Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2001 Oct;51(471):822–827.

Patient and practitioner characteristics predict brief alcohol intervention in primary care.

E F Kaner 1, N Heather 1, J Brodie 1, C A Lock 1, B R McAvoy 1
PMCID: PMC1314128  PMID: 11677706

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of an evidence-based health care intervention depends on it being delivered consistently to appropriate patients. Brief alcohol intervention is known to be effective at reducing excessive drinking and its concomitant health and social problems. However, a recent implementation trial reported partial delivery of brief alcohol intervention by general practitioners (GPs) which is likely to have reduced its impact. AIM: To investigate patient-practitioner characteristics influencing brief alcohol intervention in primary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Cross-sectional analysis of 12,814 completed Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) screening questionnaires. SETTING: Eighty-four GPs who had implemented a brief alcohol intervention programme in a previous trial based in the Northeast of England. METHOD: GPs were requested to screen all adults (aged over 16 years) presenting to their surgery and follow a structured protocol to give a brief intervention (five minutes of advice plus an information booklet) to all 'risk' drinkers. Anonymized carbon copies of the screening questionnaire were collected from all practices after a three-month implementation period. RESULTS: Although AUDIT identified 4080 'risk' drinkers, only 2043 (50%) received brief intervention. Risk drinkers that were most likely to receive brief intervention were males (58%), unemployed (61%), and technically-trained patients (55%). Risk drinkers that were least likely to receive brief intervention were females (44%), students (38%), and university educated patients (46%). Logistic regression modelling showed that patients' risk status was the most influential predictor of brief intervention. Also, GPs' experience of relevant training and longer average practice consultations predicted brief intervention. However, personal characteristics relating to patients and GPs also predicted brief intervention in routine practice. CONCLUSION: Interpersonal factors relating to patients and practitioners contributed to the selective provision of brief alcohol intervention in primary care. Ways should be found to remedy this situation or the impact of this evidence-based intervention may be reduced when implemented in routine practice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson P., Cremona A., Paton A., Turner C., Wallace P. The risk of alcohol. Addiction. 1993 Nov;88(11):1493–1508. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb03135.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Austoker J. Reducing alcohol intake. BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1549–1552. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barry K. L., Fleming M. F. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and the SMAST-13: predictive validity in a rural primary care sample. Alcohol Alcohol. 1993 Jan;28(1):33–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradley K. A., Boyd-Wickizer J., Powell S. H., Burman M. L. Alcohol screening questionnaires in women: a critical review. JAMA. 1998 Jul 8;280(2):166–171. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.2.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Calnan M., Williams S. Coronary heart disease prevention: the role of the general practitioner. Fam Pract. 1993 Jun;10(2):137–151. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coulter A. Lifestyles and social class: implications for primary care. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Dec;37(305):533–536. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards A. G., Rollnick S. Outcome studies of brief alcohol intervention in general practice: the problem of lost subjects. Addiction. 1997 Dec;92(12):1699–1704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Edwards G., Arif A., Hadgson R. Nomenclature and classification of drug- and alcohol-related problems: a WHO Memorandum. Bull World Health Organ. 1981;59(2):225–242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fleming M. F., Barry K. L., Manwell L. B., Johnson K., London R. Brief physician advice for problem alcohol drinkers. A randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care practices. JAMA. 1997 Apr 2;277(13):1039–1045. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Israel Y., Hollander O., Sanchez-Craig M., Booker S., Miller V., Gingrich R., Rankin J. G. Screening for problem drinking and counseling by the primary care physician-nurse team. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1996 Nov;20(8):1443–1450. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1996.tb01147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaner E. F., Heather N., McAvoy B. R., Lock C. A., Gilvarry E. Intervention for excessive alcohol consumption in primary health care: attitudes and practices of English general practitioners. Alcohol Alcohol. 1999 Jul-Aug;34(4):559–566. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/34.4.559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaner E. F., Lock C. A., McAvoy B. R., Heather N., Gilvarry E. A RCT of three training and support strategies to encourage implementation of screening and brief alcohol intervention by general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):699–703. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lock C. A., Kaner E. F., Heather N., McAvoy B. R., Gilvarry E. A randomized trial of three marketing strategies to disseminate a screening and brief alcohol intervention programme to general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):695–698. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McDonnell R., Maynard A. The costs of alcohol misuse. Br J Addict. 1985 Mar;80(1):27–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1985.tb05286.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McIntosh M. C., Leigh G., Baldwin N. J., Marmulak J. Reducing alcohol consumption. Comparing three brief methods in family practice. Can Fam Physician. 1997 Nov;43:1959-62, 1965-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Morton J. L., Jones T. V., Manganaro M. A. Performance of alcoholism screening questionnaires in elderly veterans. Am J Med. 1996 Aug;101(2):153–159. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(96)80069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ockene J. K., Adams A., Hurley T. G., Wheeler E. V., Hebert J. R. Brief physician- and nurse practitioner-delivered counseling for high-risk drinkers: does it work? Arch Intern Med. 1999 Oct 11;159(18):2198–2205. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.18.2198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Piccinelli M., Tessari E., Bortolomasi M., Piasere O., Semenzin M., Garzotto N., Tansella M. Efficacy of the alcohol use disorders identification test as a screening tool for hazardous alcohol intake and related disorders in primary care: a validity study. BMJ. 1997 Feb 8;314(7078):420–424. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7078.420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Radecki S. E., Mendenhall R. C. Patient counselling by primary care physicians: results of a nationwide survey. Patient Educ Couns. 1986 Jun;8(2):165–177. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(86)90087-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Raine R., Lewis L., Sensky T., Hutchings A., Hirsch S., Black N. Patient determinants of mental health interventions in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Aug;50(457):620–625. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Richmond R., Heather N., Wodak A., Kehoe L., Webster I. Controlled evaluation of a general practice-based brief intervention for excessive drinking. Addiction. 1995 Jan;90(1):119–132. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.90111915.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Saunders J. B., Aasland O. G., Babor T. F., de la Fuente J. R., Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schmidt A., Barry K. L., Fleming M. F. Detection of problem drinkers: the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). South Med J. 1995 Jan;88(1):52–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stott N. C., Pill R. M. 'Advise yes, dictate no'. Patients' views on health promotion in the consultation. Fam Pract. 1990 Jun;7(2):125–131. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.2.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thom B., Téllez C. A difficult business: detecting and managing alcohol problems in general practice. Br J Addict. 1986 Jun;81(3):405–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1986.tb00347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Volk R. J., Steinbauer J. R., Cantor S. B., Holzer C. E., 3rd The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a screen for at-risk drinking in primary care patients of different racial/ethnic backgrounds. Addiction. 1997 Feb;92(2):197–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wallace P. G., Brennan P. J., Haines A. P. Are general practitioners doing enough to promote healthy lifestyle? Findings of the Medical Research Council's general practice research framework study on lifestyle and health. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Apr 11;294(6577):940–942. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6577.940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wallace P. G., Haines A. P. General practitioner and health promotion: what patients think. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Sep 1;289(6444):534–536. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6444.534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wallace P. Patients with alcohol problems--simple questioning is the key to effective identification and management. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Mar;51(464):172–173. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wiggers J. H., Sanson-Fisher R. Duration of general practice consultations: association with patient occupational and educational status. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Apr;44(7):925–934. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00175-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wiggers J. H., Sanson-Fisher R. Practitioner provision of preventive care in general practice consultations: association with patient educational and occupational status. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jan;44(2):137–146. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00059-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES