Abstract
Salmonella enterica is a zoonotic pathogen that primarily causes disease through the contamination of food products. Foodborne salmonellosis outbreaks have frequently been associated with the consumption of contaminated ready-to-eat foods, including sprouts and fresh diced onions. To better control Salmonella throughout the food chain and enhance food safety, it is crucial to understand the interaction mechanisms of S. enterica with relevant food matrices. To identify the genetic determinants underlying the persistence of Salmonella on sprouts and onions, we analyzed barcoded transposon mutant libraries in two relevant S. enterica serovars, Typhimurium and Enteritidis, on these two food matrices for five days under refrigerated storage conditions. Key fitness determinants of S. enterica were observed to be under selection, including virulence factors, two-component systems, flagellar assembly, cell wall integrity, RNA degradation, and mismatch repair systems. The phenotype of selected S. Typhimurium mutants was subsequently verified in competition assays. Our study showed that disruption of tolC, encoding a multidrug efflux pump, resulted in a greater fitness reduction on onions than on sprouts and in nutrient-rich media. Furthermore, the fitness disadvantage of mutants in oxyR, a key regulator of the oxidative stress response, was much reduced on sprouts, compared to onions or standard growth conditions. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the genetic determinants that influence the interaction of S. enterica with these fresh produce items under real-world conditions.
Keywords: Transposon insertion sequencing, Food safety, Foodborne pathogen, Ready-to-eat products, Salmonellosis, Microbial contamination, Fresh produce
1. Introduction
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica (S. enterica) is one of the most important foodborne pathogens worldwide. Salmonellosis was the second most reported zoonosis in 2023, causing 77,486 human cases in the EU (EFSA and ECDC, 2024). Salmonella foodborne outbreaks have frequently been associated with contaminated fresh produce and ready-to-eat (RTE) food items (Ma et al., 2024; Olaimat and Holley, 2012). These products pose a higher risk to consumers, because they are intended for raw consumption without prior pathogen inactivation.
Fresh onions (Allium cepa L.) are often sold diced, as ready-to-eat (RTE) products, or included in mixed food products sold “to go” (e.g., fresh salads, kebabs, wraps). Although RTE onions are minimally processed, microbial contamination may occur at different stages of the production process. These stages include preselection, peeling, cleaning, cutting, packaging, and storage (Bahram-Parvar and Lim, 2018; Balali et al., 2020; EFSA BIOHAZ Panel, 2014; Savitha et al., 2022). Diced onions are often stored under refrigeration at serving counters, which could pose an additional risk of contamination during serving and handling. Onions may have a reduced risk of microbial contamination due to their inherent natural antimicrobial compounds (Kyung, 2012; Lanzotti et al., 2013; Santas et al., 2010; Sharma et al., 2018) and a relatively low pH of approximately 5.5 at 10 °C, which may further decrease during storage (Berno et al., 2014). Their natural microbiota consists primarily of spoilage microorganisms, such as bacteria, yeasts, and molds. After dicing, the microorganism counts usually range from 2.0 to 4.0 log10 CFU/g, and may increase during storage (Bahram-Parvar and Lim, 2018; Blanchard et al., 1996; Liu and Li, 2006). Despite this challenging environmental conditions, S. enterica is known to be able to persist on this food matrix (Lieberman et al., 2015; Yemmireddy and Mancias, 2025) and has been recently the cause of several foodborne outbreaks due to the contamination of raw onions in the US and Canada between 2020 and 2023 (Denich et al., 2024; Mitchell et al., 2024).
Sprouted seeds have also been source of several salmonellosis outbreaks in recent years. Sprouts are food products obtained from the germination of seeds, followed by their subsequent development in water, and harvested before true leaves form (Official Journal of the European Union, 2013). In 2023, sprouts were identified as the food item with the highest S. enterica prevalence among all tested RTE food samplings in the EU (EFSA and ECDC, 2024). Specifically, alfalfa sprouts (Medicago sativa L.) have been associated with salmonellosis outbreaks since 1994, with the latest outbreak continuing into 2025 in the EU (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), 2011; Ma et al., 2024; Rakover et al., 2025). The warm and humid conditions required for sprout production provide an optimal environment for bacterial growth and contamination with S. enterica or other enteric pathogens can occur at nearly every production stage (EFSA and ECDC, 2024; BIOHAZ, 2011; NACMCF, 1999). This is also reflected in its diverse background microbiota, mainly including Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonadaceae, and mesophilic aerobic populations on the finished product that may reach 109 CFU/g (Abadias et al., 2008; Jang et al., 2021; Keshri et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2013; Viswanathan and Kaur, 2001; Waje et al., 2009; Young Kim et al., 2022). Hygienic measures such as seed treatment and control of irrigation water may reduce the bacterial load on sprouts but do not fully eliminate pathogens (Ding et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2009; Sikin et al., 2013), making sprouts a challenging food product in terms of food safety.
Quantitative data provide insight into the population dynamics of different microorganisms on the food matrix under specific conditions of interest. However, it remains crucial to understand the genetic determinants and metabolic pathways underlying the resilience of S. enterica on relevant food matrices, to enhance food safety and inform the future development of highly targeted preventive measures.
During growth on the food matrix, S. enterica encounters various stress conditions, including low temperatures and an acidic environment. There is a growing understanding of the mechanisms behind the general stress response of S. enterica (Pradhan and Devi Negi, 2019; Spector and Kenyon, 2012), with an increasing number of studies that have directly investigated the interaction mechanisms of S. enterica with relevant food matrices, including tomatoes (de Moraes et al., 2017; Noel et al., 2010), low-water activity foods (de Moraes et al., 2017; Jayeola et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020) and RTE muskmelons (Esteban-Cuesta et al., 2026). These studies have identified interaction mechanisms necessary for the survival of S. enterica on the food matrix, which include cell wall integrity, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis, and motility, as well as mechanisms related to general growth, such as DNA repair, and the biosynthesis of amino acids and nucleotides. However, each food matrix presents a unique environment that may require different microbial fitness mechanisms.
No studies have been conducted to date to evaluate the genetic determinants of Salmonella survival on fresh diced onions. However, the colonization and attachment mechanisms of S. enterica during the germination and sprouting of alfalfa have been investigated in comparison to attachment on glass surfaces (Holden et al., 2024). The study identified type III secretion systems as key mechanisms for early-stage colonization, and DNA housekeeping and envelope synthesis in subsequent colonization phases. During later interaction stages, LPS and flagellar synthesis and the global stress response played essential roles. However, the mechanisms necessary for the bacterium’s survival during cold storage in supermarkets and households have not yet been assessed.
We hypothesized that distinct genetic mechanisms influence the resilience of S. enterica on fresh diced onions and alfalfa sprouts and that these mechanisms may differ between serovars. Therefore, two barcoded transposon libraries, one in S. enterica serovar Enteritidis and one in serovar Typhimurium, were analyzed on both food matrices under abusive cold storage conditions at 8 °C, temperature frequently encountered in open cooling displays or household refrigerators (Chaomuang et al., 2017; Evans and Redmond, 2015; Laguerre et al., 2002).
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Bacterial strains and library construction
S. Enteritidis PT4 P125109 (Toro et al., 2016) (SEN, NCBI accession no. CP063700.1/CP063701.1), a clinical strain associated with a poultry outbreak in the United Kingdom, and S. Ttyphimurium ATCC 14028, isolated from a 4-week-old chicken in 1960 (Jarvik et al., 2010) (STM, NCBI accession no. CP001363.1/ CP001362.2), were used to create the two barcoded transposon mutant libraries employed in this study. The wild-type strains were preserved at −80 °C in Luria-Bertani broth (LB; Carl Roth GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a final concentration of 20% glycerol (Th. Geyer GmbH & Co. KG, Renningen, Germany) and cultured in LB broth or 1.5% LB agar (Oxoid Deutschland GmbH, Wesel, Germany).
Library construction, mapping of the barcoded transposons, and annotation of the library were previously described in de Moraes et al. (2017) and Li et al. (2020). Briefly, a Tn5 derivative with an N18 random barcode was introduced in each genome using the EZ-Tn5 〈T7/KAN-2〉 promoter insertion kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI, United States). The transformed cells were collected after overnight culture at 37 °C on LB agar supplemented with 60 μg/ml kanamycin (LBKan) final concentration. The resulting libraries had a complexity of approximately 230,000 mutants for S. Typhimurium ATCC 14028 (de Moraes et al., 2017) and 140,000 mutants for S. Enteritidis PT4 P125109 (Li et al., 2020).
2.2. Comparative growth analysis
Growth analysis of the S. enterica barcoded transposon mutant libraries on alfalfa sprouts and fresh diced onions was performed as described in Esteban-Cuesta et al. (2026). Inoculation was performed as described in the library screening procedure below, and populations were enumerated 1 h after inoculation (d1) and every 24 h for five days (d1-d5). Five biological replicates were performed, and the results were analyzed using an ANOVA test. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.
2.3. Screenings of S. enterica TIS libraries on fresh diced onions and alfalfa sprouts
TIS library screenings on alfalfa sprouts and fresh-diced onions were performed mainly as described by Esteban-Cuesta et al. (2026). Briefly, library stocks were thawed, and 300 μl were propagated in 30 ml LBKan (60 μg/ml, Carl Roth) broth at 37 °C and 200 rpm until the early stationary phase was reached, which corresponds to OD600 1. 1 ml of the culture was diluted 1:10 in 9 ml PBS and centrifuged at 4500 rcf for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the inoculum was prepared by resuspending the cell pellet in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Carl Roth) at a 1:5 (pellet: PBS) volume ratio.
Onions (Allium cepa L.) and alfalfa sprouts (Medicago sativa L.) samples were bought at local grocery stores. The background microbiota of the uninoculated food matrices was analyzed by assessing the mesophilic aerobic bacteria (MAB; EN ISO 4833–2:2013) and Enterobacteriaceae (EN ISO 21528–2:2017; anaerobic incubation: O2 < 0.1%, CO2 7.0–15.0%) at each sampling time point. The absence of prior Salmonella spp. on the food matrices was ensured by qualitative microbiological analysis according to EN ISO 6579–1:2017, A1:2020.
Onions were peeled and diced with sterile knives. 10 g of food matrix was weighed into sterile blender bags (Size 400 ml, Avantor VWR International GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated with 5 ml of the inoculum. The final concentration was approximately 7.0 log10 CFU/g, to ensure that the complexity of the library was maintained. The inoculum was evenly distributed to ensure complete coverage of the food matrix. No matrix samples consisting of the inoculum without a food matrix in 5 ml PBS in sterile blender bags were included as negative controls.
Inoculated samples were incubated at 8 °C for a total of 96 h (4 days), with samples taken from the inoculum (I), after 1 h (d1), 48 h (d3), and 96 h (d5) post inoculation. Samples were transferred into 90 ml LBKan broth and incubated at 37 °C and 200 rpm for 30 min to enable detachment of the bacteria from the food matrix. S. enterica mutant populations were enumerated after serial dilutions in PBS. To remove food matrix residues, samples were subsequently filtered and centrifuged at 4500 rcf for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet resuspended in 90 ml LBKan. The washed cells were incubated at 37 °C and 200 rpm for 7.5 h and then stored at −80 °C for subsequent analysis. Given the importance of experimental consistency, five biological replicates were performed to ensure the robustness and reliability of the results.
Sequencing library preparation, Illumina sequencing, and raw read processing were performed as previously described in Esteban-Cuesta et al. (2026). For library preparation, the frozen samples (40 μl) were washed three times in water. The washed cells were digested with 1.5 μl proteinase K (concentration 100 mg/ml, recombinant proteinase K (AppliChem GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany)) in 15 μl 2x lysis buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 2 mM EDTA, 0.2% Triton X-100; Carl Roth) for 2 h at 55 °C. The transposon insertion sites were amplified via PCR using a reaction mixture with 25 μl Q5™ Hot Start High-Fidelity, 2x Master Mix (New England Biolabs Inc., Ipswich, USA) and 5 μl DNA template. L and V Primers (Esteban-Cuesta et al., 2026) containing a transposon-specific sequence and custom Illumina adapters were used at a final concentration of 0.2 μM.
5 μl of the successful PCR products were pooled and purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Maryland, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Followed by Illumina-sequencing using a NovaSeq 6000 on a dual-indexed paired-end 100 or 150 base run with one million reads per sample. Raw sequencing reads were demultiplexed according to their indexes and processed using in-house Python scripts to detect and quantify barcodes flanked by the expected genomic sequence.
Since multiple transposon insertions can map to the same gene and each is associated with a distinct barcode, the barcode insertions were compiled into aggregated counts for each disrupted gene. Differences in the aggregated mutant abundances between time points as well as between food samples and negative controls, were statistically analyzed using DESeq2 (Love et al., 2014) and the log2 fold changes (fc) were reported. Mutations were considered to have a significant fitness effect for S. enterica if they fulfilled a dual requirement for at least one sampling time point: (i) a log2 fc > |1.0| with a padj-value ≤ 0.01 in the comparison between food samples and no matrix samples in PBS, and (ii) fulfilled the same statistical threshold (log2-fc > |1.0|, padj ≤ 0.01) when comparing the inoculum to food sample at the same sampling time point. For the final sampling time point, d5, criterion (ii) was also fulfilled in comparisons between the first and the final food sampling time points (d1 vs d5). This strict criterion was implemented to identify the genes with the most significant role during the interaction with the food matrix.
For KEGG and GO enrichment analyses (Ashburner et al., 2000; Gene Ontology Consortium, 2023; Kanehisa et al., 2023; Thomas et al., 2022) the threshold for significance was relaxed to padj < 0.05. KEGG enrichment analysis was carried out using enrichKEGG from ClusterProfiler (Wu et al., 2021) and GO enrichment analysis used TopGO (Alexa and Rahnenfuhrer, 2024) in R (v.4.4.1). KEGG pathways with a q-value ≤ 0.01 and GO terms with a classic fisher ≤ 0.01 were considered to be significantly enriched.
2.4. Competition assays
Candidate genes identified in the TIS analysis were subjected to direct competition between available S. Typhimurium 14028 single-gene deletion mutants (SGDs) and the S. Typhimurium 14028 wild-type strain. The S. Typhimurium 14028 SGD collection (Porwollik et al., 2014) had two mutants available for most genes: one mutant harboring a kanamycin resistance gene in the sense direction of the deleted gene (SGDkan) and one mutant harboring a chloramphenicol resistance gene in the antisense direction (SGDcm). The wild-type strain (S. Typhimurium 14208s) used for these competition experiments was isogenic except for a tetracycline resistance inserted in malXY (WTSTMTetR). The individual mutants were stored at −80 °C in LB-broth with a final concentration of 20% glycerol and supplemented with a final concentration of 60 μg/ml kanamycin (LBKan), 20 μg/ml chloramphenicol (LBCm) or 15 μg/ml tetracycline (LBTet, all Carl Roth).
The selection of candidate genes was based on the fitness effects observed in the TIS data and whether the SGD was available in the collection. Competition assays were performed as described in Esteban-Cuesta et al., 2026. In short, a mixture of 1:1:1 (SGDkan:SGDcm: WTSTMTetR) was inoculated at a concentration of 107 CFU/g or ml to the food matrix and stored at 8 °C for 5 days. To confirm the phenotype of the selected mutants, competition indices were calculated by comparing colony count changes of the respective sense and antisense mutants with those of the wild-type strain WTSTMTetR. A negative effect was deemed confirmed if the average competitive index of each experiment plus one standard deviation was <1. If the average competitive index minus one standard deviation was >1, a positive fitness effect was considered confirmed. Competition assays were performed in triplicate, except for those assays where no fitness effect was observed in two replicates, after which the assay was discontinued.
3. Results
3.1. Growth analyses
3.1.1. Dynamics of the Transposon Insertion Sequencing (TIS) libraries on food matrices
No statistically significant differences were observed between the population dynamics of the S. enterica barcoded transposon libraries and their corresponding wild-type strains on alfalfa sprouts and fresh diced onions, except for SEN on onions at d3, where the library counts were significantly higher (0.4 log10 CFU/g, p = 0.014) than those of the wild-type (Fig. S1). After 96 h of incubation at 8 °C (d5), populations of the STM and the SEN libraries decreased on alfalfa sprouts by 0.2 and 0.3 log10 CFU/g, respectively, compared to the inoculum. On fresh diced onions, counts of the STM library decreased by 0.3 log10 CFU/g, while for the SEN library, a reduction of 0.2 log10 CFU/g was observed.
During the screenings the STM library displayed significantly higher CFU counts (p = 0.03) than its SEN counterpart at d5 on onions (Fig. S2). Significantly higher population were observed on alfalfa sprouts compared to fresh diced onions for both the STM (d1 p = 0.03) and the SEN library (d1 p = 0.01; d3 p = 0.03).
3.1.2. Background microbiota
During cold storage, mesophilic aerobic bacteria (MAB) counts on onions increased from approximately 3.0 to 6.8 log10 CFU/g while Enterobacteriaceae populations increased from 0.8 to approximately 2.0 log10 CFU/g. On alfalfa sprouts, both MAB and Enterobacteriaceae were detected at higher levels than on onions. After 96 h of storage at 8 °C, MAB populations increased slightly from 8.7 log10 CFU/g to 9.0 log10 CFU/g, and Enterobacteriaceae remained stable at approximately 7.8 log10 CFU/g (Fig. S3).
3.2. TIS data analysis: genes under selection on fresh diced onions and alfalfa sprouts
Notable differences were observed between the TIS analysis results for the interaction of S. enterica with fresh diced onions and alfalfa sprouts, as well as between the two S. enterica TIS libraries.
For the interaction of SEN on fresh diced onions, transposon insertions in a total of 193 genetic elements caused a significant fitness effect, including 44 insertions located in intergenic regions (IR), one in a pseudogene, and 56 in genes encoding hypothetical proteins (HPs), of which 41 had putative functions assigned (Table 1). Most of these mutants displayed a negative fitness effect, except for three mutants, fliA, flhD, and flgC, which were positively selected within the first hour of interaction and maintained a fitness advantage throughout the entire screening (Fig. 1 and Fig. S4). Insertions in numerous genes resulted in a negative selection within the first hour of storage, which subsequently diminished over the remaining storage period.
Table 1.
Genes with a significant fitness effect for S. Typhimurium 14028 and S. Enteritidis P125109 on fresh-diced onions grouped by function.
| Metabolic function | Genes | STM | SEN | STM14 Locus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNA repair, recombination, and replication | holC | − | n.s. | STM14_5372.J |
| holD | − | n.s. | STM14_5475 | |
| rpoC | n.s. | +/− | STM14_4991 | |
| ydeJ/cinA | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1830 | |
| xseA | − | n.s. | STM14_3077 | |
| RNA degradation | deaD | − | n.s. | STM14_3962 |
| pnp | − | n.s. | STM14_3964 | |
| vacB | − | n.s. | STM14_5250 | |
| Transcriptional regulator | envR | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_4087 |
| pocR | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_2525 | |
| sinR | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0358 | |
| PTR | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0016 | |
| PTR | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1527 | |
| PTR | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1646 | |
| marT_2 | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0037 | |
| rcsB | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_2801 | |
| ydiP | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1646 | |
| Ribosome biogenesis | yjgA | − | n.s. | STM14_5328 |
| typA | − | − | STM14_4822 | |
| tRNA biogenesis | queA | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1868 |
| Chaperones and co-chaperones | spy | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1588 |
| Transporter | corA | − | n.s. | STM14_4754 |
| yshA (ompL) | −/+ | −/+ | STM14_4829 | |
| PCT | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0889.RJ | |
| nanT | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1295 | |
| secA | +/− | n.s. | STM14_0162 | |
| Membrane transport and secretion system | csgEF | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1304/05 |
| PP | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0384; STM14_2808 | |
| sseCD | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1696/97 | |
| ssrA | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1687 | |
| tolC | − | − | STM14_3859 | |
| ulaA_1 | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1035 | |
| ydiMN | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1651/54 | |
| Signaling and cellular processes | etfA | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1003 |
| nlp_1 | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_2923 | |
| PRR | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0405; STM14_1526 | |
| SEN4290 | n.s. | −/+ | 550,537.33. peg.4529 | |
| Glycan, lipopolysaccharides, O-antigen, and enterobacterial common antigen biosynthesis | dcrB | − | − | STM14_4308 |
| wecB | − | n.s. | STM14_4718 | |
| wecD | − | n.s. | STM14_4722 | |
| wecE | − | − | STM14_4723 | |
| wecF | − | n.s. | STM14_4725 | |
| ldcA | − | n.s. | STM14_2176 | |
| POMP | + | n.s. | STM14_2773 | |
| POMP | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1612 | |
| rfc | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1616 | |
| wcaE | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_2606 | |
| Infection, virulence, and defense | avrA | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3462 |
| finP | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_5592 | |
| hilC | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3465 | |
| pipC | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1236 | |
| phoN | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_5193 | |
| pliC | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1505 | |
| rck_2 | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3661 | |
| rmbA | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_4526 | |
| sopBD | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1237; STM14_3550 | |
| sseF | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1700 | |
| psiA | n.s. | +/− | STM14_5591 | |
| PCWH | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_2358 | |
| Phage | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3172 | |
| Phage | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_2430 | |
| Phage | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1192 | |
| T3SS | invJAG | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3491; STM14_3495; STM14_3497 |
| prgI | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3472 | |
| ssaCDLPQV | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1689; STM14_1690; STM14_1708; STM14_1710; STM14_1713; STM14_1714 | |
| sipC | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3483 | |
| spaP | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3489 | |
| PCP | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1706 | |
| Flagella | fliA | n.s. | +/− | STM14_2374 |
| flgC | n.s. | +/− | STM14_1346 | |
| flhD | n.s. | +/− | STM14_2341 | |
| Chemotaxis | PSSR | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3799 |
| spi4_A (HP) | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_5118 | |
| Fimbriae | fimW | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0644 |
| pefB | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_5544 | |
| safA | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0352 | |
| sthAB | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_5514; STM14_5515 | |
| stfA | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0234 | |
| Antimicrobial resistance | acrAB | n.s. | − | STM14_0560; STM14_0559 |
| fimZ | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0641 | |
| ompC | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1848 | |
| Carbohydrate metabolism | fumB | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0886 |
| gmpA | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0896 | |
| manA | +/− | n.s. | STM14_1769 | |
| manL_2 | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_5450 | |
| PMD | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3723 | |
| Purine catabolism | allD | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0618 |
| Amino acid metabolism | aroC | − | n.s. | STM14_2933 |
| eutS | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3028 | |
| gor | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_4327 | |
| gpmA | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0896 | |
| gshB | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3739 | |
| pphB | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3509 | |
| nanM | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1293 | |
| tdcB | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3926 | |
| Envelope and membrane | envE | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1493 |
| POMLP | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1513 | |
| POMP | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_4874 | |
| ybhM | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_0938 | |
| Fatty acid metabolism | acd-6 | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1005 |
| Osmotic stress | yciEF | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_2092; STM14_2093 |
| ygaU | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3371 | |
| Conjugation | traY | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_5596 |
| PTS System | PIMP | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1036 |
| ulaA_1 | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1035 | |
| Uncharacterized genes | Hypothetical proteins | n.s. | + | 550.537.33. peg.1053; STM14_0337; STM14_0357; STM14_1197; STM14_1289; STM14_1401; STM14_2418; STM14_3789; STM14_4535; STM14_4997; STM14_5381; STM14_0643 |
| Putative cytoplasmic proteins | n.s. | + | STM14_0025; STM14_2888; STM14_0359; STM14_3960; STM14_4519; STM14_4993; STM14_4996; STM14_5175; STM14_5190 | |
| Putative inner membrane proteins | n.s. | + | STM14_0398; STM14_0979; STM14_1937; STM14_1975; STM14_2258; STM14_2638; STM14_2728; STM14_4449 | |
| Putative periplasmic proteins | n.s. | + | STM14_0399; STM14_0517; STM14_0660 | |
| ydiV | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1632 | |
| ydiL | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1655 | |
| PDR | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_1970 | |
| Pseudogene | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_3788 |
Mutants listed met the criteria for significance, as defined in the materials and methods section Genes in bold showed a significant fitness effect in both serovars.
−, conditions for which a statistically significant negative fitness effect was observed.
+, conditions for which a statistically significant positive fitness effect was observed.
+/−, positive fitness effect at the first sampling time point, followed by a negative fitness effect later.
−/+, negative fitness effect at the first sampling time point, followed by a positive fitness effect later.
n.s., genes did not fulfill both criteria for significance in the respective library. HP: hypothetical protein, PTR: putative transcriptional regulator, PCT: putative cation transporter, PP: putative permease; PRR: putative response regulator; POMP: putative outer membrane protein; PIMP: putative inner membrane protein; PCWH: putative cell wall-associated hydrolase; PCP: putative cytoplasmic protein, PSSR: putative serine sensor receptor; PMD: putative mannitol dehydrogenase, POMLP: putative outer membrane lipoprotein; PDR: putative dipicolinate reductase; T3SS: type III secretion system.
Fig. 1.

Changes in the aggregated mutant abundances of the barcoded transposon mutant libraries during interaction with fresh diced onions and alfalfa sprouts at 8 °C. Volcano plots exhibit fitness effects for the library mutants with the aggregate mutant abundances on the X-axis and the corresponding p-value on the Y-axis. Panels A–D correspond to the STM library on both onions (A, B) and alfalfa sprouts (C, D). Panels E–H correspond to the SEN library (E, F: onions; G, H: alfalfa sprouts). Panels A, C, E and G correspond to the comparison between inoculum and 1 h after incubation (I-d1), while panels B, D, F, and H depict comparison between the inoculum and end of storage (96 h, I-d5). Dots represent the aggregate mutant abundances for one specific gene. Mutations in genes with a significant fitness effect are shown in blue and selected genes were labeled. Insertions in intergenic regions with significant fitness effects were excluded.
The interaction of the STM library with onions resulted in considerably fewer genes (n = 21) with a significant fitness effect, where all but STM14_2773 were negatively selected (Table 1, Fig. 1 and Fig. S4).
On alfalfa sprouts, 13 genes with a fitness effect were observed for the SEN library; six elements conferred a positive fitness effect when disrupted by transposons, while seven genes were negatively selected (Table 2, Fig. 1 and Fig. S4). Disruption of 5 genetic elements resulted in a significant fitness effect for STM (Table 2, Fig. 1 and Fig. S4), including one in an IR. Mutants in oxyR exhibited a dynamic behavior that shifted from being negatively to positively selected, whereas all others were negatively selected.
Table 2.
Genes with a significant fitness effect for S. Typhimurium 14028 and S. Enteritidis P125109 on alfalfa sprouts grouped by function.
| Metabolic function | Genes | STM | SEN | STM14 locus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reactive oxygen species (ROS) stress response | oxyR | −/+ | −/+ | STM14_4959 |
| Chaperone | dsbA_2 | n.s. | – | STM14_4806 |
| Transporter | corA | – | n.s. | STM14_4754 |
| Flagella | fliCD | n.s. | +/− | STM14_2378; STM14_2380 |
| flgKL | n.s. | +/− | STM14_1354; STM14_1355 | |
| motA | n.s. | +/− | STM14_2338 | |
| Capsule, envelope and lipopolysaccharides | ldcA | – | n.s. | STM14_2176 |
| rcsB | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_2801 | |
| rfaK | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_4475; | |
| rfaJ | n.s. | – | STM14_4478 | |
| wecE | n.s. | – | STM14_4723 | |
| Carbohydrate metabolism | eda | – | n.s. | STM14_2289 |
| Uncharacterized | HP | n.s. | −/+ | STM14_2047 |
| HP | n.s. | +/− | STM14_2339 |
Mutants listed met the criteria for significance. Genes in bold: genes with a significant fitness effect in both serovars.
−, conditions for which a statistically significant negative fitness effect was observed.
+, conditions for which a statistically significant positive fitness effect was observed.
+/−, positive fitness effect at the first sampling time point, followed by a negative fitness effect later.
−/+, negative fitness effect at the first sampling time point, followed by a positive fitness effect later. n.s., genes did not fulfill both criteria for significance in the respective library.
HP: hypothetical protein.
The TIS approach revealed common interaction mechanisms between the two serovars and between the two food matrices. On fresh diced onions, disruption of dcrB, ompL, tolC, typA, and wecE resulted in a significant fitness effect for both S. enterica serovars. On alfalfa sprouts, oxyR was commonly identified in STM and SEN. The rcsB and wecE genes were relevant for SEN on both food matrices, while STM relied on corA and ldcA on both food matrices. The complete results of the TIS analysis are presented in Table S1.
Significantly enriched KEGG pathways (q-value ≤ 0.01) and associated GO terms (classic Fisher ≤ 0.01) are summarized in Table 3, with full results in Table S2.
Table 3.
Significantly enriched KEGG pathways associated with the interaction of S. Typhimurium 14028 and S. Enteritidis P125109 with fresh diced onions and alfalfa sprouts at 8°C along with corresponding significantly enriched GO terms.
| Enriched pathway (q-value < 0.01) | Matrix | Strain | No of genes | Genes | Associated GO-terms (classic fisher ≤ 0.01) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flagellar assembly | Onions | SEN | 28 | flgACDEFGIKL, flhABCD, fliACEFGHIJKMOPZ, motAB | GO:0040011, GO:0044780, GO:004781, GO:0051674, GO:0071973 |
| Sprouts | SEN | 32 | flgACDEFGHJKLN, flhABD, motAB, fliACDEFGHIJKLMOQRZ | GO:0040011, GO:0044780, GO:0044781, GO:0051674, GO:0071973, GO:0071978, GO:0097588 | |
| Two-component system | Onions | SEN | 34 | barA, bcfB*, cheAR, dcuB*, envZ*, fimZ*, flhCD, fliAC, iroN*, lpfB, motA, narY, ompR*, pagD, pagO*, pgtEP*, phoN, phoQ, qseC, rcsAB*, ssrA, sthAB, tolC, tsr_3, uvrY, wecC, ygiK*, STM14_3842* | |
| Sprouts | SEN | 19 | fliAC, cheAMRWY, motA, flhD, uvrY, rcsABC*, barA*, tolC, envZ*, ompR*, wecBC | GO:0000160 | |
| Salmonella infection | Onions | SEN | 17 | avrA, spvCD*, fliC, htpG, pipB2*, prgIJ, sipAC, sopB, sopD-2*, sseFI, sseL*, STM14_4996 | |
| Bacterial chemotaxis | Sprouts | SEN | 9 | cheAMRWY, motAB, fliGM | GO:0006935 |
| RNA degradation | Onions | STM | 5 | deaD, pcnB, ppk*, pnp, vacB | |
| Mismatch repair | Onions | STM | 5 | xseA, dam, uvrD, holCD | GO:0009314 |
| Biosynthesis of nucleotide sugars | Sprouts | STM | 4 | flmB, wecBCE | GO:0009246 |
Gene lists were generated based on a padj < 0.05 in at least one matrix/no matrix or inoculum/time point comparison. Bold genes indicate negative selection between sampling time points. Underlined genes indicate positive selection between time points. Genes marked with “*” exhibited a shift in selection over the incubation period, changing from negative to positive selection or vice versa.
In summary, two-component systems (TCSs), T3SS, efflux pumps, flagella, ribosome biogenesis, and LPS biosynthesis were revealed as important mechanisms for the interaction of SEN with fresh diced onions On alfalfa sprouts, TCSs, bacterial chemotaxis, and the response to ROS (reactive oxygen species) played a crucial role. The main interaction mechanisms identified for STM were genetic information processing and modification of the cell envelope.
3.3. Competition assays
A collection of genes displaying a significant fitness effect on the respective food matrix was selected for competition assays. A total of 15 genes for fresh diced onions and four for alfalfa sprouts were selected from the single-gene deletions mutant collection in S. Typhimurium 14028 and subjected to competition assays on the food matrix, in LB, and in PBS (Table 4). From these, three genes - corA, ldcA and xseA - were tested on both food matrices. Additionally, wecC was selected for competition assays on onions given the overrepresentation of the wec-genes in the TIS data and KEGG analysis. Due to the strong negative effect of xseA on onions and melons (Esteban-Cuesta et al., 2026), competitions on xseA were expanded to sprouts. Although the threshold for significance was not fulfilled on this food matrix. On diced onions, the fitness effect observed in the TIS assays was confirmed for 10 of the 15 genes tested. On alfalfa sprouts, the fitness impact of all four tested genes was confirmed. However, most of the tested mutants also had a fitness effect in nutrient-rich media. tolC showed a considerably stronger negative fitness effect on fresh-diced onions compared to LB. In contrast, oxyR showed a positive polar effect on sprouts and a negative fitness effect in LB. Additionally, deaD and vacB displayed fitness effects in LB that were absent in our competition assays in onions. In PBS, two genes, corA, and xseA, showed polar effects, while ldcA also displayed a fitness effect under these nutrient-restricted conditions.
Table 4.
Competition assays on fresh diced onions and alfalfa sprouts at 8 °C.
| Gene | Matrix | Locus Tag | Function | TIS | Competition assay | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matrix | LB | PBS | ||||||||||||||||||
| STM | SEN | CIas | stdevas | CIs | stdevs | Outcome | CIas | stdevas | CIs | stdevs | Outcome | CIas | stdevas | CIs | stdevs | Outcome | ||||
| corA | Onions | STM14_4754 | Magnesium. nickel. cobalt transporter CorA | – | n.s | 0.67 | 0.53 | 0.90 | 0.66 | ○ | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.03 | ↓ | 0.85 | 0.02 | 0.93 | 0.32 | ↙ |
| Sprouts | 0.63 | 0.22 | 0.42 | 0.25 | ↓ | |||||||||||||||
| deaD | Onions | STM1_3962 | ATP-dependent RNA helicase DeaD | – | n.s. | 1.28 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 0.43 | ○ | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.04 | ↓ | 0.89 | 0.12 | 0.89 | 0.35 | ○ |
| holC | Onions | STM14_5372 | DNA polymerase III subunit chi | – | n.s. | x | x | 0.17 | 0.11 | ↓ | x | x | 0.02 | 0.02 | ↓ | x | x | 1.05 | 0.12 | ○ |
| holD | Onions | STM14_5475 | DNA polymerase III subunit psi | – | n.s. | x | x | 0.62 | 0.01 | ↓ | x | x | 0.01 | 0.00 | ↓ | x | x | 0.90 | 0.43 | ○ |
| ldcA | Onions | STM14_2176 | L. D-carboxypeptidase A | – | n.s. | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.10 | ↓ | 0.31 | 0.13 | 0.60 | 0.25 | ↓ | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.15 | ↓ |
| Sprouts | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0.13 | ↓ | |||||||||||||||
| oxyR | Sprouts | STM14_4959 | DNA-binding transcriptional regulator OxyR | –/+ | 17.32 | 13.42 | 2.66 | 1.73 | ↖ | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.02 | ↓ | / | / | / | / | / | |
| pnp | Onions | STM14_3964 | Polynucleotide phosphorylase/polyadenylase | – | n.s. | 0.34 | 0.16 | 0.56 | 0.23 | ↓ | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.09 | ↓ | / | / | / | / | / |
| tolC | Onions | STM14_3859 | Outer membrane channel protein | – | x | x | 0.05 | 0.05 | ↓ | x | x | 0.41 | 0.20 | ↓ | x | x | 1.10 | 0.49 | ○ | |
| typA | Onions | STM14_4822 | GTP-binding protein | – | 0.71 | 0.23 | 0.46 | 0.10 | ↓ | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.02 | ↓ | / | / | / | / | / | |
| vacB | Onions | STM14_5250 | Exoribonuclease R | – | n.s. | 2.96 | 2.89 | 2.22 | 2.07 | ○ | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.11 | 0.11 | ↓ | / | / | / | / | / |
| wecC | Onions | STM14_4719 | UDP-N-acetyl-D-mannosamine dehydrogenase | (–) | n.s. | 1.15 | 0.21 | 0.77 | 0.08 | ↘ | 0.79 | 0.42 | 4.41 | 6.64 | ○ | / | / | / | / | / |
| wecD | Onions | STM14_4722 | TDP-fucosamine acetyltransferase | – | n.s. | 1.30 | 1.38 | 1.33 | 0.78 | ○ | 0.33 | 0.51 | 0.08 | 0.10 | ↓ | / | / | / | / | / |
| wecE | Onions | STM14_4723 | TDP-4-oxo-6-deoxy-d-glucose transaminase | – | 0.61 | 0.49 | x | x | ○ | 0.39 | 0.32 | x | x | ↓ | / | / | / | / | / | |
| wecF | Onions | STM14_4725 | 4-Alpha-L-fucosyltransferase | – | n.s. | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.05 | ↓ | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.27 | 0.09 | ↓ | / | / | / | / | / |
| xseA | Onions | STM14_3077 | Exodeoxyribonuclease VII large subunit | – | n.s. | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.82 | 0.31 | ↙ | 0.09 | 0.16 | 2.65 | 3.77 | ↙ | 0.64 | 0.19 | 1.68 | 1.28 | ↙ |
| Sprouts | (–) | 0.34 | 0.15 | 1.04 | 0.23 | ↙ | ||||||||||||||
| yjgA | Onions | STM14_5328 | ribosome associated protein | – | n.s. | x | x | 0.17 | 0.07 | ↓ | x | x | 0.06 | 0.02 | ↓ | x | x | 0.97 | 0.04 | ○ |
All genes were tested for the time point I-d5.
TIS: Transposon insertion sequencing. −: mutation resulted in a negative fitness effect in the TIS analysis, +: mutation resulted in a positive fitness effect in the TIS analysis.
(): mutation fulfilled only one criterium for significance, n.s.: mutation did not fulfill both criteria for significance.
CI: competitive index = timepoint (mutant/wild-type) / inoculum (mutant/wild-type), average of at least two independent experiments, S: sense – single-gene deletion mutant with a kanamycin resistance cassette inserted in the sense orientation of the gene; AS: antisense – single-gene deletion mutant with a chloramphenicol resistance cassette inserted in the antisense orientation of the gene. ↓ = single-gene deletion mutants with a significant growth disadvantage in competition assays compared to wild-type (CI + stdev < 1); ↑ = advantage in competition assays compared to wild-type (CI – stdev > 1); ○ = no effect, ↙ negative effect in antisense mutant only, ↖ positive effect in antisense mutant only, ↘ negative effect in sense mutant only. LB: Luria-Bertani broth; PBS: phosphate-buffered saline; x: SGD not available; in brackets (): fitness effects which did not fulfill the criteria for significance; /: Competition assay was not performed.
4. Discussion
Fitness determinants for the interaction of S. enterica on fresh diced onions and alfalfa sprouts were investigated using barcoded transposon libraries in S. Enteritidis P125109 (SEN) and S. Typhimurium 14028 (STM).
The food matrices analyzed in this study, fresh diced onions and alfalfa sprouts, provide two distinct environmental conditions for S. enterica. This is reflected in the TIS results, where screenings of the S. enterica libraries yielded notably fewer mutants with a fitness effect on alfalfa sprouts than on onions. Key differences between these food matrices include their inherent pH as well as their composition. Onions provide a more challenging acidic environment with a pH ranging from 5.3 to 5.9 (Berno et al., 2014; Roldán-Marín et al., 2009). Although the pH of alfalfa sprouts has not been comprehensively characterized, they are commonly assumed to represent a less acidic environment compared with onions, which may contribute to the observed differences. Furthermore, onions are known to produce natural antimicrobial substances (Al-Delaimy and Ali, 1970; Kyung, 2012; Lanzotti et al., 2013; Santas et al., 2010; Sharma et al., 2018; Zohri et al., 1995), while alfalfa sprouts also produce bioactive compounds, such as specific vitamins and antioxidants (Benincasa et al., 2019). The majority of SEN mutations with fitness effects were under strong negative selection in onions within the first hour of interaction, which then switched to positive selection for the remainder of the storage period. Many of these mechanisms may therefore only be required for the initial adaptation to intrinsic stress factors present in onions and allow subsequent cell growth.
Alfalfa sprouts supported the maintenance of both libraries significantly better than fresh diced onions in the first hour of interaction. The growth potential for both S. enterica strains was comparable to previous studies with S. enterica wild-type strains on onions (Lieberman et al., 2015; Yemmireddy and Mancias, 2025) and sprouts (Charkowski et al., 2002; Kim et al., 2018). Minimal variations could be attributed to different time-temperature combinations or inoculum concentrations.
Alfalfa sprouts and fresh diced onions also differ in their initial background microbiota. While alfalfa sprouts had high MAB and Enterobacteriaceae populations of about 9.0 and 8.0 log10 CFU/g, respectively, lower counts were found on onions, where MAB were at 3.0 log10 CFU/g and Enterobacteriaceae at 0.8 log10 CFU/g. These results correlate well with previous studies (Abadias et al., 2008; Iacumin and Comi, 2019; Jang et al., 2021; Keshri et al., 2019). However, after five days, while counts on alfalfa sprouts remained stable, the MAB increased to almost 7.0 log10 in the onion samples.
Strain-specific differences were observed during the TIS experiments. In general, the SEN library maintained lower CFUs than the STM library on onions, and substantially more SEN insertion mutants displayed a significant fitness effect. This higher sensitivity of SEN under the stress conditions posed by these food matrices of plant origin may represent strain- or serovar-specific effects. We note that salmonellosis outbreaks caused by SEN strains are mostly associated with poultry and poultry-derived products, including eggs and egg products, but are rarely associated with foods of plant origin (EFSA and ECDC, 2024). In contrast, S. Typhimurium strains have been associated with a broader food spectrum that ranges from pork or beef meet (EFSA and ECDC, 2024) to contaminated chocolate (EFSA and ECDC, 2023) and fresh produce (Colombe et al., 2019; Seelman Federman et al., 2024). A recent study also demonstrated that S. Typhimurium exhibits higher resilience to stress conditions in the food chain compared to other S. enterica strains (Pye et al., 2023).
STM relies on mechanisms such as RNA and DNA degradation (deaD, pnp, vacB), mismatch repair (holCD, xseA), and ribosome biogenesis (yjgA, typA) to sustain itself on these food matrices, which are baseline mechanisms for any cell growth. Previous studies also identified DNA repair to be relevant for S. enterica on low moisture foods, alfalfa sprouts, and muskmelons (Brankatschk et al., 2014; Esteban-Cuesta et al., 2026; Li et al., 2020). Collectively, these mechanisms enable the cell to utilize nutrients and metabolites more efficiently, which is also exemplified by the fitness effect observed in eda and aroC STM mutants. The 2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate aldolase encoded by eda is involved in the Entner-Doudoroff pathway, a more energy-efficient alternative to glycolysis that may be more metabolically favorable under different environmental conditions, such as carbon and phosphate starvation (Gupta and Gupta, 2021; Murray and Conway, 2005). AroC is a chorismate synthase that catalyzes the last step in the synthesis of chorismate within the shikimate pathway. This pathway is responsible for the de novo biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids, rendering the cell prototrophic for aromatic amino acids and other nutrients for which chorismate serves as a precursor (Bentley and Haslam, 1990; Charles et al., 1990; Dosselaere and Vanderleyden, 2001). Taken together, the fitness effects of eda and aroC, along with those related to RNA degradation, mismatch repair, and tRNA and ribosome biogenesis, suggest that STM may struggle to scavenge certain nutrients from the food matrix and heavily relies on its own metabolic resources.
KEGG enrichment analysis revealed both positively and negatively selected genes within the same system category. This reflects the functional diversity within the systems, where individual genes act as activators or repressors depending on environmental conditions, or are parallel systems with different functions, such as two-component systems. Mutations in two-component systems (TCSs) were detrimental to the maintenance of SEN and STM on both onions and alfalfa sprouts at 8 °C. TCSs are signal-transduction systems composed of a sensor kinase and a response regulator that enable bacteria to sense and respond to changes in their environment (Beier and Gross, 2006). The fitness effect observed for several SEN mutants with insertions in TCS-related genes on onions (rcsB, ompC, fimZ, phoN, wecB, ssrA, fliA, flhD, sthAB, tolC) and sprouts (rcsB, fliC, motA, wecE) is also supported by the enrichment of the corresponding KEGG pathway for both matrices, while TCS-related genes were also relevant for the interaction of STM with onions (ompL, tolC, wecBDEF). TCSs are involved in a wide variety of mechanisms. The EnvZ-OmpR TCS, crucial for SEN on onions, is primarily related to osmotic stress. However, it has an additional role in the acid stress response (Chakraborty et al., 2015; Chakraborty and Kenney, 2018), making it important for the interaction with onions (Bernardini et al., 1990; Sleator and Hill, 2002; Tipton and Rather, 2017; Xiao et al., 2022). Additionally, the EnvZ-OmpR TCS affects the expression of virulence factors, such as flagellar assembly and type III secretion systems (T3SS), in response to low pH (Kenney and Anand, 2020; Shin and Park, 1995). The EnvZ-OmpR TCS was previously found to be relevant for the survival of S. Newport on muskmelons (Esteban-Cuesta et al., 2026) and under desiccation stress on pistachios (Jayeola et al., 2020).
Modifications of the cell envelope are important mechanisms bacteria use to adapt to different environmental stressors. Genes related to cell envelope functions were commonly identified for both S. enterica serovars on fresh diced onions and alfalfa sprouts. For instance, STM ldcA mutants were negatively selected on both food matrices. ldcA encodes for the L,D-carboxypeptidase LdcA that plays a key role in the peptidoglycan recycling pathway during cell wall synthesis. This phenotype was confirmed in competition against the wild-type on the food matrix, in LB, and PBS, indicating that ldcA mutants are generally growth-impaired. LPS biosynthesis was also found to be relevant for the survival of S. enterica on low-moisture foods, RTE muskmelons, tomatoes, and alfalfa sprouts (de Moraes et al., 2017; Holden et al., 2024; Esteban-Cuesta et al., 2026; Jayeola et al., 2020). Additionally, several genes involved in the enterobacterial common antigen (ECA) biosynthesis showed a fitness effect in our TIS data. Specifically, several components of the wec gene cluster were identified to be relevant for the interaction of STM and SEN on both onions and alfalfa sprouts and have repeatedly been reported to contribute to fitness in S. enterica on various food matrices (de Moraes et al., 2017; Esteban-Cuesta et al., 2026; Holden et al., 2024; Jayeola et al., 2020). The fitness disadvantage of wecF STM mutants was confirmed in the competition experiments on onions and in LB, suggesting a nutrient-dependent fitness effect. Similarly, the RcsB-RcsC and the BarA-UvrY TCSs were relevant for SEN on both food matrices. The relevance of the RcsB-RcsC TCS may be due to its functions in regulating capsule synthesis (Stout and Gottesmann, 1990), activating virulence factors, or responding to osmotic and envelope stress (Davalos-Garcia et al., 2001). The BarA-UvrY TCS regulates the metabolic shift from glycolysis to gluconeogenesis in E. coli (Pernestig et al., 2003). This may support the hypothesis of an increased demand for de novo synthesis of certain nutrients by reutilizing intracellular resources. A linkage between this TCS and the expression of genes coding for secreted effectors has been observed in various gram-negative bacteria (Altier et al., 2000; Heeb and Haas, 2001; Herren et al., 2006; Pernestig et al., 2001). We note that in our data, the disruption of genes involved in secretion systems or the production of secreted effector proteins (csgEF, invJG, prgI, ssaCDLPQV, spaP) had a significant fitness effect, especially in SEN.
The acidic environment in onions seems to trigger various host-invasion mechanisms in SEN, perhaps because it reflects the pH drop during gastrointestinal tract passage as well as the acidic shift occurring in Salmonella-containing vacuoles (SCV) or in macrophages (Alpuche Aranda et al., 1992; Chakraborty et al., 2015). Intrinsic antimicrobial substances and the immune system of onions, as well as cold stress, may additionally induce the expression of virulence factors (Schikora et al., 2008; Shah et al., 2013, 2014; Shirron and Yaron, 2011). T3SSs were also shown to be crucial in many endophytic bacteria for plant colonization (Pinski et al., 2019; Schikora et al., 2008) and during the interaction with foods of plant origin such as alfalfa sprouts and tomatoes (Brankatschk et al., 2014; de Moraes et al., 2017; Holden et al., 2024), probably due to its role in modulating the plant immune response (Deslandes and Rivas, 2012; Guo et al., 2009; Pinski et al., 2019).
Mutants with insertions in flagellar assembly genes were positively selected on both food matrices. This is in line with previous findings showing a positive fitness effect of flagella mutants during the colonization of different species of Medicago plants with S. Typhimurium (Iniguez et al., 2007) and of muskmelons with SEN (Esteban-Cuesta et al., 2026). Since motility is energetically costly (Schavemaker and Lynch, 2022), downregulation of flagellar expression whenever motility is less beneficial improves efficiency and provides a competitive growth advantage due to the reduced energetic expenditure. Additionally, S. enterica downregulates its motility under cell envelope and oxidative stress (Spöring et al., 2018), such as an acidic environment.
Considering the natural antimicrobial substances present in onions (Kyung, 2012; Lanzotti et al., 2013; Santas et al., 2010; Sharma et al., 2018) it is not surprising that the mutants deficient for the multidrug efflux pump TolC were strongly negatively selected in the TIS analyses of both STM and SEN. A previous study showed that disruption of acrA, which is part of the well-studied AcrAB-TolC efflux complex, resulted in a significant fitness disadvantage for SEN on almonds (Li et al., 2020). TolC exports a wide range of exogenous and endogenous compounds, including antibiotics and bile compounds (Morona et al., 1983), and contributes to S. Choleraesuis survival under acidic stress (Lee et al., 2016). Taken together, these findings support the need for S. enterica to withstand acidic conditions and antimicrobial compounds on fresh onions, identifying related genes as potential targets for future food safety interventions.
The key regulator of the oxidative stress response, OxyR (Storz et al., 1990), exhibited a dynamic fitness effect in the transposon screen of both STM and SEN on alfalfa sprouts. OxyR is involved in the cellular response to reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are part of the immune system of plants (Jones and Dangl, 2006). During the transposon library screen, the initial negative selection of oxyR mutants shifted to positive for the remainder of the experiments, confirming the results previously observed on muskmelons (Esteban-Cuesta et al., 2026). The TIS data also revealed that the initial fitness disadvantage conferred by the oxyR mutation was much milder on alfalfa sprouts than on fresh diced onions or when no food matrix was provided. This suggests that oxyR is less critical for survival on sprouts than on onions and in standard matrix-free conditions. This could be because of the inherent antioxidants in alfalfa sprouts or an effect of the competing background microbiota. Due to the relevance of oxyR in the transposon data, individual oxyR mutants were included in competition assays against the wild-type. These mutants performed highly variably in the assays, resulting in a high standard deviation. This could be attributed to the dual functionality of OxyR that can switch from transcriptional repressor to transcriptional activator of a multitude of genes beyond oxidative stress.
Holden et al. (2024) identified key fitness factors for S. enterica growing at room temperature on alfalfa sprouts. Surprisingly, considering that our work measures genes required during storage without growth at 8 °C, several of their findings align with our study, including roles in LPS biogenesis, DNA housekeeping, and flagella biosynthesis. The differences between our study and theirs are of interest as they may indicate differences due to growth versus storage. Among these differences, Holden et al. (2024) highlights the importance of iron storage for the growth of biotic and abiotic surfaces, which were found on muskmelons (Esteban-Cuesta et al., 2026) and tomatoes (de Moraes et al., 2017) but which we do not observe during storage at 8 °C.
Our findings should be interpreted in light of certain limitations. First, a key limitation of most TIS studies is the high inoculation level required to preserve library complexity. However, our data were validated in competition assays where many, but not all, individual mutant phenotypes were confirmed against the wild-type. Observed discrepancies between TIS and competition assay results likely arise from methodological differences: the TIS analysis accounts for interactions of all mutants within the library, whereas competition assays assess the growth of individual deletion mutants relative to the wild-type. However, the presence of opposing selection patterns as observed in the KEGG analysis could indicate biological complexity, but also certain inconsistency, or noise in the data. An additional limitation of our experimental setup is the high amount of natural background microbiota on alfalfa sprouts, which affects nutrient availability for S. enterica libraries and contributes to greater variability between experiments. However, we deliberately aimed to provide real-world data by incorporating the naturally occurring microbiota, which plays a key role in shaping the prevalence and interaction dynamics of foodborne pathogens such as S. enterica.
5. Conclusion
This study offers novel insights into the genetic determinants of the fitness of S. enterica on fresh diced onions and alfalfa sprouts. Using transposon insertion sequencing and validation via competition assays, we identified both shared and matrix-specific survival mechanisms across serovars. In onions, virulence-associated systems such as T3SS and efflux pumps may become activated and important for growth. Salmonella oxyR mutants, which are typically severely impaired, recovered in sprouts but not on onions or in matrix-free growth conditions. Our findings deepen our understanding of how S. enterica adapts to distinct produce environments and highlight potential molecular targets for future food safety interventions.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to sincerely thank Barbara Fritz, Johanna Dietz, Erika Altgenug, René Mamet, and Larissa Klose for their dedicated assistance with the competition experiments. We also appreciate Julia Mühmel and Meike Schumann for their help with preparing the media.
Funding
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG). Grant No. 494875429.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Irene Esteban-Cuesta reports financial support was provided by German Research Foundation. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2026.111696.
Footnotes
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Laura Führer: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Data curation. Steffen Porwollik: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Data curation. Weiping Chu: Visualization. Verena Hohenester: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Data curation. Irmak Sah: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. Michael McClelland: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Methodology. Claudia Guldimann: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Irene Esteban-Cuesta: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Conceptualization.
Declaration of Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process
During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used Microsoft Copilot (2025) and ChatGPT-4o to enhance readability and clarity. All content generated with these tools was thoroughly reviewed and edited by the authors, who take full responsibility for the final version of the manuscript.
Data availability
The data are provided in the supplementary material.
References
- Abadias M, Usall J, Anguera M, Solsona C, Viñas I, 2008. Microbiological quality of fresh, minimally-processed fruit and vegetables, and sprouts from retail establishments. Int. J. Food Microbiol 123 (1–2), 121–129. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Delaimy KS, Ali SH, 1970. Antibacterial action of vegetable extracts on the growth of pathogenic bacteria. J. Sci. Food Agric 21 (2), 110–112. 10.1002/jsfa.2740210214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alexa Adrian, & Rahnenfuhrer Jorg. (2024). topGO: enrichment analysis for gene ontology. https://Bioconductor.Org/Packages/TopGO.10.18129/B9.bioc.topGO.
- Alpuche Aranda CM, Swanson JA, Loomis WP, Miller SI, 1992. Salmonella typhimurium activates virulence gene transcription within acidified macrophage phagosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 89 (21), 10079–10083. 10.1073/PNAS.89.21.10079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altier C, Suyemoto M, Ruiz AI, Burnham KD, Maurer R, 2000. Characterization of two novel regulatory genes affecting Salmonella invasion gene expression. Mol. Microbiol 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01734.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G, 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology the Gene Ontology Consortium*. http://www.flybase.bio.indiana.edu. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Bahram-Parvar M, Lim LT, 2018. Fresh-cut onion: a review on processing, health benefits, and shelf-life. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf 17 (2), 290–308. 10.1111/1541-4337.12331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balali GI, Yar DD, Afua Dela VG, Adjei-Kusi P, 2020. Microbial contamination, an increasing threat to the consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables in today’s world. Int. J. Microbiol 2020 (1), 3029295. 10.1155/2020/3029295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beier D, Gross R, 2006. Regulation of bacterial virulence by two-component systems. In: Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 9, Issue 2. Elsevier Ltd., pp. 143–152. 10.1016/j.mib.2006.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benincasa P, Falcinelli B, Lutts S, Stagnari F, Galieni A, 2019. Sprouted grains: a comprehensive review. Nutrients 11 (2). 10.3390/nu11020421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bentley R, Haslam E, 1990. The shikimate pathway - a metabolic tree with many branche. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol 25 (5), 307–384. 10.3109/10409239009090615/ASSET//CMS/ASSET/E716785E-53A1-4212-82B6-BDEC7D08B5F3/10409239009090615.FP.PNG. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernardini ML, Fontaine A, Sansonetti PJ, 1990. The two-component regulatory system ompR-envZ controls the virulence of Shigella flexneri. J. Bacteriol 172 (11), 6274–6281. 10.1128/JB.172.11.6274-6281.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berno ND, Tezotto-Uliana JV, dos Santos Dias CT, Kluge RA, 2014. Storage temperature and type of cut affect the biochemical and physiological characteristics of fresh-cut purple onions. Postharvest Biol. Technol 93, 91–96. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Blanchard M, Castaigne F, Willemot C, Makhlouf J, 1996. Modified atmosphere preservation of freshly prepared diced yellow onion. In: Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 9. [Google Scholar]
- Brankatschk K, Kamber T, Pothier JF, Duffy B, Smits THM, 2014. Transcriptional profile of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Weltevreden during alfalfa sprout colonization. Microb. Biotechnol 7 (6), 528–544. 10.1111/1751-7915.12104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty S, Kenney LJ, 2018. A new role of OmpR in acid and osmotic stress in Salmonella and E. coli. Front. Microbiol 9 (NOV), 414167. 10.3389/FMICB.2018.02656/BIBTEX. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty S, Mizusaki H, Kenney LJ, 2015. A FRET-based DNA biosensor tracks OmpR-dependent acidification of Salmonella during macrophage infection. PLoS Biol. 13 (4), e1002116. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.1002116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chaomuang N, Flick D, Laguerre O, 2017. Experimental and numerical investigation of the performance of retail refrigerated display cabinets. Trends Food Sci. Technol 70, 95–104. 10.1016/J.TIFS.2017.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Charkowski AO, Barak JD, Sarreal CZ, Mandrell RE, 2002. Differences in growth of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli O157:H7 on alfalfa sprouts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 68 (6), 3114–3120. 10.1128/AEM.68.6.3114-3120.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charles IG, Lamb HK, Pickard D, Dougan G, Hawkins AR, 1990. Isolation, characterization and nucleotide sequences of the aroC genes encoding chorismate synthase from Salmonella typhi and Escherichia coli. J. Gen. Microbiol 136 (2), 353–358. 10.1099/00221287-136-2-353/CITE/REFWORKS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colombe S, Jernberg C, Löf E, Angervall AL, Mellström-Dahlgren H, Dotevall L, Bengnér M, Hall I, Sundqvist L, Kühlmann-Berenzon S, Galanis I, Lindblad M, Hansen A, Rehn M, 2019. Outbreak of unusual H2S-negative monophasic Salmonella typhimurium strain likely associated with small tomatoes, Sweden, August to October 2019. Eurosurveillance 24 (47), 1900643. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.47.1900643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davalos-Garcia M, Conter A, Toesca I, Gutierrez C, Cam K, 2001. Regulation of osmC gene expression by the two-component system rcsB-rcsC in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol 183 (20), 5870–5876. 10.1128/JB.183.20.5870-5876.2001/ASSET/B60E2B9D-9D37-46BF-B60B-6C7399701933/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/JB2010585004.JPEG. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Moraes MH, Desai P, Porwollik S, Canals R, Perez DR, Chu W, McClelland M, Teplitski M, 2017. Salmonella persistence in tomatoes requires a distinct set of metabolic functions identified by transposon insertion sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 83 (5). 10.1128/AEM.03028-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denich L, Cheng JM, Smith CR, Taylor M, Atkinson R, Boyd E, Chui L, Honish L, Isaac L, Kearney A, Liang JJ, Mah V, Manore AJW, McCormic ZD, Misfeldt C, Nadon C, Patel K, Sharma D, Todd A, Hexemer A, 2024. A multi-provincial outbreak of Salmonella Newport infections associated with red onions: a report of the largest Salmonella outbreak in Canada in over 20 years. Epidemiol. Infect 152, e106. 10.1017/S0950268824001055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deslandes L, Rivas S, 2012. Catch me if you can: bacterial effectors and plant targets. Trends Plant Sci. 17 (11), 644–655. 10.1016/J.TPLANTS.2012.06.011/ASSET/7F9B8D96-28F1-4549-866C-F57C30430199/MAIN.ASSETS/GR3.JPG. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding H, Fu TJ, Smith MA, 2013. Microbial contamination in sprouts: how effective is seed disinfection treatment? J. Food Sci 78 (4). 10.1111/1750-3841.12064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dosselaere F, Vanderleyden J, 2001. A metabolic node in action: chorismate-utilizing enzymes in microorganisms. Crit. Rev. Microbiol 27 (2), 75–131. 10.1080/20014091096710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EFSA BIOHAZ Panel (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards), 2014. Scientific opinion on the risk posed by pathogens in food of non-animal origin. Part 2 (Salmonella, Yersinia, Shigella and Norovirus in bulb and stem vegetables, and carrots). EFSA J 12 (12). 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3937. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- EFSA, ECDC, 2023. The European Union one health 2022 zoonoses report. EFSA J 21 (12). 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EFSA, ECDC, 2024. The European Union one health 2023 zoonoses report. EFSA J 22 (12). 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), 2011. Scientific opinion on the risk posed by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) and other pathogenic bacteria in seeds and sprouted seeds. EFSA J 9 (11). 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Esteban-Cuesta I, Führer L, Porwollik S, Chu W, Fiddaman SR, Sah I, McClelland M, Guldimann C, 2026. Genomic factors contributing to the resilience of Salmonella enterica on ready-to-eat muskmelon. Food Microbiol. 134, 104947. 10.1016/j.fm.2025.104947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans EW, Redmond EC, 2015. Analysis of older adults’ domestic kitchen storage practices in the United Kingdom: identification of risk factors associated with listeriosis. J. Food Prot 78 (4), 738–745. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gene Ontology Consortium, 2023. The gene ontology knowledgebase in 2023. Genetics 224 (1). 10.1093/genetics/iyad031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo M, Tian F, Wamboldt Y, Alfano JR, 2009. The majority of the type III effector inventory of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 can suppress plant immunity. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact 22 (9), 1069–1080. 10.1094/MPMI-22-9-1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta R, Gupta N, 2021. Entner–Doudoroff pathway. In: Fundamentals of Bacterial Physiology and Metabolism, pp. 307–326. 10.1007/978-981-16-0723-3_11/FIGURES/12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Heeb S, Haas D, 2001. Regulatory Roles of the GacS/GacA Two-Component System in Plant-Associated and Other Gram-Negative Bacteria, vol. 14(12), pp. 1351–1363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herren CD, Mitra A, Palaniyandi SK, Coleman A, Elankumaran S, Mukhopadhyay S, 2006. The BarA-UvrY two-component system regulates virulence in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli O78:K80:H9. Infect. Immun 74 (8), 4900. 10.1128/IAI.00412-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holden ER, Assaf JA, Al-Khanaq H, Vimont N, Webber MA, Trampari E, 2024. Identification of pathways required for Salmonella to colonize alfalfa using TraDISX-press. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 90 (7). 10.1128/aem.00139-24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iacumin L, Comi G, 2019. Microbial quality of raw and ready-to-eat mung bean sprouts produced in Italy. Food Microbiol. 82, 371–377. 10.1016/j.fm.2019.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iniguez AL, Dong Y, Carter HD, Ahmer BMM, Stone JM, Triplett EW, 2007. Regulation of enteric endophytic bacterial colonization by plant defenses, 18 (2), 169–178. 10.1094/MPMI-18-0169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jang MJ, Kim SY, Ricke SC, Rhee MS, Kim SA, 2021. Microbial ecology of alfalfa, radish, and rapeseed sprouts based on culture methods and 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing. Food Res. Int 144. 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jarvik T, Smillie C, Groisman EA, Ochman H, 2010. Short-term signatures of evolutionary change in the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium 14028 genome †. J. Bacteriol 192 (2), 560–567. 10.1128/JB.01233-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jayeola V, McClelland M, Porwollik S, Chu W, Farber J, Kathariou S, 2020. Identification of novel genes mediating survival of Salmonella on low-moisture foods via transposon sequencing analysis. Front. Microbiol 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones JDG, Dangl JL, 2006. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323–329. 10.1038/nature05286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Ishiguro-Watanabe M, 2023. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 51 (D1), D587–D592. 10.1093/nar/gkac963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kenney LJ, Anand GS, 2020. EnvZ/OmpR two-component signaling: an archetype system that can function noncanonically. EcoSal Plus 9 (1). 10.1128/ECOSALPLUS.ESP-0001-2019/ASSET/402164D4-918E-40F1-AC32-AFECDC6D327F/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/ESP-0001-2019_FIG_009.JPG. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keshri J, Krouptiski Y, Abu-Fani L, Achmon Y, Bauer TS, Zarka O, Maler I, Pinto R, Sela Saldinger S, 2019. Dynamics of bacterial communities in alfalfa and mung bean sprouts during refrigerated conditions. Food Microbiol 84. 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim Y, Kim M, Song K. Bin, 2009. Combined treatment of fumaric acid with aqueous chlorine dioxide or UV-C irradiation to inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, and Listeria monocytogenes inoculated on alfalfa and clover sprouts. LWT 42 (10), 1654–1658. 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.05.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kim SA, Kim OM, Rhee MS, 2013. Changes in microbial contamination levels and prevalence of foodborne pathogens in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and rapeseed (Brassica napus) during sprout production in manufacturing plants. Lett. Appl. Microbiol 56 (1), 30–36. 10.1111/lam.12009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim W Il, Ryu SD, Kim SR, Kim HJ, Lee S, Kim J, 2018. Population changes and growth modeling of Salmonella enterica during alfalfa seed germination and early sprout development. Food Sci. Biotechnol 27 (6), 1865–1869. 10.1007/s10068-018-0412-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kyung KH, 2012. Antimicrobial properties of allium species. In: Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 23, issue 2, pp. 142–147. 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laguerre O, Derens E, Palagos B, 2002. Study of domestic refrigerator temperature and analysis of factors affecting temperature: a French survey. Int. J. Refrig 25 (5), 653–659. 10.1016/S0140-7007(01)00047-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lanzotti V, Bonanomi G, Scala F, 2013. What makes Allium species effective against pathogenic microbes?. In: Phytochemistry Reviews, vol. 12, issue 4. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 751–772. 10.1007/s11101-013-9295-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lee JJ, Wu YC, Kuo CJ, Hsuan SL, Chen TH, 2016. TolC is important for bacterial survival and oxidative stress response in Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis in an acidic environment. Vet. Microbiol 193, 42–48. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y, Salazar JK, He Y, Desai P, Porwollik S, Chu W, Paola PSS, Tortorello M. Lou, Juarez O, Feng H, McClelland M, Zhang W, 2020. Mechanisms of Salmonella attachment and survival on in-shell black peppercorns, almonds, and hazelnuts. Front. Microbiol 11. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.582202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lieberman VM, Zhao IY, Schaffner DW, Danyluk MD, Harris LJ, 2015. Survival or growth of inoculated Escherichia coli O157:H7 and salmonella on yellow onions (Allium cepa) under conditions simulating food service and consumer handling and storage. J. Food Prot 78 (1), 42–50. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu F, Li Y, 2006. Storage characteristics and relationships between microbial growth parameters and shelf life of MAP sliced onions. Postharvest Biol. Technol 40 (3), 262–268. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Love MI, Huber W, Anders S, 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15 (12). 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma J, Dai J, Cao C, Su L, Cao M, He Y, Li M, Zhang Z, Chen J, Cui S, Yang B, 2024. Prevalence, serotype, antimicrobial susceptibility, contamination factors, and control methods of Salmonella spp. in retail fresh fruits and vegetables: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf 23 (4). 10.1111/1541-4337.13407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell MR, Kirchner M, Schneider B, McClure M, Neil KP, Madad A, Jemaneh T, Tijerina M, Nolte K, Wellman A, Neises D, Pightling A, Swinford A, Piontkowski A, Sexton R, McKenna C, Cornell J, Sandoval AL, Wang H, Bell RL, Viazis S, 2024. Multistate outbreak of Salmonella Oranienburg infections linked to bulb onions imported from Mexico – United States, 2021. Food Control 160 (110325). 10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morona R, Manning PA, Reeves P, 1983. Identification and characterization of the TolC protein, an outer membrane protein from Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol 153 (2), 693–699. 10.1128/JB.153.2.693-699.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray EL, Conway T, 2005. Multiple regulators control expression of the Entner-Doudoroff aldolase (Eda) of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol 187 (3), 991–1000. 10.1128/JB.187.3.991-1000.2005/ASSET/7CC52EBD-7671-4828-95DD-53327AE8DA36/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/ZJB0030544360007.JPEG. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods (NACMCF), 1999. Microbiological safety evaluations and recommendations on sprouted seeds. Int. J. Food Microbiol 52. 10.1016/S0168-1605(99)00135-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noel JT, Arrach N, Alagely A, Mcclelland M, Teplitski M, 2010. Specific responses of Salmonella enterica to tomato varieties and fruit ripeness identified by in vivo expression technology. PLoS One 5 (8), e12406. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0012406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Official Journal of the European Union, 2013. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 208/2013 of 11 March 2013 on traceability requirements for sprouts and seeds intended for the production of sprouts. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2013/208/oj/eng.
- Olaimat AN, Holley RA, 2012. Factors influencing the microbial safety of fresh produce: a review. In: Food Microbiology, vol. 32, issue 1, pp. 1–19. 10.1016/j.fm.2012.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pernestig AK, Melefors Ö, Georgellis D, 2001. Identification of UvrY as the cognate response regulator for the BarA sensor kinase in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem 276 (1), 225–231. 10.1074/jbc.M001550200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pernestig AK, Georgellis D, Romeo T, Suzuki K, Tomenius H, Normark S, Melefors Ö, 2003. The Escherichia coli BarA-UvrY two-component system is needed for efficient switching between glycolytic and gluconeogenic carbon sources. J. Bacteriol 185 (3), 843–853. 10.1128/JB.185.3.843-853.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinski A, Betekhtin A, Hupert-Kocurek K, Mur LAJ, Hasterok R, 2019. Defining the genetic basis of plant–endophytic bacteria interactions. Int. J. Mol. Sci 20 (8), 1947. 10.3390/IJMS20081947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Porwollik S, Santiviago CA, Cheng P, Long F, Desai P, Fredlund J, Srikumar S, Silva CA, Chu W, Chen X, Canals R, Reynolds MM, Bogomolnaya L, Shields C, Cui P, Guo J, Zheng Y, Endicott-Yazdani T, Yang HJ, McClelland M, 2014. Defined single-gene and multi-gene deletion mutant collections in Salmonella enterica sv Typhimurium. PLoS One 9 (7). 10.1371/journal.pone.0099820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pradhan D, Devi Negi V, 2019. Stress-induced adaptations in Salmonella: a ground for shaping its pathogenesis. In: Microbiological Research, vol. 229. Elsevier GmbH. 10.1016/j.micres.2019.126311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pye HV, Thilliez G, Acton L, Kolenda R, Al-Khanaq H, Grove S, Kingsley RA, 2023. Strain and serovar variants of Salmonella enterica exhibit diverse tolerance to food chain-related stress. Food Microbiol. 112, 104237. 10.1016/J.FM.2023.104237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rakover A, Ødeskaug LE, Lund H, Lange H, Kaupang K, Skjerdal TO, Jensvoll L, Bergsjø B, Katsiouleri P, Veneti L, Naseer U, Brandal LT, Berg TC, Heradstveit PL, Lavoll SB, Laird TS, Bruvik T, Woods M, Madslien E, Astrup E, Falk M, Røed MH, Berglund T, Johannessen G, 2025. A large outbreak of multiple Salmonella serovars linked to alfalfa sprouts in Norway, October to December 2024. Infection 53 (2125–2134). 10.1007/S15010-025-02556-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roldán-Marín E, Sánchez-Moreno C, Lloría R, de Ancos B, Cano MP, 2009. Onion high-pressure processing: flavonol content and antioxidant activity. LWT 42 (4), 835–841. 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.11.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Santas J, Almajano MP, Carbó R, 2010. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of crude onion (Allium cepa, L.) extracts. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol 45 (2), 403–409. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2009.02169.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Savitha S, Chakraborty S, Thorat BN, 2022. Microbial contamination and decontamination of onion and its products. In: Applied Food Research, vol. 2, issue 1. Elsevier B.V. 10.1016/j.afres.2021.100032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schavemaker PE, Lynch M, 2022. Flagellar energy costs across the tree of life. ELife 11, e77266. 10.7554/ELIFE.77266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schikora A, Carreri A, Charpentier E, Hirt H, 2008. The dark side of the salad: Salmonella typhimurium overcomes the innate immune response of Arabidopsis thaliana and shows an endopathogenic lifestyle. PLoS One 3 (5), e2279. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0002279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seelman Federman S, Jenkins E, Wilson C, DeLaGarza A, Schwensohn C, Schneider B, Nsubuga J, Literman R, Wellman A, Whitney BM, Bell RL, Harris-Garner K, McKenna C, Brillhart D, Cross M, Rueber K, Schlichte T, Oni K, Adams J, Crosby A, Viazis S, 2024. An investigation of an outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium infections linked to cantaloupe – United States, 2022. Food Control 166, 110733. 10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2024.110733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah J, Desai PT, Chen D, Stevens JR, Weimer BC, 2013. Preadaptation to cold stress in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium increases survival during subsequent acid stress exposure. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 79 (23), 7281–7289. 10.1128/AEM.02621-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah J, Desai PT, Weimer BC, 2014. Genetic mechanisms underlying the pathogenicity of cold-stressed Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in cultured intestinal epithelial cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 80 (22), 6943–6953. 10.1128/AEM.01994-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma K, Mahato N, Lee YR, 2018. Systematic study on active compounds as antibacterial and antibiofilm agent in aging onions. J. Food Drug Anal 26 (2), 518–528. 10.1016/j.jfda.2017.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin S, Park C, 1995. Modulation of flagellar expression in Escherichia coli by acetyl phosphate and the osmoregulator OmpR. J. Bacteriol 177 (16), 4696–4702. 10.1128/JB.177.16.4696-4702.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shirron N, Yaron S, 2011. Active suppression of early immune response in tobacco by the human pathogen Salmonella Typhimurium. PLoS One 6 (4), e18855. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0018855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sikin AMD, Zoellner C, Rizvi SSH, 2013. Current intervention strategies for the microbial safety of sprouts. In: Journal of Food Protection, vol. 76, issue 12, pp. 2099–2123. 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sleator RD, Hill C, 2002. Bacterial osmoadaptation: the role of osmolytes in bacterial stress and virulence. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 26 (1), 49–71. 10.1111/J.1574-6976.2002.TB00598.X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spector MP, Kenyon WJ, 2012. Resistance and survival strategies of Salmonella enterica to environmental stresses. In: Food Research International, vol. 45, issue 2, pp. 455–481. 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.06.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Spöring I, Felgner S, Preuße M, Eckweiler D, Rohde M, Häussler S, Weiss S, Erhardt M, 2018. Regulation of flagellum biosynthesis in response to cell envelope stress in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. MBio 9 (3). 10.1128/MBIO.00736-17 (e00736–17). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Storz G, Tartaglia LA, Ames BN, 1990. The OxyR regulon. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 58 (3), 157–161. 10.1007/BF00548927/METRICS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stout V, Gottesmann S, 1990. RcsB and RcsC: a two-component regulator of capsule synthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol 172 (2). 10.1128/jb.172.2.659-669.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas PD, Ebert D, Muruganujan A, Mushayahama T, Albou LP, Mi H, 2022. PANTHER: making genome-scale phylogenetics accessible to all. Protein Sci. 31 (1), 8–22. 10.1002/PRO.4218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tipton KA, Rather PN, 2017. An ompR-envZ two-component system ortholog regulates phase variation, osmotic tolerance, motility, and virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii strain AB5075. J. Bacteriol 199 (3). 10.1128/jb.00705-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Toro M, Retamal P, Ayers S, Barreto M, Allard M, Brown EW, Gonzalez-Escalona N, 2016. Whole-genome sequencing analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolates in Chile provides insights into possible transmission between gulls, poultry, and humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 10.1128/AEM.01760-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viswanathan P, Kaur R, 2001. Prevalence and growth of pathogens on salad vegetables, fruits and sprouts. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 203 (3), 205–213. 10.1078/S1438-4639(04)70030-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waje CK, Jun SY, Lee YK, Kim BN, Han DH, Jo C, Kwon JH, 2009. Microbial quality assessment and pathogen inactivation by electron beam and gamma irradiation of commercial seed sprouts. Food Control 20 (3), 200–204. 10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2008.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, Chen M, Guo P, Dai Z, Feng T, Zhou L, Tang W, Zhan L, Fu X, Liu S, Bo X, Yu G, 2021. ClusterProfiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation 2 (3). 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao G, Zheng X, Li J, Yang Y, Yang J, Xiao N, Liu J, Sun Z, 2022. Contribution of the EnvZ/OmpR two-component system to growth, virulence and stress tolerance of colistin-resistant Aeromonas hydrophila. Front. Microbiol 13, 1032969. 10.3389/FMICB.2022.1032969/BIBTEX. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yemmireddy V, Mancias M, 2025. Impact of fresh-cut onion types and flavonoid profiles on the survival kinetics of foodborne pathogen during refrigerated storage. Int. J. Food Microbiol 431. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2025.111080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young Kim S, Ban GH, Won Hong Y, Ji Jang M, Ae Kim S, 2022. Microbiome shifts in sprouts (alfalfa, radish, and rapeseed) during production from seed to sprout using 16S rRNA microbiome sequencing. Food Res. Int 152. 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zohri AN, Abdel-Gawad K, Saber S, 1995. Antibacterial, antidermatophytic and antitoxigenic activities of onion (Allium cepa L.) oil. Microbiol. Res 150 (2), 167–172. 10.1016/S0944-5013(11)80052-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data are provided in the supplementary material.
