This is a correction to: Adam M Glendening, Cole Stephens, Vidya S Vuruputoor, Tesko Chaganti, Meghan N Myles, David L Stern, Mohamed Abdelalim, Yu-Pu Juang, Saskia A Hogenhout, Thomas C Mathers, Nicole Pauloski, Tim A Cernak, Jill L Wegrzyn, Karl C Fetter, Chromosome scale genomes of two invasive Adelges species enable virtual screening for selective adelgicides, G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics, Volume 16, Issue 1, January 2026, https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkaf232
The caption to Figure 2 has been corrected to read: “Fig. 2. a, b) Repeat landscapes of known TE families (DNA transposons, LINEs, and LTR retrotransposons) and unclassified repeat families in A. tsugae and A. abietis, respectively. c, d) Chromosome models of A. tsugae (right) and A. abietis (left) with gene density from light to dark shown in green (A. tsugae 0 to 56 genes per 500,000 bp, A. abietis 1 to 49). The focal gene family members, including: JHAMT (green boxes), ERAP (purple boxes), and nAChR (orange triangles) are shown in their respective positions on the far right. The repeat density track is on the left side in orange. e) Synteny analysis between Daktulosphaira vitifoliae, A. cooleyi (longest 10 scaffolds), and the 10 pseudo-chromosomes of A. abietis and A. tsugae. Adelgids exhibit strong synteny in both sex chromosomes and autosomes.” instead of “Fig. 2. a, b) Repeat landscapes of known TE families (DNA transposons, LINEs, and LTR retrotransposons) and unclassified repeat families in A. tsugae and A. abietis, respectively. c, d) Chromosome models of A. tsugae (left) and A. abietis (right) with gene density from light to dark shown in green (A. tsugae 0 to 56 genes per 500,000 bp, A. abietis 1 to 49). The focal gene family members, including: JHAMT, ERAP, and nAChR are shown in their respective positions on the far right. The repeat density track is on the left side in orange. e) Synteny analysis between D. vitifoliae, A. cooleyi (longest 10 scaffolds), and the 10 pseudo-chromosomes of A. abietis and A. tsugae. Adelgids exhibit strong synteny in both sex chromosomes and autosomes.”
The Panel I, in Figure 4, has been emended for readability.
Figure 4 should read:
instead of:
A duplicated file was removed from the Supplementary data material.
Both these changes have been made to the originally published paper.