Abstract
Prokaryotic type III CRISPR systems signal infection by generating cyclic oligoadenylate (cOA) second messengers, which activate defence proteins allosterically, providing immunity. cOA molecules are typically degraded by extrinsic, stand-alone ring nuclease (RN) enzymes with phosphodiesterase activity or by the intrinsic RN activity of the effectors themselves. Viruses and plasmids also encode RNs, which can function as anti-CRISPRs. Eight different families of extrinsic RNs are currently known. Here, we report the structural and biochemical analysis of one of these families: Csx15. We show that Csx15 is a dimeric protein of the CRISPR-associated Rossmann fold (CARF) superfamily with the ability to bind cyclic tetra-adenylate (cA4) molecules in a shared binding site formed by the head-to-tail stacking of dimers in a filament conformation. Some family members are non-enzymatic, relying on the sequestration (sponging) of cA4 to regulate the host immune response, while others act as canonical RNs, slowly degrading cA4.
Keywords: bacteriophages, CRISPR, cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases
Introduction
CRISPR systems provide adaptive prokaryotic immunity by capturing and storing short segments of DNA from invading mobile genetic elements in a CRISPR array in the host genome. This is transcribed and processed into CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs), guiding CRISPR defence systems to target cognate invading nucleic acids during subsequent infection. Seven major types of CRISPR system have been described [1]. Type III CRISPR systems consist of a multi-subunit interference complex with a Cas10 catalytic subunit. Upon binding to invading RNA, the cyclase domain of Cas10 is activated, producing cyclic oligoadenylates (cOA) or SAM-AMP as secondary messengers [2–4]. These messengers activate various downstream effectors, initiating diverse immune responses, including nonspecific RNA or DNA cleavage [2,5–8], proteolysis [9–11], transcriptional and translational regulation [12,13], degradation of nucleotides and cofactors [14,15], and membrane disruption [16–18]. The activation of these effectors can cause cell growth arrest or death, thus providing protection at the population level [19].
In reality, many type III CRISPR systems include a specialised class of enzymes, collectively known as ‘ring nucleases’ (RN), that degrade the cyclic nucleotide, providing a mechanism to deactivate the immune response and avoid unnecessary cell death. The first CRISPR-associated ring nuclease (Crn1) was identified biochemically [20], followed quickly by Crn2 and Crn3 [21,22]. These enzymes are all specific for the degradation of cA4, the most commonly used signalling molecule in type III CRISPR systems [23]. Recently, a further enzyme, Crn4, was described that has a much broader substrate specificity, degrading all cOA species tested [24]. In addition, many of the effector proteins activated by cOA species have intrinsic RN activity and are therefore self-limiting [12,25–31]. A recent bioinformatic analysis revealed that the ring nucleases are diverse and abundant in type III CRISPR systems, adding two more cA4-specific enzymes (Csx16 and Csx20) to the growing list [32]. Viruses also encode ring nucleases in their genomes, where they function as anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins by intercepting and destroying cOA second messengers [21,33].
Csx15 was originally proposed as a candidate RN based on its amino acid sequence and genomic neighbourhood analysis [34]. Analysis of ∼1000 type III CRISPR loci in 40,000 complete prokaryotic genomes revealed that Csx15 was present in 18 loci, often co-occurring with Crn1 [32]. About 25% of csx15 genes in the dataset were orphans, not associated with a CRISPR locus. AlphaFold3 (AF3) [35] modelling predicted a CARF (CRISPR-associated Rossmann fold)-like fold for Csx15. A representative example from Pseudomonas fluorescens (PfCsx15) was tested for RN activity but found to have little or no activity in vitro [32]. However, PfCsx15 is an orphan protein and could thus have diverged in function.
Here, we investigate two Csx15 orthologues, the orphan PfCsx15 and the CRISPR-associated Chlorobaculum limnaeum Csx15 (CliCsx15). PfCsx15 specifically sequesters cA4 to inhibit the cA4-activated ribonuclease activity of a CRISPR effector protein. CliCsx15 exhibits cA4-specific RN activity in vitro and can neutralise CRISPR defence in vivo. Both proteins adopt higher oligomerisation states induced by cA4 binding. Crystal structures of PfCsx15 and CliCsx15 reveal a conserved dimeric structure and the molecular basis for multimerisation in a head-to-tail conformation that sandwiches cA4 between dimers. The likely functions of these unusual cA4 binding proteins are discussed.
Results
PfCsx15 specifically inhibits cA4-activated CRISPR effectors
Although PfCsx15 was previously identified as a candidate RN, very limited nuclease activity was observed using HPLC analysis [32]. To further investigate the function of PfCsx15, we tested whether the protein could inhibit a range of type III CRISPR effectors in vitro. We examined the cA3-activated DNase Vibrio metoecus (Vme) NucC [8], the cA4-activated ribonuclease TTHB144 from Thermus thermophilus HB8 [25], and the cA6-activated ribonuclease Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) Csm6 [36] using an established fluorescent assay. We observed a progressive inhibition of TTHB144 in the presence of high concentrations of PfCsx15. At three concentrations of cA4 (1, 2, or 4 μM), preincubation with PfCsx15 for 15 min led to a reduction in TTHB144 ribonuclease activity when the molar ratio of PfCsx15 dimer to cA4 concentration was higher than approximately 0.6 (Figure 1). Weaker inhibition was observed for VmeNucC (Supplementary Figure S1) and MtbCsm6 (Supplementary Figure S2). These data suggest that PfCsx15 is specific for cA4 and does not primarily function as an RN but rather exhibits properties more characteristic of a cyclic nucleotide-binding, or sponge, protein, analogous to the anti-CBASS protein Acb2 [37].
Figure 1. PfCsx15 specifically inactivates cA4-induced RNase TTHB144.
(A) RNase alert assay with detection of fluorescence signal emitted by RNA cleavage when RNases were present. RNaseAlert substrates (100 nM) were incubated with the Csx15 (0–5 μM dimer) and cA4 (1, 2, and 4 μM, respectively) at 35°C for 15 min before adding RNase TTHB144 (500 nM dimer). The fluorescence signal was plotted against time. (B) Plot of baseline-corrected fluorescence signal against the ratio of Csx15 (dimer) to cA4. The average fluorescence signal from 59–61 min was corrected using the average baseline signal from 9–10 min. Data of two replicates were presented as mean ± s.d. The RNase activity of TTHB144 was inhibited when the ratio of Csx15 (dimer) to cA4 exceeded 0.6. (C) Schematic representation of the fluorogenic biochemical assay
PfCsx15 oligomerises on cA4 binding
Oligomeric states of PfCsx15 were examined using dynamic light scattering (DLS) in the presence or absence of different cOA species. Addition of cA4, but not cA3 or cA6, to PfCsx15 resulted in a significant increase in global particle size (Figure 2A). Additionally, size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) showed that PfCsx15 eluted with a retention time consistent with a dimer in the absence of cA4, while a significant shift to a shorter retention time (and thus larger size) was observed in the presence of cA4 (Figure 2B). These observations suggested that cA4 induces PfCsx15 to form high molecular weight complexes.
Figure 2. cA4 induces the oligomerisation of PfCsx15.
(A) DLS of PfCsx15 in the presence or absence of a range of cOAs. PfCsx15 assembles into significantly larger molecular species only in the presence of cA4. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA multiple comparisons, followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test (****P <0.0001). (B) SEC of PfCsx15 with and without cA4. A molar ratio of PfCsx15 (dimer) to cA4 is 2:1. Gel filtration standard (Bio-Rad) includes thyroglobulin (670,000), γ-globulin (158,000), ovalbumin (44,000), myoglobin (17,000), and vitamin B12 (1350).
Crystal structure of PfCsx15
To better understand the structural organisation of PfCsx15, we crystallised the protein and solved the structure at a resolution of 1.88 Å (Supplementary Table S1). The dimeric structure corresponds closely to that predicted by AF3 previously [32], comprising a fold with a central 5-stranded β-sheet flanked by α-helices (Figure 3A). Structural comparison with the ring nuclease Crn1, which adopts a canonical CARF fold, shows that core topological features are conserved, with the exception of β3, which is absent (Supplementary Figure S3). It is important to note that the CARF protein family deviates from the classical Rossmann fold in an important respect: the right-handed helical crossover between strands β5 and β6 is replaced with a reverse turn in CARF proteins [38]. This results in an antiparallel arrangement of β5 and β6, which are parallel in the canonical Rossmann fold, potentiating the dimeric organisation of CARF proteins. Although the CARF acronym is well established, it has been suggested that a useful alternative definition might be ‘cyclic oligoadenylate recognition fold’ [38].
Figure 3. Crystal structure of PfCsx15.
(A) Subunit of PfCsx15 with secondary structure elements labelled. Coloured from blue (N-terminus) to red (C-terminus). (B) Crystal structure of PfCsx15, showing dimer:dimer stacking in the crystal lattice with a head-to-tail organisation. Subunits are coloured green and teal in the lower dimer and orange and olive in the upper dimer. (C) Close-up view of the dimer:dimer interface, showing conserved residues H82, R116, R120, and R123 in the top dimer and S9 and H11 in the bottom dimer. The positions of two phosphate ions present in the crystal structure are shown in sphere representation.
The crystal packing positions dimers in a repeating head-to-tail conformation, generating a potential shared binding site between dimers (Figure 3B). Two β-hairpins formed by β-strands 4 and 5 form interactions with the dimer positioned above in the crystal lattice. Sequence comparisons (Supplementary Figure S4) indicate conservation of residues S9, H11, H82, R116, R120, and R123 in a range of Csx15 orthologues. In the dimer:dimer interface, we observed two phosphate ions, which might indicate the binding site of cA4. The top dimer (orange/olive) contributes the conserved arginine residues (R116, R120, and R123), which interact with the phosphate ions, along with conserved H82 (Figure 3C). The bottom dimer (green/teal) contributes the conserved residues S9 and H11. The 6 arginine residues appear suitably positioned to interact with the phosphate groups in bound nucleotide ligands. Unfortunately, we were unable to co-crystallise the protein with cA4, as the protein came out of solution when the nucleotide was added.
Mutation of conserved interface residues reduces filament formation
To test for an interaction with cA4, residues H11 (bottom dimer) and R123 (top dimer) of PfCsx15 were independently mutated to alanine. DLS assays were first performed to examine the oligomeric states of PfCsx15 wild type and variants (Figure 4A). The formation of high molecular weight species upon addition of cA4 was largely abolished for the H11A variant (Figure 4A). Although a higher oligomeric state was still observed for the R123A variant, the global particle size was significantly less than that observed for the wild type. These findings suggest that both residues play a role in the formation of higher-order oligomeric states and reinforce the conclusion that the dimer:dimer interface is the site of cA4 binding.
Figure 4. Characterisation of PfCsx15 variants H11A and R123A.
(A) DLS of PfCsx15 wild type and variants. Mutation of conserved residues H11 and R123 abolished the cA4-induced multimerisation of PfCsx15. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA multiple comparisons, followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test (****P <0.0001, nsP = 0.0726). (B) Fluorescent assay of PfCsx15 wild type and variants. RNaseAlert substrates (100 nM) were incubated with the PfCsx15 (0-5 uM dimer) and cA4 (1.1 μM) at 35°C for 15 min before adding RNase TTHB144 (500 nM dimer). The fluorescence signal was plotted against time. (C) Plot of baseline-corrected fluorescence signal in panel (B). Data of two replicates were presented as mean ± s.d. There was no observed inhibition of cA4-induced TTHB144 ribonuclease activity when H11A was present
Ribonuclease inhibition assays were subsequently carried out to investigate the ability of the variant proteins to sequester cA4 (Figure 4B,C). No inhibition of cA4-activated TTHB144 ribonuclease activity was observed, even at very high concentrations of the H11A variant. For the R123A variant, full inhibition occurred at higher protein-to-cA4 ratios than that required for the wild-type protein. Collectively, these observations indicate that H11 plays a major role in cA4 binding and multimerisation, while R123 plays a secondary role.
CliCsx15, a type III CRISPR-associated Csx15, is a cA4-specific ring nuclease
As PfCsx15 is encoded by an orphan gene that is not linked to a type III CRISPR locus, it may have diverged in function. We therefore selected and cloned a gene encoding Csx15 from the type III CRISPR locus of Chlorobaculum limnaeum strain DSM 1677, hereafter referred to as CliCsx15 (Figure 5A). The protein was expressed and purified to homogeneity. The RN activity was tested by incubating cOAs (fixed at 80 μM) with increasing concentrations of CliCsx15 for 60 min at 30°C, followed by HPLC analysis. Linear products A2-p and A-p were observed at the higher protein concentrations (Figure 5B). The observation of 3′-phosphate termini (rather than 2′,3′-cyclic phosphate termini) on the products suggests that this is a hydrolytic reaction, involving a water nucleophile. This contrasts with ring nucleases such as AcrIII-1, which degrade cA4 using an in-line attack of the adjacent 2′-hydroxyl group on the substrate [21]. The CliCsx15 RN activity was unaffected by the presence or absence of EDTA/Mg2+/Mn2+, suggesting that activation of the water nucleophile is not mediated by a divalent metal ion (Supplementary Figure S5). The turnover rate was very slow, with only ∼50% of cA4 degraded over 60 min at an enzyme:substrate ratio of 1:8. No RN activity was detected for cA3 or cA6 substrates (Supplementary Figure S6).
Figure 5. CliCsx15 is a cA4-specific ring nuclease.
(A) Genomic context of the Csx15-associated type III-A CRISPR system in C. limnaeum strain DSM 1677. (B) Ring nuclease activity of CliCsx15. cA4 (80 μM) incubated with CliCsx15 (0, 1, 10, and 40 μM) for 60 min at 30°C was analysed using HPLC. (C) DLS analysis. cA4 promoted an increase in global particle size. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA multiple comparisons, followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test (****P <0.0001).
We also tested whether cA4 promoted the oligomerisation of CliCsx15. DLS was used to examine oligomeric states in the presence or absence of different cOAs. A significant increase in particle size was observed only upon cA4 addition to CliCsx15, consistent with the observations for PfCsx15 (Figure 5C).
Crystal Structure of CliCsx15
We crystallised the apo form of CliCsx15, solving the structure at the extremely high resolution of 0.9 Å (Figure 6A). A sample of the electron density for residues at the interface is shown in Supplementary Figure S7. Overall, the dimeric structures of PfCsx15 and CliCsx15 are similar, with an RMSD of 3.0 Å over 208 residues. Notably, the same head-to-tail packing was observed in both structures, strengthening the hypothesis that this might represent the biologically relevant interface. To investigate this further, we generated a model of four monomers of CliCsx15 along with 4 AMP molecules (analogous to cA4) using AF3. The AF3 model (Figure 6B), predicted with high confidence (ipTM 0.81; pTM = 0.84), matched very well to the organisation of CliCsx15 dimers observed in the crystal lattice. The four AMP molecules adopt orientations sandwiched in the dimer:dimer interface (Figure 6B,C), in suitable positions to interact with the conserved arginine residues contributed by the top dimer. Conserved residues H13 and Y113, equivalent to H11 and F106 in PfCsx15 (Supplementary Figure S4), flank the adenosine base of AMP at two positions in the dimer:dimer interface (Figure 6C). Conserved residue H90 sits in a central position in the top dimer, suitably located to participate in catalysis. The structural data suggest that Csx15 may multimerise in a concentration-dependent manner in the absence of cA4, while the DLS data emphasise the importance of cA4 in stabilising these multimers.
Figure 6. Crystal structure and AF3 modelling of CliCsx15.
(A) Crystal structure of CliCsx15, showing dimer:dimer stacking in the crystal lattice with a head-to-tail organisation, similar to PfCsx15. (B) AF3 model of CliCsx15 together with 4 AMP ligands. The AMP molecules cluster at the dimer:dimer interface, suggesting the expected binding site for cA4. (C) Close-up view of the dimer:dimer interface in the AF3 model, showing the positions of conserved residues (labelled). (D) Structural alignment of CliCsx15 dimer (green) with AcrIII-2 SAVED monomer (light grey). cA4 from CalpL SAVED domain [10] is shown with carbon atoms coloured yellow. Csx15 H13 and AcrIII-2 H128 are indicated. (E) Top-down view of panel (D).
Comparison with other ring nucleases
As noted, Csx15 adopts the structure found in the CARF and SAVED protein superfamily [34]. The top hit in a DALI [39] search (Z-score 8.4; RMSD 2.8 Å over 238 residues) is the AcrIII-2/Crn5 protein, a ring nuclease that uses a SAVED domain to bind cA4. Similarly to Csx15, AcrIII-2 SAVED domains stack in a head-to-tail conformation to bind and cleave cA4 [33]. To extend this comparison, we added the cA4 molecule from the SAVED domain of the CalpL effector, which is closely related to AcrIII-2 [10,31]. This modelling exercise provides a good prediction for the cA4 binding site of Csx15. Notably, the catalytic residue H13 of CliCsx15 is suitably positioned to participate in phosphodiester bond cleavage and coincides with the essential catalytic residue H128 of AcrIII-2 (Figure 6E,F). The loop containing H13, found between strand β1 and helix α1, is a conserved site for nucleotide interaction in the Rossmann fold superfamily, designated as Motif-I [34]. The ring nuclease Crn1 has a catalytically important serine residue in the equivalent position [20].
To test the functional roles of H13 and H90 in CliCsx15, we mutated each residue to alanine and examined the ability of the variants to multimerise on cA4 binding and to degrade the cyclic nucleotide. The RN activity of H13A was abolished, while only very low RN activity was observed for the H90A variant (Figure 7A), implicating both residues in the catalytic mechanism. The cA4-induced oligomerisation was abolished when the residue H90 was mutated, whereas variant H13A had subtle effects on its oligomeric state (Figure 7B).
Figure 7. Ring nuclease activity and oligomeric states of CliCsx15 variants.
(A) RN activity of CliCsx15 wild-type and variants. cA4 (50 μM) incubated with CliCsx15 wt and variants (25 or 50 μM dimer) for 60 min at 30°C was analysed using HPLC. No ring nuclease activity was detected in the presence of variant H13A, whereas limited cleavage activity was observed in the high concentration of variant H90A. (B) DLS analysis. cA4-induced multimerisation was completely abolished when a conserved residue H90 was mutated, while the mutation of H13 had less effects on its oligomerisation state. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA multiple comparisons, followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test (****P <0.0001)
Taken together, our biochemical, X-ray structural, and modelling studies provide a strong prediction that Csx15 adopts a linear head-to-tail multimeric structure when bound to cA4, reminiscent of the ring nucleases Csx3 [22] and AcrIII-2 [33].
CliCsx15 can neutralise CRISPR defence in vivo
To assess the in vivo function of Csx15, we tested CliCsx15 in a well-established recombinant type III-A CRISPR system from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MtbCsm), expressed in E. coli. This system generates a range of cOA species and activates the cA4-dependent effector Thioalkalivibrio sulfidiphilus Csx1 to confer plasmid immunity. Escherichia coli C43 cells expressing MtbCsm were transformed with a pRATDuet plasmid encoding Csx1 alone or in combination with CliCsx15, together with a tetracycline resistance gene (tetR). When Csx1 was activated by cA4 produced by the MtbCsm complex programmed with a crRNA targeting tetR transcripts, a reduction in transformation efficiency was observed, as anticipated. Co-expression with CliCsx15 restored cfu to near-control levels (Figure 8). As a negative control, MtbCsm did not produce cA4 when programmed with a crRNA targeting the pUC plasmid, and no reduction in transformants was observed (Figure 8). The neutralisation of cA4-mediated plasmid immunity suggested that CliCsx15 effectively reduced the intracellular cA4 concentration.
Figure 8. CliCsx15 relieves cA4-mediated plasmid immunity.
(A) Plasmid challenge assay. Schematic representation of the experimental system. (B) Serial dilutions of E. coli transformants expressing the MtbCsm system together with effector Csx1, ring nuclease CliCsx15, or both were spotted onto antibiotic-selective agar plates with inducer to activate expression of all plasmids. Co-expression of CliCsx15 restored transformation efficiency in cells with cA4-activated Csx1. Two biological replicates, each with two technical replicates, were performed. Representative plates are shown.
Discussion
Cyclic nucleotide second messengers are a key feature of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic antiviral immunity, providing a convenient means to amplify the primary signal of infection. Typically, these cyclic nucleotides bind and allosterically activate defensive effector proteins to elicit an immune response. An unusual feature of type III CRISPR systems is the near-ubiquity of a mechanism to degrade these cyclic nucleotides via intrinsic or extrinsic ring nucleases, providing a means to switch off this defence pathway when it is no longer needed. Six families of extrinsic cA4-specific RNs have been described [32,33], in addition to an unusual RN (Crn4), which is capable of degrading all tested cOA species [24]. Here, we tested the candidate RN Csx15, demonstrating that it binds specifically to cA4, forming a head-to-tail, extended filament conformation. Some family members are capable of slowly degrading cA4, while others appear to sequester (sponge) the cyclic nucleotide.
Sponging of cyclic nucleotides is commonly encountered as an anti-defence strategy to combat the CBASS, Pycsar, and Thoeris immune systems in bacteria [37,40–42]. This appears effective when the levels of second messenger produced are quite low. In response, some bacteria encode the Panoptes system, which constitutively generates ‘decoy’ cyclic nucleotides to keep a membrane-bound effector deactivated [43,44]. When a phage with a sponge invades cells with Panoptes, sequestration of the decoy molecules results in the activation of Panoptes defence. In contrast to these pathways, type III CRISPR systems typically make much larger quantities of second messenger molecules [8,45,46], which could make sponging a fruitless approach. In response, viruses encode RNs and phosphodiesterases to degrade these molecules [47].
What then is the rationale for Csx15—a protein that is a good cA4 sponge but a very slow ring nuclease? Firstly, we note that Csx15 was not observed in any phage genomes [32], suggesting that it may not have utility as an anti-CRISPR. We have observed effective neutralisation of a cA4-activated CRISPR effector by Csx15 in vivo (Figure 6), but it should be borne in mind that this involves over-expression of the protein from a multicopy plasmid, which could enhance its effectiveness. Perhaps, when part of a CRISPR system, Csx15 serves to mop up any small amounts of cA4 that are generated aberrantly, for example, by the binding of a cellular transcript with a partial match to the crRNA of the type III system. Csx15 could thus act as a dampener to reduce autoimmunity while avoiding the unwanted neutralisation of the system when fully activated by phage infection.
Finally, Csx15 joins a growing list of CARF/SAVED superfamily proteins that multimerise by sandwiching cyclic nucleotide activators between consecutive structural units in a head-to-tail conformation. Notable examples are the SAVED proteins Cap4 [48], TIR-SAVED [49], AcrIII-2 [33], and CalpL [10,31]. For CARF proteins, the repeating unit is a dimer, and stacking interactions are less common but have been observed recently in the CRISPR effector Cat1 [14]. In many of these proteins, cyclic nucleotide-promoted filamentation provides a means to activate a fused effector domain, while in Csx15 and AcrIII-2 the relevant outcome is cA4 degradation. In CalpL, both activities are evident, and cyclic nucleotide degradation could provide a means to disassemble active filaments and deactivate the immune response. Although clearly a CARF superfamily member, Csx15 has features that distinguish it from the other characterised members of the clade. In particular, one of the six canonical strands of the CARF fold (strand 3 in Crn1) has been lost, while strands 4 and 5 form an extended β-hairpin that mediates dimer:dimer contacts. Filamentation of CARF family proteins in prokaryotic immunity pathways could be an emerging paradigm.
Methods
Cloning
Synthetic genes encoding PfCsx15 (WP_191946534.1) and CliCsx15 (WP_069809204.1), purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT), were codon optimised for expression in Escherichia coli and subcloned into the pEHisV5TEV vector between the NcoI and BamHI restriction sites. Mutants were created by site-directed mutagenesis using primers with the desired mutations. The E. coli DH5α strain was used for cloning and mutagenesis. Sequence integrity and mutation were confirmed by sequencing (Eurofins Genomics). All synthetic genes and primers used in the present study are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
For the plasmid challenge assay, the CliCsx15 gene was cloned into multiple cloning site -1 (MCS-1) between the NdeI and XhoI restriction sites of pRATDuet, under the control of a T7 promoter. For co-expression, the Csx1 gene was cloned into MCS-2 of the pRATDuet-CliCsx15 plasmid between NcoI and SalI sites, under the control of a pBAD promoter.
Protein expression and purification
The expression and purification of PfCsx15 were previously described [32]; the same protocols were used for CliCsx15. In brief, the E. coli C43 (DE3) strain was used for protein expression. Two litres of cell culture were induced with 0.4 mM isopropyl-β-d-1-thiogalactoside (IPTG) when OD600 reached 0.6–0.8 and grown overnight at 25°C. For the determination of molarity, Csx15 was considered to be dimeric. Purified proteins and variants are shown in Supplementary Figure S8.
Ring nuclease assay
RN activity was examined by incubating enzymes (1, 10, and 40 μM) with 80 μM cOA species (Biolog) in the reaction buffer 20 mM Tris–HCl, 250 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, at 30°C for 60 min. The reactions were terminated by adding two equivalent volumes of cold methanol and vortexing. Samples were vacuum-dried before resuspension in water for HPLC analysis.
HPLC analysis
HPLC was conducted on an Ultimate3000 UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a C18 column (Kinetex EVO 2.1 × 50 mm, particle size 2.6 μm). The column temperature was set at 40°C, and the absorbance was monitored at 260 nm. Samples were analysed by gradient elution with solvent A (20 mM ammonium acetate, pH 8.5) and solvent B (methanol) at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min as follows: 0–0.5 min, 1% B; 0.5–6 min, 1%–15% B; 6–7 min, 100% B.
Dynamic light scattering
DLS measurements were conducted on a Zetasizer Nano S90 (Malvern) instrument to evaluate the hydrodynamic radii of PfCsx15 and CliCsx15 in the presence or the absence of cOAs. One milligram per millilitre of proteins was mixed with and without 70 μM cOAs in 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min prior to measurement. The experiment was carried out at 4°C with 3 measurements of 13 runs in two independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA multiple comparisons, followed by Šídák’s multiple comparisons test (Prism, version 10.2.2).
Fluorogenic biochemical assay
Assays were carried out on a fluorescence plate reader (FLUOstar Omega, BMG Labtech) with a Greiner 96 half-area plate. PfCsx15 (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.5, and 5 μM dimer) was incubated with cA4 (1, 2, and 4 μM) in the presence of RNAse-Alert (IDT) substrate (100 nM). Reactions were incubated at 35°C for 15 min in a buffer of 20 mM Tris–HCl and 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, before adding T. thermophilus HB8 cA4-activated ribonuclease TTHB144 (500 nM dimer). Fluorescence intensity was monitored up to 90 min with 30 s intervals (λex/em 485/520 nm). PfCsx15 with the same gradient was incubated with cA3 (2 and 5 μM) in the presence of a FAM:Iowa Black® double-stranded DNA substrate (100 nM) in a buffer of 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, and 10 mM MgCl2. Reactions were conducted at 35°C for 15 min before adding cA3-activated DNase Vibrio metoecus NucC (250 nM trimer) and continued for 85 min with same fluorescence measurements. For cA6-activated ribonuclease Mycobacterium tuberculosis Csm6, PfCsx15 was incubated with cA6 in the same ratio of Csx15/cA3 and RNase-Alert in a buffer of 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, and 100 mM potassium l-glutamate with the same fluorescence measurements. The curves are the mean of replicates (Prism, version 10.2.2).
Protein crystallisation
Immediately prior to crystallisation both proteins, PfCsx15 at 15 mg ml−1 and CliCsx15 at 16 mg ml−1, were centrifuged at 14000×g. Sitting drop vapour diffusion experiments were set up at the nanoliter scale at 1:1 and 2:1 protein to reservoir solution ratios. Four commercially available crystallisation screens were set up, after which the plates were sealed and incubated at 20°C. Of the many conditions that yielded crystals, PfCsx15 crystals used in data collection were grown from 22.5% PEG smear medium, 10% glycerol, 0.2 M sodium potassium phosphate (pH 7.5), and 0.1 M HEPES (pH 7.5). CliCsx15 crystals used in data collection were grown from a 22% PEG smear broad, 0.1 M Tris (pH 8.8). All crystals were cryoprotected with 25% glycerol prior to harvesting and cryo-cooling in liquid nitrogen.
X-ray data collection, structure solution, and refinement
All X-ray data were collected at the Diamond Light Source. Data for PfCsx15 were collected at a wavelength 0.9537 Å, −173°C on beamline I04 to 1.88 Å, whereas data from CliCsx15 crystals were collected on IO3 at 0.7918 to 0.90 Å resolution. All data were automatically processed using Xia2 [50]. PfCsx15 data were processed in spacegroup P62 with unit cell dimensions a = b = 89.3 Å, c = 31.4 Å, ⍺ = β = 90°, and γ = 120° for one molecule in the asu. CliCsx15 also has one molecule in the asu and was processed in spacegroup C2, unit cell dimensions a = 83.3 Å, b = 32.5 Å, c = 57.8 Å, ⍺ = γ = 90°, and β = 132.8°. The structures were solved by phasing the data using PhaserMR [51] in the CCP4 suite [52], using models generated by AF3 [35]. Initial B-factors were modelled in Phenix [53]. Model refinement was achieved by iterative cycles of REFMAC5 [54] and Phenix, all hydrogens generated but not written to the output file, with manual model manipulation in COOT [55]. Anisotropic B-factor refinement was performed in the case of CliCsx15 and isotropic for PfCsx15. The second subunit of each dimer was generated from the crystallographic two-fold symmetry. Neighbouring symmetry-related dimers were generated from crystallographic translations, producing the dimer-on-dimer assembly.
PDBePISA analysis of both crystal forms supports a biologically relevant dimer. In the CliCsx15 structure, the interface buries 1730 Å2 and is stabilised by 28 hydrogen bonds and 4 salt bridges (ΔG = –6.2 kcal mol-1; CSS = 1.0). In the PfCsx15 structure, a similar interface buries 1786 Å2 and exhibits an even more favourable interaction energy (ΔG = –22.5 kcal mol-1; CSS = 0.63). These observations are consistent with SEC/DLS measurements indicating both proteins are primarily dimeric in the absence of cA4. PDBePISA does not predict higher-order oligomers to be stable in the absence of cA4. We also analysed the AF3 model of CliCsx15 together with 4 AMP ligands with PDBePISA, but this did not suggest any stable oligomer, possibly because AF3 models lack realistic side chain positioning.
As Pfcsx15 was crystallised in the presence of phosphate, phosphate ions were modelled in the structure. The geometric qualities of each structure were monitored throughout using MolProbity [56]. Data and refinement statistics are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Final coordinates have been validated and deposited in the Protein Data Bank with deposition codes 9TEU for CliCsx15 and 9TET for PfCsx15, along with the original data.
Analytical size-exclusion chromatography
To analyse the oligomeric state of Csx15, 100 μl of protein (1 mg ml−1) with or without cA4 was analysed using a Superose 6 Increase 10/300 GL size-exclusion column and equilibrated in 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 1 mM DTT. The eluted fractions were then analysed by SDS–PAGE gel (Invitrogen). Standards (catalogue number 1511901, Bio-Rad) were analysed in the same running condition, comprising thyroglobulin (670,000 Da), γ-globulin (158,000 Da), ovalbumin (44,000 Da), myoglobin (17,000 Da), and vitamin B12 (1350 Da).
Plasmid challenge assays
Plasmids used in the present study for expression of the programmed type III MtbCsm system include pCsm1-5 (containing Csm interference genes cas10, csm3, csm4, and csm5 from M. tuberculosis and csm2 from M. canettii), pCRISPR-TetR, and pCRISPR-pUC (containing M. tuberculosis cas6 and a CRISPR array targeting a tetracycline-resistance gene or a pUC multiple cloning site, respectively). pRATDuet-derived plasmids carry a tetracycline-resistance gene, either a single gene or both genes encoding TsuCsx1 and CliCsx15. Escherichia coli C43 (DE3) carrying plasmids pCsm1-5 and pCRISPR-TetR or pCRISPR-pUC was transformed with pRATDuet-derived plasmids. The cells recovered for 2 h at 37°C and serially diluted before plating onto LB agar supplemented with 100 μg/ml ampicillin and 50 μg/ml spectinomycin for determination of the recipient cell count. Transformation efficiency was assessed using plates additionally containing 12.5 μg/ml tetracycline. The plasmid immunity was evaluated on plates further supplemented with 0.2% (w/v) d-lactose and 0.2% (w/v) l-arabinose, in addition to all three antibiotics. Plates were incubated overnight at 37°C, then imaged. Technical duplicates of two biological replicates were conducted.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Tracey Gloster for helpful discussion and the University of St Andrews Mass Spectrometry service for technical assistance.
Abbreviations
- Acr
anti-CRISPRs
- AF3
AlphaFold3
- cA4
cyclic tetra-adenylate
- CARF
CRISPR-associated Rossmann fold
- CliCsx15
Chlorobaculum limnaeum Csx15
- cOA
cyclic oligoadenylate
- crRNAs
CRISPR RNAs
- DLS
dynamic light scattering
- IDT
Integrated DNA Technologies
- MCS-1
multiple cloning site -1
- Mtb
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- SEC
size-exclusion chromatography
- RN
ring nuclease
- Vme
Vibrio metoecus
Data Availability
All experimental materials described in this paper are available from the corresponding author on request. The protein structure co-ordinates and data have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with deposition codes 9TEU and 9TET [57]. Raw data underlying the fluorescence assays are provided as supplementary data.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by a European Research Council Advanced Grant [grant REF 101018608 to M.F.W.].
Open Access
Open access for this article was enabled by the participation of the University of St Andrews in an all-inclusive Read & Publish agreement with Portland Press and the Biochemical Society under an agreement with JISC.
References
- 1.Makarova K.S., Shmakov S.A., Wolf Y.I., Mutz P., Altae-Tran H., Beisel C.L.et al. (2025) An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems including rare variants. Nat. Microbiol. 10, 3346–3361 10.1038/s41564-025-02180-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kazlauskiene M., Kostiuk G., Venclovas C., Tamulaitis G. and Siksnys V. (2017) A cyclic oligonucleotide signaling pathway in type III CRISPR-Cas systems. Science 357, 605–609 10.1126/science.aao0100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Niewoehner O., Garcia-Doval C., Rostol J.T., Berk C., Schwede F., Bigler L.et al. (2017) Type III CRISPR-Cas systems produce cyclic oligoadenylate second messengers. Nature 548, 543–548 10.1038/nature23467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chi H., Hoikkala V., Gruschow S., Graham S., Shirran S. and White M.F. (2023) Antiviral type III CRISPR signalling via conjugation of ATP and SAM. Nature 622, 826–833 10.1038/s41586-023-06620-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhu W., McQuarrie S., Gruschow S., McMahon S.A., Graham S., Gloster T.M.et al. (2021) The CRISPR ancillary effector Can2 is a dual-specificity nuclease potentiating type III CRISPR defence. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 2777–2789 10.1093/nar/gkab073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McMahon S.A., Zhu W., Graham S., Rambo R., White M.F. and Gloster T.M. (2020) Structure and mechanism of a Type III CRISPR defence DNA nuclease activated by cyclic oligoadenylate. Nat Commun. 11, 500 10.1038/s41467-019-14222-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rostol J.T., Xie W., Kuryavyi V., Maguin P., Kao K., Froom R.et al. (2021) The Card1 nuclease provides defence during type-III CRISPR immunity. Nature 590, 614–629 10.1038/s41586-021-03206-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Grüschow S., Adamson C.S. and White M.F. (2021) Specificity and sensitivity of an RNA targeting type III CRISPR complex coupled with a NucC endonuclease effector. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 13122–13134 10.1093/nar/gkab1190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rouillon C., Schneberger N., Chi H., Blumenstock K., Da Vela S., Ackermann K.et al. (2023) Antiviral signalling by a cyclic nucleotide activated CRISPR protease. Nature 614, 168–174 10.1038/s41586-022-05571-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Smalakyte D., Ruksenaite A., Sasnauskas G., Tamulaitiene G. and Tamulaitis G. (2024) Filament formation activates protease and ring nuclease activities of CRISPR Lon-SAVED. Mol. Cell. 84, 4239–4255 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Steens J.A., Bravo J.P.K., Salazar C.R.P., Yildiz C., Amieiro A.M., Kostlbacher S.et al. (2024) Type III-B CRISPR-Cas cascade of proteolytic cleavages. Science 383, 512–519 10.1126/science.adk0378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mogila I., Tamulaitiene G., Keda K., Timinskas A., Ruksenaite A., Sasnauskas G.et al. (2023) Ribosomal stalk-captured CARF-RelE ribonuclease inhibits translation following CRISPR signaling. Science 382, 1036–1041 10.1126/science.adj2107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Charbonneau A.A., Eckert D.M., Gauvin C.C., Lintner N.G. and Lawrence C.M. (2021) Cyclic tetra-adenylate (cA4) recognition by Csa3; implications for an integrated class 1 CRISPR-Cas immune response in Saccharolobus solfataricus. Biomolecules 11, 1852 10.3390/biom11121852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baca C.F., Majumder P., Hickling J.H., Patel D.J. and Marraffini L.A. (2025) Cat1 forms filament networks to degrade NAD(+) during the type III CRISPR-Cas antiviral response. Science 388, eadv9045 10.1126/science.adv9045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Baca C.F., Majumder P., Hickling J.H., Ye L., Teplova M., Brady S.F.et al. (2024) The CRISPR-associated adenosine deaminase Cad1 converts ATP to ITP to provide antiviral immunity. Cell 187, 7183–7195 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Grüschow S., McQuarrie S., Ackermann K., McMahon S., Bode B.E., Gloster T.M.et al. (2024) CRISPR antiphage defence mediated by the cyclic nucleotide-binding membrane protein Csx23. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 2761–2775 10.1093/nar/gkae167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Baca C.F., Yu Y., Rostol J.T., Majumder P., Patel D.J. and Marraffini L.A. (2024) The CRISPR effector Cam1 mediates membrane depolarization for phage defence. Nature 625, 797–804 10.1038/s41586-023-06902-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Majumder P., Cahir C.W., Roberts C.G., Patel D.J. and Marraffini L.A. (2025) Cap1 forms a cyclic tetra-adenylate-induced membrane pore during the type III-A CRISPR-Cas immune response. bioRxiv [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mayo-Munoz D., Smith L.M., Garcia-Doval C., Malone L.M., Harding K.R., Jackson S.A.et al. (2022) Type III CRISPR-Cas provides resistance against nucleus-forming jumbo phages via abortive infection. Mol. Cell. 82, 4471–4486.e4479 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.10.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Athukoralage J.S., Rouillon C., Graham S., Grüschow S. and White M.F. (2018) Ring nucleases deactivate Type III CRISPR ribonucleases by degrading cyclic oligoadenylate. Nature 562, 277–280 10.1038/s41586-018-0557-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Athukoralage J.S., McMahon S.A., Zhang C., Gruschow S., Graham S., Krupovic M.et al. (2020) An anti-CRISPR viral ring nuclease subverts type III CRISPR immunity. Nature 577, 572–575 10.1038/s41586-019-1909-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Athukoralage J.S., McQuarrie S., Gruschow S., Graham S., Gloster T.M. and White M.F. (2020) Tetramerisation of the CRISPR ring nuclease Crn3/Csx3 facilitates cyclic oligoadenylate cleavage. eLife 9, e57627 10.7554/eLife.57627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hoikkala V., Graham S. and White M.F. (2024) Bioinformatic analysis of type III CRISPR systems reveals key properties and new effector families. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 52, 7129–7141 10.1093/nar/gkae462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chi H., Hoikkala V., McMahon S., Graham S., Gloster T. and White M.F. (2025) Structure and mechanism of the broad spectrum CRISPR-associated ring nuclease Crn4. Nat. Commun. 17, 889 10.1038/s41467-025-67607-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Athukoralage J.S., Graham S., Gruschow S., Rouillon C. and White M.F. (2019) A Type III CRISPR ancillary ribonuclease degrades its cyclic oligoadenylate activator. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 2894–2899 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jia N., Jones R., Yang G., Ouerfelli O. and Patel D.J. (2019) CRISPR-Cas III-A Csm6 CARF domain is a ring nuclease triggering stepwise cA4 cleavage with ApA>p formation terminating RNase activity. Mol. Cell. 75, 944–956.e946 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Garcia-Doval C., Schwede F., Berk C., Rostol J.T., Niewoehner O., Tejero O.et al. (2020) Activation and self-inactivation mechanisms of the cyclic oligoadenylate-dependent CRISPR ribonuclease Csm6. Nat. Commun. 11, 1596 10.1038/s41467-020-15334-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Smalakyte D., Kazlauskiene M., J F.H., Ruksenaite A., Rimaite A., Tamulaitiene G.et al. (2020) Type III-A CRISPR-associated protein Csm6 degrades cyclic hexa-adenylate activator using both CARF and HEPN domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 9204–9217 10.1093/nar/gkaa634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McQuarrie S., Athukoralage J.S., McMahon S.A., Graham S., Ackermann K., Bode B.E.et al. (2023) Activation of Csm6 ribonuclease by cyclic nucleotide binding: in an emergency, twist to open. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 10590–10605 10.1093/nar/gkad739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Du L., Zhu Q. and Lin Z. (2024) Molecular mechanism of allosteric activation of the CRISPR ribonuclease Csm6 by cyclic tetra-adenylate. EMBO J. 43, 304–315 10.1038/s44318-023-00017-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Binder S.C., Schneberger N., Schmitz M., Engeser M., Geyer M., Rouillon C.et al. (2024) The SAVED domain of the type III CRISPR protease CalpL is a ring nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 10520–10532 10.1093/nar/gkae676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hoikkala V., Chi H., Gruschow S., Graham S. and White M.F. (2025) Diversity and abundance of ring nucleases in type III CRISPR-Cas loci. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 380, 20240084 10.1098/rstb.2024.0084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Orzechowski M., Hoikkala V., Chi H., McMahon S., Gloster T. and White M.F. (2025) A viral SAVED protein with ring nuclease activity degrades the CRISPR second messenger cA4. Biochem. J. 482, 1707–1719 10.1042/BCJ20253271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Makarova K.S., Timinskas A., Wolf Y.I., Gussow A.B., Siksnys V., Venclovas C.et al. (2020) Evolutionary and functional classification of the CARF domain superfamily, key sensors in prokaryotic antivirus defense. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 8828–8847 10.1093/nar/gkaa635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Abramson J., Adler J., Dunger J., Evans R., Green T., Pritzel A.et al. (2024) Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Grüschow S., Athukoralage J.S., Graham S., Hoogeboom T. and White M.F. (2019) Cyclic oligoadenylate signalling mediates Mycobacterium tuberculosis CRISPR defence. Nucl. Acids Res. 47, 9259–9270 10.1093/nar/gkz676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cao X., Xiao Y., Huiting E., Cao X., Li D., Ren J.et al. (2023) Phage anti-CBASS protein simultaneously sequesters cyclic trinucleotides and dinucleotides. Mol. Cell. 84, 375–385 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Brown S., Gauvin C.C., Charbonneau A.A., Burman N. and Lawrence C.M. (2020) Csx3 is a cyclic oligonucleotide phosphodiesterase associated with type III CRISPR-Cas that degrades the second messenger cA(4). J. Biol. Chem. 295, 14963–14972 10.1074/jbc.RA120.014099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Holm L. (2020) DALI and the persistence of protein shape. Protein Sci. 29, 128–140 10.1002/pro.3749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Leavitt A., Yirmiya E., Amitai G., Lu A., Garb J., Herbst E.et al. (2022) Viruses inhibit TIR gcADPR signalling to overcome bacterial defence. Nature 611, 326–331 10.1038/s41586-022-05375-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chang R.B., Toyoda H.C., Hobbs S.J., Hadary R., Richmond-Buccola D., Wein T.et al. (2025) A widespread family of viral sponge proteins reveals specific inhibition of nucleotide signals in anti-phage defense. Mol. Cell. 85, 3151–3165.e3156 10.1016/j.molcel.2025.07.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hadary R., Chang R.B., Bechon N., Tal N., Osterman I., Yirmiya E.et al. (2025) Functional diversity of phage sponge proteins that sequester host immune signals. bioRxiv40894804 [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sullivan A.E., Nabhani A., Izrailevsky D.S., Schinkel K., Hoffman C.R.K., Robbins L.K.et al. (2025) The Panoptes system uses decoy cyclic nucleotides to defend against phage. Nature 647, 988–996 10.1038/s41586-025-09557-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Doherty E.E., Adler B.A., Yoon P.H., Hsieh K., Loi K., Armbruster E.G.et al. (2025) A miniature CRISPR-Cas10 enzyme confers immunity by inhibitory signalling. Nature 647, 997–1004 10.1038/s41586-025-09569-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Athukoralage J.S., Graham S., Rouillon C., Grüschow S., Czekster C.M. and White M.F. (2020) The dynamic interplay of host and viral enzymes in type III CRISPR-mediated cyclic nucleotide signalling. eLife 9, e55852 10.7554/eLife.55852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Rouillon C., Athukoralage J.S., Graham S., Gruschow S. and White M.F. (2018) Control of cyclic oligoadenylate synthesis in a type III CRISPR system. eLife 7, e36734 10.7554/eLife.36734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Doherty E.E., Nomburg J., Adler B.A., Lopez S., Hsieh K., Price N.et al. (2025) Divergent viral phosphodiesterases for immune signaling evasion. Cell Host Microbe 33, 2043–2051.e2046 10.1016/j.chom.2025.10.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lowey B., Whiteley A.T., Keszei A.F.A., Morehouse B.R., Mathews I.T., Antine S.P.et al. (2020) CBASS immunity uses CARF-related effectors to sense 3′-5′- and 2′-5′-linked cyclic oligonucleotide signals and protect bacteria from phage infection. Cell 182, 38–49.e17 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hogrel G., Guild A., Graham S., Rickman H., Gruschow S., Bertrand Q.et al. (2022) Cyclic nucleotide-induced helical structure activates a TIR immune effector. Nature 608, 808–812 10.1038/s41586-022-05070-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Winter G. (2010) xia2: an expert system for macromolecular crystallography data reduction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 186–190 10.1107/S0021889809045701 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.McCoy A.J., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Adams P.D., Winn M.D., Storoni L.C. and Read R.J. (2007) Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 10.1107/S0021889807021206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Winn M.D., Ballard C.C., Cowtan K.D., Dodson E.J., Emsley P., Evans P.R.et al. (2011) Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 235–242 10.1107/S0907444910045749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Liebschner D., Afonine P.V., Baker M.L., Bunkoczi G., Chen V.B., Croll T.I.et al. (2019) Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 10.1107/S2059798319011471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Murshudov G.N., Skubak P., Lebedev A.A., Pannu N.S., Steiner R.A., Nicholls R.A.et al. (2011) REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D. 67, 355–367 10.1107/S0907444911001314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Emsley P., Lohkamp B., Scott W.G. and Cowtan K. (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 10.1107/S0907444910007493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chen V.B., Arendall W.B. 3rd, Headd J.J., Keedy D.A., Immormino R.M., Kapral G.J.et al. (2010) MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 10.1107/S0907444909042073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.McMahon S.A. and White M.F. (2026) Oligomerisation of type III CRISPR-associated Csx15 to regulate antiviral signalling. Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB 9TEU, 9TET [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All experimental materials described in this paper are available from the corresponding author on request. The protein structure co-ordinates and data have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank with deposition codes 9TEU and 9TET [57]. Raw data underlying the fluorescence assays are provided as supplementary data.








