Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jan 8;48(6):1519–1528. doi: 10.1002/hed.70151

Perioperative Piperacillin/Tazobactam Reduces Early Onset SSI in Preirradiated Patients Undergoing Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction

Johannes G Schuderer 1,✉, Florian Hoferer 1, Jonas Eichberger 1, Mathias Fiedler 1, André Gessner 2, Stilla Bauernfeind 3, Maximilian Gottsauner 1, Felix Nieberle 1, Michael Maurer 1, Johannes K Meier 1, Torsten E Reichert 1, Tobias Ettl 1
PMCID: PMC13155178  PMID: 41508404

ABSTRACT

Background

Preirradiated patients undergoing microvascular head and neck reconstruction for tumor recurrence or osteoradionecrosis (ORN) face surgical site infection (SSI) rates exceeding 30%. The impact of perioperative extended‐spectrum antibiotic coverage remains unclear. This study hypothesizes that calculated prophylaxis with piperacillin/tazobactam reduces early‐onset SSI in this high‐risk population.

Methods

From a microvascular reconstructed cohort, 161 with prior irradiation were retrospectively identified (tumor, N = 101; ORN, N = 60). SSI risk reduction was compared between patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam (N = 39) and standard prophylaxis (N = 122).

Results

With underlying SSI incidence of 36%, piperacillin/tazobactam showed a fourfold SSI risk reduction (HR 0.24; p = 0.002) across the entire cohort and a fivefold reduction in patients with bone resection (HR 0.17; p = 0.01). Subgroup analyses confirmed this effect with a sevenfold reduction in tumor patients (HR 0.14; p = 0.008) and a threefold reduction in ORN patients (HR 0.29; p = 0.04). Extended coverage did not significantly prolong antibiotic treatment times.

Conclusion

In summary, calculated use of piperacillin/tazobactam in previously irradiated patients requiring microvascular reconstruction appears effective in reducing early‐onset SSI.

Keywords: head neck, microvascular reconstruction, osteonecrosis, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, SSI

1. Introduction

Surgical site infections (SSI) are dreaded complications representing the most common cause for escalation or continuation of perioperatively antibiotic administration in microvascular reconstructive head and neck surgery. Reported incidence rates range from 5% to 15% in low‐risk patients to 33%–60% in irradiated high‐risk cohorts [1, 2, 3]. Scientific discussions have focused on explaining risk factors for the occurrence of SSI, establishing predictors including preoperative radiotherapy, poor ASA status, perioperative blood transfusion, and flap failure [4, 5, 6]. Due to Antibiotic Stewardship (ABS) efforts, attention has shifted defining the optimal duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) [3, 7]. Current systematic evidence indicates that prolonged PAP does not confer an advantage over shorter regimens (< 48 h) with respect to SSI rates [4, 8, 9]. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution since available studies are exclusively retrospective and often based on highly preselected cohorts.

Clinical experience further highlights another important trend: an increasing proportion of patients undergoing complex microvascular reconstructions are seen with prior oncologic treatment. These patients often require surgery in the context of tumor recurrence, salvage procedures following primary radio/chemotherapy or secondary reconstructions for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) [10, 11, 12]. Patients with prior oncologic therapies are frequently colonized with multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative organisms, which may be selected and promoted by inadequate or unnecessarily prolonged prophylaxis, thereby directly pushing SSI incidences and highlighting the question for adequate antibiotic calculation [13, 14, 15].

Consistent with general osteomyelitis management, jaw bone infections are typically treated with a four‐ to six‐week course of antibiotic therapy following bone resection [16, 17]. Patients presenting SSI undergone salvage tumor surgery or resection of ORN with immediate microsurgical reconstruction do not fit well into this scheme. Intraoperative biopsy collection for microbiological culture‐guided antibiotic therapy is being discussed as a potential alternative to prolonged intravenous regimens, allowing for shorter treatment courses in patients with ORN [13, 18]. In literature, the duration of perioperative antibiotic application in microvascular reconstructions in previously irradiated patients varies considerably. Depending on risk stratification, flap type, defect size, and bone reconstruction, antibiotic courses may be extended from 24 h to up to 10 days postoperatively [19, 20]. In all cases, the primary objective is the uneventful integration of the microsurgical graft to enable long‐term functional rehabilitation.

Yet it is scientifically unaddressed whether a calculated perioperative antibiotic coverage with extended‐spectrum coverage provides clinical benefit in patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction after radiotherapy. This retrospective study hypothesizes that calculated perioperative piperacillin/tazobactam administration reduces the incidence of early‐onset SSIs in pre‐irradiated patients.

2. Material and Methods

The medical records of patients who underwent microvascular head and neck reconstruction in our department between 2016 and 2025 were reviewed. Patients with incomplete medical history or documentation were excluded from the analysis. Of these, patients who had received preoperative radiotherapy were included in the final statistical evaluation.

Perioperative antibiotic administration was defined from the first intravenous intraoperative dose until cessation. Standard regimens followed institutional SOPs, with intravenous amoxicillin/clavulanic acid as first‐line therapy and cephalosporins or lincosamide in case of allergy. In case of prior irradiation, piperacillin/tazobactam was set as preferred perioperative prophylaxis. Data analysis focused on type of agent, duration, and escalation. Antibiotic‐related adverse events were not assessed.

SSI were defined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria [21]. In suspected SSI cases, postoperative microbiological swabs were obtained and processed following EUCAST standards for susceptibility testing [22]. Other nosocomial infections (e.g., pneumonia) were recorded from discharge documentation, limited to events during hospitalization [23]. If clinically indicated, antibiotic treatment was escalated due to antibiogram results [22].

The following variables were retrospectively assessed: demographic data (age, sex), diagnosis, ASA score, length of ICU and normal ward stay, defect site, flap type, bone resection, neck dissection, preoperative radiotherapy. Flap‐related outcomes included overall success, local complications (arterial/venous congestion requiring revision), and flap loss, defined as partial or complete necrosis impairing reconstruction.

3. Statistical Analysis

Univariate associations were tested using Fisher's exact test, chi‐square test, and Student's t test as appropriate. Clinically relevant factors were then included in binary logistic regression models (maximum likelihood estimation), reporting regression coefficients (B) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for the association between prior piperacillin/tazobactam exposure and time to event (SSI). Model fit was evaluated by ANOVA; effect sizes were expressed as f [2], with values ≥ 0.35 indicating a strong effect. A significance threshold of p ≤ 0.05 was applied. Analyses were conducted using SPSS v29.0 (IBM Corp.). Regarding Table 1 percentages for binary variables refer to the total study population (SSI). In cases of multiple categories, percentages are reported relative to the comparison group, as in a cross‐tabulation (chi‐square test).

TABLE 1.

Clinical characteristics.

Variable Total (N = 161) SSI yes (N = 58) p
Sex NS
Male 98 (60.9%) 36 (62.1%)
Female 63 (39.1%) 22 (37.9%)
Age Years 64.7 ± 10.4 64.3 ± 8.7 NS
Diagnosis 0.02
Tumor 101 (62.7%) 30 (51.7%)
ORN 60 (37.3%) 28 (48.3%)
Flap < 0.001
FIB 67 (41.6%) 37 (63.8%)
RFF 41 (25.5%) 8 (13.8%)
ALT 29 (18%) 7 (12%)
Double 4 (2.7%) 4 (6.9%)
Other 20 (12.4%) 2 (3.5%)
Reconstruction site < 0.001
Lower jaw 86 (53.4%) 43 (74.1%)
Tongue/floor of mouth 31 (19.3%) 7 (12%)
Upper jaw 21 (13%) 6 (10.3%)
e.o. 10 (6.2%) —
Intermax. 13 (8.1%) 2 (3.6%)
ND Yes 79 (49.1%) 27 (46.5%) NS
Bone resection Yes 106 (65.8%) 50 (86.2%) < 0.001
Flap success Yes 151 (93.8%) 50 (86.2%) NS
ASA > 3 124 (78.5%) 48 (84.2%) NS
HAP Yes 10 (6.2%) 6 (10.3%) NS
ICU Days 4.1 ± 4.9 5.6 ± 6.2 0.003
NW Days 14.1 ± 7.7 17.6 ± 9.1 < 0.001
AB Days 13.9 ± 6.5 17.9 ± 6.9 < 0.001
Piperacillin/tazobactam < 0.001
Yes 39 (24.2%) 5 (8.6%)
No 122 (75.8%) 53 (91.3%)
Variable Tumor (N = 101) ORN (N = 60) p
Age Years 66.6 ± 11.1 61.6 ± 8.5 0.04
Flap < 0.001
FIB 25 (24.8%) 42 (70%)
RFF 35 (34.7%) 6 (10%)
ALT 23 (22.8%) 6 (10%)
Double 3 (3%) 1 (1.7%)
Other 15 (14.7%) 5 (8.3%)
Reconstruction site < 0.001
Lower jaw 34 (33.7%) 53 (88.3%)
Tongue/floor of mouth 30 (29.7%) —
Upper jaw 17 (16.8%) 4 (6.7%)
e.o. 7 (6.9%) 3 (5%)
Intermax. 13 (12.9%) —
ASA > 3 84 (83.2%) 42 (70%) NS
ICU Days 4.3 ± 5.2 3.8 ± 4.5 NS
NW Days 14.7 ± 7.9 13.1 ± 7.1 NS
AB Days 13.2 ± 6.2 15.2 ± 68 NS
Piperacillin/tazobactam NS
Yes 23 (22.8%) 16 (26.7%)
No 78 (77.2%) 44 (73.3%)

Abbreviations: AB: antibiotics; ALT: anterior lateral thigh flap; ASA: Score American Society of Anesthesiologists; e.o.: extraoral; FIB: fibula free flap; intermix.: intermaxillary; ND: neck dissection; NS: not significant; NW: normal ward; RFF: radialis free flap; SSI: surgical site infection.

4. Results

4.1. Clinical Features

One hundred and sixty‐one patients who underwent microvascular free flap reconstruction after prior radiotherapy between 2016 and 2025 were retrospectively identified and included in the study. Detailed epidemiological and surgical parameters are presented in Table 1.

Among the pre‐irradiated cohort, 63% were tumor patients while 37% were treated for ORN. Overall, 33 patients (20.5%) represented tumor salvage cases (32.6% within tumor cases): 11 following primary radiochemotherapy and 22 with tumor recurrence after adjuvant radiotherapy requiring surgery.

The most frequently used microvascular flaps were the fibula flap (41.6%) and the radial forearm flap (25.5%) (Table 1). In addition, four double flaps were performed: two combinations of fibula + anterolateral thigh (ALT) and two of fibula + radial forearm flap. Under “other” 10 latissimus dorsi flaps, 1 upper arm flap and 9 osseous scapula flaps were subsumed (Table 1). A total of 10 patients (6.2%) developed nosocomial pneumonia (HAP). Descriptive clinical subgroup analysis was performed for tumor and ORN (Table 1). In univariate analysis ORN patients were significantly younger than tumor patients (61.6 ± 8.5 vs. 66.6 ± 11.1 years, p = 0.04) and showed different reconstructive patterns with fibula flaps being more common in ORN cases (70% vs. 24.8%) and lower‐jaw reconstructions predominating the ORN cohort (88.3% vs. 33.7%; both p < 0.001). In contrast, perioperative factors including ASA > 3 (70% vs. 83.2%), ICU stay (3.8 ± 4.5 vs. 4.3 ± 5.2 days), NW stay (13.1 ± 7.1 vs. 14.7 ± 7.9 days), duration of antibiotic therapy (15.2 ± 6.8 vs. 13.2 ± 6.2 days), and piperacillin/tazobactam allocation did not differ significantly between groups (Table 1).

4.2. Antibiosis and SSI

Initially, 39 patients (24.2%) received perioperative broad‐spectrum PAP with piperacillin/tazobactam, whereas the remaining patients were treated with standard prophylaxis: Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (69.6%), third‐generation cephalosporins (4.4%), and clindamycin (1.9%).

In 58 cases (36%) SSIs were documented. Of these, five cases occurred in patients initially treated with piperacillin/tazobactam (5/39; 12.8%), while 53 cases (53/122; 43.4%) occurred in those who had received standard empiric therapy (p < 0.001). Within the piperacillin/tazobactam group, five patients were switched to meropenem based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing and one patient received additional vancomycin. Within the other group, antibiotic prophylaxis maintained as preemptive therapy was escalated to piperacillin/tazobactam (37.7%), ciprofloxacin (24.5%), or both (3.8%). 17% were escalated to meropenem. In three cases, initially calculated therapy with clindamycin was changed to aminopenicillin, or aminopenicillin was augmented with metronidazole. In a total of six patients with SSI, antibiotic therapy was not modified.

In the univariate analysis SSI occurrence showed significant associations with several clinical factors (Table 1). SSI was more frequent in patients with ORN (46.7% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.02), in those undergoing fibula flap reconstruction (p < 0.001), and in cases involving bone resection (86.2%, p < 0.001). Moreover, patients who developed an SSI had a significantly prolonged length of stay both in the intensive care unit (5.6 vs. 4.1 days, p = 0.03) and normal ward (17.6 vs. 14.1 days, p < 0.001). Salvage surgery showed no significant association with SSI occurrence (30.3% vs. 37.5%; p = 0.54).

Among the 122 analyzed cases without initial piperacillin/tazobactam 78 patients (63.9%) were diagnosed with tumor and 44 with ORN (36.1%). In the tumor group, 35.9% developed an SSI requiring escalation, whereas 64.1% did not. Among ORN patients, 56.8% required escalation, while 43.2% did not. Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant association between diagnosis and the occurrence of SSI in this group (Pearson's χ 2 = 5.011, p = 0.025; Fisher's exact test, p = 0.036).

Patients who received initial piperacillin/tazobactam demonstrated a significantly lower rate of SSI compared with those treated with standard regimens (12.8% vs. 43.4%, p = < 0.001, Table 2). With respect to antibiotic treatment duration in the piperacillin/tazobactam group, no difference was observed compared to the remainder of the cohort (Table 2). Overall, 33% of patients received therapy for ≤ 10 days, while 50% were treated for 11–21 days, and 17% for > 22 days.

TABLE 2.

Antibiotic characteristics:

Independent variable SSI rate SSI rate p
Piperacillin/tazobactam (no vs. yes) 43.4% 12.8% < 0.001
Variable No SSI SSI p
Antibiotic duration (days) 11.53 ± 4.85 17.9 ± 6.97 < 0.001
Piperacillin/tazobactam yes 13.0 ± 5.9 23.0 ± 6.8 NS
Piperacillin/tazobactam no 11.0 ± 4.3 17.4 ± 6.8 NS

Abbreviation: NS: not significant.

Patients without SSI required a mean treatment duration of 11.4 ± 4.7 days, whereas patients with SSI received significantly longer courses of 17.9 ± 7.0 days (p < 0.001). A trend toward prolonged antibiotic therapy was observed in the ORN group compared with the tumor group (15.2 vs. 13.2 days), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). When stratified by SSI status, treatment duration did not differ significantly between ORN and tumor patients without SSI (11.7 vs. 11.5 days, p = 0.8).

Under multivariate consideration, bone resection emerged as a strong independent risk factor, being associated with a more than sixfold increased likelihood of SSI occurrence (OR 6.28, p < 0.001) with prior exposure to piperacillin/tazobactam showing a significant protective effect, reducing the odds of the event by approximately 87% (OR 0.13, p < 0.001).

When stratified by diagnosis, bone resection remained a strong independent risk factor for SSI in both groups, with OR 5.8 (p < 0.001) in tumor patients and OR 6.8 (p = 0.025) in ORN patients. Prior exposure to piperacillin/tazobactam was associated with a protective effect in both subgroups, reaching statistical significance in the ORN cohort (OR 0.12, p < 0.01) and in the tumor cohort (OR 0.13, p = 0.01).

4.3. Cox Regression Analysis

In the Cox regression analysis without further subgroup differentiation (Figure 1), calculated exposure to piperacillin/tazobactam was identified as a significant predictor of time to event (SSI). Patients with initial piperacillin/tazobactam treatment exhibited a markedly reduced hazard compared to those without exposure for SSI event (HR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.09–0.6, p = 0.002). This corresponds to an approximate 76% reduction in the risk of SSI, indicating a robust protective effect (Figure 1). Combined with bone resection the model showed an even higher protective effect in patients (HR 0.17; CI 0s.041–0.71; p = 0.01).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Cox regression analysis and hazard ratio (HR) on overall SSI event separated for piperacillin/tazobactam groups yes/no with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) over length of stay. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

In subgroup analysis, Cox regression, the performed model was statistically significant (p < 0.001), indicating that group membership significantly predicted SSI occurrence.

Using ORN and tumor patients without piperacillin tazobactam as the reference category, tumor patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam exhibited the strongest reduction in odds of infection (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.36–0.61, p = 0.008), corresponding to an approximate 86% decrease. Similarly, ORN patients with piperacillin/tazobactam had decreased odds compared with the reference group (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09–0.98, p = 0.04), representing a 71% reduction (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Cox regression analysis comparing hazard ratios (HRs) for subgroup SSI events in ORN and tumor patients with piperacillin/tazobactam to baseline including degrees of freedom and p‐values over length of stay. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Tumor patients without piperacillin/tazobactam exposure also demonstrated significantly lower odds than ORN without extended‐spectrum coverage (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28–0.86, p = 0.013).

In patients with SSI and without perioperative piperacillin/tazobactam therapy (n = 53) the most frequently isolated microorganism was Enterobacter cloacae (30.2%), followed by Escherichia coli (11.3%). Other relevant isolates included Streptococci (7.5%), Staphylococci (7.5%), Klebsiella spp. (7.5%), and Candida spp. (7.5%). Less frequently detected organisms were Enterococcus (1.9%), Pseudomonas (1.9%), Serratia (1.9%), and Citrobacter (1.9%). In 20.8% of cases no microbial growth was observed. No growth was observed in one case, while E. cloacae, Enterococci, Serratia, and Klebsiella spp. were each detected once (see Table 3 and Table 4).

TABLE 3.

SSI culture results in 58 patients for patients with and without calculated piperacillin/tazobactam.

Without extended spectrum PAP With extended spectrum PAP
Total N = 53 100.0% Total N = 5 100.0%
No pathogen 11 20.8% No growth 1 20.0%
Streptococcus spp. 4 7.5% Enterobacter spp. 1 20.0%
Staphylococcus spp. 4 7.5% Enterococcus spp. 1 20.0%
Enterobacter spp. 16 30.2% Serratia 1 20.0%
Enterococcus spp. 1 1.9% Klebsiella spp. 1 20.0%
Pseudomonas 1 1.9%
Serratia 1 1.9%
Citrobacter spp. 1 1.9%
Escherichia coli 6 11.3%
Klebsiella spp. 4 7.5%
Candida spp. 4 7.5%

TABLE 4.

SSI culture results in 58 patients separated for tumor and ORN.

Tumor patients ORN patients
Total N = 30 100% Total N = 28 100%
No growth 9 30.0% No growth 3 10.7%
Streptococcus spp. 2 6.7% Streptococcus spp. 2 7.1%
Staphylococcus spp. 2 6.7% Staphylococcus spp. 2 7.1%
Enterobacter spp. 6 20% Enterobacter spp. 11 39.3%
Pseudomonas 1 3.3% Enterococcus spp. 2 7.1%
Serratia 1 3.3% Serratia 1 3.6%
Citrobacter spp. 1 3.3% Escherichia coli 3 10.7%
E. coli 3 10% Klebsiella spp. 1 3.6%
Klebsiella spp. 4 13.3% Candida spp. 3 10.7%
Candida spp. 1 3.3%

5. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first original study to report on the calculated use of perioperative extended‐spectrum coverage in preirradiated tumor patients and ORN patients undergoing microvascular head–neck reconstruction.

SSI have become the most relevant nosocomial complication after microvascular reconstruction in the head and neck region and pose a substantial challenge to the surgical team, particularly in oncological pretreated patients [24, 25]. Escalation of antibiotic therapy with prolonged treatment courses is frequently necessary, resulting in extended inward occupancy and patients presenting with tumor recurrence, after salvage surgery or reconstruction due to advanced ORN experience a further decline in quality of life [19, 24, 26]. Moreover, prolonged antibiotic exposure disrupts the human microbiome, which is particularly detrimental in the oncological setting where it has been linked to adverse survival outcomes [27, 28]. Therefore, careful selection and standardized implementation of an appropriate perioperative antibiotic regimen to prevent SSI is of utmost importance. It should be emphasized that narrow‐spectrum agents such as penicillin or clindamycin provide insufficient coverage of the mixed gram‐positive and gram‐negative microbiome characteristics of clean‐contaminated head and neck surgery. In this setting, broader‐spectrum agents such as amoxicillin–clavulanic acid or third‐generation cephalosporins are traditionally recommended for perioperative coverage [3, 29].

However, particularly in irradiated patients, the oral microbiome shifts and is frequently colonized by gram‐negative pathogens [14]. In addition, these patients often have a history of repetitive hospitalizations resulting in colonization with multidrug‐resistant organisms [30]. Perioperative suppression of commensal flora combined with radiation‐induced impaired healing and surgical disruption of tissue barriers creates a high‐risk environment for early onset SSI, particularly within the first postoperative week [31, 32, 33]. Most studies advocating shortened perioperative antibiotic coverage are retrospective and limited by preselected cohorts excluding microvascular reconstruction or irradiation [3, 34].

With a ratio of 1:1.7 between ORN and tumor cases in our cohort, ORN patients showed a significantly higher incidence of postoperative SSI than the tumor group (47% vs. 30%, p = 0.02) predicting significant prolonged antibiotic treatment times (see Table 1). Bone resection, particularly of the mandible, emerged as a crucial risk factor for infection reaching multivariate significance not only in the ORN but also in the tumor cohort (p < 0.001). With an overall SSI incidence of 36% in the study cohort, our findings fall within the findings of Cannon et al. suggesting a “high‐risk” SSI profile for irradiated patients [1]. Although salvage tumor procedures with rescue flaps after failed microvascular reconstruction have been associated with particularly high SSI rates, this was not observed in our cohort, where salvage surgery showed no increased risk for SSI occurrence (p = 0.5) [35].

Calculated initial perioperative coverage with an extended‐spectrum antibiosis demonstrated a statistically significant benefit with a marked four‐fold risk reduction in SSI risk across the entire cohort. This effect remained robust in both diagnostic subgroups and for patients with intraoperative bone resection after multivariate stratification. To date, this has not been reported or suggested in the literature as no study design has systematically applied extended‐spectrum perioperative antibiotic coverage in microvascular head–neck reconstruction.

In abdominal surgery D' Angelica et al. showed in a multicenter randomized clinical trial that patients undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy had significantly reduced 30‐day SSI rates if initially covered with piperacillin/tazobactam [36]. Given comparably high baseline SSI rates (≥ 30%), the anatomical complexity of the surgery and the lack of quality‐of‐life–preserving alternatives, this clinical approach can be reasonably extrapolated to patients with microvascular head–neck reconstructions after radiotherapy. As an empiric option, piperacillin/tazobactam covers Pseudomonas aeruginosa , many Enterobacterales, anaerobes, and Enterococcus faecalis , and pharmacokinetic data show therapeutically relevant jaw‐bone concentrations in in vivo studies [37, 38].

In ORN surgery intraoperative cultures frequently yield gram‐negative bacilli with notable multidrug resistance, whereas gram‐positive cocci are often broadly susceptible to standard penicillin regimen [30, 39]. Regarding cultivated pathogens in this study, we observed in the SSI group a trend toward gram‐negative bacteria with intrinsic resistance to narrow‐spectrum beta‐lactam antibiotics. Most notably, the Enterobacter spp. frequently producing extended‐spectrum β‐lactamases was more prevalent in the ORN cohort leading to antibiotic escalation (20% vs. 39%). As Arianpour et al. stated, besides changes in the oral microbiome through structural changes, this finding is likely attributable to the extensive prior oral antibiotic exposure in this patient population, which confers a selective advantage to resistant strains [39].

With 57% in subgroup analysis ORN without initial extended spectrum coverage showed the highest incidence and HR for SSI event. Cox regression model showed a significant sevenfold reduction in tumor and a threefold reduction ORN with extended‐spectrum antibiotic coverage. In our analysis, irradiated tumor patients receiving broad‐spectrum coverage showed a sevenfold reduction in SSI risk without prolonging baseline antibiotic administration times while ORN patients showed a threefold risk reduction. This difference may be explained by the underlying microbiological features. While classical studies on microbiological profiles of SSI in tumor patients typically describe polymicrobial infections with a predominance of gram‐negative species, these pathogens are often susceptible to standard antibiotic regimens [40]. In contrast, ORN is characterized by a higher incidence of multidrug‐resistant gram negative and positive strains, with beta lactam resistance rates exceeding 50% [39]. As already mentioned, patients with ORN often present with bone to skin fistula as first clinical manifestation which frequently results in prolonged administration of oral antibiotics, further complicating management and potentially contributing to the selection of resistant pathogens [41]. Notably, Arianpour et al. have suggested that adapted to Staphylococcus aureus isolates the microbial milieu in ORN may even warrant an initial regimen combining vancomycin plus piperacillin/tazobactam to achieve adequate broad‐spectrum coverage [39].

Williams et al. recently described a significant reduction in SSI prevalence in an ORN cohort reconstructed with both microvascular and pedicled flaps, achieved through intraoperative sampling and adapted postoperative culture‐directed therapy [13]. Notably, this study does neither provide detail to determine the frequency and quality of antibiotic escalation nor the proportion of cases in which calculated broad‐spectrum therapy was maintained. Several studies, employing both culture‐based and metagenomic approaches, have demonstrated that predictive perioperative cultures are not reliable for anticipating SSI in tumor patients [42]. Prior irradiation leads to fibrosis and capillary damage, resulting in markedly delayed wound healing, which secondarily predisposes to infections frequently caused by gram‐negative pathogens [30, 43, 44].

Argawal et al. constitutes that in the context of ORN—where management is typically initiated with antibiotic therapy—intraoperative biopsies from necrotic bone may fail predicting SSI [18]. Nevertheless, intraoperative cultures should be seen as the gold standard for guiding empirical postoperative antibiotic therapy and should be incorporated into an ABS algorithm.

Our data suggests that in both irradiated tumor and ORN patients calculated piperacillin/tazobactam coverage is a pragmatic strategy to prevent early‐onset SSI. It is important to emphasize the impact of this calculated intervention in previously irradiated tumor patients. In this context, a postoperative compromise of microvascular reconstruction may not only impair quality of life in a salvage setting but also decisively affect the patient's overall survival. Early‐onset SSIs, fistula formation, and partial necrosis prolong hospitalization and increase the incidence of reintubation and hospital‐acquired pneumonia [45, 46, 47]. Persistent inflammatory states further promote tumor recurrence and prolonged antibiotic treatment may further disrupt bacterial eubiosis, impairing results of adjuvant immunotherapy [27, 48].

This study has several limitations to consider. The findings are restricted to microvascular reconstructions and are not directly comparable to smaller surgical procedures in irradiated patients. In addition, the retrospective design limits the strength of clinical recommendations regarding extended‐spectrum perioperative coverage in patients after radiotherapy. The microbiological cultures in this study were obtained postoperatively in cases of SSI, which may limit their diagnostic reliability. Future investigation should be conducted in a prospective controlled setting to confirm these results. Particular emphasis should be placed on the implementation of ABS principles. Intraoperative cultures, especially in patients with ORN, are the cornerstone for culture‐guided postoperative escalation or de‐escalation managing postoperative SSI.

6. Conclusion

Patients with a history of head and neck irradiation and bone resection represent a high‐risk cohort, with an incidence of early‐onset SSI exceeding 30% and significant prolonged courses of antibiotic therapy. Overall, this patient group benefits significantly from perioperative extended‐spectrum antibiotic coverage with piperacillin/tazobactam showing four to fivefold SSI risk reduction. Subgroup analyses confirmed a threefold protective effect in ORN and a sevenfold reduced risk in tumor patients. An initial calculated broad‐spectrum coverage in preirradiated patients undergoing microvascular reconstruction may substantially lower the risk of early‐onset SSI.

Funding

The authors have nothing to report.

Ethics Statement

Approved by the local Ethics Committee (Nr: 18‐1131‐104).

Consent

The authors have nothing to report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  • 1. Cannon R. B., Houlton J. J., Mendez E., and Futran N. D., “Methods to Reduce Postoperative Surgical Site Infections After Head and Neck Oncology Surgery,” Lancet Oncology 18 (2017): e405–e413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Veve M. P., Greene J. B., Williams A. M., et al., “Multicenter Assessment of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Spectrum on Surgical Infections in Head and Neck Cancer Microvascular Reconstruction,” Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 159 (2018): 59–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Iocca O., Copelli C., Ramieri G., Zocchi J., Savo M., and di Maio P., “Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta‐Analysis,” Head & Neck 44 (2022): 254–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chacko K., Galochkina Z., Lee J. H., Conrad D., Dirain C., and Dziegielewski P., “The Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Duration on Infection Rates and Outcomes After Head and Neck Reconstruction With Bony Free Flaps and Hardware,” American Journal of Otolaryngology 46 (2025): 104584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Abbo L. M., Grossi P. A., and AST ID Community of Practice , “Surgical Site Infections: Guidelines From the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice,” Clinical Transplantation 33 (2019): e13589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Schuderer J. G., Spörl S., Spanier G., et al., “Surgical and Remote Site Infections After Reconstructive Surgery of the Head and Neck: A Risk Factor Analysis,” Journal of Cranio‐Maxillofacial Surgery 50, no. 2 (2021): 178–187, 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Vila P. M., Zenga J., and Jackson R. S., “Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Clean‐Contaminated Head and Neck Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 157 (2017): 580–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Batlle M., Badia J. M., Hernández S., et al., “Reducing the Duration of Antibiotic Therapy in Surgical Patients Through a Specific Nationwide Antimicrobial Stewardship Program. A Prospective, Interventional Cohort Study,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 62 (2023): 106943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Langerman A., Thisted R., Hohmann S., and Howell M., “Antibiotic and Duration of Perioperative Prophylaxis Predicts Surgical Site Infection in Head and Neck Surgery,” Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 154 (2016): 1054–1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Nandy K., Rai S., Bhatt S., Puj K., Rathod P., and Gangopadhyay A., “Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity: Assessment of Prognostic Factors,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 51 (2022): 602–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lee M., Chin R. Y., Eslick G. D., Sritharan N., and Paramaesvaran S., “Outcomes of Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction for Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Cranio‐Maxillofacial Surgery 43 (2015): 2026–2033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lee O.‐H., Bang J., Kim G.‐J., Sun D., and Kim S.‐Y., “Clinical Outcome of Salvage Surgery in Patients With Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Head & Neck 46 (2024): 2901–2909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Williams M. M., F. X. Creighton, Jr. , Barshak M. B., et al., “The Impact of Postoperative Antibiotics on Outcomes Following Segmental Resection and Microvascular Reconstruction for Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis,” Head & Neck 47, no. 12 (2025): 3237–3244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Huang T., Debelius J. W., Ploner A., et al., “Radiation Therapy–Induced Changes of the Nasopharyngeal Commensal Microbiome in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 109 (2021): 145–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ramsay S., Hyvärinen E., González‐Arriagada W., et al., “Radiation‐Induced Changes in Salivary Metabolite Profile and Pathways in Head and Neck Cancer Patients,” Clinical Oral Investigations 29 (2025): 145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Gentry L. O., “Osteomyelitis: Options for Diagnosis and Management,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 21 (1988): 115–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Johnston D. T., Phero J. A., and Hechler B. L., “Necessity of Antibiotics in the Management of Surgically Treated Mandibular Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology 135 (2023): 11–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Agarwal R., Freeman T. E., Li M. M., et al., “Outcomes With Culture‐Directed Antibiotics Following Microvascular Free Tissue Reconstruction for Osteonecrosis of the Jaw,” Oral Oncology 130 (2022): 105878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Schuderer J. G., Hoferer F., Eichberger J., et al., “Predictors for Prolonged and Escalated Perioperative Antibiotic Therapy After Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Analysis of 446 Cases,” Head & Face Medicine 20 (2024): 58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mitchell R. M., Mendez E., Schmitt N. C., Bhrany A. D., and Futran N. D., “Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction,” JAMA Otolaryngology. Head & Neck Surgery 141 (2015): 1096–1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) , Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), 2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 22. EUCAST , “EUCAST,” accessed 10 September, 2025, https://eucast.org/.
  • 23. Garner J. S., Jarvis W. R., Emori T. G., Horan T. C., and Hughes J. M., “CDC Definitions for Nosocomial Infections, 1988,” American Journal of Infection Control 16 (1988): 128–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lebo N. L., Quimby A. E., Caulley L., et al., “Surgical Site Infection Affects Length of Stay After Complex Head and Neck Procedures,” Laryngoscope 130 (2020): E837–E842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Akashi M., Kusumoto J., Sakakibara A., Hashikawa K., Furudoi S., and Komori T., “Literature Review of Criteria for Defining Recipient‐Site Infection After Oral Oncologic Surgery With Simultaneous Reconstruction,” Surgical Infections 18 (2017): 755–764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Borggreven P. A., Aaronson N. K., and IMV‐D, L , “Quality of Life After Surgical Treatment for Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Prospective Longitudinal Assessment of Patients Reconstructed by a Microvascular Flap,” Oral Oncology 43, no. 10 (2007): 1034–1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Preissner S., Heiland M., Preissner R., Wirth M., and Wollenberg B., “Antibiotics Significantly Decrease the Survival of Head and Neck Carcinoma Patients With Immunotherapy: A Real‐World Analysis of More Than 3000 Cases,” Cancers 15 (2023): 2342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Rühle A., Zou J., Glaser M., et al., “The Influence of Antibiotic Administration on the Outcomes of Head‐And‐Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Definitive (Chemo)radiation,” European Archives of Oto‐Rhino‐Laryngology 280 (2023): 2605–2616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Veve M. P., Davis S. L., Williams A. M., McKinnon J. E., and Ghanem T. A., “Considerations for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery,” Oral Oncology 74 (2017): 181–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zhu Y., Liang J., Wang F., Li J., Wang C., and Hou J., “Bacterial Spectrum Analysis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Study of Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw in Southern China,” Oral Diseases 28 (2022): 2015–2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sandegren L., “Selection of Antibiotic Resistance at Very Low Antibiotic Concentrations,” Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 119 (2014): 103–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Perez F., Adachi J., and Bonomo R. A., “Antibiotic‐Resistant Gram‐Negative Bacterial Infections in Patients With Cancer,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 59 (2014): S335–S339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zenga J., Atkinson S., Yen T., et al., “A Phase 2 Trial of a Topical Antiseptic Bundle in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: Effects on Surgical Site Infection and the Oral Microbiome,” eBioMedicine 81 (2022): 104099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Skitarelić N., Morović M., and Manestar D., “Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Clean‐Contaminated Head and Neck Oncological Surgery,” Journal of Cranio‐Maxillofacial Surgery 35 (2007): 15–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Ramos‐Zayas A., López‐Medrano F., Urquiza‐Fornovi I., et al., “The Impact of Healthcare‐Associated Infections in Patients Undergoing Oncological Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Prospective Multicentre Study,” Cancers 13 (2021): 2109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. D'Angelica M. I., Ellis R. J., Liu J. B., et al., “Piperacillin‐Tazobactam Compared With Cefoxitin as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA 329 (2023): 1579–1588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Thabit A. K., Fatani D. F., Bamakhrama M. S., Barnawi O. A., Basudan L. O., and Alhejaili S. F., “Antibiotic Penetration Into Bone and Joints: An Updated Review,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases 81 (2019): 128–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Al‐Nawas B., Kinzig‐Schippers M., Soergel F., and Shah P. M., “Concentrations of Piperacillin–Tazobactam in Human Jaw and Hip Bone,” Journal of Cranio‐Maxillofacial Surgery 36 (2008): 468–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Arianpour K., Liu S. W., Ciolek P. J., Prendes B. L., and Fritz M. A., “Mandibular Osteoradionecrosis: Defining the Microbial Milieu and Antimicrobial Resistance at the Time of Rescue Flap Surgery,” Laryngoscope 134 (2024): 166–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Durand M. L., Yarlagadda B. B., Rich D. L., et al., “The Time Course and Microbiology of Surgical Site Infections After Head and Neck Free Flap Surgery,” Laryngoscope 125 (2015): 1084–1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Md J. B. M., Md E. Z., Md M. A. F., and Md P. J. C., “Overview and Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Osteoradionecrosis,” Current Treatment Options in Oncology 22 (2021): 115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Vishnoi V., Morey T., Hoedt E. C., Keely S., Pockney P., and Smith S. R., “A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Intra‐Operative Surgical Site Sampling: Culture Versus Culture‐Independent Techniques in Predicting Downstream Surgical Site Infection,” Surgical Infections 24 (2023): 293–302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Lee D. H., Kim S. Y., Nam S. Y., Choi S. H., Choi J. W., and Roh J. L., “Risk Factors of Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Major Oncological Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer,” Oral Oncology 47 (2011): 528–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Dormand E.‐L., Banwell P. E., and Goodacre T. E. E., “Radiotherapy and Wound Healing,” International Wound Journal 2 (2005): 112–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Loeffelbein D. J., Julinek A., Wolff K. D., Kochs E., Haller B., and Haseneder R., “Perioperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Major Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery With Microvascular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Analysis of 648 Cases,” Journal of Cranio‐Maxillofacial Surgery 44 (2016): 952–957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Xu J., Hu J., Yu P., et al., “Perioperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Pneumonia After Major Oral Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 331 Cases,” PLoS One 12 (2017): e0188167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Schuderer J. G., Reider L., Wunschel M., et al., “Elective Tracheotomy in Patients Receiving Mandibular Reconstructions: Reduced Postoperative Ventilation Time and Lower Incidence of Hospital‐Acquired Pneumonia,” Journal of Clinical Medicine 12 (2023): 883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Goertzen C., Mahdi H., Laliberte C., et al., “Oral Inflammation Promotes Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invasion,” Oncotarget 9 (2018): 29047–29063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.


Articles from Head & Neck are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES