Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence concerning secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease is not optimally used in clinical practice. A necessary first step is to identify those eligible for treatment. In primary care, this equates to setting up a register of prevalent stroke. AIM: To compare three different methods for identifying prevalent cases of cerebrovascular disease in the community: general practice-based computer systems; population surveys; and hospital-based routine information systems. DESIGN OF STUDY: Comparison of results of each method applied to a defined population and then assessed against reference criteria for cerebrovascular disease. SETTING: A total of 5801 people aged 65 years or over, resident in seven practices situated within the South Birmingham Primary Care Trust area. METHOD: The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of each method of identification were calculated against reference criteria applied by two investigators independently of each other. RESULTS: The prevalence of reference criteria-validated cerebrovascular disease in patients aged 65 years or over was 8.2%. Overall, general practice-based computer systems had a sensitivity of 81.0%, a specificity of 97.2% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 71.8%, but there was a wide range of sensitivity (33% to 90%) and PPV (42% to 92%) between practices. Patient survey and hospital information systems were less sensitive (75.7% and 28.4%, respectively) but had higher PPVs (77.5% and 89.2%, respectively). Thirty-nine per cent of patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease had not been admitted to hospital. CONCLUSION: General practice-based computer systems can produce reasonably accurate prevalent stroke registers. In areas where these are poorly developed, patient survey is an alternative.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (74.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bamford J., Sandercock P., Warlow C., Gray M. Why are patients with acute stroke admitted to hospital? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 May 24;292(6532):1369–1372. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6532.1369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Du X., Sourbutts J., Cruickshank K., Summers A., Roberts N., Walton E., Holmes S. A community based stroke register in a high risk area for stroke in north west England. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Oct;51(5):472–478. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.5.472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geddes J. M., Fear J., Tennant A., Pickering A., Hillman M., Chamberlain M. A. Prevalence of self reported stroke in a population in northern England. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996 Apr;50(2):140–143. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.2.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibbs R. G., Newson R., Lawrenson R., Greenhalgh R. M., Davies A. H. Diagnosis and initial management of stroke and transient ischemic attack across UK health regions from 1992 to 1996: experience of a national primary care database. Stroke. 2001 May;32(5):1085–1090. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.5.1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenlund Kurt J., Giles Wayne H., Keenan Nora L., Croft Janet B., Mensah George A. Physician advice, patient actions, and health-related quality of life in secondary prevention of stroke through diet and exercise. Stroke. 2002 Feb;33(2):565–570. doi: 10.1161/hs0202.102882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hart R. G., Benavente O., McBride R., Pearce L. A. Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Oct 5;131(7):492–501. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-7-199910050-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laloux P., Jamart J., Meurisse H., De Coster P., Laterre C. Persisting perfusion defect in transient ischemic attacks: a new clinically useful subgroup? Stroke. 1996 Mar;27(3):425–430. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.3.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin P. J., Young G., Enevoldson T. P., Humphrey P. R. Overdiagnosis of TIA and minor stroke: experience at a regional neurovascular clinic. QJM. 1997 Dec;90(12):759–763. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/90.12.759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McManus R. J., Lumley L., Gough M., Jhass L., Deacon K. New beginning for care for elderly people? Framework will have considerable effect on primary care. BMJ. 2001 Aug 11;323(7308):339–339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moher M., Yudkin P., Turner R., Schofield T., Mant D. An assessment of morbidity registers for coronary heart disease in primary care. ASSIST (ASSessment of Implementation STrategy) trial collaborative group. Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Sep;50(458):706–709. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moher M., Yudkin P., Wright L., Turner R., Fuller A., Schofield T., Mant D. Cluster randomised controlled trial to compare three methods of promoting secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care. BMJ. 2001 Jun 2;322(7298):1338–1338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7298.1338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Mahony P. G., Dobson R., Rodgers H., James O. F., Thomson R. G. Validation of a population screening questionnaire to assess prevalence of stroke. Stroke. 1995 Aug;26(8):1334–1337. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.8.1334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Mahony P. G., Thomson R. G., Dobson R., Rodgers H., James O. F. The prevalence of stroke and associated disability. J Public Health Med. 1999 Jun;21(2):166–171. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/21.2.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stewart J. A., Dundas R., Howard R. S., Rudd A. G., Wolfe C. D. Ethnic differences in incidence of stroke: prospective study with stroke register. BMJ. 1999 Apr 10;318(7189):967–971. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7189.967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]