Skip to main content
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 2003 Dec;53(497):953–956.

Does changing from mercury to electronic blood pressure measurement influence recorded blood pressure? An observational study.

Richard J McManus 1, Jonathan Mant 1, Martyn R P Hull 1, F D Richard Hobbs 1
PMCID: PMC1314749  PMID: 14960220

Abstract

Mercury sphygmomanometers have been commonly used in primary care to measure blood pressure but are associated with bias. Electronic blood pressure machines are being introduced in many practices and have anecdotally been associated with higher recorded blood pressure. This study examined recorded blood pressure in four practices before and after electronic blood pressure machine introduction. No consistent change in mean blood pressure was apparent following their introduction, but there was a large and significant fall in terminal digit preference suggesting improved precision of recording.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (288.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ireland J. In praise of mercury sphygmomanometers. Electronic readings of blood pressure seem to be higher than readings obtained with mercury sphygmomanometers. BMJ. 2001 May 19;322(7296):1249–1249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. McAlister F. A., Straus S. E. Evidence based treatment of hypertension. Measurement of blood pressure: an evidence based review. BMJ. 2001 Apr 14;322(7291):908–911. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7291.908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. O'Brien E. Replacing the mercury sphygmomanometer. Requires clinicians to demand better automated devices. BMJ. 2000 Mar 25;320(7238):815–816. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7238.815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, Thomas M. Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175. Blood Press Monit. 1996 Feb;1(1):55–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ramsay L., Williams B., Johnston G., MacGregor G., Poston L., Potter J., Poulter N., Russell G. Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the third working party of the British Hypertension Society. J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Sep;13(9):569–592. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wingfield D., Freeman G. K., Bulpitt C. J., General Practice Hypertension Study Group (GPHSG) Selective recording in blood pressure readings may increase subsequent mortality. QJM. 2002 Sep;95(9):571–577. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/95.9.571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES