Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mild depression and anxiety are common problems in general practice. They can be managed by the general practitioner (GP) alone or referred. Previous quantitative studies have shown a large variation between GPs in terms of referral behaviour. The reasons for this variation are not fully understood. AIM: To describe and analyse GP's decision-making processes when considering who should be treating patients with minor mental illness, using a qualitative method. DESIGN OF STUDY: A qualitative interview study. SETTING: Twenty-three GPs in east London and Essex. METHOD: Subjects were chosen using a purposive sampling strategy and participated in one-to-one semi-structured interviews. A grounded theory approach was used for analysis. RESULTS: Two distinct referral strategies were identified--the 'containment' and the 'conduit' approaches. In addition, referrals were found to be of two types--proactive 'referrals to' and reactive 'referrals away'; for minor mental illness the 'referrals away' were found to predominate. Emotive as well as rational responses informed GP decision making on referral. CONCLUSIONS: Explanations of the variation in referral rates need to recognise the emotive responses of individual GPs to minor mental illness. The contribution of guidelines, which assume consistently rational responses to illness, may therefore be limited.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (68.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Creed F., Gowrisunkur J., Russell E., Kincey J. General practitioner referral rates to district psychiatry and psychology services. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Nov;40(340):450–454. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoddinott P., Pill R. A review of recently published qualitative research in general practice. More methodological questions than answers? Fam Pract. 1997 Aug;14(4):313–319. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.4.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- King N., Bailey J., Newton P. Analysing general practitioners' referral decisions. I. Developing an analytical framework. Fam Pract. 1994 Mar;11(1):3–8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mays N., Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109–112. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkin D., Smith A. G. Variation in general practitioners' referral rates to consultants. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Aug;37(301):350–353. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]