Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic strategies to counter acquired hearing impairment may involve routine audiometric screening of asymptomatic working-age adults attending general practice for regular health checks. AIM: To evaluate the effect of adult hearing screening on subsequent noise exposure and hearing. DESIGN OF STUDY: A randomised controlled population-based study of health checks and health discussions in general practice. SETTING: The project was initiated in the district of Ebeltoft, Aarhus county, Denmark. METHOD: Intervention group participants' hearing thresholds were determined audiometrically at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz in each ear. Participants were advised to get their ears checked if the average hearing loss exceeded 20 dB hearing level (dBHL) in either ear. Noise avoidance was emphasised when thresholds exceeded 25 dBHL bilaterally at 4 kHz. Follow-up included questionnaires and audiometry. RESULTS: Hearing loss was observed among 18.9% of the study sample at baseline. At the five-year follow-up we recorded no significant differences between the control and the intervention groups regarding subjective or objective hearing, or exposure to occupational noise. However, there was a tendency towards reduction in exposure to leisure noise among intervention participants (P = 0.045). Approximately 20% reported hearing problems; 16.5% reported tinnitus-related complaints; 0.8% used hearing aids; 35.0% reported frequent noise exposure; and occluding wax was suspected in 2.1%. CONCLUSION: Preventive health checks with audiometry did not significantly affect hearing, but leisure noise exposure tended to become less frequent. The poor effect may be ascribed to inadequate audiological counselling or a higher priority to other advice, e.g. on cardiovascular risk or lifestyle.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (75.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alexiou N. G., Gladfelter T., Saraceno C. Noise-induced hearing loss: a preventable occupational disease. J Fam Pract. 1986 May;22(5):407–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Axelsson A., Clark W. Hearing conservation programs for nonserved occupations and populations. Occup Med. 1995 Jul-Aug;10(3):657–662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cutler J. L., Ramcharan S., Feldman R., Siegelaub A. B., Campbell B., Friedman G. D., Dales L. G., Collen M. F. Multiphasic checkup evaluation study. 1. Methods and population. Prev Med. 1973 Jun;2(2):197–206. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(73)90064-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis A. C., Ostri B., Parving A. Longitudinal study of hearing. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990;476:12–22. doi: 10.3109/00016489109127251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis A. C. The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Dec;18(4):911–917. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.4.911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis A., Stephens D., Rayment A., Thomas K. Hearing impairments in middle age: the acceptability, benefit and cost of detection (ABCD). Br J Audiol. 1992 Feb;26(1):1–14. doi: 10.3109/03005369209077866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dobie R. A. Noise-induced hearing loss: the family physician's role. Am Fam Physician. 1987 Dec;36(6):141–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guidotti T. L., Novak R. E. Hearing conservation and occupational exposure to noise. Am Fam Physician. 1983 Oct;28(4):181–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hinchcliffe R. WHO and its role in the prevention of deafness and hearing impairment. J Laryngol Otol. 1997 Aug;111(8):699–701. doi: 10.1017/s002221510013840x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jerlvall L., Arlinger S. A comparison of 2-dB and 5-dB step size in pure-tone audiometry. Scand Audiol. 1986;15(1):51–56. doi: 10.3109/01050398609045954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karlsmose B., Lauritzen T., Parving A. Prevalence of hearing impairment and subjective hearing problems in a rural Danish population aged 31-50 years. Br J Audiol. 1999 Dec;33(6):395–402. doi: 10.3109/03005364000000107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karlsmose B., Pedersen H. B., Lauritzen T., Parving A. Audiometry in general practice: validation of a pragmatic pure-tone audiometry method. Scand Audiol. 1998;27(3):137–142. doi: 10.1080/010503998422638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lauritzen T., Leboeuf-Yde C., Lunde I. M., Nielsen K. D. Ebeltoft project: baseline data from a five-year randomized, controlled, prospective health promotion study in a Danish population. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Oct;45(399):542–547. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mulrow C. D., Aguilar C., Endicott J. E., Tuley M. R., Velez R., Charlip W. S., Rhodes M. C., Hill J. A., DeNino L. A. Quality-of-life changes and hearing impairment. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Aug 1;113(3):188–194. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-3-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearson J. D., Morrell C. H., Gordon-Salant S., Brant L. J., Metter E. J., Klein L. L., Fozard J. L. Gender differences in a longitudinal study of age-associated hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Feb;97(2):1196–1205. doi: 10.1121/1.412231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rösler G. Progression of hearing loss caused by occupational noise. Scand Audiol. 1994;23(1):13–37. doi: 10.3109/01050399409047483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trevelyan H. Study of evaluate the effects of multiphasic screening within general practice in Britain: design and method. Prev Med. 1973 Jun;2(2):278–294. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(73)90071-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson P. S., Fleming D. M., Donaldson I. Prevalence of hearing loss among people aged 65 years and over: screening and hearing aid provision. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Oct;43(375):406–409. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yassi A., Pollock N., Tran N., Cheang M. Risks to hearing from a rock concert. Can Fam Physician. 1993 May;39:1045–1050. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]