Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2003 Mar;53(488):217–219.

Communication at the interface: do better referral letters produce better consultant replies?

Richard Grol 1, Noor Rooijackers-Lemmers 1, Leo van Kaathoven 1, Huub Wollersheim 1, Henk Mokkink 1
PMCID: PMC1314548  PMID: 14694699

Abstract

A study of the quality of 637 referral letters from general practitioners (GPs) and corresponding reply letters from medical specialists showed that both types of letters can be improved, and that specific requests by GPs were addressed explicitly by the specialists in only a limited number of cases. Better referral letters resulted only partly in better reply letters. A letter is considered to be of higher quality when a specialist commences a letter with a reference to the specific request by the GP. In conclusion, opportunities for optimal communication should be better used.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (59.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Forrest C. B., Glade G. B., Baker A. E., Bocian A., von Schrader S., Starfield B. Coordination of specialty referrals and physician satisfaction with referral care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 May;154(5):499–506. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.5.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hampson J. P., Roberts R. I., Morgan D. A. Shared care: a review of the literature. Fam Pract. 1996 Jun;13(3):264–279. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.3.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jacobs L. G., Pringle M. A. Referral letters and replies from orthopaedic departments: opportunities missed. BMJ. 1990 Sep 8;301(6750):470–473. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6750.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kvamme O. J., Olesen F., Samuelson M., Samuelsson M. Improving the interface between primary and secondary care: a statement from the European Working Party on Quality in Family Practice (EQuiP). Qual Health Care. 2001 Mar;10(1):33–39. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lindström K., Hagman A., Berg L., Bengtsson C. Referral notes used as a tool for evaluating the co-operation between general practitioners and hospital physicians. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1994 Sep;12(3):214–218. doi: 10.3109/02813439409003702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lloyd B. W. A randomised controlled trial of dictating the clinic letter in front of the patient. BMJ. 1997 Feb 1;314(7077):347–348. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7077.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Newton J., Eccles M., Hutchinson A. Communication between general practitioners and consultants: what should their letters contain? BMJ. 1992 Mar 28;304(6830):821–824. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6830.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Westerman R. F., Hull F. M., Bezemer P. D., Gort G. A study of communication between general practitioners and specialists. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Nov;40(340):445–449. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES