Summary
Mitochondrial disorders show remarkable clinical and genetic heterogeneity and result from variants in either mitochondrion- or nucleus-encoded genes. CHCHD4 is a component of the mitochondrial import and assembly pathway that imports small cysteine-containing substrates. We report a pediatric patient with biallelic CHCHD4 variants who presented with severe neurological regression and early death. Western blot analysis showed decreased levels of CHCHD4 and diminished assembly of complexes I and IV in his fibroblasts. To demonstrate that CHCHD4 variants were responsible for the observed biochemical phenotype, we overexpressed wild-type CHCHD4 in control and subject fibroblasts, restoring levels of complex I and IV proteins and the associated assembly defects. Proteomic studies pointed to electron transport and complex I biogenesis as the main dysregulated pathways and showed a severe loss of several complex I and IV proteins and/or assembly factors rescued by overexpression of wild-type CHCHD4. CHCHD4 has numerous targets and interacting factors and is involved in the export of iron-sulfur clusters synthesized inside mitochondria. Surprisingly, few of these interacting factors or non-mitochondrial functions were impacted by the observed CHCHD4 defect. In conclusion, our work establishes CHCHD4 deficiency as a cause of dysregulated mitochondrial protein import resulting in a severe neurological condition.
Keywords: CHCHD4, mitochondria, mitochondrial import and assembly, MIA pathway, OXPHOS defect
We report CHCHD4 deficiency as a new cause of dysregulated mitochondrial protein import, resulting in a severe neurological condition. Biochemical and proteomics studies in fibroblasts of the subject pointed to an assembly defect of the respiratory chain that was rescued by overexpression of wild-type CHCHD4 cDNA.
Introduction
Most mitochondrial proteins are encoded by nuclear genes and subsequently imported into the organelle through the outer-membrane translocase (TOM), the sorting and assembly machinery (SAM), and the inner-membrane translocase (TIM).1 A subgroup of small cysteine-containing mitochondrial proteins carrying (CX9C)2 motifs is imported by the evolutionary conserved mitochondrial import and assembly (MIA) pathway, located in the intermembrane space (IMS). The MIA pathway, which catalyzes the oxidative folding of incoming mitochondrial proteins through a disulfide relay system (DRS), is composed of CHCHD4 and growth factor ERV1-like (GFER).2 CHCHD4 imports small cysteine-containing substrates, such as TIM proteins (TIMM8A and TIM13), complex I subunits (NDUFA8, NDUFB7, NDUFB10, NDUFS5, and NDUFS8), complex IV subunits and assembly factors (COX6B1, COX17, COX19, COA4, COA5, and COA6), or the regulator of mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter, expanding the diversity of CHCHD4 substrates.3 The CHCHD-containing proteins are (CX9C)2 motif-containing proteins involved in several mitochondrial functions. CHCHD1 is a subunit of the mitoribosome, CHCHD3 and CHCHD6 are components of the mitochondrial contact site and crista-organizing system (MICOS), CHCHD10 is involved in MICOS stability, and CHCHD8 is an assembly factor of complex IV.4 CHCHD4 is the only known CHCHD-containing protein involved in protein import into the IMS. It also interacts with the apoptosis-inducing factor AIFM1, which acts as an effector of CHCHD4 activity.5 CHCHD4 contains an iron-sulfur cluster (ISC) and is also a component of the mitochondrial ISC export machinery, modulating cellular iron homeostasis.6 Finally, CHCHD4 can regulate mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) release into the cytosol, triggering the cGAS-STING-nuclear factor B (NF-B) pathway.7
Pathogenic variants in genes encoding CHCHD proteins such as CHCHD2 (MIM: 616244; coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain-containing protein 2) and CHCHD10 (MIM: 615903; coiled-coil-helix-coiled-coil-helix domain-containing protein 10) have been reported in Parkinson disease8 and in frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-2,9 respectively. Moreover, GFER (MIM: 600924) variants result in mitochondrial myopathy with cataracts (MIM: 613076),10 and AIFM1 (MIM: 300169) variants cause mitochondrial disease manifesting as combined oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) deficiency (MIM: 300816; combined oxidative phosphorylation deficiency 6 [COXPD6]).11 To date, there are no reports of pathogenic CHCHD4 (MIM: 611077) variants. Here, we report a subject carrying bi-allelic CHCHD4 variants who presented with severe lactic acidosis and psychomotor and neurological regression. Using subject-derived fibroblasts, we demonstrate impaired OXPHOS function that can be restored by expression of wild-type (WT) CHCHD4 cDNA, while an unbiased proteomic analysis allows us to decipher the mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial consequences of CHCHD4 deficiency.
Subjects and methods
The subject was the first child of non-consanguineous healthy parents, with no family history. Pregnancy was uneventful except for gestational hypertension diagnosed at 37+2 weeks. The infant was born at 37+3 weeks following induction for abnormal fetal heart rate tracing. Apgar scores were 9/10/10. Intrauterine growth restriction was noted (birth weight: 1,860 g, <third percentile; head circumference: 31.5 cm, third percentile; Table S1). Birth length was not documented. At 9 h of life, the infant presented with persistent hypoglycemia refractory to oral glucose supplementation, requiring continuous intravenous glucose infusion. Metabolic workup revealed severe lactic acidosis (pH 7.00, lactate 26 mmol/L), hepatocellular cytolysis (AST, 176 U/L; ALT, 42 U/L), cholestasis, and moderate hyperammonemia (135 μmol/L), consistent with acute liver dysfunction. Further investigations showed massive lactic aciduria. Rapid normalization of hepatic function and acid-base balance occurred within the first days of life. However, recurrent short-fasting hypoglycemia persisted, requiring enriched feeding regimens and nocturnal enteral nutrition. Chronic hyperlactatemia (2–6.5 mmol/L) persisted, with an elevated lactate/pyruvate ratio (blood lactate/pyruvate ratio [L/P] = 33.5). From 6 months of age, glycemic control improved progressively. However, a delay in developmental milestones was noted, with increased peripheral hypertonia. At 9 months, the patient developed psychomotor development regression with loss of previously acquired motor skills and impaired social interaction. Neurological deterioration progressed rapidly, with episodes of inconsolable crying, marked hypertonia, and major discomfort. He had worsened hyperlactatemia (7.5 mmol/L), elevated cerebrospinal fluid lactate (4.5 mmol/L), and increased L/P (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] L/P = 27.7). The neurological phenotype evolved toward a severe encephalopathic state with recurrent dystonic episodes and major discomfort. The patient died at 11 months of age.
A first brain MRI performed at 2 months of age showed enlargement of the periventricular spaces in the supratentorial region (Figure 1). At 9 months of age, brain MRI detected hypersignal in the white matter of the semioval centers, the pyramidal tracts, the brain stem, and the middle cerebellar peduncles. Diffusion weighted imaging showed apparent diffusion coefficient restriction in the pathological areas. Spectroscopy revealed a lactate peak. No abnormality in the basal ganglia could be observed.
Figure 1.
Brain MRI of the subject at 2 and 9 months of age
(A and B) Brain MRI axial slices in T2. The arrow indicates the enlargement of the periventricular spaces in the supratentorial region.
(C–I) Illustration of brain images at 9 months of age. Shown are brain MRI axial slices on T2 (C, F, and I) and diffusion weighted images (D and G) and apparent diffusion coefficients (E and H). The arrows indicate marked hypersignal in middle cerebellar peduncles (C), semioval centers (I), pyramidal tracts (F), and marked enlargement of the periventricular spaces in the supratentorial region (F).
(J) MR spectroscopy showed a lactate peak (arrow).
Informed consent was obtained for the subject in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki protocols and approved by local institutional review boards in Paris.
Details of cell culture, whole-exome sequencing, protein extraction, SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, BN-PAGE, CHCHD4 overexpression, and proteomics analysis are presented as supplemental information.
Results
Molecular genetic investigations were undertaken using EDTA-blood DNA samples. mtDNA sequencing did not detect any pathological variant. WES was performed on the subject as a family trio. A first WES analysis in the trio did not allow identification of any gene with biallelic heterozygous variations predicted to be deleterious. Nevertheless, analysis of WES data of the subject alone resulted in the identification of an apparently homozygous variant in CHCHD4 (NM_001098502.1, CHCHD4.1), also known as MIA40. This c.5C>T variation (p.Ser2Phe) was inherited from the father, but the mother was apparently homozygous for the WT allele, which prompted us to hypothesize that instead she carried a deletion at the CHCHD4 locus. Indeed, analysis of the WES data at CHCHD4 locus showed loss of heterozygosity of several successive SNPs in the mother and her son, confirming the presence of a large deletion of 255 kb maximum, encompassing the complete CHCHD4 gene and exons 1–7 of the adjacent TMEM43 gene (Figure 2A). The CHCHD4 Ser2Phe change replaces a hydrophilic with a hydrophobic amino acid; this change affects a highly evolutionary conserved amino acid and is predicted to be deleterious (Figures 2B and 2C). TMEM43 is a nuclear envelope protein involved in the organization of protein complexes at the inner nuclear membrane.12 Heterozygous TMEM43 missense or nonsense variations result in adult-onset autosomal-dominant arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia,13 Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy,14 or auditory neuropathy,15 but no large deletion has been previously reported. Considering that the mother is healthy, we hypothesize that the TMEM43 deletion has no clinical consequences.
Figure 2.
CHCHD4 variants
(A) Pedigree of the subject’s family and haplotypes at the CHCHD4 locus. The mutant paternal and maternal alleles are indicated in green and yellow, respectively. The arrow indicates the c.5C>T variant. The maximum size of the deletion is 255,753 bp (between heterozygous rs537563009 and rs6766740 SNPs), and the minimum size is 22,215 bp (between homozygous rs2731316 and rs2340917 SNPs).
(B) Evidence of pathogenicity associated with the c.5C>T CHCHD4 variant.
(C) Multisequence alignment of CHCHD4 proteins.
(D) Three-dimensional representation of the human CHCHD4 structure predicted by AlphaFold, showing the location and the prediction of hydrogen-bonding (H-bond, dotted lines) of Ser2 (pink). The two arrows indicate the β strands of the N-terminal part of the protein. The colors of the 3D structure correspond to the confidence scores of the different parts of the protein: dark blue, very high (pLDDT > 90); light blue, confident (90 > pLDDT >70); yellow, low (70 > pLDDT >50); and orange, very low (pLDDT <50).
To visualize the location of mutant amino acid, we used the AlphaFold machine learning algorithm that predicts protein structures and that has high confidence in the location of the identified missense variant.16 Ser2 is located just before the β1 strand (Cys4-Glu7), forming a β hairpin with the β2 strand.17 Ser2 is predicted by AlphaFold to be involved in two hydrogen-bonding (H bonds) with Asp19. Both Ser2 and Asp19 are highly conserved residues among species, suggesting they are important residues for CHCHD4 protein function and/or structure (Figure 2D).
SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis revealed a decreased steady-state level of CHCHD4 protein in cultured skin fibroblasts of the subject compared to controls (Figures 3A and S2), suggesting that the CHCHD4 variants affect the stability of the protein. CHCHD4 mediates the import of several mitochondrial proteins, including complex I and complex IV subunits and/or assembly factors. Consistent with this, we could observe a severe decrease of various OXPHOS subunits, Grim19, and UQCRC2 in fibroblasts with a relative sparing of ATP5A (Figures 3B and S3). Moreover, the mitochondrially encoded COXII subunit was also decreased, suggesting a destabilization of at least OXPHOS complex IV. Finally, to assess the assembly status and function of the OXPHOS system, we carried out BN-PAGE analyses, which revealed an obvious complex I and IV assembly defect (Figures 3C and S4).
Figure 3.
Biochemical investigation of fibroblasts
(A) Western blot analysis of CHCHD4 performed on total protein of fibroblasts of the subject (S) compared to 3 controls (C1, C2, and C3). GAPDH was used as a loading control.
(B) Western blot analysis of OXPHOS subunits in fibroblasts of the subject and two controls (C2 and C3) transduced with or without WT CHCHD4 cDNA. β-actin was used as a loading control.
(C) BN-PAGE on fibroblasts from S and 2 controls transduced with or without WT CHCHD4 cDNA.
To demonstrate that variations in the CHCHD4 gene were responsible for the observed molecular phenotype of subject-derived fibroblasts and therefore are likely disease causing in nature, we undertook functional complementation analyses in control and subject-derived fibroblasts. Fibroblasts were transduced with lentiviral particles expressing WT CHCHD4 using pD2109 (Atum) for 12 h and then incubated for an additional 40 days until the cells were harvested. Stable transduction with lentiviral particles expressing WT CHCHD4 cDNA (transcript variant 1) restored the steady-state levels of GRIM19, UQCRC2, and COXII proteins as well as a complex I and IV assembly defect (Figures 3B and 3C).
To assess the effect of the identified CHCHD4 variants on various cellular functions, we performed proteomics analysis in subject and control fibroblasts transduced with or without WT CHCHD4 cDNA. The proteomics analysis allowed the quantification of 8211 proteins, 603 of which were significantly downregulated in the fibroblasts of the subject compared to the control group (t test, false discovery rate [FDR] = 0.05). Overall, mitochondrial proteins were found to be mostly downregulated (17% of the downregulated proteins were mitochondrial proteins against 3% of the upregulated proteins) (Figure 4A; Table S2). CHCHD4 was significantly decreased in subject fibroblasts (Figure 4A) and transduction with WT CHCHD4 cDNA significantly increased its level in subject-derived fibroblasts (Figure S1C). As expected, the TMEM43 protein level was reduced in subject-derived fibroblasts compared to the control and not modified by overexpression of WT CHCHD4 cDNA (Figure S1C).
Figure 4.
Proteomics analysis of subject and control fibroblasts transduced or not by WT CHCHD4 cDNA
(A) Volcano plot representing the statistical comparison of the protein label-free quantification (LFQ) intensities of subject fibroblasts vs. control fibroblasts (FC = 2, FDR = 0.05). Proportions of up- and downregulated mitochondrial proteins are reported. Mitochondrial proteins (green) were retrieved from Mitocarta and literature data. CHCHD4 is shown in red.
(B) Volcano plot representing the statistical comparison of the protein LFQ intensities of subject fibroblasts vs. subject fibroblasts transduced with WT CHCHD4 cDNA (FC = 2, FDR = 0.05). Complex I and IV proteins are reported.
(C–F) Heatmap representation depicting the dysregulated complex I (C) and complex IV (D) subunits and/or assembly factors, mtDNA-encoded proteins (E), and CHCHD4 targets (F) in different samples.
Reactome pathway analysis identified respiratory electron transport and complex I biogenesis as the main dysregulated pathways within our dataset (FDR = 1.4e−14; Figures S1A and S1B; Table S2). We then systematically looked at OXPHOS structure proteins and assembly factors and detected decreased levels of a large part of nucleus-encoded complex I subunits (Figures 4B and 4C; Table S2). Among them, only NDUFA8, NDUFB8, NDUFB10, and NDUFS5 are known CHCHD4 targets,2 suggesting a secondary defect of other subunits related to complex I assembly defect. Most complex IV subunits were also significantly decreased (Figures 4B and 4D; Table S2). Two complex IV assembly factors, COA7 and COA6, were also reduced (FC −3.6 and −2.76, respectively) as well as SCO2, COX19, COX11, and COX17 to a lesser extent (FC −2.08 to −1.07; Table S2). Accordingly, COX6B1 complex IV subunit and the COA6, COA7, SCO2, and COX17 assembly factors are CHCHD4 targets.2 No significant modification of nucleus-encoded subunits or assembly factors of complexes II, III, and V was observed (data not shown). Interestingly, several complex I and IV subunits encoded by mtDNA were also significantly decreased, but they do not require mitochondrial import, as they are synthesized within mitochondria (Figure 4E; Table S2). This decrease should be related to the decreased stability of complexes I and IV rather to abnormal mitochondrial protein synthesis, as factors involved in mitochondrial translation were mostly not changed in the subject’s fibroblasts (Table S2), whereas downregulation of CHCHD4 has been previously shown to decrease several mitoribosome proteins.18 Interestingly, overexpression of WT CHCHD4 cDNA in subject’s fibroblasts increased the level of almost all of these proteins (Figures 4 and S1C; Table S2), demonstrating that CHCHD4 variants are the cause of the OXPHOS defect and that improvement of protein import significantly rescues OXPHOS function.
CHCHD4 forms a stable complex with AIFM1 through a direct interaction with its N-terminal part19 for mitochondrial protein import, but only a minor decrease of AIFM1 was observed in the subject’s fibroblasts (Figure S1C; Table S2). This is consistent with previous reports showing that knockdown of CHCHD4 does not affect the AIF amount.19 CHCHD4 also interacts with GFER protein, essential for protein folding and import of a subset of mitochondrial proteins as part of the DRS. Notably, CHCHD4 downregulation has been shown to decrease the mitochondrial import of GFER.20 Accordingly, the subject’s fibroblasts displayed a medium decrease of GFER, and overexpression of WT CHCHD4 cDNA increased it in the subject’s fibroblasts (Figure S1C; Table S2).
CHCHD4 has a central role in mitochondrial protein import and has several targets and interacting factors. CHCHD-containing proteins are imported with the help of the CHCHD4 import machinery,2 but no major modification of these proteins was observed in subject-derived cells (Figure 4F; Table S2). Similarly, very few components of translocase of outer and inner mitochondrial membrane machinery were modified despite several proteins of this machinery being substrates for CHCHD421 (Figure 4F; Table S2). Finally, the additional CHCHD4 partner proteins22,23 were not significantly modified in the subject’s fibroblasts except those involved in complexes I and IV (Figure 4F; Table S2).
CHCHD4 is not only involved in mitochondrial protein import but also in the export of ISCs synthesized inside the mitochondria6 that are then incorporated in cytosolic or nuclear proteins involved in essential cellular pathways such as iron homeostasis (IRP2 and FBXL5), nuclear DNA polymerases, helicases or exonucleases, or interferon response (RSAD2).24,25,26 Accordingly, CHCHD4 downregulation in HEK293 cells lowered the activity and stability of several cytosolic ISC-containing proteins.6 Among all known non-mitochondrial ISC-containing proteins, only one, the AOX1 aldehyde oxidase, a cytosolic drug-metabolizing enzyme,27 was significantly decreased in the subject’s fibroblasts (FC −3.26) and increased by overexpression of WT CHCHD4 cDNA (Figure S1C).
Finally, none of the proteins and enzymes involved in mtDNA maintenance, mtRNA metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, mitochondrial lipid metabolism, fatty acid oxidation, CoQ10 synthesis, mitochondrial dynamics and surveillance, amino acid metabolism, or mitochondrial transport were downregulated in CHCHD4-deficient fibroblasts (data not shown), suggesting that these proteins do not depend on CHCHD4 for protein import. In keeping with this, neither the regulator of the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter MICU1, a well-known target of CHCHD4,23 nor other proteins involved in mitochondrial calcium metabolism were changed in the subject’s fibroblasts (data not shown). Furthermore, proteomics analysis did not detect other non-mitochondrial deregulated pathways, suggesting that CHCHD4 variants primarily affect OXPHOS proteins.
Discussion
In conclusion, this work shows that a CHCHD4 (MIA40) defect in humans is associated with a severe mitochondrial disease, resulting mainly from an OXPHOS function and assembly defect. Nevertheless, this defect does not alter other well-known functions depending on CHCHD4, such as Ca2+ signaling, or cytosolic ISC-containing proteins, suggesting that the residual amount of CHCHD4 is sufficient to maintain these functions. This confirms a central role of CHCHD4 in OXPHOS protein import, but why other functions are not affected is intriguing. Moreover, these results add to rare causes of protein import defects associated with pathogenic variants in AIFM1, GFER, TIMM50 (MIM: 607381; translocase of inner mitochondrial membrane 50), TIMM8B (MIM: 606659), TIMM22 (MIM: 607251), TOMM7 (MIM: 607980; translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 7), MAGMAS/PAM16 (MIM: 614336; presequence translocase-associated motor 16), and DNAJC19 (MIM: 608977, DNAJ/HSP40 homolog, subfamily C, member 19)28 and emphasizes the wide clinical heterogeneity associated with this cause of genetic diseases.
Limitations of the study
The coexistence of a complete CHCHD4 deletion and the p.Ser2Phe variation leads to a significant decrease in CHCHD4 protein, and it is not possible to determine whether the p.Ser2Phe variation leads to a total loss of protein function or whether some residual activity remains.
We present here a single case that does not allow us to determine the natural history of CHCHD4, and identification of additional individuals with CHCHD4 variants will allow us to better define the clinical and biochemical consequences of these very rare variations.
Data and code availability
The genome sequencing data supporting the current study have not been deposited in a public repository because consent was not obtained for this.
The published article includes all other data generated or analyzed during this study, or it is readily available from the authors.
Proteomic data submission
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited into the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD069027.
ClinVar submission
The accession number for the c.5C>T (p.Ser2Phe) variant is VCV004795219.1. The accession number for the CHCHD4 deletion is SCV007338468.
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche through the Investissements d’Avenir program ANR-10-IAHU-01 (to M.M., C.B., P.N., and A.R.) and the E-Rare project GENOMIT (01GM1207 to A.R. and M.M.). We acknowledge the use of bioresources of the Necker Imagine DNA Biobank (BB-033-00065). R.W.T. is funded by the Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research (203105/Z/16/Z), the Mitochondrial Disease Patient Cohort (UK) (G0800674), the Medical Research Council (MR/W019027/1), the Lily Foundation, the Pathological Society, the UK NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ageing and Age-related disease award to the Newcastle upon Tyne Foundation Hospitals NHS Trust, LifeArc, and the UK NHS Highly Specialised Service for Rare Mitochondrial Disorders of Adults and Children. M.A. thanks Medical Research Council (MR/K002201/2).
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xhgg.2026.100615.
Web resources
Alphafold Protein Structure Database, https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/
MassDynamics 2.0 software, https://massdynamics.com
OMIM, http://www.omim.org/
Supplemental information
References
- 1.Pfanner N., den Brave F., Becker T. Mitochondrial protein import stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2025;27:188–201. doi: 10.1038/s41556-024-01590-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Modjtahedi N., Tokatlidis K., Dessen P., Kroemer G. Mitochondrial Proteins Containing Coiled-Coil-Helix-Coiled-Coil-Helix (CHCH) Domains in Health and Disease. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016;41:245–260. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Al-Habib H., Ashcroft M. CHCHD4 (MIA40) and the mitochondrial disulfide relay system. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2021;49:17–27. doi: 10.1042/BST20190232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhou Z.D., Saw W.T., Tan E.K. Mitochondrial CHCHD-Containing Proteins: Physiologic Functions and Link with Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017;54:5534–5546. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-0099-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brosey C.A., Shen R., Tainer J.A. NADH-bound AIF activates the mitochondrial CHCHD4/MIA40 chaperone by a substrate-mimicry mechanism. EMBO J. 2025;44:1220–1248. doi: 10.1038/s44318-024-00360-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Murari A., Thiriveedi V.R., Mohammad F., Vengaldas V., Gorla M., Tammineni P., Krishnamoorthy T., Sepuri N.B.V. Human mitochondrial MIA40 (CHCHD4) is a component of the Fe-S cluster export machinery. Biochem. J. 2015;471:231–241. doi: 10.1042/BJ20150012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ma J., Wang P.Y., Zhuang J., Son A.Y., Karius A.K., Syed A.M., Nishi M., Wu Z., Mori M.P., Kim Y.C., Hwang P.M. CHCHD4-TRIAP1 regulation of innate immune signaling mediates skeletal muscle adaptation to exercise. Cell Rep. 2024;43 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Funayama M., Ohe K., Amo T., Furuya N., Yamaguchi J., Saiki S., Li Y., Ogaki K., Ando M., Yoshino H., et al. CHCHD2 mutations in autosomal dominant late-onset Parkinson's disease: a genome-wide linkage and sequencing study. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:274–282. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70266-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bannwarth S., Ait-El-Mkadem S., Chaussenot A., Genin E.C., Lacas-Gervais S., Fragaki K., Berg-Alonso L., Kageyama Y., Serre V., Moore D.G., et al. A mitochondrial origin for frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis through CHCHD10 involvement. Brain. 2014;137:2329–2345. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Di Fonzo A., Ronchi D., Lodi T., Fassone E., Tigano M., Lamperti C., Corti S., Bordoni A., Fortunato F., Nizzardo M., et al. The mitochondrial disulfide relay system protein GFER is mutated in autosomal-recessive myopathy with cataract and combined respiratory-chain deficiency. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009;84:594–604. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ghezzi D., Sevrioukova I., Invernizzi F., Lamperti C., Mora M., D'Adamo P., Novara F., Zuffardi O., Uziel G., Zeviani M. Severe X-linked mitochondrial encephalomyopathy associated with a mutation in apoptosis-inducing factor. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010;86:639–649. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bengtsson L., Otto H. LUMA interacts with emerin and influences its distribution at the inner nuclear membrane. J. Cell Sci. 2008;121:536–548. doi: 10.1242/jcs.019281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Merner N.D., Hodgkinson K.A., Haywood A.F.M., Connors S., French V.M., Drenckhahn J.D., Kupprion C., Ramadanova K., Thierfelder L., McKenna W., et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy type 5 is a fully penetrant, lethal arrhythmic disorder caused by a missense mutation in the TMEM43 gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008;82:809–821. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liang W.C., Mitsuhashi H., Keduka E., Nonaka I., Noguchi S., Nishino I., Hayashi Y.K. TMEM43 mutations in Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy-related myopathy. Ann. Neurol. 2011;69:1005–1013. doi: 10.1002/ana.22338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jang M.W., Oh D.Y., Yi E., Liu X., Ling J., Kim N., Sharma K., Kim T.Y., Lee S., Kim A.R., et al. A nonsense TMEM43 variant leads to disruption of connexin-linked function and autosomal dominant auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2019681118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jumper J., Evans R., Pritzel A., Green T., Figurnov M., Ronneberger O., Tunyasuvunakool K., Bates R., Žídek A., Potapenko A., et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fagnani E., Cocomazzi P., Pellegrino S., Tedeschi G., Scalvini F.G., Cossu F., Da Vela S., Aliverti A., Mastrangelo E., Milani M. CHCHD4 binding affects the active site of apoptosis inducing factor (AIF): Structural determinants for allosteric regulation. Structure. 2024;32:594–602.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2024.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thomas L.W., Stephen J.M., Ashcroft M. CHCHD4 regulates the expression of mitochondrial genes that are essential for tumour cell growth. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Basis Dis. 2024;1870 doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hangen E., Féraud O., Lachkar S., Mou H., Doti N., Fimia G.M., Lam N.V., Zhu C., Godin I., Muller K., et al. Interaction between AIF and CHCHD4 Regulates Respiratory Chain Biogenesis. Mol. Cell. 2015;58:1001–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chang H.C., Shapiro J.S., Jiang X., Senyei G., Sato T., Geier J., Sawicki K.T., Ardehali H. Augmenter of liver regeneration regulates cellular iron homeostasis by modulating mitochondrial transport of ATP-binding cassette B8. eLife. 2021;10 doi: 10.7554/eLife.65158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Reinhardt C., Arena G., Nedara K., Edwards R., Brenner C., Tokatlidis K., Modjtahedi N. AIF meets the CHCHD4/Mia40-dependent mitochondrial import pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Mol. Basis Dis. 2020;1866 doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Habich M., Salscheider S.L., Murschall L.M., Hoehne M.N., Fischer M., Schorn F., Petrungaro C., Ali M., Erdogan A.J., Abou-Eid S., et al. Vectorial Import via a Metastable Disulfide-Linked Complex Allows for a Quality Control Step and Import by the Mitochondrial Disulfide Relay. Cell Rep. 2019;26:759–774.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Petrungaro C., Zimmermann K.M., Küttner V., Fischer M., Dengjel J., Bogeski I., Riemer J. The Ca(2+)-Dependent Release of the Mia40-Induced MICU1-MICU2 Dimer from MCU Regulates Mitochondrial Ca(2+) Uptake. Cell Metab. 2015;22:721–733. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rouault T.A. The indispensable role of mammalian iron sulfur proteins in function and regulation of multiple diverse metabolic pathways. Biometals. 2019;32:343–353. doi: 10.1007/s10534-019-00191-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang H., Shi H., Rajan M., Canarie E.R., Hong S., Simoneschi D., Pagano M., Bush M.F., Stoll S., Leibold E.A., Zheng N. FBXL5 Regulates IRP2 Stability in Iron Homeostasis via an Oxygen-Responsive [2Fe2S] Cluster. Mol. Cell. 2020;78:31–41.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shaveta G., Shi J., Chow V.T.K., Song J. Structural characterization reveals that viperin is a radical S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) enzyme. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;391:1390–1395. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.12.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Terao M., Garattini E., Romão M.J., Leimkühler S. Evolution, expression, and substrate specificities of aldehyde oxidase enzymes in eukaryotes. J. Biol. Chem. 2020;295:5377–5389. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV119.007741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ruiz-Pesini E., Montoya J., Pacheu-Grau D. Molecular Insights into Mitochondrial Protein Translocation and Human Disease. Genes. 2021;12 doi: 10.3390/genes12071031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The genome sequencing data supporting the current study have not been deposited in a public repository because consent was not obtained for this.
The published article includes all other data generated or analyzed during this study, or it is readily available from the authors.
Proteomic data submission
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited into the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD069027.
ClinVar submission
The accession number for the c.5C>T (p.Ser2Phe) variant is VCV004795219.1. The accession number for the CHCHD4 deletion is SCV007338468.




