Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) comprises a complex of symptoms in the hand, including pain and paresthesia and weakness of hand muscles thought to result from compression of the median nerve. Many clinicians either refer patients for electrodiagnostic studies to aid diagnosis or conduct electrodiagnostic studies, which may be useful as an aid to decisions on treatment. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence base for the use of electrodiagnostic tests in the diagnosis and management of carpal tunnel syndrome. A systematic search was undertaken for studies that included patients with clinical diagnosis of CT5 who were undergoing electrodiagnostic tests and surgery together with reported outcomes of surgery. A published systematic review found that electrodiagnosis was not a useful diagnostic test in patients with clinical signs of CTS. Seven primary studies of prognosis reporting electrodiagnosis and surgery outcomes were found, however, one of them was subsequently retracted. The remaining six were retrospective case senes of poor quality. Four of these studies reported outcomes of surgery in patients with clinically identified CTS, comparing both positive or negative electrodiagnostic results. No study found any statistical difference in surgical outcome between those who were electrodiagnostic test positive and those who were negative. Despite the limited quality of the evidence, in cases of clear-cut clinical CTS, electrodiagnosis is not warranted either as a diagnostic test, where clinical symptoms are well defined, or as a predictive indicator of surgical outcome. It may still be useful in cases where the clinical diagnosis is not clear.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (60.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alderson P., Roberts I. Should journals publish systematic reviews that find no evidence to guide practice? Examples from injury research. BMJ. 2000 Feb 5;320(7231):376–377. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7231.376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Braun R. M., Jackson W. J. Electrical studies as a prognostic factor in the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1994 Nov;19(6):893–900. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90086-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell W. W. Diagnosis and management of common compression and entrapment neuropathies. Neurol Clin. 1997 Aug;15(3):549–567. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8619(05)70333-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi S. J., Ahn D. S. Correlation of clinical history and electrodiagnostic abnormalities with outcome after surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Dec;102(7):2374–2380. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199812000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Concannon M. J., Gainor B., Petroski G. F., Puckett C. L. The predictive value of electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Nov;100(6):1452–1458. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199711000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dammers J. W., Veering M. M., Vermeulen M. Injection with methylprednisolone proximal to the carpal tunnel: randomised double blind trial. BMJ. 1999 Oct 2;319(7214):884–886. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7214.884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grundberg A. B. Carpal tunnel decompression in spite of normal electromyography. J Hand Surg Am. 1983 May;8(3):348–349. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(83)80179-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hankin F. M., Louis D. S. Retraction. Orthopedics. 1988 Apr;11(4):532–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harrington J. M., Carter J. T., Birrell L., Gompertz D. Surveillance case definitions for work related upper limb pain syndromes. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Apr;55(4):264–271. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.4.264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Higgs P. E., Edwards D. F., Martin D. S., Weeks P. M. Relation of preoperative nerve-conduction values to outcome in workers with surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Mar;22(2):216–221. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(97)80154-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes G., Fitzharris P. Managing acute anaphylaxis. New guidelines emphasise importance of intramuscular adrenaline. BMJ. 1999 Jul 3;319(7201):1–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7201.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jablecki C. K., Andary M. T., So Y. T., Wilkins D. E., Williams F. H. Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. AAEM Quality Assurance Committee. Muscle Nerve. 1993 Dec;16(12):1392–1414. doi: 10.1002/mus.880161220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanaan N., Sawaya R. A. Carpal tunnel syndrome: modern diagnostic and management techniques. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Apr;51(465):311–314. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Louis D. S., Hankin F. M. Symptomatic relief following carpal tunnel decompression with normal electroneuromyographic studies. Orthopedics. 1987 Mar;10(3):434–436. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19870301-06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rempel D., Evanoff B., Amadio P. C., de Krom M., Franklin G., Franzblau A., Gray R., Gerr F., Hagberg M., Hales T. Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health. 1998 Oct;88(10):1447–1451. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]