Abstract
BACKGROUND: Local Health Care Cooperatives (LHCCs) and Primary Care Groups (PCGs) reflect the continuing importance of a shift towards a 'primary care-led NHS' as a health policy goal in England and Scotland. Yet many commentators have concluded that, to date, the extent of the shift has been limited. To assess the ways in which LHCCs and PCGs might develop in the future, it is necessary to understand the progress made in moving towards a primary care-led NHS and the factors that have either encouraged or hindered its development. AIM: To investigate the nature of the barriers to, and the incentives encouraging the shift towards a primary care-led NHS. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. SETTING: Purposive sample of key stakeholders in health authorities, trusts, and primary care in four urban health authorities (two in Scotland and two in England). METHOD: The interviews discussed the commissioning types, the nature and scale of shifts that had occurred, the barriers to and the factors promoting the shift, the mechanisms for discussing and monitoring the shifts that were taking place and the likely impact of LHCCs and PCGs in relation to three common conditions: inguinal hernia, stroke, and asthma. RESULTS: Shifts in activity from secondary to primary care were regarded as small, non-strategic, piecemeal, and not direct underpinned by resource shifts. Barriers identified by responders include the immobility of existing resources, concerns in the primary and secondary care sectors about the appropriateness of the shift weak incentives supporting the shift, the perspectives of general practioners involved in commissioning and the absence of co-operation between key stakeholders. CONCLUSION: The development of a primary care-led NHS needs to resolve a fundamental tension at the heart of the policy: those to whom power was devolved were neither equipped nor minded to engineer the strategic resource shifts necessary to underpin a more primary care-based NHS.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (75.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Britten N. Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):251–253. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon J., Holland P., Mays N. Primary care: core values developing primary care: gatekeeping, commissioning, and managed care. BMJ. 1998 Jul 11;317(7151):125–128. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7151.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drummond N., Iliffe S., McGregor S., Craig N., Fischbacher M. Can primary care be both patient-centred and community-led? J Manag Med. 2001;15(4-5):364–375. doi: 10.1108/eum0000000006183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goodwin N., Mays N., McLeod H., Malbon G., Raftery J. Evaluation of total purchasing pilots in England and Scotland and implications for primary care groups in England: personal interviews and analysis of routine data. The Total Purchasing National Evaluation Team. BMJ. 1998 Jul 25;317(7153):256–259. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7153.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanlon P., Murie J., Gregan J., McEwen J., Moir D., Russell E. A study to determine how needs assessment is being used to improve health. Public Health. 1998 Sep;112(5):343–346. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iliffe S., Munro J. New labour and Britain's National Health Service: an overview of current reforms. Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(2):309–334. doi: 10.2190/53PU-DW4C-5KY5-8WYX. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mays N., Mulligan J. A., Goodwin N. The British quasi-market in health care: a balance sheet of the evidence. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Jan;5(1):49–58. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller P., Craig N., Scott A., Walker A., Hanlon P. Measuring progress towards a primary care-led NHS. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jul;49(444):541–545. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murie J., Hanlon P., McEwen J., Russell E., Moir D., Gregan J. Needs assessment in primary care: general practitioners' perceptions and implications for the future. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Jan;50(450):17–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Cathain A., Musson G., Munro J. Shifting services from secondary to primary care: stakeholders' views of the barriers. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Jul;4(3):154–160. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Cathain A., Musson G., Munro J. Shifting services from secondary to primary care: stakeholders' views of the barriers. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Jul;4(3):154–160. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pedersen L. L., Leese B. What will a primary care led NHS mean for GP workload? The problem of the lack of an evidence base. BMJ. 1997 May 3;314(7090):1337–1341. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7090.1337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pollitt C., Harrison S., Hunter D. J., Marnoch G. No hiding place: on the discomforts of researching the contemporary policy process. J Soc Policy. 1990 Apr;19(2):169–190. doi: 10.1017/s0047279400001987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raftery J., Stevens A. Day case surgery trends in England: the influences of target setting and of general practitioner fundholding. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Jul;3(3):149–152. doi: 10.1177/135581969800300305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shapiro J. Global commissioning by general practitioners. BMJ. 1996 Mar 16;312(7032):652–653. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7032.652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilkin D., Gillam S., Smith K. Tackling organisational change in the new NHS. BMJ. 2001 Jun 16;322(7300):1464–1467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]