Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2003 Sep;53(494):690–696.

Developing primary care review criteria from evidence-based guidelines: coronary heart disease as a model.

Allen Hutchinson 1, Aileen McIntosh 1, Jeff Anderson 1, Claire Gilbert 1, Rosemary Field 1
PMCID: PMC1314691  PMID: 15103876

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National Health Service (NHS) initiatives such as Clinical Governance, National Service Frameworks and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines programme create demand for tools to enable performance review by healthcare professionals. Ideally such tools should enable clinical teams to assess quality of care and highlight areas of good practice or where improvement is needed. They should also be able to be used to demonstrate progress towards goals and promote quality, while not unnecessarily increasing demand on limited resources or weakening professional control. AIM: To formulate and evaluate a method for developing, from clinical guidelines, evidence-based review criteria that are proritised, useful and relevant to general practices assessing quality of care for the primary care management of coronary heart disease (CHD). DESIGN OF STUDY: A two-stage study comprising, first, a review of available evidence-based guidelines for CHD and, second, the definition and prioritization of associated review criteria from the most highly rated guidelines. SETTING: Primary healthcare teams in England. METHODS: Using structured methods, evidence-based clinical guidelines for CHD were identified and appraised to ensure their suitability as the basis for developing review criteria. Recommendations common to a number of guidelines were priortszid by a panel of general practitioners to develop review criteria suitable for use in primary care. RESULTS: A standardised method has been developed for constructing evidence-based review criteria from clinical guidelines. A limited, prioritized set of review criteria was developed for the primary care management of CHD. This was distributed around the NHS through the Royal College of General Practitioners for use by primary care teams across the United Kingdom. CONCLUSION: Developing useful, evidence-based review criteria is not a straightforward process, partly because of a lack of consistency and clarity in guidelines currently available. A method was developed which accommodated these limitations and which can be applied to the development and evaluation of review criteria from guidelines for other conditions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (85.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker R., Fraser R. C. Development of review criteria: linking guidelines and assessment of quality. BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):370–373. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7001.370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker Richard, Fraser Robin C., Stone Margaret, Lambert Paul, Stevenson Keith, Shiels Chris. Randomised controlled trial of the impact of guidelines, prioritized review criteria and feedback on implementation of recommendations for angina and asthma. Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Apr;53(489):284–291. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell D., Layton A. J., Gabbay J. Use of a guideline based questionnaire to audit hospital care of acute asthma. BMJ. 1991 Jun 15;302(6790):1440–1443. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6790.1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradley E. H., Horwitz S. M., Grogan C. M., Roberto M. Monitoring clinical quality in Medicaid managed care. Conn Med. 1998 Apr;62(4):215–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Buetow S. A., Coster G. D. New Zealand and United Kingdom experiences with the RAND modified Delphi approach to producing angina and heart failure criteria for quality assessment in general practice. Qual Health Care. 2000 Dec;9(4):222–231. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.4.222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell S. M., Braspenning J., Hutchinson A., Marshall M. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):358–364. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell S. M., Hann M., Hacker J., Durie A., Thapar A., Roland M. O. Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):125–130. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Campbell S. M., Roland M. O., Shekelle P. G., Cantrill J. A., Buetow S. A., Cragg D. K. Development of review criteria for assessing the quality of management of stable angina, adult asthma, and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in general practice. Qual Health Care. 1999 Mar;8(1):6–15. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.1.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Curry S. J. Organizational interventions to encourage guideline implementation. Chest. 2000 Aug;118(2 Suppl):40S–46S. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.2_suppl.40s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davies H. T. Performance management using health outcomes: in search of instrumentality. J Eval Clin Pract. 1998 Nov;4(4):359–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1998.tb00099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davis D. A., Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997 Aug 15;157(4):408–416. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gourgoulianis K. I., Hamos B., Christou K., Rizopoulou D., Efthimiou A. Prescription of medications by primary care physicians in the light of asthma guidelines. Respiration. 1998;65(1):18–20. doi: 10.1159/000029222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice. Qual Health Care. 1994 Mar;3(1):45–52. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hadorn D. C., Baker D. W., Kamberg C. J., Brooks R. H. Phase II of the AHCPR-sponsored heart failure guideline: translating practice recommendations into review criteria. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1996 Apr;22(4):265–276. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30230-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haycox A., Bagust A., Walley T. Clinical guidelines-the hidden costs. BMJ. 1999 Feb 6;318(7180):391–393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7180.391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hearnshaw H. M., Harker R. M., Cheater F. M., Baker R. H., Grimshaw G. M. Expert consensus on the desirable characteristics of review criteria for improvement of health care quality. Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):173–178. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100173... [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McColl A., Roderick P., Gabbay J., Smith H., Moore M. Performance indicators for primary care groups: an evidence based approach. BMJ. 1998 Nov 14;317(7169):1354–1360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7169.1354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ryan T. J., Anderson J. L., Antman E. M., Braniff B. A., Brooks N. H., Califf R. M., Hillis L. D., Hiratzka L. F., Rapaport E., Riegel B. J. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Nov 1;28(5):1328–1428. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00392-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sculpher M. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the utilization of evidence-based guidelines. Fam Pract. 2000 Feb;17 (Suppl 1):S26–S31. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.suppl_1.s26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wilkinson E. K., McColl A., Exworthy M., Roderick P., Smith H., Moore M., Gabbay J. Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study. Qual Health Care. 2000 Sep;9(3):166–174. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.3.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Woolf S. H., Grol R., Hutchinson A., Eccles M., Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999 Feb 20;318(7182):527–530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES