex, and their modulation in people without injuries and those with spastic hyperreflexia due to chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). A: Main pathway of the spinal short-latency stretch reflex and the H-reflex. Excitation of Ia (and large II) spindle afferents activates α-motoneurons innervating the same muscle and its synergists largely monosynaptically. If the afferents are excited by muscle stretch, the response is the stretch reflex. If they are stimulated electrically, the response is the H-reflex. The activity of this spinal pathway is strongly affected by excitatory (red) and inhibitory (navy) input of spinal and supraspinal origins. B: In an individual with no injuries, the spinal reflex pathway (center) responsible for the soleus H-reflex participates in many motor behaviors, ranging from standing to walking to running to athletic skills such as ballet dancing, jumping, and kicking a ball. The gain of the reflex pathway (+ and - in the gray circle) is modulated between the tasks such that the input from muscle spindle afferents contributes appropriately to soleus activity in each of these movement tasks. C: In a person with spasticity due to SCI, task-dependent reflex gain modulation is often impaired, and the pathway could remain hyperactive regardless of the movement tasks, and therefore non-functional. Modified from107.

Phase-dependent modulation.

During dynamic motion such as locomotion, these reflexes are also phase-dependently modulated. For instance, the soleus H- and stretch reflexes are phase-dependently modulated during walking, in accord with soleus motoneuron excitability level (expressed indirectly through the EMG activity), which is high in the mid-stance phase and little-to-none in the swing phase40,41. In individuals with SCI, soleus H- and stretch reflexes are unsuppressed or often large in the mid-late swing phase42 (Figure 2). This supports the possibility that these reflexes, if not suppressed adequately, would contribute to inappropriate soleus activity in the swing phase and exacerbate foot drop43.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Phase-dependent modulation of the soleus H-reflex and stretch reflexes during walking in people without neurological injuries and people with spasticity due to chronic incomplete SCI. A: Examples of the soleus H-reflex during the mid-stance and late-swing phase of and walking in a participant without known neurological injuries (top, black) and in a participant with chronic incomplete SCI (bottom, blue). Height, weight, and age are similar in these two individuals. Each trace is the average of ≥10 EMG sweeps and the time of stimulation is indicated with an arrowhead in each panel. In the participant without injuries, the H-reflex is present in the mid-stance when the soleus is active but completely suppressed in the late-swing phase when the soleus is not active. In the participant with SCI, the H-reflex is not suppressed in the late-swing. B: Amplitudes (mean ± SE) of the soleus EMG, H-reflex, and M1 (soleus short-latency) and M2 (soleus medium-latency) stretch reflexes during walking in participants with chronic incomplete SCI and participants without. For calculating the soleus EMG, >100 unperturbed steps were averaged for each participant. For calculating reflex sizes, for each participant in each of eight equal bins of the step cycle, ≥10 responses were averaged together and normalized to the maximum M-wave (Mmax) amplitude measured during standing. Bins 1 to 4 correspond to the stance phase, bin 5 to the stance-swing transition, and bins 6 to 8 to the swing phase. Horizontal lines labeled with “S” in indicate the average maximum H-reflex (Hmax) amplitudes during standing. For all panels, statistically significant differences between the groups (red) and between the bins (blue, for the SCI group only) by Student t-test with Bonferroni correction are indicated. Modified from42.

Clonus during walking.

Clonus, which is often associated with spastic hyperreflexia44–46 (however, see also47), also impairs walking. As elicitation of stretch reflexes requires only a degree or two of joint rotation48, when those reflexes are not suppressed adequately, ground contact that produces a small joint motion perturbation can elicit stretch reflexes, which in turn trigger clonus in individuals with spastic hyperreflexia. Clonus triggered in the late swing to swing-stance transition phase often continues into the stance phase, exaggerates breaking force, reduces forward propulsion, continues into smaller fused push-off bursts and propulsive force generation49,50, thereby contributing to slow gait51. Notably, muscle stretch and joint rotation are not the only input sources that trigger clonus; during walking, non-noxious cutaneous nerve stimulation that produces cutaneous sensation around the foot often triggers clonus in the plantarflexors of spastic individuals with chronic SCI (non-published observations by the authors), similarly to dorsiflexion perturbation or H-reflex eliciting posterior tibial nerve stimulation reported previously42. The fact that different kinds of afferent input can trigger clonus may further suggest that to some extent, the problems are in the motoneuron (i.e., the final common path for generating motor function and behaviors), multiple spinal interneurons that mediate between the afferents and motoneurons, and/or deprivation of appropriate descending input to the spinal neural circuitry in general.

Abnormal excitability modulation of spinal reflexes in SCI.

Abnormal excitability modulation of spinal reflexes arising from muscle spindle afferent52–58 is likely be further exacerbated by abnormal reciprocal inhibition between the antagonists52,56,59–62. Reflex abnormalities are also present in other spinal pathways, such as those of Ib inhibition63, recurrent inhibition64, and cutaneous reflexes65, and are often accompanied by changes in spinal motoneurons and interneurons66–69. These pathways may also interact with each other60,70–73. Altogether, in the spinal cord of individuals with chronic SCI, the excitability modulation and function of multiple pathways become impaired, contributing to abnormal motoneuron firing66,68,69,74–76 and motor control12,56,77. Based on these facts, we may view spasticity in chronic SCI as impaired regulation of reflexive excitation of motoneurons and inadequate suppression of motoneuron firing, at least partly.

Spinal reflexes as tools to probe the neural state

Since spinal reflexes are a means of the CNS to excite or inhibit motoneurons, by examining spinal reflexes, we can learn so much about the state of the CNS78. In doing so, one should be cognizant of the context in which a reflex is measured and the purpose of measuring a reflex.

Presence/absence and when.

The presence or absence of a reflex indicates whether that specific reflex pathway is available to excite motoneurons in a specific context in which the reflex is measured37–39. For instance, in individuals without injuries, the soleus H- and stretch reflexes are present during the mid-stance of walking, indicating that these reflex pathways are available to excite soleus motoneurons; whereas during the mid to late swing phase, those reflexes are almost completely absent, indicating that their pathways are not available as the means to excite the same motoneurons (see Figure. 2)36,37. In spastic individuals with SCI, the H- and stretch reflexes are present in the late-swing phase and can be robust42 and trigger clonus that continues into the following stance and leads to a chain of events that impair gait49–51. A reflex that cannot be turned off when it should be or a reflex whose excitatory/inhibitory action cannot be asserted when it is critical79,80 would not be useful but detrimental in motor control. Reflexes measured at a specific phase of movement or during a specific task may therefore give insight into normal or abnormal neural control of movements in people with SCI and others.

Reflex measurements at rest.

In the traditional clinical setting, reflex assessments are often made at rest or made without monitoring pre-stimulus ongoing EMG activity or posture. During such “resting” reflex measurements, the subthreshold level of motoneuron pool’s excitability is unknown and uncontrolled81. That is, from the surface EMG signal, we cannot know how close or far the motoneuron pool’s excitability is from the firing threshold, and therefore, the variability in subthreshold level of motoneuron pool’s excitability from one reflex measurement to another would be unknown. Thus, when a reflex is measured at rest, a large sample size or a large effect size is likely necessary to overcome such measurement variability. When measuring a reflex at rest, the stimulation rate (for post-activation depression8,81–83), the agonist and antagonist muscles’ ongoing EMG activity (for motoneuron pool’s excitability, post- and presynaptic inhibition61,62 84–87), and joint posture (for posture-dependent reflex gain modulation88–91) should be carefully considered in the protocol development. Reflexes are influenced by many factors. At rest, the excitability variability in many spinal neurons including motoneurons is unknown/uncontrolled. Therefore, resting reflexes should be interpretated carefully in association with spasticity and neuromuscular impairments.

Examination of a reflex in dynamic motion to understand its dynamic function.

Abnormal reflex behaviors observed at rest, during static motor tasks, or during isolated joint motion in individuals with SCI52–56,66,67,69,92 have encouraged us to assume that spinal reflex abnormalities contribute to spastic movement disorders93,94. However, in people with spastic hemiparesis due to stroke, stretch reflexes that are hyperexcitable at rest or in passive conditions are near normal or even suppressed during active muscle contractions95,96, and antispastic medication does not necessarily improve motor function23,93,97,98. In spastic individuals with chronic SCI, the soleus stretch reflex excitability is elevated during sitting or lying in supine99,100; the reflex gain and reflex stiffness do not decrease with muscle activation100; and those reflexes are abnormally large in the mid to late swing phase of walking42 (Figure. 2), likely contributing to spastic gait disorders50. These observations are reminder that how we measure the reflex matters81. That is, we can determine whether a reflex functions abnormally and contributes to impaired motion, through its examination in the actual dynamic motion; a reflex characterization measure made at rest would not immediately explain how it functions. In sum, reflexes are useful neural probes of the CNS, as long as we measure them correctly for the intended measurement purposes and apply appropriate interpretation on the gathered observations.

A method to train the CNS to control the excitability of a neural pathway - operant conditioning

In the previous sections, we discussed; (1) reflexes are effective means to excite spinal motoneurons and functionally meaningful when their excitability is adequately modulated; (2) when a reflex is not modulable or its modulation is impaired, it could become a part of spastic movement disorders; and (3) reflexes can be used as robust tools to probe the state of the CNS when the user knows how to use and interpret them. A question that may arise from these facts is “can we train a reflex behavior to improve the CNS function, to improve movement generation and control?” For example, can we train a hyperexcitable reflex to decrease its excitability, thereby making the spastic muscle less spastic and improving spastic movement disorders? Since a spastic limb is not necessarily a strong limb51,93, removing or reducing the motoneuron’s ability to fire altogether1,10–21 wouldn’t be ideal. Instead, if we could improve reflexive excitation of motoneurons and motoneuron firing behaviors, that would be preferable. Operant conditioning of spinal reflexes can be one such approach.

Operant conditioning of spinal reflexes.

Operant conditioning is a powerful method for modifying a behavior based on its consequences78,101–104. Through trial and error, a subject learns to produce a behavior that is rewarded101. Through repetition, a trained neural behavior becomes a habitual behavior102. With operant conditioning of a spinal reflex, a subject is rewarded for producing a larger (with up-conditioning) or a smaller (with down-conditioning) reflex. Since the amplitude of a reflex reflects the excitability of that reflex pathway at the time of reflex elicitation28,81,105,106, with reflex operant conditioning, we can train the CNS to produce the neural activity that increases (up-conditioning) or decreases (down-conditioning) the excitability of the targeted reflex pathway103,104,107–109. As this is done repeatedly and persistently, over time, the spinal reflex pathway (including spinal interneurons and motoneurons) goes through anatomical and physiological changes78,103,104,107,109–122; and the changes persist after conditioning ends78,103,104,107,109,110,117–121,123–125. Markedly different from conventional pharmacological therapies, reflex operant conditioning does not disable certain connections (e.g., botulinum toxins) or enhance general inhibition (e.g., baclofen), either of which would limit muscle activation and contraction regardless of the motor functions of the person’s intention. When a reflex that underlies spasticity is targeted by down-conditioning107,109, that reflex’s excitability decreases but preserves motoneuron’s ability to fire in response to voluntary effort124 or when it is functionally appropriate (e.g., mid-late stance phase of walking126) (Figure 3)125,127, and thereby helps to improve locomotion in SCI104,107,109,119–121,128–135.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Soleus H-reflexes in individuals with spastic hyperreflexia due to chronic incomplete SCI, in whom H-reflex size decreased significantly through down-conditioning125 and effects of H-reflex down-conditioning on locomotor EMG activity. A: Average H-reflexes for a baseline session (black dotted line) and the last conditioning session (blue solid line) from a participant with SCI. B: Average (±SE) H-reflex size for baseline, conditioning, and 1- and 3-month follow-up sessions. C: Locomotor EMG in the soleus and tibialis anterior (TA) in absolute value before (dashed) and after (solid, green) down-conditioning in an individual whose H-reflex size decreased through down-conditioning. Soleus push-off burst was increased and TA’s co-contraction with the plantarflexors in the stance phase was decreased after conditioning (Modified from125). Push-off burst is highlighted by a red oval.

Summary

Spinal reflexes are an effective means of exciting or inhibiting spinal motoneurons. The CNS generates different motor functions, in part, by modulating the excitability of various spinal reflex pathways. Thus, reflexes can serve as tools to probe the CNS state or how it is functioning. During locomotion, spinal reflexes make a meaningful contribution. When a reflex becomes not modulable or its modulation becomes impaired due to injuries and diseases, it becomes a part of spastic gait and other movement disorders. It should be noted that abnormal reflex behaviors observed during chronically impaired locomotion do not necessarily mean that they are the causes of impairments. Hyperexcitable stretch or Ia reflex pathways shaped by the altered descending neural input may be partial underlying causes of spastic gait, or products of compensatory or adaptive plasticity to chronic SCI; nonetheless, they are often part of the post-SCI spastic gait42. When considering various features and functions of spinal reflexes, simply removing or suppressing reflex pathways altogether seems far from an optimal solution. Instead, making these pathways more usable by restoring their excitability modulation through neurobehavioral training (e.g., reflex operant conditioning) could be a better solution for enhancing functional recovery in people with spasticity due to SCI or other CNS injuries125,127,128,135,136.

Key Points.

  • The central nervous system(CNS) generates various motor functions, in part by modulating the excitability of spinal reflex pathways that drive spinal motoneurons.

  • When reflex modulation becomes impaired due to spinal cord lesions or other CNS diseases, it could become a part of spastic movement disorders.

  • Particularly for locomotion, in which spinal reflexes make a meaningful contribution, impaired reflexes could become a part of spastic gait and other movement disorders.

  • Taking advantage of such features of spinal reflexes, it is possible to operantly condition a reflex to improve the CNS activity and resulting motor function.

Synopsis.

The CNS generates various motor functions, in part by modulating the excitability of spinal reflex pathways, which are effective means of driving spinal motoneurons. When a reflex becomes not modulable or its modulation becomes impaired due to spinal cord lesions or other CNS diseases, it could become a part of spastic movement disorders. For the CNS with or without chronic lesions, thus, reflexes can be used as tools to probe its state. Utilizing such feature of spinal reflexes, it is possible to operantly condition a reflex to improve CNS activity and resulting motor function in spastic individuals with spinal cord lesions.

Consideration in Clinics.

  • In the traditional clinical setting, reflex assessments are often made at rest or made without monitoring pre-stimulus ongoing EMG activity or posture. While controlling details of reflex testing procedures could be challenging in the clinic, the clinician or examiner who administers the reflex testing should know the limitations and implications of what they measured in their specific setting.

  • A reflex measured at rest could be a useful characterization measure, but it is not a valid explanation for impaired motor function.

  • Operant conditioning of a spinal reflex may be used as an effective neurobehavioral training tool to enhance function recovery in people with spasticity due to SCI or other CNS injuries.

Footnotes

Disclosures

The Authors have nothing to disclose.

Contributor Information

Aiko K. Thompson, Professor, Department of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States

Thomas Sinkjær, Professor, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

References

  • 1.Adams MM, Hicks AL. Spasticity after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. Oct 2005;43(10):577–86. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Skold C, Levi R, Seiger A. Spasticity after traumatic spinal cord injury: nature, severity, and location. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Dec 1999;80(12):1548–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maynard FM, Karunas RS, Waring WP 3rd. Epidemiology of spasticity following traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Jul 1990;71(8):566–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Andresen SR, Biering-Sorensen F, Hagen EM, Nielsen JF, Bach FW, Finnerup NB. Pain, spasticity and quality of life in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury in Denmark. Spinal Cord. Nov 2016;54(11):973–979. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Westerkam D, Saunders LL, Krause JS. Association of spasticity and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. Sep 2011;49(9):990–4. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Palazón-García R. Chapter 9 - Spasticity in spinal cord injury. In: Rajendram R, Preedy VR, Martin CR, eds. Diagnosis and Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury. Academic Press; 2022:107–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mirbagheri MM, Kindig MW, Niu X. Effects of robotic-locomotor training on stretch reflex function and muscular properties in individuals with spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol. May 2015;126(5):997–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grey MJ, Klinge K, Crone C, et al. Post-activation depression of soleus stretch reflexes in healthy and spastic humans. Exp Brain Res. Feb 2008;185(2):189–97. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1142-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schmit BD, Benz EN, Rymer WZ. Reflex mechanisms for motor impairment in spinal cord injury. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;508:315–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Young RR. Spasticity: a review. Neurology. Nov 1994;44(11 Suppl 9):S12–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stetkarova I, Brabec K, Vasko P, Mencl L. Intrathecal Baclofen in Spinal Spasticity: Frequency and Severity of Withdrawal Syndrome. Pain physician. Jul-Aug 2015;18(4):E633–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Elbasiouny SM, Moroz D, Bakr MM, Mushahwar VK. Management of spasticity after spinal cord injury: current techniques and future directions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. Jan 2010;24(1):23–33. doi: 10.1177/1545968309343213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ward AB. Spasticity treatment with botulinum toxins. Review. J Neural Transm. 2008;115(4):607–16. doi: 10.1007/s00702-007-0833-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dario A, Tomei G. A benefit-risk assessment of baclofen in severe spinal spasticity. Review. Drug safety : an international journal of medical toxicology and drug experience. 2004;27(11):799–818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dietz N, Wagers S, Harkema SJ, D’Amico JM. Intrathecal and Oral Baclofen Use in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review of Efficacy in Spasticity Reduction, Functional Changes, Dosing, and Adverse Events. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Jan 2023;104(1):119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.05.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li S, Francisco GE. The Use of Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of Spasticity. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2021;263:127–146. doi: 10.1007/164_2019_315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wagstaff AJ, Bryson HM. Tizanidine. A review of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the management of spasticity associated with cerebral and spinal disorders. Drugs. Mar 1997;53(3):435–52. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199753030-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen YT, Liu Y, Zhang C, et al. Comprehensive Assessment of the Time Course of Biomechanical, Electrophysiological and Neuro-Motor Effects after Botulinum Toxin Injections in Elbow Flexors of Chronic Stroke Survivors with Spastic Hemiplegia: A Cross Sectional Observation Study. Toxins (Basel). Jan 28 2022;14(2)doi: 10.3390/toxins14020104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen YT, Zhang C, Liu Y, et al. The Effects of Botulinum Toxin Injections on Spasticity and Motor Performance in Chronic Stroke with Spastic Hemiplegia. Toxins (Basel). Jul 31 2020;12(8)doi: 10.3390/toxins12080492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mirbagheri MM, Kindig M, Niu X, Varoqui D. Therapeutic effects of anti-spastic medication on neuromuscular abnormalities in SCI: a system identification approach. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:6203–6. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Thomas CK, Hager-Ross CK, Klein CS. Effects of baclofen on motor units paralysed by chronic cervical spinal cord injury. Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S. Brain. Jan 2010;133(Pt 1):117–25. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yoshizaki S, Yokota K, Kubota K, et al. The beneficial aspects of spasticity in relation to ambulatory ability in mice with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. May 2020;58(5):537–543. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0395-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dietz V, Sinkjaer T. Spasticity. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;109:197–211. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00012-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pearson KG, Misiaszek JE, Fouad K. Enhancement and resetting of locomotor activity by muscle afferents. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Nov 16 1998;860:203–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rudomin P Presynaptic selection of afferent inflow in the spinal cord. J Physiol Paris. Sep-Oct 1999;93(4):329–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Donelan JM, Pearson KG. Contribution of force feedback to ankle extensor activity in decerebrate walking cats. J Neurophysiol. Oct 2004;92(4):2093–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mayer WP, Murray AJ, Brenner-Morton S, Jessell TM, Tourtellotte WG, Akay T. Role of muscle spindle feedback in regulating muscle activity strength during walking at different speed in mice. J Neurophysiol. Nov 1 2018;120(5):2484–2497. doi: 10.1152/jn.00250.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zehr EP, Stein RB. What functions do reflexes serve during human locomotion? Progress in Neurobiology. Jun 1999;58(2):185–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zehr EP, Duysens J. Regulation of arm and leg movement during human locomotion. Neuroscientist. Aug 2004;10(4):347–61. doi: 10.1177/1073858404264680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sinkjaer T, Andersen JB, Ladouceur M, Christensen LO, Nielsen JB. Major role for sensory feedback in soleus EMG activity in the stance phase of walking in man. Journal of Physiology. Mar 15 2000;523 Pt 3:817–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mazzaro N, Grey MJ, Sinkjaer T. Contribution of afferent feedback to the soleus muscle activity during human locomotion. J Neurophysiol. Jan 2005;93(1):167–77. doi: 10.1152/jn.00283.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mazzaro N, Grey MJ, do Nascimento OF, Sinkjaer T. Afferent-mediated modulation of the soleus muscle activity during the stance phase of human walking. Exp Brain Res. Sep 2006;173(4):713–23. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0451-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grey MJ, Nielsen JB, Mazzaro N, Sinkjaer T. Positive force feedback in human walking. J Physiol. May 15 2007;581(Pt 1):99–105. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.130088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gossard JP, Brownstone RM, Barajon I, Hultborn H. Transmission in a locomotor-related group Ib pathway from hindlimb extensor muscles in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1994;98(2):213–28. doi: 10.1007/BF00228410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.af Klint R, Mazzaro N, Nielsen JB, Sinkjaer T, Grey MJ. Load rather than length sensitive feedback contributes to soleus muscle activity during human treadmill walking. J Neurophysiol. May 2010;103(5):2747–56. doi: 10.1152/jn.00547.2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Damewood BAP, Sinkjaer T, Thompson AK. Generation and modification of human locomotor EMG activity when walking faster and carrying additional weight. Exp Physiol. Mar 6 2025;doi: 10.1113/EP092063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stein RB, Capaday C. The modulation of human reflexes during functional motor tasks. Trends in Neurosciences. Jul 1988;11(7):328–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Capaday C, Stein RB. Difference in the amplitude of the human soleus H reflex during walking and running. Journal of Physiology. Nov 1987;392:513–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Capaday C, Stein RB. Amplitude modulation of the soleus H-reflex in the human during walking and standing. Journal of Neuroscience. May 1986;6(5):1308–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sinkjaer T, Andersen JB, Nielsen JF, Hansen HJ. Soleus long-latency stretch reflexes during walking in healthy and spastic humans. Clin Neurophysiol. May 1999;110(5):951–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sinkjaer T, Andersen JB, Larsen B. Soleus stretch reflex modulation during gait in humans. J Neurophysiol. Aug 1996;76(2):1112–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Thompson AK, Mrachacz-Kersting N, Sinkjaer T, Andersen JB. Modulation of soleus stretch reflexes during walking in people with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. Exp Brain Res. Oct 2019;237(10):2461–2479. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05603-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Thompson AK, Sinkjaer T. Features and physiology of spinal stretch reflexes in people with chronic spinal cord injury. In: Rajendram R, Preedy VR, Martin C, eds. Neuroscience of Spinal Injury, Book 2 Spinal Cord Injury, Cellular Mechanisms, Physiology and Behavior. Elsevier; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Corcos DM, Gottlieb GL, Penn RD, Myklebust B, Agarwal GC. Movement deficits caused by hyperexcitable stretch reflexes in spastic humans. Brain. Oct 1986;109 (Pt 5):1043–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Latash ML, Penn RD, Corcos DM, Gottlieb GL. Short-term effects of intrathecal baclofen in spasticity. Exp Neurol. Feb 1989;103(2):165–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rossi A, Mazzocchio R, Scarpini C. Clonus in man: a rhythmic oscillation maintained by a reflex mechanism. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. Feb 1990;75(2):56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Beres-Jones JA, Johnson TD, Harkema SJ. Clonus after human spinal cord injury cannot be attributed solely to recurrent muscle-tendon stretch. Exp Brain Res. Mar 2003;149(2):222–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stein RB, Kearney RE. Nonlinear behavior of muscle reflexes at the human ankle joint. Journal of Neurophysiology. Jan 1995;73(1):65–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Turns LJ, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Relationships between muscle activity and anteroposterior ground reaction forces in hemiparetic walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Sep 2007;88(9):1127–35. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Thompson AK, Sinkjaer T. Chapter 30 - Features and physiology of spinal stretch reflexes in people with chronic spinal cord injury. In: Rajendram R, Preedy VR, Martin CR, eds. Cellular, Molecular, Physiological, and Behavioral Aspects of Spinal Cord Injury. Academic Press; 2022:365–375. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking. Stroke. Mar 2006;37(3):872–6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000204063.75779.8d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Crone C, Johnsen LL, Biering-Sorensen F, Nielsen JB. Appearance of reciprocal facilitation of ankle extensors from ankle flexors in patients with stroke or spinal cord injury. Brain. Feb 2003;126(Pt 2):495–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hiersemenzel LP, Curt A, Dietz V. From spinal shock to spasticity: neuronal adaptations to a spinal cord injury. Neurology. Apr 25 2000;54(8):1574–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yang JF, Fung J, Edamura M, Blunt R, Stein RB, Barbeau H. H-reflex modulation during walking in spastic paretic subjects. The Canadian journal of neurological sciences Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques. Nov 1991;18(4):443–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stein RB, Yang JF, Belanger M, Pearson KG. Modification of reflexes in normal and abnormal movements. Progress in brain research. 1993;97:189–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Thompson AK, Estabrooks KL, Chong S, Stein RB. Spinal reflexes in ankle flexor and extensor muscles after chronic central nervous system lesions and functional electrical stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. Feb 2009;23(2):133–42. doi: 10.1177/1545968308321067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mailis A, Ashby P. Alterations in group Ia projections to motoneurons following spinal lesions in humans. J Neurophysiol. Aug 1990;64(2):637–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Taylor S, Ashby P, Verrier M. Neurophysiological changes following traumatic spinal lesions in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Oct 1984;47(10):1102–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ashby P, Wiens M. Reciprocal inhibition following lesions of the spinal cord in man. Journal of Physiology. Jul 1989;414:145–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Knikou M, Mummidisetty CK. Reduced reciprocal inhibition during assisted stepping in human spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. Sep 2011;231(1):104–12. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.05.021 S0014–4886(11)00218–4 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Boorman GI, Lee RG, Becker WJ, Windhorst UR. Impaired “natural reciprocal inhibition” in patients with spasticity due to incomplete spinal cord injury. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Apr 1996;101(2):84–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Boorman G, Hulliger M, Lee RG, Tako K, Tanaka R. Reciprocal Ia inhibition in patients with spinal spasticity. Neuroscience Letters. Jun 10 1991;127(1):57–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Morita H, Shindo M, Momoi H, Yanagawa S, Ikeda S, Yanagisawa N. Lack of modulation of Ib inhibition during antagonist contraction in spasticity. Neurology. Jul 11 2006;67(1):52–6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000223399.59212.f4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shefner JM, Berman SA, Sarkarati M, Young RR. Recurrent inhibition is increased in patients with spinal cord injury. Neurology. Nov 1992;42(11):2162–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jones CA, Yang JF. Reflex behavior during walking in incomplete spinal-cord-injured subjects. Experimental Neurology. Aug 1994;128(2):239–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hultborn H Changes in neuronal properties and spinal reflexes during development of spasticity following spinal cord lesions and stroke: studies in animal models and patients. J Rehabil Med. May 2003;(41 Suppl):46–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Hornby TG, Kahn JH, Wu M, Schmit BD. Temporal facilitation of spastic stretch reflexes following human spinal cord injury. J Physiol. Mar 15 2006;571(Pt 3):593–604. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.102046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Heckman CJ, Johnson M, Mottram C, Schuster J. Persistent inward currents in spinal motoneurons and their influence on human motoneuron firing patterns. Neuroscientist. Jun 2008;14(3):264–75. doi:1073858408314986 [pii] 10.1177/1073858408314986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gorassini MA, Knash ME, Harvey PJ, Bennett DJ, Yang JF. Role of motoneurons in the generation of muscle spasms after spinal cord injury. Brain. Oct 2004;127(Pt 10):2247–58. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Knikou M, Kay E, Schmit BD. Parallel facilitatory reflex pathways from the foot and hip to flexors and extensors in the injured human spinal cord. Exp Neurol. Jul 2007;206(1):146–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Knikou M Plantar cutaneous input modulates differently spinal reflexes in subjects with intact and injured spinal cord. Spinal Cord. Jan 2007;45(1):69–77. doi:3101917 [pii] 10.1038/sj.sc.3101917 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bastiaanse CM, Degen S, Baken BC, Dietz V, Duysens J. Suppression of cutaneous reflexes by a conditioning pulse during human walking. Exp Brain Res. Jun 2006;172(1):67–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Nakajima T, Mezzarane RA, Hundza SR, Komiyama T, Zehr EP. Convergence in reflex pathways from multiple cutaneous nerves innervating the foot depends upon the number of rhythmically active limbs during locomotion. PloS one. 2014;9(8):e104910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Thomas CK, Bakels R, Klein CS, Zijdewind I. Human spinal cord injury: motor unit properties and behaviour. Acta Physiol (Oxf). Jan 2014;210(1):5–19. doi: 10.1111/apha.12153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zijdewind I, Bakels R, Thomas CK. Motor unit firing rates during spasms in thenar muscles of spinal cord injured subjects. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2014;8:922. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Benedetto A, Jenz ST, Farley M, et al. Characterization of ankle musculature motor unit discharge patterns in humans with incomplete spinal cord injury. Society for Neuroscience, 2024. Online; 2024:PSTR291.09/J2. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.D’Amico JM, Condliffe EG, Martins KJ, Bennett DJ, Gorassini MA. Recovery of neuronal and network excitability after spinal cord injury and implications for spasticity. Front Integr Neurosci. 2014;8:36. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wolpaw JR. What can the spinal cord teach us about learning and memory? Neuroscientist. Oct 2010;16(5):532–49. doi:16/5/532 [pii] 10.1177/1073858410368314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Phipps AM, Thompson AK. Altered cutaneous reflexes to non-noxious stimuli in the triceps surae of people with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol. Feb 1 2023;129(3):513–23. doi: 10.1152/jn.00266.2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Crone C, Nielsen J, Petersen N, Ballegaard M, Hultborn H. Disynaptic reciprocal inhibition of ankle extensors in spastic patients. Brain. Oct 1994;117:1161–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Stein RB, Thompson AK. Muscle reflexes in motion: how, what, and why? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. Oct 2006;34(4):145–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Crone C, Nielsen J. Methodological implications of the post activation depression of the soleus H-reflex in man. Experimental Brain Research. 1989;78(1):28–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Stein RB, Estabrooks KL, McGie S, Roth MJ, Jones KE. Quantifying the effects of voluntary contraction and inter-stimulus interval on the human soleus H-reflex. Exp Brain Res. Sep 2007;182(3):309–19. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0989-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zehr EP, Stein RB. Interaction of the Jendrassik maneuver with segmental presynaptic inhibition. Experimental Brain Research. Feb 1999;124(4):474–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Stein RB. Presynaptic inhibition in humans. Progress in Neurobiology. Dec 1995;47(6):533–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Capaday C, Stein RB. The effects of postsynaptic inhibition on the monosynaptic reflex of the cat at different levels of motoneuron pool activity. Experimental Brain Research. 1989;77(3):577–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Capaday C, Stein RB. A method for simulating the reflex output of a motoneuron pool. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. Oct 1987;21(2–4):91–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Frigon A, Carroll TJ, Jones KE, Zehr EP, Collins DF. Ankle position and voluntary contraction alter maximal M waves in soleus and tibialis anterior. Muscle Nerve. Jun 2007;35(6):756–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Dutt-Mazumder A, Segal RL, Thompson AK. Effect of Ankle Angles on the Soleus H-Reflex Excitability During Standing. Motor Control. Jan 2 2020;24(2):189–203. doi: 10.1123/mc.2018-0118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Angulo-Kinzler RM, Mynark RG, Koceja DM. Soleus H-reflex gain in elderly and young adults: modulation due to body position. Journal of Gerontology. Mar 1998;53(2):M120–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Koceja DM, Markus CA, Trimble MH. Postural modulation of the soleus H reflex in young and old subjects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Dec 1995;97(6):387–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Li Y, Gorassini MA, Bennett DJ. Role of persistent sodium and calcium currents in motoneuron firing and spasticity in chronic spinal rats. J Neurophysiol. Feb 2004;91(2):767–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Dietz V, Sinkjaer T. Spastic movement disorder: impaired reflex function and altered muscle mechanics. Lancet Neurol. Aug 2007;6(8):725–33. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70193-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Nielsen JB, Crone C, Hultborn H. The spinal pathophysiology of spasticity--from a basic science point of view. Acta Physiol (Oxf). Feb 2007;189(2):171–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sinkjaer T, Magnussen I. Passive, intrinsic and reflex-mediated stiffness in the ankle extensors of hemiparetic patients. Brain. Apr 1994;117 (Pt 2):355–63. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.2.355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Berger W, Horstmann GA, Dietz V. Spastic paresis: impaired spinal reflexes and intact motor programs. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. Apr 1988;51(4):568–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Nielsen JB, Christensen MS, Farmer SF, Lorentzen J. Spastic movement disorder: should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement? Exp Brain Res. Aug 2020;238(7–8):1627–1636. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05792-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Dietz V, Sinkjaer T. Secondary changes after damage of the central nervous system: significance of spastic muscle tone in rehabilitation. In: Dietz V, Ward N, eds. Oxford Textbook of Neurorehabilitation. Oxford University Press; 2015:chap 9. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Nakazawa K, Kawashima N, Akai M. Enhanced stretch reflex excitability of the soleus muscle in persons with incomplete rather than complete chronic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Jan 2006;87(1):71–5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Mirbagheri MM, Barbeau H, Ladouceur M, Kearney RE. Intrinsic and reflex stiffness in normal and spastic, spinal cord injured subjects. Experimental Brain Research. Dec 2001;141(4):446–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.McSweeney FK, Murphy ES. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Operant and Classical Conditioning. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2014:864. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Schultz W Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data. Physiol Rev. Jul 2015;95(3):853–951. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00023.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Wolpaw JR, Chen XY. Operant conditioning of reflexes. In: Squire LR, ed. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Oxford: Academic Press; 2009:225–233. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Thompson AK, Wolpaw JR. Operant conditioning of spinal reflexes: from basic science to clinical therapy. Front Integr Neurosci. 2014;8:25. doi:doi: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Zehr PE. Considerations for use of the Hoffmann reflex in exercise studies. Eur J Appl Physiol. Apr 2002;86(6):455–68. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0577-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Misiaszek JE. The H-reflex as a tool in neurophysiology: its limitations and uses in understanding nervous system function. Muscle Nerve. Aug 2003;28(2):144–60. doi: 10.1002/mus.10372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Thompson AK, Wolpaw JR. Restoring walking after spinal cord injury: operant conditioning of spinal reflexes can help. Neuroscientist. Apr 2015;21(2):203–15. doi: 10.1177/1073858414527541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Thompson AK, Wolpaw JR. The simplest motor skill: mechanisms and applications of reflex operant conditioning. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. Apr 2014;42(2):82–90. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Thompson AK, Wolpaw JR. Targeted neuroplasticity for rehabilitation. Prog Brain Res. 2015;218:157–72. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.02.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Carp JS, Wolpaw JR. Motoneuron plasticity underlying operantly conditioned decrease in primate H-reflex. Journal of Neurophysiology. Jul 1994;72(1):431–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Carp JS, Wolpaw JR. Motoneuron properties after operantly conditioned increase in primate H-reflex. Journal of Neurophysiology. Apr 1995;73(4):1365–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Feng-Chen KC, Wolpaw JR. Operant conditioning of H-reflex changes synaptic terminals on primate motoneurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Aug 20 1996;93(17):9206–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Carp JS, Chen XY, Sheikh H, Wolpaw JR. Motor unit properties after operant conditioning of rat H-reflex. Exp Brain Res. Oct 2001;140(3):382–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Carp JS, Chen XY, Sheikh H, Wolpaw JR. Operant conditioning of rat H-reflex affects motoneuron axonal conduction velocity. Exp Brain Res. Jan 2001;136(2):269–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Wolpaw JR, Chen XY. Operant conditioning of rat H-reflex: effects on mean latency and duration. Experimental Brain Research. Jan 2001;136(2):274–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Pillai S, Wang Y, Wolpaw JR, Chen XY. Effects of H-reflex up-conditioning on GABAergic terminals on rat soleus motoneurons. Eur J Neurosci. Aug 2008;28(4):668–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Wang Y, Pillai S, Wolpaw JR, Chen XY. H-reflex down-conditioning greatly increases the number of identifiable GABAergic interneurons in rat ventral horn. Neurosci Lett. Mar 13 2009;452(2):124–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Halter JA, Carp JS, Wolpaw JR. Operantly conditioned motoneuron plasticity: possible role of sodium channels. Journal of Neurophysiology. Feb 1995;73(2):867–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Wolpaw JR. The complex structure of a simple memory. Trends Neurosci. Dec 1997;20(12):588–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Wolpaw JR, Tennissen AM. Activity-dependent spinal cord plasticity in health and disease. Annual review of neuroscience. 2001;24:807–43. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wolpaw JR. The education and re-education of the spinal cord. Prog Brain Res. 2006;157:261–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Wang Y, Chen Y, Chen L, Herron BJ, Chen XY, Wolpaw JR. Motor learning changes the axon initial segment of the spinal motoneuron. J Physiol. May 2024;602(9):2107–2126. doi: 10.1113/JP283875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Chen XY, Chen Y, Wang Y, et al. Reflex conditioning: a new strategy for improving motor function after spinal cord injury. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Jun 2010;1198 Suppl 1:E12–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05565.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Thompson AK, Chen XY, Wolpaw JR. Acquisition of a simple motor skill: task-dependent adaptation plus long-term change in the human soleus H-reflex. J Neurosci. May 6 2009;29(18):5784–92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4326-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Thompson AK, Pomerantz FR, Wolpaw JR. Operant conditioning of a spinal reflex can improve locomotion after spinal cord injury in humans. J Neurosci. Feb 6 2013;33(6):2365–75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3968-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Neptune RR, Kautz SA, Zajac FE. Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. J Biomech. Nov 2001;34(11):1387–98. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00105-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Thompson AK, Wolpaw JR. H-reflex conditioning during locomotion in people with spinal cord injury. J Physiol. May 2021;599(9):2453–2469. doi: 10.1113/JP278173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Wolpaw JR, Thompson AK. Enhancing neurorehabilitation by targeting beneficial plasticity. Front Rehabil Sci. 2023;4:1198679. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1198679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Chen XY, Carp JS, Chen L, Wolpaw JR. Sensorimotor cortex ablation prevents H-reflex up-conditioning and causes a paradoxical response to down-conditioning in rats. J Neurophysiol. Jul 2006;96(1):119–27. doi: 10.1152/jn.01271.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Wolpaw JR, Chen XY. The cerebellum in maintenance of a motor skill: a hierarchy of brain and spinal cord plasticity underlies H-reflex conditioning. Learn Mem. Mar-Apr 2006;13(2):208–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Chen XY, Wolpaw JR. Ablation of cerebellar nuclei prevents H-reflex down-conditioning in rats. Learn Mem. May-Jun 2005;12(3):248–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Chen XY, Carp JS, Chen L, Wolpaw JR. Corticospinal tract transection prevents operantly conditioned H-reflex increase in rats. Exp Brain Res. May 2002;144(1):88–94. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1026-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Chen XY, Wolpaw JR. Probable corticospinal tract control of spinal cord plasticity in the rat. Journal of Neurophysiology. Feb 2002;87(2):645–52. doi: 10.1152/jn.00391.2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Wolpaw JR. Spinal cord plasticity in acquisition and maintenance of motor skills. Acta Physiol (Oxf). Feb 2007;189(2):155–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01656.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Manella KJ, Roach KE, Field-Fote EC. Operant conditioning to increase ankle control or decrease reflex excitability improves reflex modulation and walking function in chronic spinal cord injury. J Neurophysiol. Jun 2013;109(11):2666–79. doi: 10.1152/jn.01039.2011 jn.01039.2011 [pii] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Thompson AK, Gill CR, Feng W, Segal RL. Operant down-conditioning of the soleus H-reflex in people after stroke. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022;3:859724. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.859724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES