Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2026 Apr 22;17:1790697. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1790697

Acute high-intensity exercise alters gut microbiota composition and energy metabolism in different strains of mice

Ruolin Gao 1,†,#, Jie Wang 1,†,‡,#, Jiajia Song 1, Wenlong Zhang 1, Lei Quan 1,*
PMCID: PMC13148273  PMID: 42100686

Abstract

Introduction

The gut microbiota is a critical modulator of host energy metabolism and immune regulation. Although exercise modulates microbial composition, the temporal dynamics and strain-specific impact of acute high-intensity exercise remains unclear.

Methods

This study investigated dynamic alterations in gut microbiota following acute high-intensity exercise in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, focusing on energy and gut health-related genera. Age-matched male mice underwent a 30-min high-intensity treadmill run. To capture temporal dynamics, colonic content samples were collected at 0, 30, and 60 min post-exercise for 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Results

Exercise induced significant remodeling of gut microbiota composition in both strains, with a notable post-exercise elevation in the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio, particularly in C57BL/6 mice (C57Cr vs. C57T0, p < 0.01; C57Cr vs. C57T60, p < 0.05; BCCr vs. BCT30, p < 0.05). Both alpha and beta diversity metrics revealed significant exercise-induced microbial changes, with C57BL/6 mice showing a more pronounced increase in diversity at 30 and 60 min post-exercise (OTUs and observed species, all p < 0.001) compared to BALB/c mice. Functional analysis revealed strain-specific responses: BALB/c mice exhibited upregulated enzymes involved in energy metabolism but impaired immune regulation, indicating compromised intestinal barrier integrity and delayed energy recovery. In contrast, C57BL/6 mice displayed enhanced anti-inflammatory capacity, accelerated energy recovery through enrichment of energy metabolism-related genera, and maintained gut integrity through the proliferation of beneficial bacteria. The potential important genus Muribaculum identified as a key exercise-responsive taxon across time points, potentially associated with gut motility. The role of Muribaculum warrants further using multi-omics investigation.

Discussion

These findings provide a foundation for identifying genetic loci influencing exercise microbiota interactions, thereby providing a theoretical basis for microbiota-based personalized exercise interventions.

Keywords: acute high-intensity exercise, energy metabolism, gut microbiota, Muribaculum, temporal dynamics

1. Introduction

The gut microbiota comprises a complex ecosystem of trillions of microorganisms that critically influence host physiology and susceptibility to diseases. Recognized as a novel endocrine organ (Jiang, 2024), the gut microbiome possesses collective genetic potential termed the gut metagenome (Sales and Reimer, 2023). Compared to the human genome, which encodes approximately 23,000 genes, the gut microbiome contains approximately 3.3 million genes involved in modulating numerous aspects of host function, including energy extraction and metabolism (Turnbaugh et al., 2006), inflammation (Boulangé et al., 2016), vitamin synthesis (Wan et al., 2022), and immunity (Mohr et al., 2020). The inherent plasticity of the gut microbiota further positions it as a promising therapeutic target for disease prevention and management (Gomez et al., 2019). As a pivotal interface between the host and external environment, the composition and functional output of the gut microbiota are influenced by various extrinsic factors, including diet and exercise. Disruption of the homeostatic host-microbiota interaction has been established as a driver of multiple diseases (Cani and Van Hul, 2024). Exercise has emerged as a powerful modulator of both the composition and metabolic activity of the gut microbiota (Monda et al., 2017; Hao et al., 2022; Cho et al., 2020; Lkhagva et al., 2021; Pereira et al., 2025; Morgado et al., 2023). Research aimed at understanding the interaction between exercise and gut microbiota has largely expanded within the past decade. In 2014, Clarke and colleagues published a landmark study demonstrating that professional rugby players exhibited higher alpha diversity and a greater relative abundance of the health-associated genus Akkermansia, compared to sedentary controls with high or low body mass indices (Clarke et al., 2014). These findings stimulated numerous subsequent investigations into the exercise-gut microbiota relationship. Several observational studies have subsequently reported that exercise-associated states correlate with increased alpha diversity (Estaki et al., 2016; Mörkl et al., 2017), enrichment of beneficial microbial taxa (Estaki et al., 2016; Jang et al., 2019; O'Donovan et al., 2020), and elevated fecal concentrations of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (Barton et al., 2018). This bidirectional relationship is supported by findings indicating that the gut microbiota and its metabolites can reciprocally affect exercise capacity and performance by enhancing lactate metabolism, increasing glycogen storage, and altering substrate metabolism in skeletal muscle (Sales and Reimer, 2023). Specific microbial-derived SCFAs, such as acetate and propionate, have also been directly implicated in improved athletic performance (Scheiman et al., 2019; Koh et al., 2016). However, whether and how gut microbiota alterations directly mediate the metabolic benefits associated with exercise remain unclear.

The effect of exercise on gut microbiota also depends on exercise modality and intensity. Aerobic exercise has been shown to induce diet-independent compositional and functional changes in the human gut microbiota (Allen et al., 2018b), which reverse upon cessation of training (Allen et al., 2018b; Hampton-Marcell et al., 2020). For example, high-intensity intermittent exercise has been reported to increase the abundance of Bacteroides, the Bacteroidetes-to-Firmicutes ratio, and alpha diversity, suggesting a potential to counter dysbiosis associated with diet-induced obesity and various metabolic disorders (Denou et al., 2016). Chronic exercise beneficially modulates the gut microbiota and its metabolic output. The positive effects of chronic exercise on gut microbiota may depend on acute changes in microbial community structure and function following a single exercise session (acute exercise). Thus, delineating the dynamic changes in gut microbiota following acute exercise serves as a critical prerequisite for unraveling the microbial mechanisms underlying the health benefits of exercise, ultimately, for optimizing evidence-based exercise interventions.

A significant challenge in translating findings from murine models to humans stems from the greater inter-subject variability in human gut microbiome composition (Tanes et al., 2021). For instance, dietary interventions typically produce more substantial alterations in gut microbiota composition in mice compared to humans (Baxter et al., 2019; Johnson et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2011). To identify robust and conserved exercise-responsive microbial signatures, we integrated time-series datasets from BALB/c and C57BL/6J mice, two widely utilized laboratory mouse strains. By examining the differential responses of gut microbiota to acute high-intensity exercise across distinct genetic backgrounds, we aimed to delineate potential important exercise-responsive taxa and achieve high-resolution temporal insights into gut microbiota dynamics post-exercise.

In this study, we subjected C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice to a single bout of acute high-intensity exercise, in order to examine strain-specific alterations in gut microbiota and differences between strains following exercise intervention. While previous research relying on single-time-point sampling has demonstrated exercise-induced structural changes in gut microbiota, such approaches are limited in capturing transient microbial dynamics. We hypothesize that post-exercise sampling time points are critical for capturing acute exercise-induced microbial shifts. Thus, to investigate temporal alterations in gut microbiota across two mouse strains with different motility characteristics following acute high-intensity exercise, samples were collected at multiple time points (0, 30, and 60 min) at rest and following a single acute high-intensity exercise session.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Animal and experimental design

Eight-week-old male BALB/c mice (n = 32) and C57BL/6J mice (n = 32), weighing 27 ± 2 g, were purchased from Charles River Co. (Beijing, China). All mice were housed individually in cages in a controlled environment (23 ± 1 °C, 12:12 h light–dark cycle). All shipped mice were acclimated to the new controlled surroundings for 1 week. To minimize the variation of environmental factors, all mice had ad libitum access to autoclaved water and were fed a standard commercial rodent chow diet (Rodent breeding diet, code 1035, Beijing HFK Bioscience Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).

All exercise experiments were conducted at the same time of the day (between 9 a.m. and 12 a.m., 1–3 h after lights off), with immediate sample processing to control for circadian variation. Exercise protocol was adapted from standardized running protocols used in previous studies with slight modifications. The protocol was designed in line with PASS protocols of the Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC) (MoTrPAC Study Group, Lead Analysts, MoTrPAC Study Group, 2024; Sanford et al., 2020; Sato et al., 2022). Sampling series was selected towards early time points (0, 30, and 60 min post-exercise) to capture the temporal dynamics of acute-exercise responses.

2.2. Exercise protocol

All experiments were conducted between 9 a.m. and 12 p.m. in non-fasted animals. A modified exercise protocol based on previous studies was employed (Sanford et al., 2020; Sato et al., 2022). In brief, mice were habituated to treadmill running (Model DB030, Beijing Zhishuduobao Biological Technology, Beijing, China) following a 5-day acclimatization protocol as described below (Days 1–5):

Day 1 (15 min total; 5 deg. inclination).

For the first 5 min, mice were placed on the stationary treadmill.

Start running at 6 m/min and accelerate by 2 m/min every 2 min up to 12 m/min.

Day 2 (15 min total; 5 deg. inclination).

Start running at 6 m/min and accelerate by 2 m/min every 2 min up to 14 m/min.

Day 3 (15 min total; 5 deg. inclination).

Start running at 6 m/min and accelerate by 2 m/min every 2 min up to 16 m/min.

Day 4 and Day 5.

Rest.

Mice completed the acclimatization protocol were randomly divided into two groups in each mouse strain. On the day of study, food was removed from all the cages at 8 a.m. (1 h prior to the experiment). The exercise group of mice were subjected to a single bout of acute treadmill running as described below (Day 6), whereas the control group of mice were placed on a stationary treadmill alongside the running treadmill for the same amount of time (sham-exercise). To ensure exercise-specific effects, control mice were subjected to identical handling, environmental, and procedural conditions as exercised mice, except for treadmill belt movement.

Day 6 (30 min total; 5 deg. inclination) Start running at 6 m/min and accelerate by 2 m/min every 2 min up to 20 m/min, an intensity previously estimated to correspond to approximately 80–90% VO2max in mice based on published regression equations (Qin et al., 2024; Sousa et al., 2019; Xu L. et al., 2023). Mice attempting to rest were encouraged to continue running by gently tapping on their back.

Mice were kept in their host cages with no access to food between the end of exercise and before they were sacrificed by cervical dislocation immediately, 30 or 60 min after the exercise bout (n = 8 for each time point per strain) or immediately after shamexercise (n = 8), respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Diagram illustrating the study design: 32 BALB/c and 32 C57BL/6 mice underwent adaptive treadmill running followed by a single high-intensity exercise bout (30 min). Colonic contents were collected at baseline (Cr), immediately after exercise (T0), and at 30 min (T30) and 60 min (T60) post-exercise for 16S rRNA sequencing.

Study design.

2.3. Sample acquisition

2.3.1. Fecal sample collection

In both BALB/c mice and C57BL/6 J mice, samples were aseptically collected at immediately, 30 or 60 min after the exercise bout or immediately after sham-exercise as baseline. The entire intestine was removed and colonic segments were excised using a sterile scalpel at 4 °C. To ensure consistency in microbiome analysis, the colonic contents were gently extruded in their entirety from the whole colon using sterile tweezers, avoiding cross-contamination, and placed into sterile centrifuge tubes. In order to protect the quality of the samples, the samples were kept at −80 °C.

2.3.2. Extraction of fecal sample DNA and quality control

The CTAB/SDS method was used to extract total genome DNA from fecal samples, using the CTAB extraction buffer (N0211, NobleRyder, Beijing, China). All samples from the same strain were processed in parallel to minimize batch effects. The purity and concentration of the DNA was detected by agarose gel electrophoresis, and the appropriate amount of DNA was placed in a centrifuge tube and diluted to 1 ng/μL with sterile water. Both extraction blanks (sterile water subjected to the full DNA extraction protocol) and PCR-negative controls (nuclease-free water replacing template DNA) were included to assess contamination during DNA extraction and amplification steps.

2.4. 16S rRNA gene sequencing and data processing

2.4.1. 16S rRNA gene amplification and library preparation

The diluted genomic DNA was used as a template for PCR amplification using specific primers, high efficiency high fidelity enzyme and Phusion® High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix with GC Buffer to ensure the amplification efficiency and accuracy. Primers in the 16S V4 region (515F and 806R) identified bacterial diversity; primers in the 18S V4 region (528F and 706R) identified prokaryotic microbial diversity; and primers in the ITS1 region (ITS5-1737F and ITS2-2043R) identified fungal diversity. In addition, amplified regions included: 16S V3-V4/16S V4-V5/16SV5-V7; Archaea 16S V4-V5/Archaea 16S V8; 18S V9 and ITS2 regions. For electrophoresis detection, screen out eligible PCR products using an agarose gel at a 2% concentration. After being purified using magnetic beads, the qualified PCR products were quantified using enzyme labeling and mixed in aliquots based on their concentration. Following mixing, they were electrophoretically detected using a 2% agarose gel once more, and the target bands were recovered using the Qiagen gel recovery kit. The TruSeq® DNA PCR-Free Sample Preparation Kit was used to create the library, Qubit and Q-PCR were used to quantify it, and NovaSeq6000 was used to qualify it for online sequencing.

2.4.2. Paired-end reads assembly and quality control

Paired-end reads were assigned to samples based on their unique barcode and truncated by cutting off the barcode and primer sequence. Paired-end reads were merged using FLASH (VI.2.71) (Magoč and Salzberg, 2011), which was designed to merge paired-end reads when at least some of the reads overlap the read generated from the opposite end of the same DNA fragment, and the splicing sequences were called raw tags. Quality filtering on the raw tags were performed under specific filtering conditions to obtain the high-quality clean tag (Bokulich et al., 2013) according to the QIIME (V1.9.12) (Caporaso et al., 2010) quality controlled process. The tags were compared with the reference database (Silva database3) using UCHIME algorithm (UCHIME Algorithm4) (Edgar et al., 2011) to detect chimera sequences, and then the chimera sequences were removed (Haas et al., 2011). Then the Effective Tags finally obtained.

2.4.3. Bioinformatics analysis

Based on the valid data, species categorization analysis and OTU (Operational Taxonomic Unit) clustering were then carried out. The OTUs sequences were classified by species annotation according to the silva SSUrRNA database (Quast et al., 2013). To assess the diversity of species complexity in the samples, Alpha diversity analysis was performed by observed species index and Shannon index, and Beta diversity was analyzed by Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) performed based on UniFrac distances. To statistically test for differences in microbial community structure between groups, we performed analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) using the vegan package in R (version 4.4.2) based on Bray-Curtis distances, each with 999 permutations. Differences in abundance between groups were calculated using the R (version 4.4.2) edgeR package, and heatmap and Venn plots were plotted. All difference abundance histograms were plotted by LDA Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis performed using the R (version 4.4.2) lefse package implementation, with a linear divergence analysis (LDA) score threshold set at 4.0. LDA scores indicate the degree of effect of significantly different species between groups, with higher scores indicating higher scores indicate greater differences in characteristics between the two groups. Functional predictions of the differentially abundant genera were derived from previously published literature.

2.5. Statistical analysis

The analyses were performed using R (version 4.4.2) and SPSS (version 26.0) and expressed as means ± SEM. After data were tested for normality, the Student’s t test was used to compare two groups. For comparisons involving more than two groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by post-hoc pairwise comparisons using the least significant difference (LSD) test. To control the false discovery rate due to multiple testing, p-values from all post-hoc comparisons were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure (FDR < 0.05). Data differences were considered to be statistically significant at a value of p < 0.05. Figures were generated using the GraphPad Prism software (Version 9.0; San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Overall distribution of gut microbiota species in response to acute exercise

Analysis of fecal samples by 16S rRNA sequencing revealed significant phylum-level shifts in gut microbiota composition following acute exercise in both BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice, with strain-specific variations in abundance. Bacteroidetes, Fimicutes, Proteobacteria, and Deferribacteres were the dominant bacterial phyla (Figure 2A). The identified predominant phyla, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria, are well-established major constituents of murine gut microbiota.

Figure 2.

Panel A: Circos plot showing top 10 phyla across groups. Panel B: Heatmap of top 35 genera. Panel C: Line graph of Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio over time; C57BL/6 mice show significant increases at T30 and T60 vs. baseline; BALB/c mice show increase only at T30. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

Impact of acute high-intensity exercise on compositional dynamics of gut microbiota. (A) Circos plot representing the top 10 most abundant phylums across groups. (B) Heatmap illustrating the top 35 most abundant genera across samples. (C) Temporal dynamics of the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio following acute high-intensity exercise. No significant difference was observed between the two strains at baseline (BCCr vs. C57Cr). Comparisons shown: within-strain (BCCr vs. BCT30/BCT60; C57Cr vs. C57T30/C57T60), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, determined by one-way ANOVA followed by LSD post-hoc tests.

The top 35 most abundant genera were selected based on genus-level species annotation and abundance data from all samples. These genera were clustered at the genus and sample levels and displayed in a heatmap according to their relative abundance (Figure 2B). While certain genera showed similar abundance patterns, most exhibited pronounced inter-strain differences. Notably, temporal changes in genus abundance following exercise were strain-dependent, with contrasting trajectories observed for specific taxa (e.g., Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas, and Staphylococcus were enriched in C57BL/6 mice at 60 min post-exercise [C57T60], whereas Enterococcus and Enterorhabdus predominated in BALB/c mice at baseline [BCT0]).

The ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes, a critical indicator of intestinal microecology, increased post-exercise in both strains, with a more marked elevation in C57BL/6 mice (Figure 2C). This increase suggests improved intestinal health following exercise, as previous studies have associated dysregulation of the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio with metabolic disorders (e.g., obesity, diabetes).

3.2. Significant changes in gut microbiota alpha diversity following acute exercise

The average number of OTUs and shared OTUs across different groups (BCCr, BCT0, BCT30, BCT60, C57Cr, C57T0, C57T30, and C57T60) were visualized using Venn diagrams (Figures 3A,B). A total of 591 genera were shared by all BALB/c mouse groups pre- and post-exercise, with exercise eliciting dynamic genus-level changes. The BCCr group had 96 unique genera, BCT0 had 193 unique genera, BCT30 had 93 unique genera, and BCT60 had 110 unique genera (Figure 3A). In contrast, C57BL/6 mice displayed greater microbial plasticity, with 644 shared genera across groups; however, the C57Cr group had 60 unique genera, C57T0 had 92 unique genera, C57T30 had 302 unique genera, and C57T60 had 421 unique genera (Figure 3B). Petal plot analysis further confirmed these strain-specific differences, revealing a significantly higher number of unique genera in C57T30 and C57T60 groups compared to other groups (Figure 3C). These results indicate that acute aerobic exercise has the most substantial impact on gut microbiota composition in C57BL/6 mice at 30 and 60 min post-exercise.

Figure 3.

Panels A-B: Venn diagrams of OTU overlap in BALB/c and C57BL/6 groups. Panel C: Petal diagram of shared/unique genera (535 core genera). Panel D: Box plots of observed species – C57BL/6 shows higher diversity at T30/T60 vs. baseline (*P<0.001). Panel E: Violin plots of Shannon index – similar strain-specific increases (*P<0.001). Between-strain baseline comparison: ###P<0.001.

Acute high-intensity exercise significantly alters gut microbiota α-diversity. (A,B) Venn diagrams illustrating the average number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and overlapping OTUs among groups in (A) BALB/c and (B) C57BL/6 mice. (C) Petal diagram showing shared and unique bacterial genera across sample groups. (D,E) Alpha diversity as indicated by (D) observed species and (E) Shannon index across groups. Comparisons shown: within-strain (BCCr vs. BCT30/BCT60; C57Cr vs. C57T30/C57T60), **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; and between-strain baseline (BCCr vs. C57Cr). ###p < 0.001, determined by Wilcoxon test. p-values were adjusted for multiple testing with the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction.

Alpha diversity analysis was performed to assess changes from baseline (sham-exercise) within each strain. To comprehensively characterize community structure, we used observed species (richness) and the Shannon index (richness and evenness) (Eitan et al., 2024). The observed species indicated that the BCT60 (p < 0.01), C57T30 (p < 0.001), and C57T60 (p < 0.01) groups had significantly greater numbers of observed species (Figure 3D), suggesting the emergence of new genera post-exercise. At baseline, C57BL/6 mice harbored significantly more OTUs than BALB/c mice (p < 0.001), and this strain difference persisted across all post-exercise time points, with a particularly notable expansion of novel genera in the C57T30 and C57T60 groups. Moreover, substantial differences in Shannon index were identified between groups: BCCr vs. BCT60 (p < 0.05) and C57Cr vs. C57T30 (p < 0.05). Notably, temporal diversity patterns differed between strains; while BALB/c mice displayed increasing shannon diversity from 30 to 60 min post-exercise (BCT30 vs. BCT60), C57BL/6 mice exhibited peak diversity at 30 min (C57T30) followed by a decline at 60 min (C57T60) (Figure 3E). This decline, despite sustained high richness, reflects decreased community evenness driven by the increasing dominance of exercise-responsive genera. Overall, exercise enhanced intestinal microbial diversity in both mouse strains; however, the increase was more pronounced in C57BL/6 mice than in BALB/c mice.

3.3. Significant changes in gut microbiota beta diversity following acute exercise

Regarding community similarity, PCoA analysis revealed significant shifts in microbial composition in the C57T30 and C57T60 groups compared to the C57Cr group (Figure 4B). In contrast, acute exercise had a less pronounced impact on BALB/c groups (BCT0, BCT30, and BCT60) compared to the BCCr group (Figure 4A). Both ANOSIM and PERMANOVA analyses confirmed significant between-group differences in gut microbial community structure. ANOSIM analysis confirmed significant between-group differences (all R > 0), with the most substantial variations observed between mouse strains (BCCr vs. C57Cr: p < 0.001, R = 0.803) and across post-exercise time points (C57Cr vs. C57T0: p < 0.05; C57Cr vs. C57T30/T60: p < 0.001; BCCr vs. BCT30: p < 0.001; BCCr vs. BCT60: p < 0.05). Notably, no significant difference was observed between the BCCr and BCT0 groups (p > 0.05).

Figure 4.

Panels A-B: PCoA plots (unweighted UniFrac) showing distinct clustering in BALB/c and C57BL/6 groups (95% confidence ellipses). Panels C-D: LDA scores (LDA>4.0) identifying discriminative taxa among time points. Panels E-F: Cladograms from LEfSe analysis highlighting enriched taxa for each time point in both strains.

Acute high-intensity exercise significantly alters gut microbiota β-diversity. (A,B) PCoA plots based on unweighted UniFrac distances showing distinct clustering of groups in (A) BALB/c and (B) C57BL/6 mice. Ellipses represent 95% confidence intervals around group centroids. (C,D) LDA scores from multi-group comparison among BCCr, BCT0, BCT30, and BCT60 groups in (C) BALB/c mice, and among C57Cr, C57T0, C57T30, and C57T60 groups in (D) C57BL/6 mice. Only taxa with LDA score > 4.0 and Wilcoxon test p < 0.05 (adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberg FDR) are shown. (E,F) LEfSe identifying specific microbial signatures in (E) BALB/c and (F) C57BL/6 mice groups. The same significance thresholds as in (C,D) were applied.

Additionally, LEfSe analysis revealed that at 30 min post-exercise, BALB/c mice were enriched in taxa belonging predominantly to the phylum Firmicutes, including Clostridia, Oscillospirales, and Oscillospiraceae (Figure 4C). At 60 min post-exercise, however, most enriched taxa belonged to the phylum Bacteroidetes, specifically Prevotellaceae, Muribaculaceae, and Bacteroidaceae (Figure 4C). In C57BL/6 mice, the C57T60 group showed enrichment in Bacilli and Lactobacillales, whereas Alistipes, Rikenellaceae, Bacteroides, and Bacteroidaceae were abundant in the C57T0 group (Figure 4D). Further examination via cladograms confirmed significant enrichment of Bacteroidaceae, Muribaculaceae, Prevotellaceae, Bacteroidales, and Bacteroidia in the BCT60 group, while Clostridium, Oscillospirales, Oscillospiraceae, and related taxa predominated in the BCT30 group (Figure 4E). In the C57T60 group, taxa such as Bacteroidaceae, Rikenellaceae, Bacteroides, and Alistipes were significantly enriched (Figure 4F). These findings suggest that acute aerobic exercise significantly promotes the proliferation of beneficial microbial taxa.

3.4. Comparative analysis of genus-level composition and functional shifts in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice

Comparative analysis between control groups (C57Cr vs. BCCr) identified 11 genera significantly differing in abundance, classified into the phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria. Of these, only Alistipes and Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 had average relative abundances exceeding 1% across all samples (Figure 5A). Functional analysis revealed that these genera are primarily involved in energy metabolism. Specifically, Alistipes produces succinic acid, a substrate for the TCA cycle, and modulates immune responses through the HIF-1α/IL-1β signaling pathway.

Figure 5.

Seven paired bar-dot plots (A–G) comparing genus abundances: (A) BCCr vs. C57Cr; (B) BCCr vs. BCT0; (C) BCCr vs. BCT30; (D) BCCr vs. BCT60; (E) C57Cr vs. C57T0; (F) C57Cr vs. C57T30; (G) C57Cr vs. C57T60. Non-overlapping confidence intervals indicate significant differences (FDR-adjusted).

Genus-level taxonomic divergence in gut microbiota between BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice following acute high-intensity exercise. (A–G) Comparative genus-level profiling reveals significant differences between (A) BCCr vs. C57Cr; (B) BCCr vs. BCT0; (C) BCCr vs. BCT30; (D) BCCr vs. BCT60; (E) C57Cr vs. C57T0; (F) C57Cr vs. C57T30; and (G) C57Cr vs. C57T60 groups. p-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method.

To investigate dynamic genus-level shifts in gut microbiota following acute high-intensity exercise, eight genera with significant intergroup differences were identified immediately after exercise (BCCr vs. BCT0) in BALB/c mice at T0 (immediately post-exercise). These genera belonged to the phyla Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteriota, and Firmicutes, with only three (Bacteroides, Colidextribacter, and Oscillibacter) exhibiting mean relative abundances above 1% across all samples (Figure 5B). Similarly, four genera displaying significant distributional changes were identified in C57BL/6 mice (C57Cr vs. C57T0), belonging to the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, each having a mean relative abundance exceeding 1% (Figure 5E).

At 30 min post-exercise, BALB/c mice (BCCr vs. BCT30) showed significant distributional differences in eight genera, assigned to the phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteriota. Among these, the dominant genus shifted towards Bacteroides, with only Bacteroides and Oscillospiraceae maintaining mean relative abundances above 1% (Figure 5C). In C57BL/6 mice (C57Cr vs. C57T30), 20 genera exhibiting significant intergroup variation were identified, belonging to the phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Desulfobacterota. Alloprevotella, Lactobacillus, Colidextribacter, Bilophila, Oscillibacter, and Odoribacter had mean relative abundances greater than 1% across samples. Remarkably, novel genera such as Romboutsia (0.2615%), Prevotella (0.2944%), and Prevotellaceae_UCG-003 (0.1643%) emerged in the C57T30 group but were absent in controls (C57Cr) (Figure 5F). This observation supports the notion that acute exercise significantly enhances microbial diversity, though the precise mechanisms underlying these increases remain unclear.

At 60 min post-exercise, BALB/c mice (BCCr vs. BCT60) displayed 10 genera with significant distributional differences, assigned to Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteriota. Among these, Oscillibacter, Oscillospiraceae, and Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 had mean relative abundances of approximately 1% or more (Figure 5D). For C57BL/6 mice (C57Cr vs. C57T60), 19 genera showing significant intergroup variations were identified, belonging to Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Desulfobacterota, and Actinobacteriota. The genera Bacteroides, Colidextribacter, Bilophila, Oscillibacter, Odoribacter, and Staphylococcus consistently exhibited mean relative abundances exceeding 1% (Figure 5G). Compared to the C57T30 group, the C57T60 group exhibited a relatively high number of significantly altered genera but fewer novel OTUs, suggesting stabilization of gut microbial composition at this time point.

Based on a comprehensive literature review of the functional analysis of the differentially abundant genera revealed alterations in immune-regulatory pathways (e.g., Bacteroides-associated pathways), elevated carbohydrate metabolism (e.g., Lactobacillus-mediated lactic acid production), and an increase in SCFA-producing bacteria (e.g., Alloprevotella) in both mouse strains. Collectively, these findings indicate that despite strain-specific genus-level differences, acute exercise drives functional convergence in gut microbiota through similar metabolic pathways.

3.5. Temporal dynamics of exercise-induced gut microbiota alterations in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice

We generated a chronological table summarizing genera that exhibited significant changes after exercise in both mouse strains to clarify the temporal dynamics of gut microbial responses to acute high-intensity exercise (Figure 6). Functional predictions of markedly altered genera were performed based on pathways related to metabolism, human disease, and cellular processes, and literature-derived functional annotations were incorporated to improve interpretation of genus-level shifts (Table 1).

Figure 6.

Table of mean ± SEM cell counts for gut genera in both strains at four time points. Cells color-coded: yellow = significant upregulation, blue = significant downregulation, based on p-value thresholds. Legend indicates direction of change and significance levels (FDR-adjusted).

Temporal dynamics of significant genus-level changes in BALB/c and C57BL/6 gut microbiota following acute high-intensity exercise. Relative abundances for all genera shown are expressed as mean ± SEM. p-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR method. Up: Up regulated; Down: Down regulated; NC: Not changed; ——: Not delected.

Table 1.

Microbiota functional profiles associated with locomotor responses in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice.

Genus Function summary References
Only in BALB/c Peptococcus Pathogenic bacteria, pro-inflammatory Sencio et al. (2022), Duan et al. (2021), and Huang et al. (2021)
UCG-005 Producing butyrate, fiber-degrading, bile acids deconjugation reaction Zhou J. et al. (2023), Li J. et al. (2022), Xu S. et al. (2022), Shi et al. (2022), Shi et al. (2023), Gao et al. (2022), Song et al. (2023), and Sun J. et al. (2022)
NK4A214_group Hydrogenation of long-chain FA Wang et al. (2019)
Anaerotruncus Producing acetic and butyrate, fiber digestion, inflammation-associated, fermenting sugars, autoimmune and metabolic disorders Valido et al. (2022), Wang W. et al. (2022), Gao et al. (2022), Yuan et al. (2022), Eslabão et al. (2022), García-Belenguer et al. (2021), Raimondi et al. (2021), Bailén et al. (2020), Luo et al. (2022), Bianchimano et al. (2022), Thomann et al. (2022), Yue et al. (2020), Bi et al. (2022), Song et al. (2023), Yao et al. (2020), and Yang et al. (2023a)
GCA-900066575 Lipid metabolism Zhou C. et al. (2022)
Candidatus_Arthromitus Metabolism Yang J. et al. (2023) and Vallianou et al. (2021)
Enterorhabdus Inflammatory-related, polyphenol-degrading, lignin metabolism, bile acids metabolism Xu W. et al. (2023), Lahtinen et al. (2023), Yin et al. (2022), Tang et al. (2021), and Lee et al. (2023)
Only in C57/6J Bifidobacterium Immunomodulatory activities Wu Y. et al. (2023), Gavzy et al. (2023), Derrien et al. (2022), and Zafar and Saier (2021)
Prevotella Bile acid metabolism-related, detoxify superoxide radicals and tolerate reactive oxygen species, producing SCFAs Abdelsalam et al. (2023)
Romboutsia Producing butyrate, associated with diabetes or other metabolic diseas, antioxidant capacity and glucose metabolism Wu et al. (2021), Ye et al. (2021), Zeng et al. (2019), Du et al. (2020), and Zhang P. et al. (2023)
Stenotrophomonas Colonize immunocompromised patients Ryan et al. (2009)
Helicobacter Peptic ulcer disease and nonulcer dyspepsia Fischbach and Malfertheiner (2018)
UCG-009 Inflammation-related Li et al. (2019)
Staphylococcus Promote inflammation Nat Rev Dis Primers (2018)
ASF356 Producing SCFAs Wang Q. et al. (2022)
Turicibacter Producing bacteria, producing butyrate and propionate, anti-inflammation, producing serotonin Chi et al. (2023), Yang et al. (2022), Rahman et al. (2023), Xu Y. et al. (2022); Garrido et al. (2021), Li et al. (2017), Lynch et al. (2023), and Pirozzi et al. (2023)
Tyzzerella Producing propionate, inflammatory-related Isipato et al. (2020), Huang et al. (2022), and Sugiyama et al. (2022)
Monoglobus producing butyrate, fiber degradation, bile acid metabolism Lesniak et al. (2022) and Kim et al. (2019)
Christensenellaceae_R-7_group Producing butyrate, fibrolytic bacteria, closely associated with host health Mao et al. (2023), Tian et al. (2023), Wang X. et al. (2022), Jian et al. (2022), and Bian et al. (2024)
Butyricimonas Producing butyric and isobutyric acids, bile acid metabolism-related Otsuka et al. (2024), Bai et al. (2023), Wen et al. (2023), Liu Y. et al. (2023), Dayama et al. (2020), Wang et al. (2023), and Zhuang et al. (2020)
UCG-003 Alfalfa fiber hydrolysis, producing SCFAs Gao et al. (2022)
Parabacteroides Producing acetate, anti-inflammation, antimetabolic disease-associated, producing succinate and secondary bile acid Ishibashi et al. (2022), Yu et al. (2022), Cui et al. (2022), Bi et al. (2022), Medawar et al. (2021), and Lei et al. (2021)
Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 Fiber-degrading, producing SCFAs, activation of AMPK signaling pathway Bian et al. (2024), Mei et al. (2023), Tao et al. (2022), Peng et al. (2022), and Li H. et al. (2022)
Ruminococcaceae Producing butyrate, cellulolytic bacterial community, modulate immunotherap Sun et al. (2021), Grenda et al. (2022), Asare et al. (2021), Jangid et al. (2022), He J. et al. (2023), Sun Y. et al. (2022), Messaoudene et al. (2022), and Zhuang et al. (2020)
Ruminococcus Metabolic diseases, intra- and extraintestinal diseases Crost et al. (2023)
Bilophila Producing lipopolysaccharide (LPS), promote inflammation Huang et al. (2019), Deng X. et al. (2022), Li L. et al. (2022), He et al. (2022), Zhao et al. (2022b), Zhao et al. (2022a), Wang et al. (2021), Agudelo-Ochoa et al. (2020), David et al. (2014), and Zhuang et al. (2020)
Lactobacillus Antibacterial activities, immunomodulatory activities Liévin-Le Moal and Servin (2014)
Alloprevotella Producing SCFAs, anti-inflammation Derrien et al. (2022), Chen et al. (2020), Zhou X. et al. (2023), Yang et al. (2023a), and Yang et al. (2023b)
Odoribacter Producing butyrate, associated with host intestinal inflammation Zhang Y. et al. (2023), Wang G. et al. (2022), Wang et al. (2023), Wang R. et al. (2022), Deng L. et al. (2022), and Cheng et al. (2018)
Alistipes Obesity-related, anti-inflammatory, producing butyrate, bile acid metabolism-related Cai et al. (2023), Luo et al. (2021), Fernández et al. (2020), Huang et al. (2019), Chanda and De (2024), Liang et al. (2023), Messaoudene et al. (2022), He et al. (2020), Zhong et al. (2020), David et al. (2014), and Song et al. (2023)
Common in BALB/c and C57/6J Butyricicoccus Producing butyrate, regulating bile acids Devriese et al. (2017), Li et al. (2023), and Zhou X. et al. (2023)
Oscillospiraceae Producing butyrate, anti-inflammation Correa et al. (2023), Litwinowicz and Gamian (2023), Pirozzi et al. (2023), Leth et al. (2023), Van den Abbeele et al. (2022), Yang J. Y. et al. (2023), and Juárez-Castelán et al. (2022)
Muribaculum Carbohydrate metabolism, immunomodulatory screen, deconjugation and oxidation of bile acid Wang J. L. et al. (2022), Chung et al. (2020), Medina-Larqué et al. (2022), Lee et al. (2023), Shi et al. (2023), Marion et al. (2020), Abbondio et al. (2023), Yang B. et al. (2023), Xu H. et al. (2023), and Wang T. et al. (2022)
Intestinimonas Producing butyrate, anti-obesity and anti-inflammatory, prevent obesity and improve insulin sensitivity Zhu et al. (2024), He K. et al. (2023), Zhou Y. et al. (2022), Companys et al. (2021), Du et al. (2020), Zhuang et al. (2020), Chen et al. (2024), Cheng et al. (2023), Liu T. et al. (2023), Song et al. (2023), Yu et al. (2022), Cai et al. (2020), Bui et al. (2015), and Bui et al. (2016)
Oscillibacter Obesity-related, producing SCFAs Newman et al. (2023), Scorletti et al. (2020), Yao et al. (2020), and Thingholm et al. (2019)
Colidextribacter Oxidative stress, anti-inflammatory and lipid deposition, producing SCFAs Sun J. et al. (2022), Yang et al. (2023a), Yang et al. (2023b), Wu Q. et al. (2023), Liu et al. (2022), and Zhang P. et al. (2023)
Bacteroides Polysaccharides degradation, anti-inflammation, producing SCFAs, synthesizing Vitamin K Wexler (2007), Tan et al. (2019), and Bäckhed et al. (2005)

Functional roles are inferred from published literature (references shown) and represent predictions based on taxonomy, not direct measurements from this study.

In BALB/c mice, four genera were significantly up-regulated and four were down-regulated immediately after exercise (BCT0). Among the down-regulated taxa, Candida, which participates in host immune regulation, showed the greatest decline (47%). At 30 min post-exercise (BCT30), five genera increased and three decreased. Candida abundance continued to decline, whereas genera associated with energy metabolism—particularly Prevotellaceae_UCG-001, which increased by 138%—continued to expand. By 60 min post-exercise (BCT60), ten genera were significantly altered, with three down-regulated and seven up-regulated. Most genera linked to energy metabolism and immune regulation increased further at T60 compared to T30, with the exception of Candida, which continued to decrease.

In C57BL/6 mice, only four genera changed significantly immediately after exercise (C57T0), with the most strongly up-regulated genus showing a 61% increase. At 30 min (C57T30), a pronounced response was observed, with 20 genera significantly altered. Most were functionally associated with energy metabolism and anti-inflammatory defense, supporting intestinal barrier protection. Among the nine down-regulated genera, Clostridium, Cholera spp., and Tyzzerella butyricum, taxa linked to intestinal inflammation and cardiovascular disease, showed substantial reductions (−43, −50%, and −88%, respectively). These findings suggest that C57BL/6 mice exhibit rapid reductions of inflammation-associated taxa to counteract exercise-induced stress and restore energy balance. Sixty minutes post-exercise (C57T60), 18 genera showed significant abundance changes, of which seven were up-regulated and eleven were down-regulated. However, the number of significantly altered genera at T60 was slightly lower than at T30. Compared with the T0 time point and all post-exercise phases in BALB/c mice, the C57T60 phase exhibited a notably higher number of significantly altered genera. Although still significantly different from baseline at T60, genera such as Clostridium butyricum, Tyzzerella, and Cholera spp. showed peak reductions at T30, whereas most genera associated with energy metabolism declined from T30 to T60. Interestingly, genera with increased abundance included both pathogenic taxa (e.g., Staphylococcus, Helicobacter, and Stenotrophomonas) and beneficial intestinal barrier-associated taxa (e.g., Anaerotruncus and Bifidobacterium). Despite having fewer significantly altered genera than the C57T30 group, the C57T60 group showed the broadest phylum-level diversity and the highest number of non-significantly altered genera. These results suggest that despite the presence of potentially harmful bacteria, acute exercise interventions in C57BL/6 mice promote rapid energy recovery and beneficially reshape overall gut microbial diversity and composition.

A comparative analysis between the two mouse strains revealed that certain genera present at low baseline abundances (<0.2%) in C57BL/6 mice were absent or rare in BALB/c mice. Additionally, these low-abundance genera displayed more substantial abundance fluctuations following exercise in C57BL/6 mice. In both strains, genera with similar baseline abundances often exhibited divergent post-exercise trajectories. For instance, bile-associated genera (Bilophila, Intestinimonas, and Colidextribacter) showed opposing abundance changes between the strains. Overall, acute exercise intervention induced a greater number of altered genera in C57BL/6 mice compared to BALB/c mice. C57BL/6 mice displayed more uniform changes across both high- and low-abundance genera, whereas significantly altered genera in BALB/c mice exhibited a relatively clustered pattern. Thus, C57BL/6 mice possess a greater capacity to mobilize gut microbiota in response to acute high-intensity exercise compared to BALB/c mice.

3.6. Muribaculum as a potential important genus responsive to exercise

The majority of genera, including Colidextribacter, Oscillibacter, Intestinimonas, and Oscillospiraceae, displayed opposing abundance trends following exercise, while only Muribaculum and Butyricoccus exhibited consistent changes across strains. Among all significantly altered genera identified in both mouse strains, nearly all showed divergent abundance trajectories between strains. From a functional perspective, the two mouse strains showed opposite trends for genera associated with energy metabolism; however, beneficial bacterial genera generally increased in both strains. For example, the abundance of Bacteroides increased significantly (p < 0.05) immediately following exercise in both strains and continued to rise 30 min post-exercise. Subsequently, bacterial abundance gradually decreased after 30 min, showing strain-specific patterns at 60 min. In BALB/c mice, Bacteroides abundance returned to baseline levels, whereas in C57BL/6 mice, abundance decreased to half of baseline levels.

Venn diagrams were utilized to illustrate the mean and median numbers of significantly altered genera between mouse strains following exercise (Figure 7A). The majority of significantly altered genera unique to C57BL/6 mice were associated with resistance to intestinal inflammation and energy metabolism. Probiotic bacterial abundance peaked at 30 min post-exercise and declined by 60 min post-exercise. Although changes in probiotic and pathogenic bacterial abundance were generally inversely correlated, several pathogenic taxa exhibited distinct temporal dynamics (Figure 7B). The abundance of Candidatus_Arthromitus, a genus involved in regulating host immune responses, decreased from immediately after exercise to 30 min post-exercise, followed by a slight increase at 60 min post-exercise. Few genera were uniquely altered in BALB/c mice; among these, Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 and Enterorhabdus were associated with energy metabolism. Notably, following exercise, Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 abundance increased more markedly than Enterorhabdus, which continued to decline. The pathogenic genus Peptococcus increased substantially 60 min post-exercise, alongside a significant rise in Staphylococcus abundance at the same time point (Figure 7B).

Figure 7.

Panel A: Venn diagram of genera overlap among three sets (BALB/c-C57BL/6 baseline, BALB/c exercise-responsive, C57BL/6 exercise-responsive). Panel B: Categorized lists of differential genera (baseline, C57-specific, BALB/c-specific, common). Panel C: Scatter plot of Muribaculum abundance over time – significant increase in C57BL/6 at T30/T60 (**P<0.01) and between strains at baseline (##P<0.01).

Key genus responses to acute high-intensity exercise. (A) Venn diagram illustrating consistent and variable genus-level responses to exercise. (B) Conserved and divergent genus-level exercise responses in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. (C) Temporal changes in Muribaculum abundance following acute high-intensity exercise. Comparisons shown: within-strain (BCCr vs. BCT30/BCT60; C57Cr vs. C57T30/C57T60), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; and between-strain baseline (BCCr vs. C57Cr). ##p < 0.01, determined by one-way ANOVA followed by LSD post-hoc tests.

Interestingly, Muribaculum abundance differed significantly between mouse strains at baseline and underwent significant changes in both strains following exercise. Based on these findings, we propose Muribaculum as a potential important genus potentially associated with inter-strain differences in murine locomotor activity. C57Cr mice had approximately three-fold higher baseline abundance of Muribaculum compared to BCCr mice (Figure 7C). Post-exercise trajectories also differed between strains: Muribaculum abundance in BALB/c mice increased, peaking at T30 and subsequently declining at T60, whereas in C57BL/6 mice, Muribaculum abundance continued to rise throughout the post-exercise period (Figure 7C). Previous studies have suggested that Muribaculum performs diverse metabolic functions that promote nutrient breakdown and absorption. Further research is warranted, as direct associations between Muribaculum and exercise capacity remain unexplored.

In addition to Muribaculum, five other genera exhibited significant post-exercise changes in both mouse strains. We propose these genera as secondary potential taxa potentially linked to differences in locomotor performance between mouse strains (Figure 7B), despite their lack of significant baseline differences between strains. Notably, these genera displayed nearly opposite abundance trajectories between strains, likely due to genetic background differences.

4. Discussion

The gut microbiota, often termed the “second genome,” critically influences host metabolism and health (Min et al., 2024). Under physiological conditions, gut microbes facilitate nutrient absorption and produce essential metabolites such as folate, vitamins, and SCFAs (Clark and Mach, 2016; Huang et al., 2024). Conversely, dysbiosis contributes to chronic diseases, including obesity and hyperlipidemia (Duan et al., 2021; Quiroga et al., 2020; Illiano et al., 2020; Cuevas-Sierra et al., 2019). Exercise is increasingly recognized as a non-pharmacological modulator of gut microbial composition and metabolic function, influencing microbiota-derived metabolites and thereby promoting metabolic health and disease prevention (Barton et al., 2018; Allen et al., 2018a; Campbell and Wisniewski 2nd, 2017; Campbell et al., 2016; Bressa et al., 2017). Although the general impact of exercise on the gut microbiome has become clearer, the temporal dynamics of microbial community responses following exercise remain poorly defined. It is plausible that long-term exercise-induced alterations in gut microbiota composition arise from the cumulative effect of repeated acute perturbations—each transiently reshaping the intestinal environment and microbial activity. In this study, we conducted longitudinal analyses of gut microbiota in two widely used laboratory mouse strains to provide comprehensive insights into microbial responses to acute exercise. Since acute physiological changes in gut permeability and ion transport can occur within this timeframe, the rapid microbial shifts seen within an hour after exercise most likely reflect a combination of physical displacement due to increased gut motility and rapid functional/metabolic changes in resident microbes (Vicario et al., 2012; Leigh et al., 2023; Grosicki et al., 2023).

Overall, BALB/c mice harbored lower microbial richness than C57BL/6 mice. In BALB/c mice, acute exercise primarily induced an early enrichment of energy-associated genera, such as Bacteroides (Wexler, 2007; Zafar and Saier, 2021), Colidextribacter (Liu et al., 2022; Zhang P. et al., 2023), and Oscillibacter (Newman et al., 2023; Yao et al., 2020), whereas genera associated with immunomodulation, such as Candidatus_Arthromitus (Yang J. et al., 2023; Vallianou et al., 2021), showed marked reductions (Supplementary Table 1). These findings suggest that the immediate post-exercise microbiota shift in BALB/c mice primarily favors enhanced energy metabolism, while immunomodulatory functions may be transiently suppressed. The expansion of Bacteroides, Prevotellaceae_UCG-001, and Oscillospiraceae, particularly Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 (Supplementary Table 1), which is closely linked to dietary fiber degradation and SCFA production (Bi et al., 2022; Bian et al., 2024; Mei et al., 2023; Tao et al., 2022; Peng et al., 2022; Li H. et al., 2022), likely reflects increased post-exercise energy demands. In contrast, the delayed recovery of Candidatus_Arthromitus suggests that immune regulatory restoration lags behind metabolic recovery. Collectively, these patterns indicate that the gut microbiota of BALB/c mice may prioritize rapid energy replenishment post-exercise, while immunoregulatory processes recover more slowly. This delayed recovery of immune-associated genera could reflect lower intrinsic energy-metabolic capacity in BALB/c mice, requiring longer periods to restore systemic energy balance after acute high-intensity exercise. Consequently, BALB/c mice exhibited lower microbial diversity (Figures 3, 4), fewer genera undergoing significant post-exercise changes, more uneven genus-level shifts (Figure 5), fewer taxa available for functional compensation, and reduced overall microbial stress resilience under exercise intervention. BALB/c mice demonstrated slower post-exercise energy recovery and a greater reliance on a limited set of energy- and inflammation-related genera, characterized by decreased beneficial genera associated with energy metabolism and immunity, alongside increased abundance of pro-inflammatory and disease-associated genera.

In contrast, gut microbiota alterations were more pronounced in C57BL/6 mice, with the number of significantly altered genera increasing over time and peaking at 60 min post-exercise. C57BL/6 mice exhibited increases in genera linked to intestinal health and energy metabolism, including Lactobacillus (Liévin-Le Moal and Servin, 2014), Ruminococcus (Crost et al., 2023), and Prevotella (Abdelsalam et al., 2023). Conversely, genera associated with inflammation and disease, such as Bilophila (Huang et al., 2019; Deng X. et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2021; Agudelo-Ochoa et al., 2020; Zhuang et al., 2020) and Tyzzerella (Huang et al., 2022), significantly decreased, suggesting protective microbial responses against exercise-induced inflammation. However, the abundances of both beneficial genera, such as Bifidobacterium (Wu Y. et al., 2023; Gavzy et al., 2023; Derrien et al., 2022; Laursen et al., 2021), and pathogenic taxa, including Helicobacter (Crowe, 2019) and Staphylococcus (Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2018), increased substantially (Supplementary Table 2). This indicates that while overall gut microbial diversity increased at 60 min post-exercise, there was also a rise in certain pathogenic bacteria, possibly reflecting changes in the gut environment following acute high-intensity exercise, although the precise mechanism remains to be determined. Collectively, these patterns suggest more efficient energy recovery in C57BL/6 mice, accompanied by reductions, rather than increases, in genera linked to cardiovascular disease and intestinal inflammation during the immediate post-exercise period, consistent with intestinal barrier protection. These findings indicate that the intestinal microbiota of C57BL/6 mice is associated with enhances intestinal health by expanding beneficial taxa and rapid post-exercise energy restoration. Following energy recovery, the simultaneous rise in both beneficial and potentially pathogenic genera reflects a complex and dynamic restructuring of the microbial community. The high number of significantly altered genera, the relatively uniform genus-level shifts, the greater availability of taxa for functional compensation, and the increased resilience of the microbial community collectively reveal a highly diverse gut flora in C57BL/6 mice under exercise intervention.

Comparative analysis of BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice following acute high-intensity exercise demonstrated marked differences in microbial response patterns. First, gut microbiota diversity was significantly higher in C57BL/6 mice than in BALB/c mice after exercise. At 30 and 60 min post-exercise, C57BL/6 mice harbored far more endemic genera (Figures 7A,B), many of which were associated with energy metabolism and resistance to intestinal inflammation. This indicates that microbial functional regulation in C57BL/6 mice is more diverse and complex during post-exercise recovery. In contrast, BALB/c mice showed increases in energy-associated genera and decreases in immunomodulatory genera, representing the dominant features of their post-exercise microbial alterations. Meanwhile, C57BL/6 mice exhibited pronounced increases in genera linked to intestinal health and energy metabolism, especially Lactobacillus and Prevotella (Supplementary Table 2), supporting the hypothesis that their gut microbiota is linked to intestinal health and accelerates energy recovery following acute exercise. Furthermore, the two strains displayed opposing abundance trends in several genera. For instance, Colidextribacter, Oscillibacter, and Intestinimonas were more abundant in BALB/c mice yet decreased in C57BL/6 mice (Supplementary Tables 1, 2). These contrasting dynamics suggest fundamental differences in microbial regulatory mechanisms between strains during post-exercise adaptation, likely attributable to their distinct genetic backgrounds.

Aside from these differences, the similarities in gut microbiota alterations between BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice following acute high-intensity exercise indicate a generalized effect of exercise on gut flora, theoretically supporting the health-promoting benefits of exercise through modulation of the intestinal microbiome. Functional prediction analyses further demonstrated that significantly altered Bacteroidetes in both mouse strains predominantly engaged in energy metabolism. This suggests gut microbes may facilitate rapid replenishment of host energy stores post-exercise by enhancing energy metabolism and nutrient absorption. The strains’ exercise responses are probably influenced by the significant baseline difference in microbiota richness (Figure 3D). Especially, lower diversity may limit the spectrum of potential changes, while higher baseline diversity may offer a greater functional repertoire for community rearrangement (Wallace et al., 2025). Therefore, it is best to think of the observed post-exercise alterations as modulations superimposed on different baseline states, with the initial community structure having some influence on the response amplitude.

We propose that Muribaculum, identified as a potential genus undergoing significant post-exercise changes in both mouse strains, may represent a critical genus potentially linked to inter-strain differences in locomotor capacity. Baseline abundances of Muribaculum varied significantly between strains and changed notably following exercise intervention (Figure 7A). Prior studies have indicated that Muribaculum participates in diverse metabolic activities, including lipid metabolism, SCFA synthesis, polysaccharide degradation, and nutrient digestion and absorption (Abbondio et al., 2023; Yang B. et al., 2023; Xu H. et al., 2023; Wang T. et al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2024; Bang et al., 2023). High-resolution sequencing has revealed that exercise and host genotype exert species-level selection on the gut microbiota, with different activity states harboring distinct Muribaculum species. This suggests that the abundance changes observed in our 16S-based study may reflect shifts in species composition rather than a bloom of a single taxon (Dowden et al., 2020). Additionally, early-life Western diet has been shown to persistently reduce Muribaculum intestinale abundance (McNamara et al., 2021), highlighting its environmental sensitivity. To date, Muribaculum has not been consistently reported as a conserved exercise-responsive genus across published studies. This may be explained by its high sensitivity to baseline microbiota composition, host genetic background, or technical factors such as sequencing resolution. However, concrete evidence linking this genus directly to exercise adaptations or locomotor performance is lacking. Therefore, future studies should employ integrative multi-omics approaches, such as metagenomics and metabolomics, to elucidate the precise roles and mechanisms of Muribaculum in exercise-induced metabolic adaptations and host exercise performance. These observations are limited to two mouse strains under a single acute exercise protocol. Moreover, given the profound influence of circadian rhythmicity on gut microbiota composition (Bishehsari et al., 2020; Bae et al., 2019; Matenchuk et al., 2020), future studies should be designed to address the effects of sampling time, and validation in additional models and cohorts will be essential to establish the generalizability and functional relevance of these findings.

5. Conclusion

Through longitudinal analysis of gut microbiota dynamics in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice following acute high-intensity exercise, this study revealed significant temporal changes in microbial composition and functional capacity. Acute exercise markedly influenced the abundance of genera associated with energy metabolism and intestinal homeostasis. Although BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice showed divergent temporal trajectories in the response of specific genera, the central finding is the rapid and significant microbial remodeling over the post-exercise period. These observations provide a foundation for future genetic mapping studies aimed at identifying genomic loci involved in exercise–microbiota interactions.

A limitation of this study is its focus solely on acute exercise responses, leaving unanswered how chronic exercise training cumulatively shapes gut microbial communities. Additionally, although Muribaculum consistently emerged as a significantly altered genus post-exercise, its functional contribution to exercise adaptation remains unclear. The functional assignments presented are based on literature-derived predictions rather than direct measurements, inferring metabolic functions from taxonomy alone has inherent limitations. Future research employing integrative multi-omics approaches, including metagenomics and metabolomics, will be essential to clarify the precise mechanistic roles of Muribaculum and other key taxa in host energy metabolism and exercise performance. Furthermore, future studies should include extended post-exercise sampling (e.g., 3 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days) to better differentiate between acute functional shifts and sustained compositional changes. Expanding these analyses to encompass additional mouse strains and larger study cohorts would further validate the generalizability of our findings and help establish causal relationships between microbiota dynamics and exercise capacity.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (grant number 24JCYBJC00380 to LQ).

Edited by: Sidharth Prasad Mishra, University of South Florida, United States

Reviewed by: Joyeta Ghosh, Amity University Kolkata, India

Matthew Rusling, Self Employed, Alexandria, VA, United States

Data availability statement

The RNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession number GSE324758 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE324758).

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by Ethics committee of Tianjin University of Sport. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

RG: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation, Visualization, Validation. JW: Investigation, Visualization, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Data curation. JS: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Data curation. WZ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Data curation. LQ: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Data curation, Validation.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1790697/full#supplementary-material

Table_1.docx (18.2KB, docx)
Table_2.docx (20.8KB, docx)
Table_3.xlsx (15.2KB, xlsx)
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S1

(A) Rarefaction curves of observed species for all individual samples, showing plateauing. (B) Rarefaction curves grouped by experimental condition (BCCr, BCT0, BCT30, BCT60, C57Cr, C57T0, C57T30, C57T60), demonstrating adequate sequencing depth across all groups.

Image_1.tif (2.3MB, tif)

References

  1. Abbondio M., Tanca A., De Diego L., Sau R., Bibbò S., Pes G. M., et al. (2023). Metaproteomic assessment of gut microbial and host functional perturbations in Helicobacter pylori-infected patients subjected to an antimicrobial protocol. Gut Microbes 15:2291170. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2291170, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdelsalam N. A., Hegazy S. M., Aziz R. K. (2023). The curious case of Prevotella copri. Gut Microbes 15:2249152. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2249152, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Agudelo-Ochoa G. M., Valdés-Duque B. E., Giraldo-Giraldo N. A., Jaillier-Ramírez A. M., Giraldo-Villa A., Acevedo-Castaño I., et al. (2020). Gut microbiota profiles in critically ill patients, potential biomarkers and risk variables for sepsis. Gut Microbes 12:1707610. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1707610, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen J. M., Mailing L. J., Cohrs J., Salmonson C., Fryer J. D., Nehra V., et al. (2018a). Exercise training-induced modification of the gut microbiota persists after microbiota colonization and attenuates the response to chemically-induced colitis in gnotobiotic mice. Gut Microbes 9, 115–130. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1372077, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Allen J. M., Mailing L. J., Niemiro G. M., Moore R., Cook M. D., White B. A., et al. (2018b). Exercise alters gut microbiota composition and function in lean and obese humans. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 50, 747–757. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001495, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Asare P. T., Greppi A., Pennacchia A., Brenig K., Geirnaert A., Schwab C., et al. (2021). In vitro modeling of chicken Cecal microbiota ecology and metabolism using the PolyFermS platform. Front. Microbiol. 12:780092. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.780092, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bäckhed F., Ley R. E., Sonnenburg J. L., Peterson D. A., Gordon J. I. (2005). Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science (New York, N.Y.) 307, 1915–1920. doi: 10.1126/science.1104816, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bae S. A., Fang M. Z., Rustgi V., Zarbl H., Androulakis I. P. (2019). At the Interface of lifestyle, behavior, and circadian rhythms: metabolic implications. Front. Nutr. 6:132. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00132, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bai T., Xu Z., Xia P., Feng Y., Liu B., Liu H., et al. (2023). The short-term efficacy of Bifidobacterium quadruple viable tablet in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: potentially mediated by metabolism rather than diversity regulation. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 118, 1256–1267. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002147, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bailén M., Bressa C., Martínez-López S., González-Soltero R., Montalvo Lominchar M. G., San Juan C., et al. (2020). Microbiota features associated with a high-fat/low-Fiber diet in healthy adults. Front. Nutr. 7:583608. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.583608, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bang S., Shin Y. H., Ma X., Park S. M., Graham D. B., Xavier R. J., et al. (2023). A Cardiolipin from Muribaculum intestinale induces antigen-specific cytokine responses. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 23422–23426. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c09734, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Barton W., Penney N. C., Cronin O., Garcia-Perez I., Molloy M. G., Holmes E., et al. (2018). The microbiome of professional athletes differs from that of more sedentary subjects in composition and particularly at the functional metabolic level. Gut 67, 625–633. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313627, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Baxter N. T., Schmidt A. W., Venkataraman A., Kim K. S., Waldron C., Schmidt T. M. (2019). Dynamics of human gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in response to dietary interventions with three fermentable fibers. MBio 10:e02566-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02566-18, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bi Y., Wei H., Nian H., Liu R., Ji W., Liu H., et al. (2022). Socializing models during lactation Alter colonic mucosal gene expression and fecal microbiota of growing piglets. Front. Microbiol. 13:819011. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.819011, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bian G., Yu S., Cheng C., Huang H., Liu J. (2024). Ruminal microbiota-host crosstalks promote ruminal epithelial development in neonatal lambs with alfalfa hay introduction. mSystems 9:e0103423. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01034-23, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bianchimano P., Britton G. J., Wallach D. S., Smith E. M., Cox L. M., Liu S., et al. (2022). Mining the microbiota to identify gut commensals modulating neuroinflammation in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Microbiome 10:174. doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01364-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bishehsari F., Voigt R. M., Keshavarzian A. (2020). Circadian rhythms and the gut microbiota: from the metabolic syndrome to cancer. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 16, 731–739. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-00427-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bokulich N. A., Subramanian S., Faith J. J., Gevers D., Gordon J. I., Knight R., et al. (2013). Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 57–59. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2276, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Boulangé C. L., Neves A. L., Chilloux J., Nicholson J. K., Dumas M. E. (2016). Impact of the gut microbiota on inflammation, obesity, and metabolic disease. Genome Med. 8:42. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0303-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bressa C., Bailén-Andrino M., Pérez-Santiago J., González-Soltero R., Pérez M., Montalvo-Lominchar M. G., et al. (2017). Differences in gut microbiota profile between women with active lifestyle and sedentary women. PLoS One 12:e0171352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171352, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bui T. P., Ritari J., Boeren S., de Waard P., Plugge C. M., de Vos W. M. (2015). Production of butyrate from lysine and the Amadori product fructoselysine by a human gut commensal. Nat. Commun. 6:10062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bui T. P., Shetty S. A., Lagkouvardos I., Ritari J., Chamlagain B., Douillard F. P., et al. (2016). Comparative genomics and physiology of the butyrate-producing bacterium Intestinimonas butyriciproducens. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 8, 1024–1037. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12483, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cai C., Cheng W., Shi T., Liao Y., Zhou M., Liao Z. (2023). Rutin alleviates colon lesions and regulates gut microbiota in diabetic mice. Sci. Rep. 13:4897. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31647-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cai W., Xu J., Li G., Liu T., Guo X., Wang H., et al. (2020). Ethanol extract of propolis prevents high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance and obesity in association with modulation of gut microbiota in mice. Food Res. Int. (Ottawa, ON) 130:108939. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108939, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Campbell S. C., Wisniewski P. J., 2nd (2017). Exercise is a novel promoter of intestinal health and microbial diversity. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 45, 41–47. doi: 10.1249/jes.0000000000000096, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Campbell S. C., Wisniewski P. J., Noji M., McGuinness L. R., Häggblom M. M., Lightfoot S. A., et al. (2016). The effect of diet and exercise on intestinal integrity and microbial diversity in mice. PLoS One 11:e0150502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150502, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cani P. D., Van Hul M. (2024). Gut microbiota in overweight and obesity: crosstalk with adipose tissue. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 21, 164–183. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00867-z, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Caporaso J. G., Kuczynski J., Stombaugh J., Bittinger K., Bushman F. D., Costello E. K., et al. (2010). QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chanda D., De D. (2024). Meta-analysis reveals obesity associated gut microbial alteration patterns and reproducible contributors of functional shift. Gut Microbes 16:2304900. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2304900, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen Y. Y., Chen S. Y., Chang H. Y., Liu Y. C., Chuang B. F., Yen G. C. (2024). Phyllanthus emblica L. polysaccharides ameliorate colitis via microbiota modulation and dual inhibition of the RAGE/NF-κB and MAPKs signaling pathways in rats. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 258:129043. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.129043, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen H., Zhang F., Zhang J., Zhang X., Guo Y., Yao Q. (2020). A holistic view of Berberine inhibiting intestinal carcinogenesis in conventional mice based on microbiome-metabolomics analysis. Front. Immunol. 11:588079. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.588079, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Cheng W., Lu J., Lin W., Wei X., Li H., Zhao X., et al. (2018). Effects of a galacto-oligosaccharide-rich diet on fecal microbiota and metabolite profiles in mice. Food Funct. 9, 1612–1620. doi: 10.1039/C7FO01720K, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Cheng T., Xu C., Wu D., Yan G., Wang C., Wang T., et al. (2023). Sodium houttuyfonate derived from Houttuynia cordata Thunb improves intestinal malfunction via maintaining gut microflora stability in Candida albicans overgrowth aggravated ulcerative colitis. Food Funct. 14, 1072–1086. doi: 10.1039/D2FO02369E, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chi Y., Wu Z., Du C., Zhang M., Wang X., Xie A., et al. (2023). Regulatory effects mediated by ulvan oligosaccharide and its zinc complex on lipid metabolism in high-fat diet-fed mice. Carbohydr. Polym. 300:120249. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120249, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Cho J., Kim D., Kang H. (2020). Exercise preconditioning attenuates the response to experimental colitis and modifies composition of gut microbiota in wild-type mice. Life 10:9. doi: 10.3390/life10090200, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Chung Y. W., Gwak H. J., Moon S., Rho M., Ryu J. H. (2020). Functional dynamics of bacterial species in the mouse gut microbiome revealed by metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses. PLoS One 15:e0227886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227886, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Clark A., Mach N. (2016). Exercise-induced stress behavior, gut-microbiota-brain axis and diet: a systematic review for athletes. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 13:43. doi: 10.1186/s12970-016-0155-6, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Clarke S. F., Murphy E. F., O'Sullivan O., Lucey A. J., Humphreys M., Hogan A., et al. (2014). Exercise and associated dietary extremes impact on gut microbial diversity. Gut 63, 1913–1920. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306541, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Companys J., Gosalbes M. J., Pla-Pagà L., Calderón-Pérez L., Llauradó E., Pedret A., et al. (2021). Gut microbiota profile and its association with clinical variables and dietary intake in overweight/obese and lean subjects: a cross-sectional study. Nutrients 13:2032. doi: 10.3390/nu13062032, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Correa F., Luise D., Negrini C., Ruggeri R., Bosi P., Trevisi P. (2023). Effect of two milk supplements and two ways of administration on growth performance, welfare and fecal microbial ecology of suckling piglets. Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1050414. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1050414, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Crost E. H., Coletto E., Bell A., Juge N. (2023). Ruminococcus gnavus: friend or foe for human health. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 47:fuad014. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuad014, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Crowe S. E. (2019). Helicobacter pylori infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 1158–1165. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1710945, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Cuevas-Sierra A., Ramos-Lopez O., Riezu-Boj J. I., Milagro F. I., Martinez J. A. (2019). Diet, gut microbiota, and obesity: links with host genetics and epigenetics and potential applications. Adv. Nutr. 10, s17–s30. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy078, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Cui Y., Zhang L., Wang X., Yi Y., Shan Y., Liu B., et al. (2022). Roles of intestinal Parabacteroides in human health and diseases. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 369:fnac072. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnac072, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. David L. A., Maurice C. F., Carmody R. N., Gootenberg D. B., Button J. E., Wolfe B. E., et al. (2014). Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505, 559–563. doi: 10.1038/nature12820, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Dayama G., Priya S., Niccum D. E., Khoruts A., Blekhman R. (2020). Interactions between the gut microbiome and host gene regulation in cystic fibrosis. Genome Med. 12:12. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-0710-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Deng L., Yang Y., Xu G. (2022). Empagliflozin ameliorates type 2 diabetes mellitus-related diabetic nephropathy via altering the gut microbiota. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1867:159234. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2022.159234, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Deng X., Zhang C., Wang P., Wei W., Shi X., Wang P., et al. (2022). Cardiovascular benefits of Empagliflozin are associated with gut microbiota and plasma metabolites in type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 107, 1888–1896. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac210, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Denou E., Marcinko K., Surette M. G., Steinberg G. R., Schertzer J. D. (2016). High-intensity exercise training increases the diversity and metabolic capacity of the mouse distal gut microbiota during diet-induced obesity. Am. J. Phys. Endocrinol. Metab. 310, E982–E993. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00537.2015, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Derrien M., Turroni F., Ventura M., van Sinderen D. (2022). Insights into endogenous Bifidobacterium species in the human gut microbiota during adulthood. Trends Microbiol. 30, 940–947. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2022.04.004, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Devriese S., Eeckhaut V., Geirnaert A., Van den Bossche L., Hindryckx P., Van de Wiele T., et al. (2017). Reduced mucosa-associated Butyricicoccus activity in patients with ulcerative colitis correlates with aberrant Claudin-1 expression. J. Crohns Colitis 11, 229–236. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw142, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Dowden R. A., McGuinness L. R., Wisniewski P. J., Campbell S. C., Guers J. J., Oydanich M., et al. (2020). Host genotype and exercise exhibit species-level selection for members of the gut bacterial communities in the mouse digestive system. Sci. Rep. 10:8984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65740-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Du G., Dong W., Yang Q., Yu X., Ma J., Gu W., et al. (2020). Altered gut microbiota related to inflammatory responses in patients with Huntington's disease. Front. Immunol. 11:603594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Duan R., Guan X., Huang K., Zhang Y., Li S., Xia J., et al. (2021). Flavonoids from whole-grain oat alleviated high-fat diet-induced hyperlipidemia via regulating bile acid metabolism and gut microbiota in mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 69, 7629–7640. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c01813, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Edgar R. C., Haas B. J., Clemente J. C., Quince C., Knight R. (2011). UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Eitan A., Gover O., Sulimani L., Meiri D., Shterzer N., Mills E., et al. (2024). The effect of oil-based Cannabis extracts on metabolic parameters and microbiota composition of mice fed a standard and a high-fat diet. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25:1073. doi: 10.3390/ijms25021073, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Eslabão L. B., Gubert G. F., Beltrame L. C., Mello I. M. A., Bruna-Romero O., Zárate-Bladés C. R. (2022). Prophylactic treatment of undernourished mice with Cotrimoxazole induces a different profile of Dysbiosis with functional metabolic alterations. Cells 11:2278. doi: 10.3390/cells11152278, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Estaki M., Pither J., Baumeister P., Little J. P., Gill S. K., Ghosh S., et al. (2016). Cardiorespiratory fitness as a predictor of intestinal microbial diversity and distinct metagenomic functions. Microbiome 4:42. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0189-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Fernández J., de la Fuente V. G., García M. T. F., Sánchez J. G., Redondo B. I., Villar C. J., et al. (2020). A diet based on cured acorn-fed ham with oleic acid content promotes anti-inflammatory gut microbiota and prevents ulcerative colitis in an animal model. Lipids Health Dis. 19:28. doi: 10.1186/s12944-020-01205-x, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Fischbach W., Malfertheiner P. (2018). Helicobacter Pylori infection. Deutsches Arzteblatt Int. 115, 429–436. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Gao Q., Sun G., Duan J., Luo C., Yangji C., Zhong R., et al. (2022). Alterations in gut microbiota improve SCFA production and fiber utilization in Tibetan pigs fed alfalfa diet. Front. Microbiol. 13:969524. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.969524, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Gao Q., Wang Y., Li J., Bai G., Liu L., Zhong R., et al. (2022). Supplementation of multi-enzymes alone or combined with inactivated Lactobacillus benefits growth performance and gut microbiota in broilers fed wheat diets. Front. Microbiol. 13:927932. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.927932, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. García-Belenguer S., Grasa L., Valero O., Palacio J., Luño I., Rosado B. (2021). Gut microbiota in canine idiopathic epilepsy: effects of disease and treatment. Animals 11:3121. doi: 10.3390/ani11113121, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Garrido V., Migura-García L., Gaitán I., Arrieta-Gisasola A., Martínez-Ballesteros I., Fraile L., et al. (2021). Prevalence of Salmonella in free-range pigs: risk factors and intestinal microbiota composition. Foods 10:6. doi: 10.3390/foods10061410, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Gavzy S. J., Kensiski A., Lee Z. L., Mongodin E. F., Ma B., Bromberg J. S. (2023). Bifidobacterium mechanisms of immune modulation and tolerance. Gut Microbes 15:2291164. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2291164, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Gomez A., Sharma A. K., Mallott E. K., Petrzelkova K. J., Jost Robinson C. A., Yeoman C. J., et al. (2019). Plasticity in the human gut microbiome defies evolutionary constraints. mSphere 4:e00271-19. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00271-19, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Grenda A., Iwan E., Krawczyk P., Frąk M., Chmielewska I., Bomba A., et al. (2022). Attempting to identify bacterial allies in immunotherapy of NSCLC patients. Cancer 14:6250. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246250, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Grosicki G. J., Langan S. P., Bagley J. R., Galpin A. J., Garner D., Hampton-Marcell J. T., et al. (2023). Gut check: unveiling the influence of acute exercise on the gut microbiota. Exp. Physiol. 108, 1466–1480. doi: 10.1113/ep091446, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Haas B. J., Gevers D., Earl A. M., Feldgarden M., Ward D. V., Giannoukos G., et al. (2011). Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 21, 494–504. doi: 10.1101/gr.112730.110, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hampton-Marcell J. T., Eshoo T. W., Cook M. D., Gilbert J. A., Horswill C. A., Poretsky R. (2020). Comparative analysis of gut microbiota following changes in training volume among swimmers. Int. J. Sports Med. 41, 292–299. doi: 10.1055/a-1079-5450, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Hao X., Zhang J., Shang X., Sun K., Zhou J., Liu J., et al. (2022). Exercise modifies the disease-relevant gut microbial shifts in post-traumatic osteoarthritis rats. Bone Joint Res. 11, 214–225. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.114.BJR-2021-0192.R1, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. He J., Gong X., Hu B., Lin L., Lin X., Gong W., et al. (2023). Altered gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids in Chinese children with constipated autism Spectrum disorder. Sci. Rep. 13:19103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46566-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. He N., Wang S., Lv Z., Zhao W., Li S. (2020). Low molecular weight chitosan oligosaccharides (LMW-COSs) prevent obesity-related metabolic abnormalities in association with the modification of gut microbiota in high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice. Food Funct. 11, 9947–9959. doi: 10.1039/d0fo01871f, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. He K., Xiong J., Yang W., Zhao L., Wang T., Qian W., et al. (2023). Metagenome of gut microbiota provides a novel insight into the pathogenicity of Balantioides coli in weaned piglets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24:10791. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310791, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. He X., Zhang M., Li S. T., Li X., Huang Q., Zhang K., et al. (2022). Alteration of gut microbiota in high-fat diet-induced obese mice using carnosic acid from rosemary. Food Sci. Nutr. 10, 2325–2332. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2841, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Huang A., Cai R., Wang Q., Shi L., Li C., Yan H. (2019). Dynamic change of gut microbiota during porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection in suckling piglets. Front. Microbiol. 10:322. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00322, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Huang J., Huang J., Li Y., Wang Y., Wang F., Qiu X., et al. (2021). Sodium alginate modulates immunity, intestinal mucosal barrier function, and gut microbiota in cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppressed BALB/c mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 69, 7064–7073. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c02294, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Huang W. C., Tung C. L., Yang Y. S. H., Lin I. H., Ng X. E., Tung Y. T. (2022). Endurance exercise ameliorates Western diet-induced atherosclerosis through modulation of microbiota and its metabolites. Sci. Rep. 12:3612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Huang J., Wang Q., Xu Q., Zhang Y., Lin B., Guan X., et al. (2019). In vitro fermentation of O-acetyl-arabinoxylan from bamboo shavings by human colonic microbiota. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 125, 27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.024, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Huang B., Zhao L., Campbell S. C. (2024). Bidirectional link between exercise and the gut microbiota. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 52, 132–144. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000343, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Illiano P., Brambilla R., Parolini C. (2020). The mutual interplay of gut microbiota, diet and human disease. FEBS J. 287, 833–855. doi: 10.1111/febs.15217, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ishibashi R., Furusawa Y., Honda H., Watanabe Y., Fujisaka S., Nishikawa M., et al. (2022). Isoliquiritigenin attenuates adipose tissue inflammation and metabolic syndrome by modifying gut bacteria composition in mice. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 66:e2101119. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.202101119, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Isipato M., Dessì P., Sánchez C., Mills S., Ijaz U. Z., Asunis F., et al. (2020). Propionate production by bioelectrochemically-assisted lactate fermentation and simultaneous CO(2) recycling. Front. Microbiol. 11:599438. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.599438, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Jang L. G., Choi G., Kim S. W., Kim B. Y., Lee S., Park H. (2019). The combination of sport and sport-specific diet is associated with characteristics of gut microbiota: an observational study. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12970-019-0290-y, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Jangid A., Fukuda S., Suzuki Y., Taylor T. D., Ohno H., Prakash T. (2022). Shotgun metagenomic sequencing revealed the prebiotic potential of a grain-based diet in mice. Sci. Rep. 12:6748. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10762-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Jian C., Silvestre M. P., Middleton D., Korpela K., Jalo E., Broderick D., et al. (2022). Gut microbiota predicts body fat change following a low-energy diet: a PREVIEW intervention study. Genome Med. 14:54. doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01053-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Jiang C. (2024). Progress in gut microbiota-host interaction. Sci. China Life Sci. 67, 851–853. doi: 10.1007/s11427-024-2577-0, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Johnson A. J., Vangay P., Al-Ghalith G. A., Hillmann B. M., Ward T. L., Shields-Cutler R. R., et al. (2019). Daily sampling reveals personalized diet-microbiome associations in humans. Cell Host Microbe 25, 789–802.e785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Juárez-Castelán C. J., Vélez-Ixta J. M., Corona-Cervantes K., Piña-Escobedo A., Cruz-Narváez Y., Hinojosa-Velasco A., et al. (2022). The Entero-mammary pathway and perinatal transmission of gut microbiota and SARS-CoV-2. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:10306. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810306, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kim C. C., Lunken G. R., Kelly W. J., Patchett M. L., Jordens Z., Tannock G. W., et al. (2019). Genomic insights from Monoglobus pectinilyticus: a pectin-degrading specialist bacterium in the human colon. ISME J. 13, 1437–1456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Koh A., De Vadder F., Kovatcheva-Datchary P., Bäckhed F. (2016). From dietary Fiber to host physiology: short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell 165, 1332–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.041, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Lahtinen M. H., Kynkäänniemi E., Jian C., Salonen A., Pajari A. M., Mikkonen K. S. (2023). Metabolic fate of lignin in birch glucuronoxylan extracts as dietary fiber studied in a rat model. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 67:e2300201. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.202300201, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Laursen M. F., Sakanaka M., von Burg N., Mörbe U., Andersen D., Moll J. M., et al. (2021). Bifidobacterium species associated with breastfeeding produce aromatic lactic acids in the infant gut. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 1367–1382. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00970-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Lee E. J., Edward O. C., Seo E. B., Mun E. G., Jeong S. J., Ha G., et al. (2023). Gochujang ameliorates hepatic inflammation by improving Dysbiosis of gut microbiota in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Microorganisms 11:911. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11040911, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Lei Y., Tang L., Liu S., Hu S., Wu L., Liu Y., et al. (2021). Parabacteroides produces acetate to alleviate heparanase-exacerbated acute pancreatitis through reducing neutrophil infiltration. Microbiome 9:115. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01065-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Leigh S. J., Uhlig F., Wilmes L., Sanchez-Diaz P., Gheorghe C. E., Goodson M. S., et al. (2023). The impact of acute and chronic stress on gastrointestinal physiology and function: a microbiota-gut-brain axis perspective. J. Physiol. 601, 4491–4538. doi: 10.1113/JP281951, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Lesniak N. A., Schubert A. M., Flynn K. J., Leslie J. L., Sinani H., Bergin I. L., et al. (2022). The gut bacterial community potentiates Clostridioides difficile infection severity. MBio 13:e0118322. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01183-22, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Leth M. L., Pichler M. J., Abou Hachem M. (2023). Butyrate-producing colonic clostridia: picky glycan utilization specialists. Essays Biochem. 67, 415–428. doi: 10.1042/EBC20220125, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Li D., Chen H., Mao B., Yang Q., Zhao J., Gu Z., et al. (2017). Microbial biogeography and Core microbiota of the rat digestive tract. Sci. Rep. 7:45840. doi: 10.1038/srep45840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Li J. W., Fang B., Pang G. F., Zhang M., Ren F. Z. (2019). Age- and diet-specific effects of chronic exposure to chlorpyrifos on hormones, inflammation and gut microbiota in rats. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 159, 68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Li Q., Liu W., Zhang H., Chen C., Liu R., Hou H., et al. (2023). α-D-1,3-glucan from Radix Puerariae thomsonii improves NAFLD by regulating the intestinal flora and metabolites. Carbohydr. Polym. 299:120197. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120197, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Li L., Lv X., Han X., Sun C., An K., Gao W., et al. (2022). Effect of dietary Bacillus licheniformis supplementation on growth performance and microbiota diversity of Pekin ducks. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:832141. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.832141, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Li H., Wang Y., Shao S., Yu H., Wang D., Li C., et al. (2022). Rabdosia Serra alleviates dextran sulfate sodium salt-induced colitis in mice through anti-inflammation, regulating Th17/Treg balance, maintaining intestinal barrier integrity, and modulating gut microbiota. J. Pharmaceut. Analysis 12, 824–838. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2022.08.001, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Li J., Zhao M., Li J., Wang M., Zhao C. (2022). Combining fecal microbiome and metabolomics to reveal the disturbance of gut microbiota in liver injury and the therapeutic mechanism of shaoyao gancao decoction. Front. Pharmacol. 13:911356. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.911356, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Liang T., Xie X., Wu L., Li L., Yang L., Jiang T., et al. (2023). Metabolism of resistant starch RS3 administered in combination with Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain 84-3 by human gut microbiota in simulated fermentation experiments in vitro and in a rat model. Food Chem. 411:135412. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135412, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Liévin-Le Moal V., Servin A. L. (2014). Anti-infective activities of lactobacillus strains in the human intestinal microbiota: from probiotics to gastrointestinal anti-infectious biotherapeutic agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 27, 167–199. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00080-13, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Litwinowicz K., Gamian A. (2023). Microbiome alterations in alcohol use disorder and alcoholic liver disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24:2461. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032461, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Liu Y., Lian X., Qin X. (2023). Bile acid metabolism involved into the therapeutic action of Xiaojianzhong Tang via gut microbiota to treat chronic atrophic gastritis in rats. Phytomed. Int. J. Phytother. Phytopharm. 109:154557. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154557, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Liu X., Zhang Y., Li W., Zhang B., Yin J., Liuqi S., et al. (2022). Fucoidan ameliorated dextran sulfate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis by modulating gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism. J. Agric. Food Chem. 70, 14864–14876. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c06417, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Liu T., Zhao M., Zhang Y., Wang Z., Yuan B., Zhao C., et al. (2023). Integrated microbiota and metabolite profiling analysis of prebiotic characteristics of Phellinus linteus polysaccharide in vitro fermentation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 242:124854. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124854, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Lkhagva E., Chung H. J., Ahn J. S., Hong S. T. (2021). Host factors affect the gut microbiome more significantly than diet shift. Microorganisms 9:12. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122520, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Luo S., He L., Zhang H., Li Z., Liu C., Chen T. (2022). Arabinoxylan from rice bran protects mice against high-fat diet-induced obesity and metabolic inflammation by modulating gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids. Food Funct. 13, 7707–7719. doi: 10.1039/d2fo00569g, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Luo J., Zhang H., Lu J., Ma C., Chen T. (2021). Antidiabetic effect of an engineered bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum-pMG36e -GLP-1 in monkey model. Synthetic Syst. Biotechnol. 6, 272–282. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2021.09.009, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Lynch J. B., Gonzalez E. L., Choy K., Faull K. F., Jewell T., Arellano A., et al. (2023). Gut microbiota Turicibacter strains differentially modify bile acids and host lipids. Nat. Commun. 14:3669. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39403-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Magoč T., Salzberg S. L. (2011). FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics (Oxf. Engl.) 27, 2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Mao J. H., Zhang K., He Y. F., Liu J., Shao Y. H., Tu Z. C. (2023). Molecular structure, IgE binding capacity and gut microbiota of ovalbumin conjugated to fructose and galactose: a comparative study. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 234:123640. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123640, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Marion S., Desharnais L., Studer N., Dong Y., Notter M. D., Poudel S., et al. (2020). Biogeography of microbial bile acid transformations along the murine gut. J. Lipid Res. 61, 1450–1463. doi: 10.1194/jlr.RA120001021, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Matenchuk B. A., Mandhane P. J., Kozyrskyj A. L. (2020). Sleep, circadian rhythm, and gut microbiota. Sleep Med. Rev. 53:101340. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101340, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. McNamara M. P., Singleton J. M., Cadney M. D., Ruegger P. M., Borneman J., Garland T. (2021). Early-life effects of juvenile Western diet and exercise on adult gut microbiome composition in mice. J. Exp. Biol. 224:jeb239699. doi: 10.1242/jeb.239699, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Medawar E., Haange S. B., Rolle-Kampczyk U., Engelmann B., Dietrich A., Thieleking R., et al. (2021). Gut microbiota link dietary fiber intake and short-chain fatty acid metabolism with eating behavior. Transl. Psychiatry 11:500. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01620-3, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Medina-Larqué A. S., Rodríguez-Daza M. C., Roquim M., Dudonné S., Pilon G., Levy É., et al. (2022). Cranberry polyphenols and agave agavins impact gut immune response and microbiota composition while improving gut barrier function, inflammation, and glucose metabolism in mice fed an obesogenic diet. Front. Immunol. 13:871080. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.871080, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Mei S., He G., Chen Z., Zhang R., Liao Y., Zhu M., et al. (2023). Probiotic-fermented distillers grain alters the rumen microbiome, metabolome, and enzyme activity, enhancing the immune status of finishing cattle. Animals 13:3774. doi: 10.3390/ani13243774, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Messaoudene M., Pidgeon R., Richard C., Ponce M., Diop K., Benlaifaoui M., et al. (2022). A natural polyphenol exerts antitumor activity and circumvents anti-PD-1 resistance through effects on the gut microbiota. Cancer Discov. 12, 1070–1087. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0808, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Min L., Ablitip A., Wang R., Luciana T., Wei M., Ma X. (2024). Effects of exercise on gut microbiota of adults: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Nutrients 16:1070. doi: 10.3390/nu16071070, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Mohr A. E., Jäger R., Carpenter K. C., Kerksick C. M., Purpura M., Townsend J. R., et al. (2020). The athletic gut microbiota. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 17:24. doi: 10.1186/s12970-020-00353-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Monda V., Villano I., Messina A., Valenzano A., Esposito T., Moscatelli F., et al. (2017). Exercise modifies the gut microbiota with positive health effects. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017:3831972. doi: 10.1155/2017/3831972, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Morgado M. C., Sousa M., Coelho A. B., Costa J. A., Seabra A. (2023). Exploring gut microbiota and the influence of physical activity interventions on overweight and obese children and adolescents: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel, Switz.) 11:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Mörkl S., Lackner S., Müller W., Gorkiewicz G., Kashofer K., Oberascher A., et al. (2017). Gut microbiota and body composition in anorexia nervosa inpatients in comparison to athletes, overweight, obese, and normal weight controls. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 50, 1421–1431. doi: 10.1002/eat.22801, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. MoTrPAC Study Group, Lead Analysts, MoTrPAC Study Group (2024). Temporal dynamics of the multi-omic response to endurance exercise training. Nature 629, 174–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Nat Rev Dis Primers (2018). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 4:18034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Newman N. K., Zhang Y., Padiadpu J., Miranda C. L., Magana A. A., Wong C. P., et al. (2023). Reducing gut microbiome-driven adipose tissue inflammation alleviates metabolic syndrome. Microbiome 11:208. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01637-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. O'Donovan C. M., Madigan S. M., Garcia-Perez I., Rankin A., O'Sullivan O., Cotter P. D. (2020). Distinct microbiome composition and metabolome exists across subgroups of elite Irish athletes. J. Sci. Med. Sport 23, 63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.08.290, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Otsuka K., Isobe J., Asai Y., Nakano T., Hattori K., Ariyoshi T., et al. (2024). Butyricimonas is a key gut microbiome component for predicting postoperative recurrence of esophageal cancer. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 73:23. doi: 10.1007/s00262-023-03608-y, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Peng J., Li X., Zheng L., Duan L., Gao Z., Hu D., et al. (2022). Ban-Lan-gen granule alleviates dextran sulfate sodium-induced chronic relapsing colitis in mice via regulating gut microbiota and restoring gut SCFA derived-GLP-1 production. J. Inflamm. Res. 15, 1457–1470. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S352863, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Pereira S. M. S., José V., da Silva A., Martins K. V. C., Leite L. B., Forte P., et al. (2025). Can physical exercise modify intestinal integrity and gut microbiota composition? A systematic review of in vivo studies. Biol. Sport 42, 13–28. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2025.148545, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Pirozzi C., Coretti L., Opallo N., Bove M., Annunziata C., Comella F., et al. (2023). Palmitoylethanolamide counteracts high-fat diet-induced gut dysfunction by reprogramming microbiota composition and affecting tryptophan metabolism. Front. Nutr. 10:1143004. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1143004, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Qin F., Huang W., Qu C., Zhao L., Du Y., Zhao T., et al. (2024). The effects of exercise on microRNA expression profiling in adipose tissue macrophages of mice. Front. Immunol. 15:1412621. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1412621, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Quast C., Pruesse E., Yilmaz P., Gerken J., Schweer T., Yarza P., et al. (2013). The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Quiroga R., Nistal E., Estébanez B., Porras D., Juárez-Fernández M., Martínez-Flórez S., et al. (2020). Exercise training modulates the gut microbiota profile and impairs inflammatory signaling pathways in obese children. Exp. Mol. Med. 52, 1048–1061. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0459-0, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Rahman A. T., Shin J., Whang C. H., Jung W., Yoo D., Seo C., et al. (2023). Bilirubin nanomedicine rescues intestinal barrier destruction and restores mucosal immunity in colitis. ACS Nano 17, 10996–11013. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c03252, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Raimondi S., Musmeci E., Candeliere F., Amaretti A., Rossi M. (2021). Identification of mucin degraders of the human gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 11:11094. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90553-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Ryan R. P., Monchy S., Cardinale M., Taghavi S., Crossman L., Avison M. B., et al. (2009). The versatility and adaptation of bacteria from the genus Stenotrophomonas. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 514–525. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2163, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Sales K. M., Reimer R. A. (2023). Unlocking a novel determinant of athletic performance: the role of the gut microbiota, short-chain fatty acids, and "biotics" in exercise. J. Sport Health Sci. 12, 36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2022.09.002, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Sanford J. A., Nogiec C. D., Lindholm M. E., Adkins J. N., Amar D., Dasari S., et al. (2020). Molecular transducers of physical activity consortium (MoTrPAC): mapping the dynamic responses to exercise. Cell 181, 1464–1474. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.004, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Sato S., Dyar K. A., Treebak J. T., Jepsen S. L., Ehrlich A. M., Ashcroft S. P., et al. (2022). Atlas of exercise metabolism reveals time-dependent signatures of metabolic homeostasis. Cell Metab. 34, 329–345.e328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Scheiman J., Luber J. M., Chavkin T. A., MacDonald T., Tung A., Pham L. D., et al. (2019). Meta-omics analysis of elite athletes identifies a performance-enhancing microbe that functions via lactate metabolism. Nat. Med. 25, 1104–1109. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0485-4, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Scorletti E., Afolabi P. R., Miles E. A., Smith D. E., Almehmadi A., Alshathry A., et al. (2020). Synbiotics alter fecal microbiomes, but not liver fat or fibrosis, in a randomized trial of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 158, 1597–1610.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.031, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Sencio V., Benech N., Robil C., Deruyter L., Heumel S., Machelart A., et al. (2022). Alteration of the gut microbiota's composition and metabolic output correlates with COVID-19-like severity in obese NASH hamsters. Gut Microbes 14:2100200. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2100200, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Shi H., Li X., Hou C., Chen L., Zhang Y., Li J. (2023). Effects of pomegranate Peel polyphenols combined with inulin on gut microbiota and serum metabolites of high-fat-induced obesity rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 71, 5733–5744. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c01014, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Shi R., Tao Y., Tang H., Wu C., Fei J., Ge H., et al. (2023). Abelmoschus Manihot ameliorates the levels of circulating metabolites in diabetic nephropathy by modulating gut microbiota in non-obese diabetes mice. Microb. Biotechnol. 16, 813–826. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.14200, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Shi Y., Wang P., Zhou D., Huang L., Zhang L., Gao X., et al. (2022). Multi-omics analyses characterize the gut microbiome and metabolome signatures of soldiers under sustained military training. Front. Microbiol. 13:827071. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.827071, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Song B., He J., Pan X., Kong L., Xiao C., Keerqin C., et al. (2023). Dietary Macleaya cordata extract supplementation improves the growth performance and gut health of broiler chickens with necrotic enteritis. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 14:113. doi: 10.1186/s40104-023-00916-2, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Sousa A. S., Sponton A. C. S., Trifone C. B., Delbin M. A. (2019). Aerobic exercise training prevents perivascular adipose tissue-induced endothelial dysfunction in thoracic aorta of obese mice. Front. Physiol. 10:1009. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01009, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Sugiyama Y., Mori Y., Nara M., Kotani Y., Nagai E., Kawada H., et al. (2022). Gut bacterial aromatic amine production: aromatic amino acid decarboxylase and its effects on peripheral serotonin production. Gut Microbes 14:2128605. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2128605, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Sun W., Du D., Fu T., Han Y., Li P., Ju H. (2021). Alterations of the gut microbiota in patients with severe chronic heart failure. Front. Microbiol. 12:813289. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.813289, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Sun J., Fan J., Li T., Yan X., Jiang Y. (2022). Nuciferine protects against high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis via modulation of gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism in rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 70, 12014–12028. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c04817, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Sun Y., Wang F., Liu Y., An Y., Chang D., Wang J., et al. (2022). Comparison of water- and alkali-extracted polysaccharides from Fuzhuan brick tea and their immunomodulatory effects in vitro and in vivo. Food Funct. 13, 806–824. doi: 10.1039/D1FO02944D, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Tan H., Zhai Q., Chen W. (2019). Investigations of Bacteroides spp. towards next-generation probiotics. Food Res. Int. 116, 637–644. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.088, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Tanes C., Bittinger K., Gao Y., Friedman E. S., Nessel L., Paladhi U. R., et al. (2021). Role of dietary fiber in the recovery of the human gut microbiome and its metabolome. Cell Host Microbe 29, 394–407.e395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Tang X., Wang W., Hong G., Duan C., Zhu S., Tian Y., et al. (2021). Gut microbiota-mediated lysophosphatidylcholine generation promotes colitis in intestinal epithelium-specific Fut2 deficiency. J. Biomed. Sci. 28:20. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00711-z, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Tao Y., Wang T., Huang C., Lai C., Ling Z., Zhou Y., et al. (2022). Incomplete degradation products of galactomannan from Sesbania cannabina modulated the cecal microbial community of laying hens. J. Anim. Sci. 100:skac087. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac087, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Thingholm L. B., Rühlemann M. C., Koch M., Fuqua B., Laucke G., Boehm R., et al. (2019). Obese individuals with and without type 2 diabetes show different gut microbial functional capacity and composition. Cell Host Microbe 26, 252–264.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.004, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Thomann A. K., Wüstenberg T., Wirbel J., Knoedler L. L., Thomann P. A., Zeller G., et al. (2022). Depression and fatigue in active IBD from a microbiome perspective-a Bayesian approach to faecal metagenomics. BMC Med. 20:366. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02550-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Tian H., Cui J., Ye C., Zhao J., Yang B., Xu Y., et al. (2023). Depletion of butyrate-producing microbes of the Firmicutes predicts nonresponse to FMT therapy in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Gut Microbes 15:2236362. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2236362, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Turnbaugh P. J., Ley R. E., Mahowald M. A., Magrini V., Mardis E. R., Gordon J. I. (2006). An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 444, 1027–1031. doi: 10.1038/nature05414, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Valido E., Bertolo A., Fränkl G. P., Itodo O. A., Pinheiro T., Pannek J., et al. (2022). Systematic review of the changes in the microbiome following spinal cord injury: animal and human evidence. Spinal Cord 60, 288–300. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00737-y, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Vallianou N., Dalamaga M., Stratigou T., Karampela I., Tsigalou C. (2021). Do antibiotics cause obesity through Long-term alterations in the gut microbiome? A review of current evidence. Curr. Obes. Rep. 10, 244–262. doi: 10.1007/s13679-021-00438-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Van den Abbeele P., Ghyselinck J., Marzorati M., Koch A. M., Lambert W., Michiels J., et al. (2022). The effect of amino acids on production of SCFA and bCFA by members of the porcine colonic microbiota. Microorganisms 10:762. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10040762, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Vicario M., Alonso C., Guilarte M., Serra J., Martínez C., González-Castro A. M., et al. (2012). Chronic psychosocial stress induces reversible mitochondrial damage and corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type-1 upregulation in the rat intestine and IBS-like gut dysfunction. Psychoneuroendocrinology 37, 65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.05.005, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Wallace B. A., Varona N. S., Stiffler A. K., Vermeij M. J. A., Silveira C. (2025). High microbial diversity, functional redundancy, and prophage enrichment support the success of the yellow pencil coral, Madracis mirabilis, in Curaçao's coral reefs. mSystems 10:e0120825. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01208-25, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Wan Z., Zheng J., Zhu Z., Sang L., Zhu J., Luo S., et al. (2022). Intermediate role of gut microbiota in vitamin B nutrition and its influences on human health. Front. Nutr. 9:1031502. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1031502, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Wang J. L., Han X., Li J. X., Shi R., Liu L. L., Wang K., et al. (2022). Differential analysis of intestinal microbiota and metabolites in mice with dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 28, 6109–6130. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i43.6109, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Wang R., Lin F., Ye C., Aihemaitijiang S., Halimulati M., Huang X., et al. (2023). Multi-omics analysis reveals therapeutic effects of Bacillus subtilis-fermented Astragalus membranaceus in hyperuricemia via modulation of gut microbiota. Food Chem. 399:133993. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133993, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Wang X., Martin G. B., Wen Q., Liu S., Zhang J., Yu Y., et al. (2019). Linseed oil and heated linseed grain supplements have different effects on rumen bacterial community structures and fatty acid profiles in cashmere kids1. J. Anim. Sci. 97, 2099–2113. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz079, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Wang G., Song J., Huang Y., Li X., Wang H., Zhang Y., et al. (2022). Lactobacillus plantarum SHY130 isolated from yak yogurt attenuates hyperglycemia in C57BL/6J mice by regulating the enteroinsular axis. Food Funct. 13, 675–687. doi: 10.1039/D1FO02387J, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Wang Q., Wang C., Abdullah, Tian W., Qiu Z., Song M., et al. (2022). Hydroxytyrosol alleviates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis by modulating inflammatory responses, intestinal barrier, and microbiome. J. Agric. Food Chem. 70, 2241–2252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Wang R., Yao L., Meng T., Li C., Wang L. (2022). Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Ait.) Hassk fruit phenolic-rich extract mitigates intestinal barrier dysfunction and inflammation in mice. Food Chem. 393:133438. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133438, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Wang X., Ye P., Fang L., Ge S., Huang F., Polverini P. J., et al. (2021). Active smoking induces aberrations in digestive tract microbiota of rats. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11:737204. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.737204, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Wang T., Ye Y., Ji J., Zhang S., Yang X., Xu J., et al. (2022). Astilbin from Smilax glabra Roxb. Alleviates high-fat diet-induced metabolic dysfunction. Food Funct. 13, 5023–5036. doi: 10.1039/D2FO00060A, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Wang W., Zhu J., Cao Q., Zhang C., Dong Z., Feng D., et al. (2022). Dietary catalase supplementation alleviates Deoxynivalenol-induced oxidative stress and gut microbiota Dysbiosis in broiler chickens. Toxins 14:830. doi: 10.3390/toxins14120830, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Wang X., Zhu L., Li X., Wang X., Hao R., Li J. (2022). Effects of high fructose corn syrup on intestinal microbiota structure and obesity in mice. npj Sci. Food 6:17. doi: 10.1038/s41538-022-00133-7, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Wen J. J., Li M. Z., Chen C. H., Hong T., Yang J. R., Huang X. J., et al. (2023). Tea polyphenol and epigallocatechin gallate ameliorate hyperlipidemia via regulating liver metabolism and remodeling gut microbiota. Food Chem. 404:134591. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134591, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Wexler H. M. (2007). Bacteroides: the good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 20, 593–621. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00008-07, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Wu G. D., Chen J., Hoffmann C., Bittinger K., Chen Y. Y., Keilbaugh S. A., et al. (2011). Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science (New York, N.Y.) 334, 105–108. doi: 10.1126/science.1208344, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Wu Y., Yang Y., Wang L., Chen Y., Han X., Sun L., et al. (2023). Effect of Bifidobacterium on osteoclasts: TNF-α/NF-κB inflammatory signal pathway-mediated mechanism. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1109296. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1109296, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Wu Q., Zhuang M., Guo T., Bao S., Wu S., Ke S., et al. (2023). Gut microbiota, host lipid metabolism and regulation mechanism of high-fat diet induced mice following different probiotics-fermented wheat bran intervention. Food Res. Int. 174:113497. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113497, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Wu S., Zuo J., Cheng Y., Zhang Y., Zhang Z., Wu M., et al. (2021). Ethanol extract of Sargarsum fusiforme alleviates HFD/STZ-induced hyperglycemia in association with modulation of gut microbiota and intestinal metabolites in type 2 diabetic mice. Food Res. Int. 147:110550. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110550, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Xu H., Fang F., Wu K., Song J., Li Y., Lu X., et al. (2023). Gut microbiota-bile acid crosstalk regulates murine lipid metabolism via the intestinal FXR-FGF19 axis in diet-induced humanized dyslipidemia. Microbiome 11:262. doi: 10.1186/s40168-023-01709-5, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Xu L., Jia J., Miao S., Gong L., Wang J., He S., et al. (2023). Aerobic exercise reduced the amount of CHRONO bound to BMAL1 and ameliorated glucose metabolic dysfunction in skeletal muscle of high-fat diet-fed mice. Life Sci. 324:121696. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121696, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Xu W., Kong Y., Zhang T., Gong Z., Xiao W. (2023). L-theanine regulates lipid metabolism by modulating gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism. J. Sci. Food Agric. 103, 1283–1293. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12222, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Xu S., Wang F., Zou P., Li X., Jin Q., Wang Q., et al. (2022). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 in the diet improves egg quality of hens by altering intestinal microbiota and the effect is diminished by antimicrobial peptide. Front. Nutr. 9:999998. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.999998, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Xu Y., Yang Y., Li B., Xie Y., Shi Y., Le G. (2022). Dietary methionine restriction improves gut microbiota composition and prevents cognitive impairment in D-galactose-induced aging mice. Food Funct. 13, 12896–12914. doi: 10.1039/d2fo03366f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Yang J. Y., Chen S. Y., Wu Y. H., Liao Y. L., Yen G. C. (2023). Ameliorative effect of buckwheat polysaccharides on colitis via regulation of the gut microbiota. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 227, 872–883. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.155, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Yang Y., Lu M., Xu Y., Qian J., Le G., Xie Y. (2022). Dietary methionine via dose-dependent inhibition of short-chain fatty acid production capacity contributed to a potential risk of cognitive dysfunction in mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 70, 15225–15243. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c04847, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Yang L., Wang Y., Li Z., Wu X., Mei J., Zheng G. (2023a). Brain targeted peptide-functionalized chitosan nanoparticles for resveratrol delivery: impact on insulin resistance and gut microbiota in obesity-related Alzheimer's disease. Carbohydr. Polym. 310:120714. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120714, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Yang J., Wang J., Liu Z., Chen J., Jiang J., Zhao M., et al. (2023). Ligilactobacillus Salivarius improve body growth and anti-oxidation capacity of broiler chickens via regulation of the microbiota-gut-brain axis. BMC Microbiol. 23:395. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-03135-x, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Yang L., Wang Y., Zheng G., Li Z., Mei J. (2023b). Resveratrol-loaded selenium/chitosan nano-flowers alleviate glucolipid metabolism disorder-associated cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 239:124316. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124316, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Yang B., Xiong Z., Lin M., Yang Y., Chen Y., Zeng J., et al. (2023). Astragalus polysaccharides alleviate type 1 diabetes via modulating gut microbiota in mice. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 234:123767. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123767, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Yao Y., Yan L., Chen H., Wu N., Wang W., Wang D. (2020). Cyclocarya paliurus polysaccharides alleviate type 2 diabetic symptoms by modulating gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acids. Phytomed. Int. J. Phytother. Phytopharm. 77:153268. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153268, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Ye X., Liu Y., Hu J., Gao Y., Ma Y., Wen D. (2021). Chlorogenic acid-induced gut microbiota improves metabolic Endotoxemia. Front. Endocrinol. 12:762691. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.762691, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Yin Y., Cai J., Zhou L., Xing L., Zhang W. (2022). Dietary oxidized beef protein alters gut microbiota and induces colonic inflammatory damage in C57BL/6 mice. Front. Nutr. 9:980204. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.980204, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Yu J., Liu J., Senthil Kumar P., Wei Y., Zhou M., Vo D. N., et al. (2022). Promotion of methane production by magnetite via increasing acetogenesis revealed by metagenome-assembled genomes. Bioresour. Technol. 345:126521. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126521, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Yu H., Xie Y., Wu B., Zhao H., Chen X., Tian G., et al. (2022). Dietary supplementation of ferrous glycinate improves intestinal barrier function by modulating microbiota composition in Cherry Valley ducks. Anim. Nutr. 11, 264–275. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.07.007, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Yuan Y., Liu S., Ding X., Li Y., Zhang X., Song H., et al. (2022). Early intestinal microbiota changes in aged and adult mice with sepsis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 12:1061444. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1061444, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Yue C., Li M., Li J., Han X., Zhu H., Yu G., et al. (2020). Medium-, long- and medium-chain-type structured lipids ameliorate high-fat diet-induced atherosclerosis by regulating inflammation, adipogenesis, and gut microbiota in ApoE(−/−) mice. Food Funct. 11, 5142–5155. doi: 10.1039/D0FO01006E, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Zafar H., Saier M. H., Jr. (2021). Gut Bacteroides species in health and disease. Gut Microbes 13, 1–20. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1848158, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Zeng Q., Li D., He Y., Li Y., Yang Z., Zhao X., et al. (2019). Discrepant gut microbiota markers for the classification of obesity-related metabolic abnormalities. Sci. Rep. 9:13424. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49462-w, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Zhang P., Jiang G., Wang Y., Yan E., He L., Guo J., et al. (2023). Maternal consumption of l-malic acid enriched diets improves antioxidant capacity and glucose metabolism in offspring by regulating the gut microbiota. Redox Biol. 67:102889. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102889, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Zhang Y., Li Y., Yuan Y., Wang J., Zhang S., Zhu R., et al. (2023). Reducing light exposure enhances the circadian rhythm of the biological clock through interactions with the gut microbiota. Sci. Total Environ. 858:160041. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160041, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Zhao Q., Fu Y., Zhang F., Wang C., Yang X., Bai S., et al. (2022a). Heat-treated adzuki bean protein hydrolysates reduce obesity in mice fed a high-fat diet via remodeling gut microbiota and improving metabolic function. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 66:e2100907. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.202100907, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Zhao Q., Liu Z., Zhu Y., Wang H., Dai Z., Yang X., et al. (2022b). Cooked adzuki bean reduces high-fat diet-induced body weight gain, ameliorates inflammation, and modulates intestinal homeostasis in mice. Front. Nutr. 9:918696. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.918696, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Zhong H., Abdullah, Deng L., Zhao M., Tang J., Liu T., et al. (2020). Probiotic-fermented blueberry juice prevents obesity and hyperglycemia in high fat diet-fed mice in association with modulating the gut microbiota. Food Funct. 11, 9192–9207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Zhou Y., Chen L., Han H., Xiong B., Zhong R., Jiang Y., et al. (2022). Taxifolin increased semen quality of Duroc boars by improving gut microbes and blood metabolites. Front. Microbiol. 13:1020628. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1020628, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Zhou J., Cheng J., Liu L., Luo J., Peng X. (2023). Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA) fermenting astragalus polysaccharides (APS) improves calcium absorption and osteoporosis by altering gut microbiota. Foods 12:275. doi: 10.3390/foods12020275, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Zhou C., Zhang W., Lin H., Zhang L., Wu F., Wang Y., et al. (2022). Effect of theaflavin-3,3′-digallate on leptin-deficient induced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease might be related to lipid metabolism regulated by the Fads1/PPARδ/Fabp4 axis and gut microbiota. Front. Pharmacol. 13:925264. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.925264, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Zhou X., Zhang B., Zhao X., Zhang P., Guo J., Zhuang Y., et al. (2023). Coffee leaf tea extracts improve hyperuricemia nephropathy and its associated negative effect in gut microbiota and amino acid metabolism in rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 71, 17775–17787. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c02797, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Zhu Y., Chen B., Zhang X., Akbar M. T., Wu T., Zhang Y., et al. (2024). Exploration of the Muribaculaceae family in the gut microbiota: diversity, metabolism, and function. Nutrients 16:2660. doi: 10.3390/nu16162660, [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Zhuang P., Zhang Y., Shou Q., Li H., Zhu Y., He L., et al. (2020). Eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids differentially alter gut microbiome and reverse high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 64:e1900946. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201900946, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table_1.docx (18.2KB, docx)
Table_2.docx (20.8KB, docx)
Table_3.xlsx (15.2KB, xlsx)
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S1

(A) Rarefaction curves of observed species for all individual samples, showing plateauing. (B) Rarefaction curves grouped by experimental condition (BCCr, BCT0, BCT30, BCT60, C57Cr, C57T0, C57T30, C57T60), demonstrating adequate sequencing depth across all groups.

Image_1.tif (2.3MB, tif)

Data Availability Statement

The RNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession number GSE324758 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE324758).


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES