Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2003 Feb;53(487):94–100.

Modifying dyspepsia management in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial of educational outreach compared with passive guideline dissemination.

Gurvinder Banait 1, Bonnie Sibbald 1, David Thompson 1, Chris Summerton 1, Mark Hann 1, Stuart Talbot 1; Salford and Trafford Ulcer Research Network1
PMCID: PMC1314507  PMID: 12817353

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement initiatives in health services rely upon the effective introduction of clinical practice guidelines. However, even well constructed guidelines have little effect unless supported by dissemination and implementation strategies. AIM: To test the effectiveness of 'educational outreach' as a strategy for facilitating the uptake of dyspepsia management guidelines in primary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: A pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial of guideline introduction, comparing educational outreach with postal guideline dissemination alone. SETTING: One-hundred and fourteen general practices (233 general practitioners) in the Salford and Trafford Health authority catchment area in the northwest of England. METHOD: All practices received guidelines by post in July 1997. The intervention group practices began to receive educational outreach three months later. This consisted of practice-based seminars with hospital specialists at which guideline recommendations were appraised, and implementation plans formulated. Seminars were followed up with 'reinforcement' visits after a further 12 weeks. Outcome measures were: (a) the appropriateness of referral for; and (b) findings at, open access upper gastrointestinal endoscopy; (c) costs of GP prescriptions for acid-suppressing drugs, and (d) the use of laboratory-based serological tests for Helicobacter pylori. Data were collected for seven months before and/or after the intervention and analysed by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: (a) The proportion of appropriate referrals was higher in the intervention group in the six-month post-intervention period (practice medians: control = 50.0%, intervention = 63.9%, P < 0.05); (b) the proportion of major findings at endoscopy did not alter significantly; (c) there was a greater rise in overall expenditure on acid-suppressing drugs in the intervention as compared with the control group (+8% versus +2%, P = 0.005); and (d) the median testing rate per practice for H pylori in the post-intervention period was significantly greater in the intervention group (four versus O, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that educational outreach may be more effective than passive guideline dissemination in changing clinical behaviour. It also demonstrates that unpredictable and unanticipated outcomes may emerge.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (82.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brook R. H., Park R. E., Chassin M. R., Solomon D. H., Keesey J., Kosecoff J. Predicting the appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 1990 Oct 25;323(17):1173–1177. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199010253231705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Conroy M., Shannon W. Clinical guidelines: their implementation in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Jul;45(396):371–375. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gonvers J. J., Burnand B., Froehlich F., Pache I., Thorens J., Fried M., Kosecoff J., Vader J. P., Brook R. H. Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit. Endoscopy. 1996 Oct;28(8):661–666. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1005573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice. Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;3(1):45–52. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grimshaw J., Freemantle N., Wallace S., Russell I., Hurwitz B., Watt I., Long A., Sheldon T. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar;4(1):55–64. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.1.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grimshaw J., Russell I. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines. I: Developing scientifically valid guidelines. Qual Health Care. 1993 Dec;2(4):243–248. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.4.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mahajan R. J., Barthel J. S., Marshall J. B. Appropriateness of referrals for open-access endoscopy. How do physicians in different medical specialties do? Arch Intern Med. 1996 Oct 14;156(18):2065–2069. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Majeed A., Evans N., Head P. What can PACT tell us about prescribing in general practice? BMJ. 1997 Dec 6;315(7121):1515–1519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morrissey J. F. The problem of the inappropriate endoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Oct 15;109(8):605–606. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-109-8-605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Raisch D. W., Bootman J. L., Larson L. N., McGhan W. F. Improving antiulcer agent prescribing in a health maintenance organization. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Aug;47(8):1766–1773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Soumerai S. B., Avorn J. Principles of educational outreach ('academic detailing') to improve clinical decision making. JAMA. 1990 Jan 26;263(4):549–556. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Treasure T., MacRae K. D. Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials?. Randomisation doesn't guarantee similarity of groups; minimisation does. BMJ. 1998 Aug 8;317(7155):362–363. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7155.362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Worrall G., Chaulk P., Freake D. The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. CMAJ. 1997 Jun 15;156(12):1705–1712. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zuccaro G., Jr, Provencher K. Does an open access system properly utilize endoscopic resources? Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Jul;46(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70203-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES