Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 Nov;50(460):882–887.

Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison.

R Grol 1, M Wensing 1, J Mainz 1, H P Jung 1, P Ferreira 1, H Hearnshaw 1, P Hjortdahl 1, F Olesen 1, S Reis 1, M Ribacke 1, J Szecsenyi 1; European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice Care (EUROPEP)1
PMCID: PMC1313852  PMID: 11141874

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients' evaluations can be used to improve health care and compare general practice in different health systems. AIM: To identify aspects of general practice that are generally evaluated positively by patients and to compare opinions of patients in different European countries on actual care provision. METHOD: An internationally-validated questionnaire was distributed to and completed by patients in 10 European countries. A stratified sample of 36 practices per country, with at least 1080 patients per country, was included. A set of 23 validated questions on evaluations of different aspects of care was used, as well as questions on age, sex, overall health status, and frequency of visiting the GP. RESULTS: The patient sample included 17,391 patients in 10 different countries; the average response rate was 79% (range = 67% to 89%). In general, patients visiting their general practitioner (GP) were very positive about the care provided. For most of the 23 selected aspects of care more than 80% viewed care as good or excellent; in particular, keeping records confidential, GP listening to patients, time during consultations, and quick services in case of urgent problems were evaluated positively. Patients were relatively negative about organisational aspects of care. The evaluations in different countries were largely similar, with some interesting differences; for instance, service and organisational aspects were evaluated more positively in fee-for-service health systems. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in Europe are positive about general practice but improvements in practice management in some countries are requested. More research is needed to study the complex field of differences in expectations and evaluations between countries with different health systems.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (51.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boerma W. G., van der Zee J., Fleming D. M. Service profiles of general practitioners in Europe. European GP Task Profile Study. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Aug;47(421):481–486. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Calnan M., Katsouyiannopoulos V., Ovcharov V. K., Prokhorskas R., Ramic H., Williams S. Major determinants of consumer satisfaction with primary care in different health systems. Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):468–478. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.4.468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cockburn J., Pit S. Prescribing behaviour in clinical practice: patients' expectations and doctors' perceptions of patients' expectations--a questionnaire study. BMJ. 1997 Aug 30;315(7107):520–523. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7107.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grol R., Wensing M., Mainz J., Ferreira P., Hearnshaw H., Hjortdahl P., Olesen F., Ribacke M., Spenser T., Szécsényi J. Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP). Fam Pract. 1999 Feb;16(1):4–11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.1.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guillemin F., Bombardier C., Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417–1432. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jung H. P., Wensing M., Grol R. What makes a good general practitioner: do patients and doctors have different views? Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Dec;47(425):805–809. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Richards T. Partnership with patients. BMJ. 1998 Jan 10;316(7125):85–86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Richards T. Patients' priorities. BMJ. 1999 Jan 30;318(7179):277–277. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7179.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith R. The NHS: possibilities for the endgame. Think more about reducing expectations. BMJ. 1999 Jan 23;318(7178):209–210. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7178.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Starfield B. Is primary care essential? Lancet. 1994 Oct 22;344(8930):1129–1133. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90634-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wensing M., Jung H. P., Mainz J., Olesen F., Grol R. A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(10):1573–1588. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00222-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wensing M., Mainz J., Ferreira P., Hearnshaw H., Hjortdahl P., Olesen F., Reis S., Ribacke M., Szécsényi J., Grol R. General practice care and patients' priorities in Europe: an international comparison. Health Policy. 1998 Sep;45(3):175–186. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00040-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. van den Hombergh P., Grol R., van den Hoogen H. J., van den Bosch W. J. Assessment of management in general practice: validation of a practice visit method. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Nov;48(436):1743–1750. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES