Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2003 Jan;53(486):15–19.

Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice.

Jako S Burgers 1, Richard P T M Grol 1, Joost O M Zaat 1, Teun H Spies 1, Akke K van der Bij 1, Henk G A Mokkink 1
PMCID: PMC1314503  PMID: 12569898

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of clinical guidelines in general practice is often limited. Research on barriers to guideline adherence usually focuses on attitudinal factors. Factors linked to the guideline itself are much less studied. AIM: To identify characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice, and to explore whether these differ between therapeutic and diagnostic recommendations. DESIGN OF STUDY: Analysis of performance data from an audit study of 200 general practitioners (GPs) in The Netherlands conducted in 1997. SETTING: Panel of 12 GPs in The Netherlands who were familiar with guideline methodology. METHOD: A set of 12 attributes, including six potential facilitators and six potential barriers to guideline use, was formulated. The panel assessed the presence of these attributes in 96 guideline recommendations formulated by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. The attributes of recommendations with high compliance rates (70% to 100%) were compared with those with low compliance rates (0% to 60%). RESULTS: Recommendations with high compliance rates were to a lesser extent those requiring new skills (7% compared with 22% in recommendations with low compliance rates), were less often part of a complex decision tree (12% versus 25%), were more compatible with existing norms and values in practice (87% versus 76%), and more often supported with evidence (47% versus 31%). For diagnostic recommendations, the ease of applying them and the potential (negative) reactions of patients were more relevant than for therapeutic recommendations. CONCLUSION: To bridge the gap between research and practice, the evidence as well as the applicability should be considered when formulating recommendations. If the recommendations are not compatible with existing norms and values, not easy to follow or require new knowledge and skills, appropriate implementation strategies should be designed to ensure change in daily practice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker R., Fraser R. C. Development of review criteria: linking guidelines and assessment of quality. BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):370–373. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker R. Is it time to review the idea of compliance with guidelines? Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jan;51(462):7–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cabana M. D., Rand C. S., Powe N. R., Wu A. W., Wilson M. H., Abboud P. A., Rubin H. R. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458–1465. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.15.1458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell S., Roland M., Wilkin D. Primary care groups: Improving the quality of care through clinical governance. BMJ. 2001 Jun 30;322(7302):1580–1582. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7302.1580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cluzeau F. A., Littlejohns P., Grimshaw J. M., Feder G., Moran S. E. Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Feb;11(1):21–28. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.1.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen J. E. Universities and tobacco money. BMJ. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):1–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Foy Robbie, MacLennan Graeme, Grimshaw Jeremy, Penney Gillian, Campbell Marion, Grol Richard. Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Jul;55(7):717–722. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00403-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grilli R., Lomas J. Evaluating the message: the relationship between compliance rate and the subject of a practice guideline. Med Care. 1994 Mar;32(3):202–213. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199403000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Grimshaw J. M., Shirran L., Thomas R., Mowatt G., Fraser C., Bero L., Grilli R., Harvey E., Oxman A., O'Brien M. A. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8 Suppl 2):II2–I45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grol R., Dalhuijsen J., Thomas S., Veld C., Rutten G., Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ. 1998 Sep 26;317(7162):858–861. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7162.858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Grol R. National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Sep;40(338):361–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grol R., Thomas S., Roberts R. Development and implementation of guidelines for family practice: lessons from The Netherlands. J Fam Pract. 1995 May;40(5):435–439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grol R., Zwaard A., Mokkink H., Dalhuijsen J., Casparie A. Dissemination of guidelines: which sources do physicians use in order to be informed? Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Apr;10(2):135–140. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.2.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marshall D. A., Simpson K. N., Norton E. C., Biddle A. K., Youle M. Measuring the effect of clinical guidelines on patient outcomes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Autumn;16(4):1013–1023. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300103083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shekelle P. G., Kravitz R. L., Beart J., Marger M., Wang M., Lee M. Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making. Health Serv Res. 2000 Mar;34(7):1429–1448. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Watkins C., Harvey I., Langley C., Gray S., Faulkner A. General practitioners' use of guidelines in the consultation and their attitudes to them. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jan;49(438):11–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES