Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2003 May;53(490):399–404.

Immunisation policy: from compliance to concordance?

J Gervase Vernon 1
PMCID: PMC1314602  PMID: 12830570

Abstract

Immunisation has proved a highly effective public health policy. However, it has come under public suspicion at times, with large falls in pertussis immunizations in the 1980s and smaller falls in measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine uptake recently. Immunisation scares have also occurred in other countries. This discussion paper explores the concepts of herd immunity, altruism, and informed consent. Historical, quantitative, and qualitative research on the sociology of immunisation is reviewed. Recent research has shown that the concerns of parents include a loss of trust in health professionals and increasing worries about side effects. The sociologist Streefland is the leader of the World Health Organisation Sociology and Immunisation Project. His concept of the five perspectives on immunisation is explained. Concordance is then described as a dialogue based on mutual respect between different perspectives. Finally, some suggestions are made for immunisation policy in the UK. Immunisation policy should move from the current situation, which largely assumes the passive compliance of the population, to a policy where people are actively involved and their views respected.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (76.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bedford H., Elliman D. Concerns about immunisation. BMJ. 2000 Jan 22;320(7229):240–243. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7229.240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bond L., Nolan T., Pattison P., Carlin J. Vaccine preventable diseases and immunisations: a qualitative study of mothers' perceptions of severity, susceptibility, benefits and barriers. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998 Jun;22(4):441–446. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01411.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Donovan Jenny, Mills Nicola, Smith Monica, Brindle Lucy, Jacoby Ann, Peters Tim, Frankel Stephen, Neal David, Hamdy Freddie. Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult. BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):766–770. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Duffell E. Attitudes of parents towards measles and immunisation after a measles outbreak in an anthroposophical community. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Sep;55(9):685–686. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.9.685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elliman D. A., Bedford H. E. MMR vaccine--worries are not justified. Arch Dis Child. 2001 Oct;85(4):271–274. doi: 10.1136/adc.85.4.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans M., Stoddart H., Condon L., Freeman E., Grizzell M., Mullen R. Parents' perspectives on the MMR immunisation: a focus group study. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Nov;51(472):904–910. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gangarosa E. J., Galazka A. M., Wolfe C. R., Phillips L. M., Gangarosa R. E., Miller E., Chen R. T. Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story. Lancet. 1998 Jan 31;351(9099):356–361. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04334-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greenough P. Intimidation, coercion and resistance in the final stages of the South Asian Smallpox Eradication Campaign, 1973-1975. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Sep;41(5):633–645. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00035-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gust Ian D. The pros and cons of immunisation -- Paper two: the importance of immunisation. Health Care Anal. 1995 May;3(2):107–111. doi: 10.1007/BF02198211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Holm S. The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority setting in health care. BMJ. 1998 Oct 10;317(7164):1000–1002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Janz N. K., Becker M. H. The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984 Spring;11(1):1–47. doi: 10.1177/109019818401100101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jewell D. MMR and the age of unreason. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Nov;51(472):875–876. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kassianos George. Boosting influenza immunisation for the over-65s. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Sep;52(482):710–711. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kulenkampff M., Schwartzman J. S., Wilson J. Neurological complications of pertussis inoculation. Arch Dis Child. 1974 Jan;49(1):46–49. doi: 10.1136/adc.49.1.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leask J. A., Chapman S. An attempt to swindle nature: press anti-immunisation reportage 1993-1997. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1998 Feb;22(1):17–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1998.tb01140.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Markland R. E., Durand D. E. An investigation of socio-psychological factors affecting infant immunization. Am J Public Health. 1976 Feb;66(2):168–170. doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.2.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marshall S., Swerissen H. A qualitative analysis of parental decision making for childhood immunisation. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999 Oct;23(5):543–545. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1999.tb01316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meszaros J. R., Asch D. A., Baron J., Hershey J. C., Kunreuther H., Schwartz-Buzaglo J. Cognitive processes and the decisions of some parents to forego pertussis vaccination for their children. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Jun;49(6):697–703. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. New S. J., Senior M. L. "I don't believe in needles": qualitative aspects of a study into the uptake of infant immunisation in two English health authorities. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(4):509–518. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90333-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nichter M. Vaccinations in the Third World: a consideration of community demand. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Sep;41(5):617–632. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00034-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Peltola H., Patja A., Leinikki P., Valle M., Davidkin I., Paunio M. No evidence for measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine-associated inflammatory bowel disease or autism in a 14-year prospective study. Lancet. 1998 May 2;351(9112):1327–1328. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)24018-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pilgrim D., Rogers A. Mass childhood immunization: some ethical doubts for primary health care workers. Nurs Ethics. 1995 Mar;2(1):63–70. doi: 10.1177/096973309500200108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Poland Gregory A., Murray Dennis, Bonilla-Guerrero Ruben. New vaccine development. BMJ. 2002 Jun 1;324(7349):1315–1319. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7349.1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Porter D., Porter R. The politics of prevention: anti-vaccinationism and public health in nineteenth-century England. Med Hist. 1988 Jul;32(3):231–252. doi: 10.1017/s0025727300048225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Reichert T. A., Sugaya N., Fedson D. S., Glezen W. P., Simonsen L., Tashiro M. The Japanese experience with vaccinating schoolchildren against influenza. N Engl J Med. 2001 Mar 22;344(12):889–896. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103223441204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rogers A., Pilgrim D., Gust I. D., Stone D. H., Menzel P. T. The pros and cons of immunisation. Health Care Anal. 1995 May;3(2):99–115. doi: 10.1007/BF02198210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schmidt K., Ernst E., Andrews Aspects of MMR. Survey shows that some homoeopaths and chiropractors advise against MMR. BMJ. 2002 Sep 14;325(7364):597–597. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Simpson N., Lenton S., Randall R. Parental refusal to have children immunised: extent and reasons. BMJ. 1995 Jan 28;310(6974):227–227. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6974.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sköld P. From inoculation to vaccination: smallpox in Sweden in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Popul Stud (Camb) 1996 Jul;50(2):247–262. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000149336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sporton R. K., Francis S. A. Choosing not to immunize: are parents making informed decisions? Fam Pract. 2001 Apr;18(2):181–188. doi: 10.1093/fampra/18.2.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Stone Erin G., Morton Sally C., Hulscher Marlies E., Maglione Margaret A., Roth Elizabeth A., Grimshaw Jeremy M., Mittman Brian S., Rubenstein Lisa V., Rubenstein Laurence Z., Shekelle Paul G. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002 May 7;136(9):641–651. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-9-200205070-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Streefland P. H. Enhancing coverage and sustainability of vaccination programs: an explanatory framework with special reference to India. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Sep;41(5):647–656. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00036-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Streefland P. H. Public doubts about vaccination safety and resistance against vaccination. Health Policy. 2001 Mar;55(3):159–172. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00132-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Streefland P., Chowdhury A. M., Ramos-Jimenez P. Patterns of vaccination acceptance. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Dec;49(12):1705–1716. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00239-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Strobino D., Keane V., Holt E., Hughart N., Guyer B. Parental attitudes do not explain underimmunization. Pediatrics. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1076–1083. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vernon Gervase. The limitations of natural science as applied to medicine. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Oct;52(483):870–871. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wolfe Robert M., Sharp Lisa K. Anti-vaccinationists past and present. BMJ. 2002 Aug 24;325(7361):430–432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7361.430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES