Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value and the impact of some signs and symptoms in most diseases in primary care have only been studied incompletely. AIM: To assess the diagnostic value of macroscopic haematuria for the idagnosis of urological cancer (bladder, kidney) in a general practice setting, as well the influence of age, sex, and some additional signs and symptoms. DESIGN OF STUDY: Diagnostic study. SETTING: The study was performed in a sentinel station network of general practices in Belgium, covering almost 1% of the population. SUBJECTS: All patients attending their general practitioner and complaining of haematuria during 1993 and 1994 were included for the prospective part of the study. Every patient diagnosed with a urological cancer in this period was registered for the retrospective part. METHOD: Mean outcome measures of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and positive and negative likelihood ratio were used to assess diagnostic value. RESULTS: Within the registration year 1993-1994, patient-doctor encounters, related to 83,890 patient-years, were registered. The positive predictive value (PPV) for urological cancer was 10.3% (95% CI = 7.6% to 13.7%). Sensitivity was 59.5% (95% CI = 50.4% to 60.1%). The PPV of patients aged over 60 years was 22.1% (95% CI = 15.8% to 30.1%) for men and 8.3% (95% CI = 3.4% to 17.9%) for women. In the age group 40 to 59 years, the PPV was 3.6% (95% CI = 0.6% to 13.4%) for men and 6.4% (95% CI = 1.7% to 18.6%) for women. In the prospective part of the study, no urological cancer was found in the age group under 40 years. CONCLUSION: Men older than 60 years of age with macroscopic haematuria have a high positive predictive value for urological cancer. In these patients, a thorough investigation is indicated. In patients over 40 years of age of either sex, referral or watchful waiting can be justified.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Buntinx F., Wauters H. The diagnostic value of macroscopic haematuria in diagnosing urological cancers: a meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 1997 Feb;14(1):63–68. doi: 10.1093/fampra/14.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoogendam A., Buntinx F., de Vet H. C. The diagnostic value of digital rectal examination in primary care screening for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 1999 Dec;16(6):621–626. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.6.621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knottnerus J. A., Leffers P. The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;45(10):1143–1154. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90155-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lobet M. P., Stroobant A., Mertens R., Van Casteren V., Walckiers D., Masuy-Stroobant G., Cornelis R. Tool for validation of the network of sentinel general practitioners in the Belgian health care system. Int J Epidemiol. 1987 Dec;16(4):612–618. doi: 10.1093/ije/16.4.612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mommsen S., Aagaard J., Sell A. Presenting symptoms, treatment delay and survival in bladder cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1983;17(2):163–167. doi: 10.3109/00365598309180162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Summerton Nicholas, Mann Sara, Rigby Alan S., Ashley Julie, Palmer Sarah, Hetherington John W. Patients with new onset haematuria: assessing the discriminant value of clinical information in relation to urological malignancies. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Apr;52(477):284–289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wauters H., Van Casteren V., Buntinx F. Rectal bleeding and colorectal cancer in general practice: diagnostic study. BMJ. 2000 Oct 21;321(7267):998–999. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7267.998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]