Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2000 Dec;50(461):995–1000.

Diagnosis and general practice.

N Summerton 1
PMCID: PMC1313890  PMID: 11224975

Abstract

This discussion paper presents the case for a rigorous diagnostic research agenda within primary care. In view of unique aspects of primary care medicine and the relatively unselected nature of the populations encountered by general practitioners, it is clear that diagnostic research undertaken in other settings may be inapplicable. Most diagnostic studies adopt designs that seek to compare items, or clusters of items, of clinical information against a gold standard. In order to enhance the feasibility and rigour of such research within primary care, suggestions are made about priorities and specific key methodological issues. It is essential that the information generated by primary care diagnostic research should be reliable, valid, useful, and useable within general practice. The ultimate objective must be the identification of specific items, or small clusters of items, of clinical information of high discriminant ability among the groups of patients encountered in general practice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (50.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barsky A. J., Cleary P. D., Barnett M. C., Christiansen C. L., Ruskin J. N. The accuracy of symptom reporting by patients complaining of palpitations. Am J Med. 1994 Sep;97(3):214–221. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90003-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Begg C. B. Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 1987 Jun;6(4):411–423. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergman A. B., Stamm S. J. The morbidity of cardiac nondisease in schoolchildren. N Engl J Med. 1967 May 4;276(18):1008–1013. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196705042761804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bluestein D., Levin J. S. Symptom reporting in wanted and unwanted pregnancies. Fam Med. 1991 May-Jun;23(4):271–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buntinx F., Wauters H. The diagnostic value of macroscopic haematuria in diagnosing urological cancers: a meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 1997 Feb;14(1):63–68. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CROWNE D. P., MARLOWE D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J Consult Psychol. 1960 Aug;24:349–354. doi: 10.1037/h0047358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deeks J. J. Using evaluations of diagnostic tests: understanding their limitations and making the most of available evidence. Ann Oncol. 1999 Jul;10(7):761–768. doi: 10.1023/a:1008359805260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fijten G. H., Starmans R., Muris J. W., Schouten H. J., Blijham G. H., Knottnerus J. A. Predictive value of signs and symptoms for colorectal cancer in patients with rectal bleeding in general practice. Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;12(3):279–286. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.3.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Govaert T. M., Dinant G. J., Aretz K., Knottnerus J. A. The predictive value of influenza symptomatology in elderly people. Fam Pract. 1998 Feb;15(1):16–22. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.1.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Howie J. G. Diagnosis--the Achilles heel? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1972 May;22(118):310–315. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hui S. L., Zhou X. H. Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards. Stat Methods Med Res. 1998 Dec;7(4):354–370. doi: 10.1177/096228029800700404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Knottnerus J. A. Diagnostic prediction rules: principles, requirements and pitfalls. Prim Care. 1995 Jun;22(2):341–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Knottnerus J. A., Leffers P. The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;45(10):1143–1154. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90155-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Knottnerus J. A. The effects of disease verification and referral on the relationship between symptoms and diseases. Med Decis Making. 1987 Jul-Sep;7(3):139–148. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8700700304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Laupacis A., Sekar N., Stiell I. G. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA. 1997 Feb 12;277(6):488–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liedekerken B. M., Hoogendam A., Buntinx F., van der Weyden T., de Vet H. C. Prolonged cough and lung cancer: the need for more general practice research to inform clinical decision-making. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Aug;47(421):505–505. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lindbaek M., Hjortdahl P., Johnsen U. L. Use of symptoms, signs, and blood tests to diagnose acute sinus infections in primary care: comparison with computed tomography. Fam Med. 1996 Mar;28(3):183–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Love R. R., Evans A. M., Josten D. M. The accuracy of patient reports of a family history of cancer. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(4):289–293. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90074-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Melbye H., Straume B., Aasebø U., Dale K. Diagnosis of pneumonia in adults in general practice. Relative importance of typical symptoms and abnormal chest signs evaluated against a radiographic reference standard. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992 Sep;10(3):226–233. doi: 10.3109/02813439209014066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Muris J. W., Starmans R., Fijten G. H., Crebolder H. F., Schouten H. J., Knottnerus J. A. Non-acute abdominal complaints in general practice: diagnostic value of signs and symptoms. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jun;45(395):313–316. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nylenna M. Diagnosing cancer in general practice: from suspicion to certainty. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Aug 2;293(6542):314–317. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6542.314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Olesen F. The pattern of attendance at general practice in the years before the diagnosis of cervical cancer. A case control study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1988 Nov;6(4):199–203. doi: 10.3109/02813438809009317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Owen P. Clinical practice and medical research: bridging the divide between the two cultures. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Oct;45(399):557–560. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ransohoff D. F., Feinstein A. R. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 26;299(17):926–930. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810262991705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Richards M. A., Westcombe A. M., Love S. B., Littlejohns P., Ramirez A. J. Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet. 1999 Apr 3;353(9159):1119–1126. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02143-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rosenstock I. M. Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3 Suppl):94–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sackett D. L. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(1-2):51–63. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Salander P., Bergenheim A. T., Hamberg K., Henriksson R. Pathways from symptoms to medical care: a descriptive study of symptom development and obstacles to early diagnosis in brain tumour patients. Fam Pract. 1999 Apr;16(2):143–148. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.2.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schlesselman J. J. "Proof" of cause and effect in epidemiologic studies: criteria for judgment. Prev Med. 1987 Mar;16(2):195–210. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90083-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sox H. C., Jr, Hickam D. H., Marton K. I., Moses L., Skeff K. M., Sox C. H., Neal E. A. Using the patient's history to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease: a comparison of primary care and referral practices. Am J Med. 1990 Jul;89(1):7–14. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90090-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Spiegelhalter D. J. Statistical methodology for evaluating gastrointestinal symptoms. Clin Gastroenterol. 1985 Jul;14(3):489–515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Spiteri M. A., Cook D. G., Clarke S. W. Reliability of eliciting physical signs in examination of the chest. Lancet. 1988 Apr 16;1(8590):873–875. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91613-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Stoffers H. E., Kester A. D., Kaiser V., Rinkens P. E., Knottnerus J. A. Diagnostic value of signs and symptoms associated with peripheral arterial occlusive disease seen in general practice: a multivariable approach. Med Decis Making. 1997 Jan-Mar;17(1):61–70. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9701700107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Theis B., Boyd N., Lockwood G., Tritchler D. Accuracy of family cancer history in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1994 Jul;3(4):321–327. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199407000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vecchio T. J. Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations. N Engl J Med. 1966 May 26;274(21):1171–1173. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196605262742104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. de Bock G. H., Houwing-Duistermaat J. J., Springer M. P., Kievit J., van Houwelingen J. C. Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests in acute maxillary sinusitis determined by maximum likelihood in the absence of an external standard. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Dec;47(12):1343–1352. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES