Skip to main content
Frontiers in Oncology logoLink to Frontiers in Oncology
. 2026 Apr 23;16:1824040. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1824040

Correction: A mammalian, glutaminase-free asparaginase enhances venetoclax activity in preclinical AML models with chromosome 7 deletion

Dhabya Majid 1,†, Zhe Wang 1,†, Amanda M Schalk 2,3, Bin Yuan 1, Qi Zhang Tatarata 1, Jessica L Root 1, Araceli Isabella Garza 1, Mhd Yousuf Yassouf 1, Basant T Gamal 4, Sammy Feri-Borgogno 4, Annie Hoai Nguyen 1,5, Marina Konopleva 6, Evelien Peeters 7, Ying Su 2, Patrick K Reville 1, Farhad Ravandi-Kashani 1, Arnon Lavie 2,3,8,*, Hussein A Abbas 1,*
PMCID: PMC13150448  PMID: 42109680

There were several errors in Table 1 as originally published. The unit reported next to kcat was incorrect and should be “s−1”. In addition, the Michaelis–Menten constant was incorrectly written as km and should be corrected to “Km”, and the unit µM should be corrected to “mM”. For Km: the “m” is NOT subscript; “Km” correct, Km incorrect.

Table 1.

The table summarizes the catalytic efficiency kcat and Michaelis-Menten constant Km for asparaginase and glutaminase activities of each L-asparaginase.

Enzyme Asparaginase activity Glutaminase activity Mouse half-life
kcat (s-1) Km (µM) kcat (s-1) Km (mM) kobs at 1 mM (s-1) glutaminase/asparaginase activities (%) t1/2 (hr)
ErA (10) 207.5 ± 3.6 47.5 ± 3.5 26.84 ± 0.26 0.36 ± 0.02 19.22 13 2.3
EcA (10) 44.4 ± 0.3 15.0 ± 0.5 0.89 ± 0.01 1.38 ± 0.09 0.36 2 3.5
EBD-300 70.0 ± 0.5 41.2 ± 1.2 0.01 ND 0.00 0 20.8
GpA (11) 38.6 ± 1.4 57.7 ± 6.4 0.00 ND 0.00 0 ND
hA (11) 14.4 ± 0.4 2,960 ± 131a ND ND ND ND ND

Additionally, the in vivo mouse half-life is included for each enzyme.

a

hA shows allosteric behavior, in line with Type I asparaginases (EcA is a Type II enzyme), and for these the Km is called [S]0.5 or K0.5.

ND, Not determined.

The reference labels in column 1 were also incorrect: ErAref1 (10), EcAref2 (10), gpAref2 (11), and hAref2 (11) should be corrected to ErA (10), EcA (10), GpA (11), and hA (11). Furthermore, gpA should be capitalized as “GpA”. Lastly, in the Enzyme column, the enzyme names should be italicized “(ErA, EcA, GpA, hA)”.

The corrected version of Table 1 appears below

There was a mistake in the caption of Table 1 as published. The caption stated is: “The table summarizes the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) and Michaelis–Menten constant (Km) for asparaginase and glutaminase activities of each L-asparaginase. Additionally, the in vivo mouse half-life is included for each enzyme”. The corrected caption of Table 1 appears below:

“The table summarizes the catalytic efficiency kcat and Michaelis-Menten constant Km for asparaginase and glutaminase activities of each L-asparaginase. Additionally, the in vivo mouse half-life is included for each enzyme”.

There was a mistake in the caption of Figure 1 as published. The caption stated is:

”EBD-300 is human-like with very high sequence identity to the human homolog and has the required kinetic properties for achieving sustained asparagine depletion without perturbing glutamine. EBD-300 is highly human-like in protein sequence compared to the asparaginase domain from the guinea pig homolog truncated at residue 369 (GpA369) but especially compared to the clinical bacterial asparaginases from E. coli (EcA) and Erwinia (ErA) (A) surface representations of the tetramers where each protomer in the tetramer is shown in a different color (gray, green, blue or orange) and residues not identical to the human homolog are denoted in red. (B) Pie charts displaying % identity compared to the human enzyme where non-human is shown in red and identity to human is show in blue”. Please delete the first sentence in the Figure 1 legend as shown below and add in word “protein sequence” as shown in the corrected caption below

The corrected caption of Figure 1 should be:

“EBD-300 is highly human-like in protein sequence compared to the asparaginase domain from the guinea pig homolog truncated at residue 369 (GpA369) but especially compared to the clinical bacterial asparaginases from E. coli (EcA) and Erwinia (ErA) (A) surface representations of the tetramers where each protomer in the tetramer is shown in a different color (gray, green, blue or orange) and residues not identical to the human homolog are denoted in red. (B) Pie charts displaying % identity compared to the human enzyme where non-human is shown in red and identity to human is show in blue”.

There was a mistake in the caption of Figure 4 as published. The caption stated is:

“EBD-300 monotherapy suppressed leukemic growth in a del7q AML model. Human AML cells with cytogenetics were implanted in NOG mice (n = 4) and after confirming engraftment were randomly assigned to a vehicle control group and an EBD-300 group, which was dosed at 750 IU/kg Mondays and Wednesdays and 1,500 IU/kg on Fridays for a total study duration of 28 days. On Day 28 mice were sacrificed, and bone marrow (A) and blood (B) were analyzed for the presence of hCD45. The animals experienced an initial weight loss 10–15% which then stabilized for the duration of the study (C). Statistical significance was determined using Student t-test (Prism 9.1.2). The error bars shown represent the standard error of mean (SEM)”.

The corrected caption of Figure 4 should be:

“EBD-300 monotherapy suppressed leukemic growth in a del7q AML model. Human AML cells (Champions Oncology model CTG-2456) with cytogenetics 46, XX, del(7)(q22q36) [15] were implanted in NOG mice (n=10) and after confirming engraftment were randomly assigned to a vehicle control group (n=10) and an EBD-300 group (n=10), which was dosed at 750 IU/kg Mondays and Wednesdays and 1,500 IU/kg on Fridays for a total study duration of 28 days. On Day 28 mice were sacrificed, and bone marrow (A) and blood (B) were analyzed for the presence of hCD45. The animals experienced an initial weight loss 10-15% which then stabilized for the duration of the study (C). Statistical significance was determined using Student t-test (Prism 9.1.2). The error bars shown represent the standard error of mean (SEM)”.

There was an error in the format of the enzyme names EcA, ErA, GpA, and hA. The correct formatting should be: EcA, ErA, GpA, and hA.

The original version of this article has been updated.

Footnotes

Edited and reviewed by: Alessandro Isidori, AORMN Hospital, Italy

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Articles from Frontiers in Oncology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES