Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2003 Oct;53(495):764–770.

PHASE: a randomised, controlled trial of supervised self-help cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care.

Ann Richards 1, Michael Barkham 1, Jane Cahill 1, David Richards 1, Chris Williams 1, Phil Heywood 1
PMCID: PMC1314708  PMID: 14601351

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Common mental health problems account for up to 40% of all general practitioner (GP) consultations. Patients have limited access to evidence-based psychological therapies. Cognitive behavioural therapy self-help strategies offer one potential solution. AIM: To determine differences in clinical outcome, patient satisfaction and costs, between a cognitive behavioural-based self-help package facilitated by practice nurses compared to ordinary care by GPs for mild to moderate anxiety and depression. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Seventeen primary healthcare teams. METHOD: Patients presenting to their GP with mild to moderate anxiety and/or depression were recruited to the study and randomised to receive either a self-help intervention facilitated by practice nurses or ordinary care. The self-help intervention consisted of up to three appointments: two 1 week apart and a third 3 months later. There were no restrictions on ordinary care. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis showed that patients treated with practice nurse-supported cognitive behavioural therapy self-help attained similar clinical outcomes for similar costs and were more satisfied than patients treated by GPs with ordinary care. On-treatment analysis showed patients receiving the facilitated cognitive behavioural therapy self-help were more likely to be below clinical threshold at 1 month compared to the ordinary care group (odds ratio [OR] = 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.87 to 4.37). This difference was less well marked at 3 months (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 0.52 to 3.56). CONCLUSION: Facilitated cognitive behavioural self-help may provide a short-term cost-effective clinical benefit for patients with mild to moderate anxiety and depression. This has the potential to help primary care provide a choice of effective psychological as well as pharmacological treatments for mental health problems.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (85.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barkham M., Shapiro D. A., Hardy G. E., Rees A. Psychotherapy in two-plus-one sessions: outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral and psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy for subsyndromal depression. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Apr;67(2):201–211. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.2.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bower P., Richards D., Lovell K. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of self-help treatments for anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Oct;51(471):838–845. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crosland A., Kai J. 'They think they can talk to nurses': practice nurses' views of their roles in caring for mental health problems. Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Jul;48(432):1383–1386. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Evans Chris, Connell Janice, Barkham Michael, Margison Frank, McGrath Graeme, Mellor-Clark John, Audin Kerry. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;180:51–60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldberg D. The management of anxious depression in primary care. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60 (Suppl 7):39–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kiely B. G., McPherson I. G. Stress self-help packages in primary care: a controlled trial evaluation. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Jul;36(288):307–309. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mynors-Wallis L. M., Gath D. H., Day A., Baker F. Randomised controlled trial of problem solving treatment, antidepressant medication, and combined treatment for major depression in primary care. BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):26–30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nolan P., Murray E., Dallender J. Practice nurses' perceptions of services for clients with psychological problems in primary care. Int J Nurs Stud. 1999 Apr;36(2):97–104. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(99)00015-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Poulton B. C. Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients' satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses: reliability, replicability and discriminant validity. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Jan;46(402):26–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Priest R. G., Vize C., Roberts A., Roberts M., Tylee A. Lay people's attitudes to treatment of depression: results of opinion poll for Defeat Depression Campaign just before its launch. BMJ. 1996 Oct 5;313(7061):858–859. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7061.858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Richards A., Carley J., Jenkins-Clarke S., Richards D. A. Skill mix between nurses and doctors working in primary care-delegation or allocation: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2000 Jun;37(3):185–197. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(00)00005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES