Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2002 Nov;52(484):889–893.

Measuring consultation skills in primary care in England: evaluation and development of content of the MAAS scale.

J Robinson 1, Tom Walley 1, M Pearson 1, D Taylor 1, Stuart Barton 1
PMCID: PMC1314439  PMID: 12434956

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Consultation skills are essential for general practice. Tools for measuring consultation skills in everyday practice are not well developed AIM: To examine and develop the content validity of the MAAS History-taking and Advice Checklist GP (MAAS-GP) tool which is used in The Netherlands for testing consultation skills, with simulated patients in United Kingdom general practice from the perspectives of both general practitioners and patients. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative research using semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Alternate patients attending seven general practices in the north west of England. METHOD: Thematic analysis of the contents of patient and GP interviews, and of focus groups, mapping key themes to the MAAS-GP. RESULTS: There was strong agreement between patients and GPs on issues mapping to 46 out of 68 items of the MAAS-GP. Eight further MAAS-GP items were linked to issues only raised by patients and four to issues raised only by GPs. The remaining 10 items could not be related to issues raised by either. All of the issues raised by GPs could be mapped but 27 patient items could not. These were included in a revised checklist, the Liverpool MAAS (LIV-MAAS). CONCLUSION: the revised tool seems to have content validity in measuring consultation skills. Measurement of its relability is now required.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (71.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beckman H. B., Frankel R. M. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Nov;101(5):692–696. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-5-692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chesson R. Low profile, high impact: the role of the sociologist in quality in health care. Qual Health Care. 1996 Dec;5(4):230–234. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.4.230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cox J., Mulholland H. An instrument for assessment of videotapes of general practitioners' performance. BMJ. 1993 Apr 17;306(6884):1043–1046. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6884.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Difford F., Hughes R. C. Experience of using rating scales for the assessment of vocational trainees in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Sep;41(350):360–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fraser R. C., McKinley R. K., Mulholland H. Consultation competence in general practice: establishing the face validity of prioritized criteria in the Leicester assessment package. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Mar;44(380):109–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fraser R. C., McKinley R. K., Mulholland H. Consultation competence in general practice: testing the reliability of the Leicester assessment package. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jul;44(384):293–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grol R. Research and development in quality of care: establishing the research agenda. Qual Health Care. 1996 Dec;5(4):235–242. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.4.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haas Marion. The relationship between expectations and satisfaction: a qualitative study of patients' experiences of surgery for gynaecological cancer. Health Expect. 1999 Mar;2(1):51–60. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00037.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Holden J., Wearne J. Membership by Assessment of Performance: developing a method for assessing established general practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Mar;50(452):231–235. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jung H. P., Van Horne F., Wensing M., Hearnshaw H., Grol R. Which aspects of general practitioners' behaviour determine patients' evaluations of care? Soc Sci Med. 1998 Oct;47(8):1077–1087. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00138-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kurtz S. M., Silverman J. D. The Calgary-Cambridge Referenced Observation Guides: an aid to defining the curriculum and organizing the teaching in communication training programmes. Med Educ. 1996 Mar;30(2):83–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00724.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Like R., Zyzanski S. J. Patient satisfaction with the clinical encounter: social psychological determinants. Soc Sci Med. 1987;24(4):351–357. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90153-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lipkin M., Jr, Quill T. E., Napodano R. J. The medical interview: a core curriculum for residencies in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Feb;100(2):277–284. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-100-2-277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McKinley R. K., Fraser R. C., Baker R. Model for directly assessing and improving clinical competence and performance in revalidation of clinicians. BMJ. 2001 Mar 24;322(7288):712–715. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7288.712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McKinley R. K., Fraser R. C., van der Vleuten C., Hastings A. M. Formative assessment of the consultation performance of medical students in the setting of general practice using a modified version of the leicester assessment package. Med Educ. 2000 Jul;34(7):573–579. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00490.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ram P., Grol R., Rethans J. J., Schouten B., van der Vleuten C., Kester A. Assessment of general practitioners by video observation of communicative and medical performance in daily practice: issues of validity, reliability and feasibility. Med Educ. 1999 Jun;33(6):447–454. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Simpson M., Buckman R., Stewart M., Maguire P., Lipkin M., Novack D., Till J. Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement. BMJ. 1991 Nov 30;303(6814):1385–1387. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6814.1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tate P., Foulkes J., Neighbour R., Campion P., Field S. Assessing physicians' interpersonal skills via videotaped encounters: a new approach for the Royal College of General Practitioners Membership examination. J Health Commun. 1999 Apr-Jun;4(2):143–152. doi: 10.1080/108107399127011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Whitehouse C. R. The teaching of communication skills in United Kingdom medical schools. Med Educ. 1991 Jul;25(4):311–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00072.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Williams S., Weinman J., Dale J. Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction: a review. Fam Pract. 1998 Oct;15(5):480–492. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.5.480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES