Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2001 Apr;51(465):291–294.

Individualised multifactorial lifestyle intervention trial for high-risk cardiovascular patients in primary care.

E Ketola 1, M Mäkelä 1, M Klockars 1
PMCID: PMC1313979  PMID: 11458482

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The multiprofessional teams in Finnish health centres are well placed to carry out interventions aimed at the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of an individually tailored multifactorial lifestyle intervention in primary care for individuals at high risk for cardiovascular disease. DESIGN OF STUDY: A randomised controlled trial was conducted over 24 months with interim assessments at six and 12 months. SETTING: A health centre in Finland with a patient population of 11,000. METHOD: One hundred and fifty adults aged 18 to 65 years old with existing cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors were randomised to active multiprofessional risk factor intervention or to standard care. The main outcome measure was a change in cardiovascular risk-factor score. Secondary outcomes were changes in blood pressure, weight, body-mass index, serum cholesterol, blood glucose, smoking cessation, and exercise habits. RESULTS: The cardiovascular risk score decreased by 28% in the intervention group (23% in the control group), body weight decreased by 3.7% (2%) and total cholesterol decreased by 10.8% (6.5%), while time engaged in exercise increased by 39% (43%). Differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular risk levels of high-risk individuals decreased in both intervention and control groups. Primary care prevention should be targeted to high-risk persons. Long-term follow-up studies are needed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agewall S., Wikstrand J., Samuelsson O., Persson B., Andersson O. K., Fagerberg B. The efficacy of multiple risk factor intervention in treated hypertensive men during long-term follow up. Risk Factor Intervention Study Group. J Intern Med. 1994 Dec;236(6):651–659. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb00858.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blair S. N., Applegate W. B., Dunn A. L., Ettinger W. H., Haskell W. L., King A. C., Morgan T. M., Shih J. A., Simons-Morton D. G. Activity Counseling Trial (ACT): rationale, design, and methods. Activity Counseling Trial Research Group. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Jul;30(7):1097–1106. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199807000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell N. C., Thain J., Deans H. G., Ritchie L. D., Rawles J. M. Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: baseline survey of provision in general practice. BMJ. 1998 May 9;316(7142):1430–1434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7142.1430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cupples M. E., McKnight A. Randomised controlled trial of health promotion in general practice for patients at high cardiovascular risk. BMJ. 1994 Oct 15;309(6960):993–996. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6960.993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hämäläinen H., Luurila O. J., Kallio V., Knuts L. R., Arstila M., Hakkila J. Long-term reduction in sudden deaths after a multifactorial intervention programme in patients with myocardial infarction: 10-year results of a controlled investigation. Eur Heart J. 1989 Jan;10(1):55–62. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jackson R. Updated New Zealand cardiovascular disease risk-benefit prediction guide. BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):709–710. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7236.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kallio V., Hämäläinen H., Hakkila J., Luurila O. J. Reduction in sudden deaths by a multifactorial intervention programme after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1979 Nov 24;2(8152):1091–1094. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)92502-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ketola E., Klockars M. Computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) in primary care. Fam Pract. 1999 Apr;16(2):179–183. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.2.179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ketola E., Sipilä R., Mäkelä M. Effectiveness of individual lifestyle interventions in reducing cardiovascular disease and risk factors. Ann Med. 2000 May;32(4):239–251. doi: 10.3109/07853890009011767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Knutsen S. F., Knutsen R. The Tromsø Survey: the Family Intervention study--the effect of intervention on some coronary risk factors and dietary habits, a 6-year follow-up. Prev Med. 1991 Mar;20(2):197–212. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(91)90020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Meland E., Laerum E., Ulvik R. J. Effectiveness of two preventive interventions for coronary heart disease in primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1997 Mar;15(1):57–64. doi: 10.3109/02813439709043432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miettinen T. A., Huttunen J. K., Naukkarinen V., Strandberg T., Mattila S., Kumlin T., Sarna S. Multifactorial primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in middle-aged men. Risk factor changes, incidence, and mortality. JAMA. 1985 Oct 18;254(15):2097–2102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pyke S. D., Wood D. A., Kinmonth A. L., Thompson S. G. Change in coronary risk and coronary risk factor levels in couples following lifestyle intervention. The British Family Heart Study. Arch Fam Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;6(4):354–360. doi: 10.1001/archfami.6.4.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pérez-Stable E. J., Coates T. J., Baron R. B., Biró B. S., Hauck W. W., McHenry K. S., Gardiner P. S., Feigal D. Comparison of a lifestyle modification program with propranolol use in the management of diastolic hypertension. J Gen Intern Med. 1995 Aug;10(8):419–428. doi: 10.1007/BF02599912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stamler R., Stamler J., Gosch F. C., Civinelli J., Fishman J., McKeever P., McDonald A., Dyer A. R. Primary prevention of hypertension by nutritional-hygienic means. Final report of a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA. 1989 Oct 6;262(13):1801–1807. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stevens V. J., Corrigan S. A., Obarzanek E., Bernauer E., Cook N. R., Hebert P., Mattfeldt-Beman M., Oberman A., Sugars C., Dalcin A. T. Weight loss intervention in phase 1 of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention. The TOHP Collaborative Research Group. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Apr 12;153(7):849–858. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wallis E. J., Ramsay L. E., Ul Haq I., Ghahramani P., Jackson P. R., Rowland-Yeo K., Yeo W. W. Coronary and cardiovascular risk estimation for primary prevention: validation of a new Sheffield table in the 1995 Scottish health survey population. BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):671–676. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7236.671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wood P. D., Stefanick M. L., Dreon D. M., Frey-Hewitt B., Garay S. C., Williams P. T., Superko H. R., Fortmann S. P., Albers J. J., Vranizan K. M. Changes in plasma lipids and lipoproteins in overweight men during weight loss through dieting as compared with exercise. N Engl J Med. 1988 Nov 3;319(18):1173–1179. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198811033191801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES