Abstract
The concept of intermediate care is part of the National Health Service (NHS) modernization agenda to make services more flexible and accessible. One objective is for the general practitioner with a special interest (GPwSI) to provide a variety of extended services in a primary care setting that have been traditionally provided in secondary care. This development is underpinned by the hope that primary care organisations (PCOs) will provide more effective and efficient care in local settings, but, as with other skill-mix changes, the process has developed ahead of an evidence base of effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. This paper considers intermediate care from an economic perspective and provides healthcare commissioners with a background that can facilitate resource allocation decisions. It cautions that, unless the economic issues are carefully considered, there is a danger that services may be introduced that are thought to be efficient, when in fact they may not be so.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (60.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bryan S., Brown J. Extrapolation of cost-effectiveness information to local settings. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1998 Apr;3(2):108–112. doi: 10.1177/135581969800300209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delaney B., Wilson S., Fitzmaurice D., Hyde C., Hobbs R. Near-patient tests in primary care: setting the standards for evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Jan;5(1):37–41. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Godber E., Robinson R., Steiner A. Economic evaluation and the shifting balance towards primary care: definitions, evidence and methodological issues. Health Econ. 1997 May-Jun;6(3):275–294. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199705)6:3<275::aid-hec255>3.0.co;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jan S. Institutional considerations in priority setting: transactions cost perspective on PBMA. Health Econ. 2000 Oct;9(7):631–641. doi: 10.1002/1099-1050(200010)9:7<631::aid-hec531>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kernick D. P., Reinhold D. M., Netten A. What does it cost the patient to see the doctor? Br J Gen Pract. 2000 May;50(454):401–403. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mauskopf J. A., Paul J. E., Grant D. M., Stergachis A. The role of cost-consequence analysis in healthcare decision-making. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Mar;13(3):277–288. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813030-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mays N., Mulligan J. A., Goodwin N. The British quasi-market in health care: a balance sheet of the evidence. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Jan;5(1):49–58. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Cathain A., Musson G., Munro J. Shifting services from secondary to primary care: stakeholders' views of the barriers. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Jul;4(3):154–160. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan M., Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1530–1533. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott A. Primary or secondary care? What can economics contribute to evaluation at the interface? J Public Health Med. 1996 Mar;18(1):19–26. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott A., Vale L. Increased general practice workload due to a primary care led National Health Service: the need for evidence to support rhetoric. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Mar;48(428):1085–1088. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torgerson D. J., Spencer A. Marginal costs and benefits. BMJ. 1996 Jan 6;312(7022):35–36. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7022.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams Siân, Ryan Dermot, Price David, Langley Carol, Fletcher Monica, Everden Paul. General practitioners with a special clinical interest: a model for improving respiratory disease management. Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Oct;52(483):838–843. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]