Skip to main content
Human Molecular Genetics logoLink to Human Molecular Genetics
. 2025 Dec 1;35(2):ddaf176. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddaf176

Widespread intron retention and exon skipping characterise alternative splicing changes in a C. elegans model of spinal muscular atrophy

Saman Rashid 1,#, Aykut Shen 2,#, Amy Yong 3, Alper Akay 4,#, Maria Dimitriadi 5,#,
PMCID: PMC13158239  PMID: 41324485

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurodegenerative disease caused by reduced levels of the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein, an essential component of the RNA splicing machinery. Although disruption of alternative splicing is a well-established hallmark of SMA, the specific splicing events that contribute to disease pathogenesis remain poorly understood. We utilised an established Caenorhabditis elegans SMA model to investigate global splicing changes using poly(A)+ RNA-seq and custom transcriptome assembly. Zygotic loss of smn-1 led to extensive transcriptomic changes, including over 1000 alternative splicing events, many of which were functionally tied to larval development. Exon skipping and intron retention were the most prevalent splicing alterations, and sequence motif analysis indicated a general shift from strong to weak splice site usage; however, no single motif accounted for the majority of observed splicing changes. Notably, we identified an overlap between smn-1 dependent splicing and those regulated by U6 snRNA m6A methylation. Our findings reinforce the conserved, broad role of SMN in maintaining splicing fidelity and reveal specific sequence biases associated with splicing errors in SMA.

Keywords: SMA, alternative splicing, intron retention, exon skipping, C. elegans

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive motor neuron disorder characterised by the progressive degeneration of spinal α-motor neurons, leading to muscle dysfunction and atrophy [1]. In milder forms, the disease manifests as gradually worsening muscular weakness, whereas severe cases cause profound impairment of proximal neuromuscular function and are often fatal in early childhood [2]. SMA is characterised by a deficiency of the ubiquitously expressed survival motor neuron (SMN) protein, primarily due to mutation(s) or deletions in the SMN1 gene [3, 4]. Although the closely related SMN2 gene is present and capable of producing SMN protein, a single nucleotide polymorphism (C-to-T transition in exon 7) disrupts an exonic splicing enhancer, leading to exon 7 skipping and the production of a functionally impaired protein known as SMNΔ7 [3]. Due to a gene duplication event, patients may harbour multiple copies of SMN2, which contributes to the phenotypic variability observed in SMA. However, approximately 85–90% of SMN2-derived transcripts result in SMNΔ7, while only 10–15% produce full-length, functional SMN protein, which is insufficient to prevent the development of SMA [5].

The SMN protein is expressed in both the nucleus and cytoplasm, where its canonical function involves the assembly of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs), essential components of the pre-mRNA splicing machinery, through interactions with the Gemin complex [6–9]. Consequently, splicing defects represent a prominent feature of SMA pathology, with aberrant pre-mRNA splicing observed in various in vitro and vivo models [10–16]. Notably, in SMN-depleted NSC-34 cells, U snRNP biogenesis was significantly reduced, with exon skipping identified as the predominant splicing event following SMN depletion [17]. Interestingly, although U12-type introns have been proposed to be particularly sensitive to reduced SMN levels, Custer and colleagues [17] reported few instances of U12 intron retention in SMN-depleted cells; however, widespread U12 intron retention was observed across multiple tissues in SMA mouse models and patient fibroblasts [13, 14]. Similar findings were observed following transcriptomic analysis of SMA patient fibroblasts, in which a notable increase of U12-type intron retention was also observed [14]. Moreover, reductions in minor-class small nuclear RNAs (U12 snRNAs), accompanied by aberrant splicing of U12-type intron-containing transcripts, have been observed in both SMA patient-derived fibroblasts and SMA animal models. These findings further support a link between minor intron mis-splicing and SMA pathology [12, 18, 19]. Collectively, evidence from patient-derived cells and SMA vertebrate models demonstrates that SMN deficiency broadly impairs snRNP assembly, resulting in widespread splicing abnormalities—including exon skipping, intron retention, and altered splice site selection—in transcripts essential for neuronal function and survival [20, 21].

In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), smn-1 is essential for viability, with complete loss of function resulting in severe developmental arrest, larval lethality, impaired neuromuscular activity and a dramatically shortened lifespan [22–24]. To maintain smn-1(ok355) null mutants, heterozygous parental strains are generated using the hT2 balancer chromosome, which suppresses recombination and preserves the mutant allele in the population. Therefore, viable smn-1 mutant progeny relies on maternally deposited SMN-1 protein from smn-1(ok355)/hT2 heterozygous mothers, enabling embryonic development despite the absence of zygotic smn-1 expression [22].

In C. elegans, depletion of smn-1—the ortholog of human SMN1—was noted to result in widespread changes in expression of mitochondrial, vacuolar H+-ATPase and histone genes [25]. Moreover, diminished smn-1 levels caused reduced recognition of weak 3′ splice sites (SS), which was attributed to its interaction with the U2AF large subunit uaf-1 [25, 26]. These observations were derived from comparison with wildtype animals at the early symptomatic stage. It is worth noting that unpaired DNA, such as that present in the hT2 balancer chromosome, can influence histone methylation and gene expression [23, 27]. Therefore, utilising wildtype controls from a common hT2 genetic background and analysing smn-1(ok355) nematodes at the symptomatic stage are essential to accurately assess the effects of smn-1 depletion in C. elegans.

Despite significant advances in the field, the specific alternative splicing events or downstream gene targets that are most critical for disease progression following SMN depletion remain unresolved. This challenge is further compounded by the ubiquitous expression of SMN, which performs splicing-related functions across a diverse range of tissues beyond motor neurons, leading to widespread molecular perturbations. Whole-animal transcriptomic analyses provide an unbiased and comprehensive approach to delineate the global landscape of alternative splicing changes in response to SMN deficiency. Importantly, such studies have the potential to uncover novel splicing events and identify conserved molecular pathways disrupted in SMA, thereby offering new insights into disease mechanism(s) and potential therapeutic targets. In this study, we investigate the effects of zygotic smn-1 loss in the presence of residual maternal SMN-1 protein on gene expression and splicing by profiling smn-1(ok355) mutants during the symptomatic phase, using wildtype controls derived from a shared hT2 genetic background.

Results

Zygotic loss of smn-1 leads to large-scale gene expression and splicing changes

The smn-1(ok355) null allele contains a large 975 bp deletion that leads to L4 larval stage arrest with defects in gonad development [22]. Therefore, the smn-1(ok355) strain is maintained in a heterozygous state using the hT2 balancer chromosome (smn-1(ok355)/hT2). Although complete loss of SMN-1 is lethal, C. elegans homozygous for smn-1 can survive for several days due to partial maternal rescue [22]. To investigate gene expression and splicing alterations resulting from smn-1, we performed paired-end Illumina sequencing of poly(A)+ RNA isolated from smn-1(ok355) progeny derived from heterozygous parents, alongside wildtype controls from mothers carrying the hT2 balancer to maintain a consistent genetic background. Using three biological replicates, we obtained, on average, 24 million read pairs with a minimum of 98.2% mapped reads. To capture novel transcriptome isoforms and splicing events, we built a custom C. elegans reference transcriptome using the reads from smn-1(ok355) and wildtype animals and mapped reads to the custom transcriptome. Overall, the PCA analysis distinguished between the smn-1(ok355) and wildtype genotypes (Fig. S1A).

Our differential gene expression analysis revealed large-scale gene expression changes with 4579 upregulated and 3059 downregulated genes in smn-1(ok355) animals compared to wildtype (Fig. 1A and Fig. S1B). We verified that the smn-1 RNA levels are significantly reduced in smn-1(ok355) animals, showing only minimal smn-1 reads likely arising from maternal contribution (Fig. S1C). Next, we compared the splicing differences using ΔPSI (per cent spliced in) analysis and identified 1023 differentially spliced genes across seven categories of splicing changes between smn-1(ok355) and wildtypes (Fig. 1B). Overall, 197 genes had significant changes in both their expression and splicing (Fig. 1A and Fig. S1D). The mean ΔPSI in each category of splicing defect indicated that exon skipping and alternative first and last exon usage events had the highest ΔPSI values (Fig. 1B). We did not observe any correlation between different splicing events and their expression (Fig. S1E and F).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Zygotic loss of SMN-1 causes large-scale gene expression and splicing changes. (A) Volcano plot showing the log2 fold change of gene expression in smn-1(ok355) animals compared to wildtype animals. Genes that also show significant splicing changes are coloured in blue. (B) Number and percentage of significantly altered splicing event types (blue bars) and their average ΔPSI values in smn-1(ok355) animals compared to wildtype animals. (C) Number and percentage of in-frame and out-of-frame changes for alternative splicing classes, alternative 5′ (A5), 3′ (A3), retained intron (RI) and skipped exon (SE) in smn-1(ok355) animals compared to wildtype animals. (D) Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions were significantly enriched among the differentially spliced genes. (E) Phenotype enrichment analysis for the gene set, illustrating overrepresented phenotypic variants with enrichment fold changes. (F) Tissue-specific enrichment of genes impacted across various tissues, including neurons, muscles and reproductive system components.

To understand the impact of alternative splicing events on protein translation, we analysed whether the splicing changes affect the open reading frame of the transcripts (Fig. 1C). As expected, the majority of intron retention events led to out-of-frame changes, and most exon skipping events led to in-frame changes. The majority of 3′ splice site changes were in-frame, and alternative 5′ splice site events equally led to in and out-of-frame changes (Fig. 1C).

We conclude that the smn-1 function is required for accurate splicing and expression of thousands of genes during the larval development of C. elegans, particularly impacting intron retention and exon skipping events.

Functional and tissue enrichment analyses of smn-1 targets

To further explore the biological relevance of smn-1 affected genes, we performed comprehensive Gene Ontology (GO), phenotype and tissue enrichment analyses of differentially spliced genes. The GO analysis revealed significant enrichment in biological processes closely associated with larval development, including adherens junction organisation, actin filament-based processes, regulation of adult lifespan and muscle system morphology (Fig. 1D). Phenotype enrichment analysis highlighted key developmental and physiological traits such as somatic transgene silencing, RNAi resistance, muscle system morphology defects, P granule abnormalities, sterility and molting variants (Fig. 1E). These phenotypes highlight the involvement of smn-1 affected genes in essential developmental, germline and early embryogenic functions. Tissue-specific enrichment pointed to a pronounced role for these targets in PVD neurons, the spermatheca, reproductive musculature and epidermal cells, all critical for proper growth and function during both larval and adult stages (Fig. 1F).

Collectively our data supports the hypothesis that a substantial subset of smn-1 affected genes are functionally tied to larval development, somatic and germline tissues and post-embryonic processes integral to organismal growth and fertility [22, 28].

Alternative 5′ splice site usage in smn-1(ok355) animals

C. elegans 5′ splice sites predominantly have the //GURAGU motif (R = A or G, Fig. S2A). Mutations in splicing factors such as snrp-27 and snu-66 or the absence of U6 snRNA m6A modification can reduce the usage of 5′ SSs with //GURAG motif and promote the usage of 5′ SSs with AG//GU motif [29–31]. In contrast, the sequence motifs of 5′ SSs sensitive to loss of smn-1 and 5′ SSs used more frequently in smn-1(ok355) are similar with only minor differences; smn-1(ok355) sensitive sites have more pronounced AG//GURAG motif and the alternative sites have less AG at the −3 and − 4 positions and less AG at the +4 and + 5 positions (Fig. 2A). The nature of the base at +3 or + 4 positions independently or together did not correlate with the ΔPSI changes in smn-1(ok355) animals (Fig. S2B-D). Together, these changes lead to a shift from stronger 5′ SSs used more frequently in wildtype animals to weaker 5′ SSs used less frequently in wildtype animals (Fig. 2B and E). Alternative 5′ SSs can be found upstream and downstream of the canonical splice site, most often within 20 nt (Fig. 2C). For example, nlp-16 encodes for a nematode neuropeptide protein. In wildtype animals, intron 3 of nlp-16 is equally spliced at two 5′ SSs (Fig. 2D). In smn-1(ok355) animals, the usage of alternative 5′ SS1 is reduced by approximately 15% (Fig. 2D).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Zygotic loss of SMN-1 leads to alternative 5′ SS usage. (A) Sequence motif analysis of 5′ SSs sensitive to SMN-1 loss (left panel) and 5′SSs used more frequently in smn-1(ok355) animals. Frequency of different sequences for U5 interacting (y-axis) sequences (−2, −1 positions) and U6 interacting sequences (x-axis, +3, +4, +5 positions) are shown in the heat-map. (B) Alternative 5′SSs shifting from canonical (strong) to non-canonical (weak) positions (grey), from weak to strong positions (green) and those that completely shift from strong to weak positions (black) are shown. (C) Frequency of alternative 5′SS events and their distance to the original splice site position. (D) nlp-16 intron 3 splice site coverage showing the wildtype (blue) and smn-1(ok355) (brown) splice site positions.

In conclusion, zygotic loss of smn-1 results in differential 5′ splice site usage; however, this altered splicing preference does not correspond to the +4A bias observed in other splicing pathway mutants affecting 5′ splice site recognition.

Alternative 3′ splice site usage in smn-1(ok355) animals

In smn-1(ok355) mutants, 19.1% of alternative splicing events are alternative 3′ SS usage (Fig. 1B). In order to understand if smn-1 is required for the splicing of specific 3′ SS sequences, we analysed the sequence motifs around 3′ SSs. The sequence motif of 5′ SSs of all alternatively spliced 3′ SS events is similar to the general 5′ SS sequences with the AG//GURAG motif (Fig. 3A). The sequence motif of smn-1 sensitive 3′ SSs and the 3′ SSs used more often in smn-1(ok355) mutants are highly similar and reminiscent to the canonical C. elegans 3′ SS motif of UUUCAG/R motif with minor differences; the smn-1 sensitive sites have less frequent -3C and both sensitive and alternative sites have a preference for +1A/U instead of +1A/G (Fig. 3A). In contrast, alternative 3′ SSs with increased upstream or downstream usage show differences in their sequence motifs; alternative 3′ SSs with increased upstream usage appear to shift from a stronger downstream position to a weaker upstream usage, and 3′ SSs with increased downstream position appear to shift from a weaker upstream position to a stronger downstream position (Fig. 3B) and there is no correlation with the 5′ SS +4A (Fig. S3A). Overall, most alternative 3′ SSs are downstream of the canonical 3′ SSs (Fig. 3C), but the shift from weak to strong or strong to weak is approximately equal (Fig. 3B and D). Similar to other splicing mutants in C. elegans, 3′ SSs shifts in smn-1(ok355) show 3 nt periodicity starting from −6 or + 6 positions. For example, clh-1 intron 11 has 2 alternative splicing positions, and the usage of the upstream alternative 3′ SS 1 position is reduced from approximately 40% in wildtype animals to 20% in smn-1(ok355) (Fig. 3E).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Zygotic loss of SMN-1 leads to alternative 3′ SS usage. (A) Sequence motifs of smn-1 sensitive 3′SSs and 3′SSs used more frequently in smn-1(ok355). (B) Sequence motifs of 3′SSs sensitive to loss of smn-1 and those used more frequently separated by direction of splice site change. (C) Frequency of alternative 3′SS events and their distance to the original splice site position. (D) Alternative 3′SSs shifting from canonical (strong) to non-canonical (weak) positions (grey), from weak to strong positions (green), and those that completely shift from strong to weak positions (black) are shown. (E) clh-1 intron 11 splice site coverage showing the wildtype (blue) and smn-1(ok355) (brown) splice site positions.

Overall, the 3′ SS changes in smn-1(ok355) animals do not correlate with the 3′ SS strength determined by the U2AF binding preferences.

Intron retention and exon-skipping in smn-1(ok355) animals

In smn-1(ok355) animals, intron retention and exon-skipping events have the highest ΔPSI values. Therefore, we analysed the sequence motifs of 5′ and 3′ SSs of the intron retention and exon-skipping events (Fig. 4 and 5). The 5′ SSs of introns with increased retention in smn-1(ok355) animals (n = 70) have predominantly an AG//GU motif and lack +4A required for U6 snRNA m6A base pairing (Fig. 4A). However, the 5′ SSs of introns with reduced retention in smn-1(ok355) animals (n = 99) have reduced AG motif at −1 and − 2 positions, and + 4A frequency is slightly higher (Fig. 4A). Similarly, the 3′ SS motifs of introns with increased or decreased retention are similar and consist mainly of UUUCAG/R sequence, with the introns showing increased retention having less frequent -4 U and -3C (Fig. 4B). For example, cyp-31A1 intron 5 has a 5′ SS of AG//GUAAC, and 3′ SS of CUACAG//G, which are different to the canonical 5′ and 3′ SS motifs. As a result, cyp-31A1 intron 5 shows significantly higher retention levels in smn-1(ok355) animals (Fig. 4C, additional examples Fig. S4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Zygotic loss of SMN-1 leads to changes in intron retention. (A) 5′ SS motifs of introns with increased retention (left panel) or reduced retention (right panel) and the frequency of bases that interact with U6 and U5 snRNAs (heatmap). (B) 3′ SS motifs of introns with increased retention (left panel) or reduced retention (right panel). (C) cyp-31A1 intron 5 coverage map showing increased retention in smn-1(ok355).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Zygotic loss of SMN-1 leads to exon-skipping and exon-inclusion. (A) 5′ and 3′ SS motifs of exons with increased skipping (upper panel) and increased inclusion (lower panel) together with the upstream 5′ SS and downstream 3′ SS sequence motifs. (B) aqp-2 intron 5 with increased inclusion in smn-1(ok355) animals compared to wildtype animals. W07E11.1 intron 10 shows increased skipping in smn-1(ok355) animals compared to wildtype animals.

In smn-1(ok355) animals, the highest number of splicing changes with the strongest ΔPSI values are the exon skipping events (Fig. 1B). The 5′ SSs of exons with increased skipping (Fig. 5A, top panels) or inclusion (Fig. 5A, bottom panels) have weaker splice site motifs compared to their corresponding upstream 5′ SSs, with less frequent AG at positions −2 and − 1 and less frequent AG at positions +4 and + 5. However, the 5′ SS motifs are similar between exons showing increased skipping or inclusion. The 3′ SSs of exons showing increased skipping or inclusion have similar motifs and are weaker than their downstream 3′ SSs with less frequent UC at positions −4 and − 3. Overall, although exon skipping or inclusion appears to associate with weaker 5′ and 3′ SS motifs, the sequence motifs alone cannot distinguish skipping events from inclusion events. For example, the C. elegans aquaporin gene aqp-2 intron 5 inclusion is significantly reduced, whereas the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase orthologue W07E11.1 intron 10 inclusion is significantly increased in smn-1(ok355) animals (Fig. 5B, additional examples Fig. S5A and B).

Overall, zygotic loss of smn-1 causes large-scale changes in intron retention and exon-skipping or inclusion.

Overlap of smn-1 dependent splicing changes with other splicing factors

Mutations in spliceosome components that are directly involved in splice site recognition lead to splicing defects in a sequence-dependent manner. For instance, the absence of U6 snRNA m6A modification in yeast, C. elegans, plants, and humans, along with the absence of the splicing factors likely involved in 5′ SS recognition, such as snrp-27 in C. elegans, predominantly affects 5′ SSs with +4A [29, 30, 32, 33]. The lack of a specific motif in splice sites affected by the zygotic loss of smn-1 suggests that SMN-1 is not directly involved in splice site recognition. To investigate whether SMN-1 regulates the same splice sites as U6 snRNA m6A modification or snrp-27, we compared splice site alterations resulting from smn-1 loss with those observed following the loss of the U6 snRNA m6A methyltransferase mett-10 [30] and the spliceosome component snrp-27 [29]. We identified significant overlap between smn-1 and mett-10 sensitive splice sites (Fig. 6A and C). Next, we compared whether the splicing changes were affected in the same direction between conditions (Fig. 6C). Approximately an equal number of splice sites were affected in the same direction as in the opposite direction, except for alternative 3′ SSs, where we observed that the majority of changes were affected in the same direction. In contrast, we did not see a significant overlap between smn-1 affected splice sites and those affected in snrp-27 (Fig. 6B). Our results suggest that smn-1 may modulate splice site selection together with U6 snRNA m6A modification, implicating a potential mechanistic link between SMN-1 function and RNA methylation-dependent splicing regulation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Overlap of SMN-1 sensitive splice sites with those affected from the loss of splicing factors. (A) Heatmap showing the overlap of splice sites sensitive to the loss of SMN-1 and splice sites sensitive to the loss of METT-10. (B) Heatmap showing the overlap of splice sites sensitive to the loss of SMN-1 and splice sites sensitive to the loss of SNRP-27. (C) Table summarising the splice site overlaps.

Discussion

To date, identifying a definitive pathological mechanism directly linking SMN deficiency to neurodegeneration has remained elusive. In SMA models, no single molecular pathway has been identified whose correction universally mitigates the effects of SMN deficiency across diverse genetic backgrounds. This is expected, as SMN is essential for spliceosome assembly and thus impacts numerous cellular processes. This absence of a unifying pathogenic mechanism has been highlighted in multiple studies, underscoring the multifactorial nature of SMA and the insufficiency of targeting a single pathway to fully rescue the phenotype [34, 35].

To assess the effect of zygotic SMN loss during the symptomatic stage, we performed whole-animal transcriptomic profiling in C. elegans. Our analysis revealed that smn-1(ok355) mutants, which lack zygotic SMN-1 protein but retain maternally deposited SMN-1, exhibited widespread changes in gene expression and alternative splicing, underscoring the critical role of SMN-1 in transcriptome regulation during larval development (Figs 1A–C, S1A–F). These findings mirror prior observations from vertebrate SMA models, where SMN deficiency leads to defects in snRNP biogenesis and splicing regulation [14, 20]. Our findings that SMN depletion perturbs splicing and potentially other aspects of RNA processing are consistent with previous studies showing that SMN deficiency leads to widespread defects in RNA maturation [15, 17]. Notably, this includes impaired U7 snRNP-mediated histone RNA processing [36], highlighting the broader impact of SMN disruption on multiple RNA regulatory pathways.

Moreover, our observation that widespread alternative splicing alterations occur in C. elegans smn-1(ok355) mutants at the stage of developmental arrest is consistent with findings in vertebrate models, where extensive splicing disruptions coincide with symptom onset and precede overt neurodegeneration in SMA [12]. Our enrichment analyses provide key insights into the biological roles of smn-1 sensitive splicing targets, highlighting their importance not only in neuromuscular function but also in broader developmental and reproductive processes. The significant enrichment for processes such as adherens junction organisation, actin cytoskeleton dynamics and muscle morphology (Fig. 1D) aligns with the essential role of SMN-1 in maintaining neuromuscular integrity and organismal motility, as observed in both C. elegans and vertebrate SMA models [15, 20, 22]. Phenotype enrichment implicating RNAi resistance and somatic gene silencing (Fig. 1E) reflects the known interplay between RNA regulatory pathways and developmental gene expression programs, suggesting that disruption of epigenetic and post-transcriptional control may contribute to the pleiotropic effects of SMN deficiency [14, 23]. In addition, tissue-specific enrichment in PVD neurons, reproductive musculature and epidermal cells (Fig. 1F) corroborates previous findings illustrating the systemic consequences of smn-1 depletion across somatic and germline tissues during C. elegans larval development and adulthood [22, 25]. This emphasises that SMA pathology likely stems from complex, tissue-wide perturbations in splicing and gene expression rather than motor neuron dysfunction exclusively. Our data therefore extends our current understanding of SMN function, proposing that post-embryonic processes fundamental to growth and fertility are also vulnerable to splicing defects stemming from smn-1 depletion, potentially underlying the developmental arrest phenotypes observed in smn-1(ok355) mutants.

Among the splicing changes, exon skipping and alternative usage of first and last exons exhibited the largest ΔPSI values (Fig. 1B). Intron retention events were also prominent, often involving introns with weak or non-canonical splice sites, such as in cyp-31A1 (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that SMN-1 is particularly important for the accurate processing of transcripts with suboptimal splice signals. Interestingly, many retained introns and skipped exons lacked distinct sequence features that could reliably predict their mis-splicing, suggesting that SMN-1 influences splicing primarily by modulating overall spliceosomal efficiency rather than through recognition of specific sequence motifs. This agrees with studies in both vertebrate and invertebrate systems, which have established that SMN is indispensable for snRNP biogenesis and consequent pre-mRNA splicing [6, 8]. Widespread, tissue-specific reductions in snRNP abundance, along with disruption of both major and minor spliceosome components, have been reported in human SMA patient samples and animal models. These findings support a unifying model in which global splicing dysfunction represents a central pathogenic mechanism in SMA [18, 21].

Notably, our analysis of 5′ splice site usage revealed a bias toward weaker splice sites in smn-1(ok355) animals (Fig. 2B), while 3′ splice site usage revealed a shift from a weaker upstream position to a stronger downstream position, albeit with no particular favour in either direction (Fig. 3D). For 5′ SSs, we observed a shift from stronger canonical motifs to weaker, non-canonical sites, but this did not correspond to the +4A sequence preference seen in other splicing mutants such as snrp-27 or mett-10 (Fig. S2B–D). Similarly, 3′ SS usage often shifted downstream but without a clear pattern in splice site strength based on U2AF recognition motifs (Fig. 3A–D). This suggests that SMN-1 does not directly regulate splice site recognition specificity but may instead affect spliceosome assembly or fidelity more broadly. Indeed, it has been shown previously that the C. elegans uaf-1 gene, which encodes the U2AF large subunit, could affect the behaviour and lifespan of smn-1(ok355) animals [25]. The discrepancy observed between our findings and those of Gao et al. [25] regarding U2AF and smn-1 likely stems from differences in the developmental stage at which the animals were examined. While our analysis focused on symptomatic animals at the final larval stage, Gao and colleagues [25] assessed animals at an earlier symptomatic stage. Additionally, this comparison was made using wildtype animals that were not derived from the hT2 genetic background. Nevertheless, the preferential retention of introns with weak or non-canonical splice sites is consistent with observations in SMN-deficient mouse tissues and human patient lymphoblasts, suggesting conserved vulnerability of such transcripts across species [11, 14].

We also compared splicing events affected by smn-1 loss to those in mett-10 and snrp-27 mutants. A significant overlap was observed between smn-1 and mett-10, particularly for 3′ SS events, whereas no significant overlap was found with snrp-27 (Fig. 6A–C). This supports the model proposed by Lotti and coauthors [20], in which SMN deficiency leads to a general decrease in splicing efficiency rather than selective misrecognition of specific splice sites. Indeed, SNRP-27 promotes distal weak 3' SS usage, whereas U6 snRNA m6A modification promotes proximal weak 3' SS usage [30]. Importantly, although splicing changes in smn-1 mutants partially overlap with those observed upon U6 snRNA m6A methylation, we found that smn-1 sensitive 5′ splice sites do not exhibit the characteristic +4A to +4 U motif shift. This suggests that the impact of SMN-1 on alternative splicing is not simply mediated through U6 snRNA m6A-dependent 5’SS selection but may reflect a broader or position-dependent effect on spliceosome assembly or activity. Thus, while RNA methylation–dependent regulation of splice site choice is a general mechanism, its influence in the context of SMN deficiency appears to be more subtle and is unlikely to account for the majority of splicing alterations observed here. Therefore, the interaction between SMN-1 and U6 snRNA m6A modification could be splice site dependant and SMN-1 function in snRNP biogenesis could contribute to position dependent splicing changes. Consistent with this, experimental evidence from human, Drosophila and C. elegans suggests that SMN-1 is involved in the Sm class snRNAs U1, U2, U4 and U5 stability but not the Sm class U6, implying that the splicing changes and overlaps with U6 could be due to alterations in Sm class snRNAs [26, 37].

Altogether, our results demonstrate that the zygotic loss of SMN-1 in C. elegans causes widespread disruption of pre-mRNA splicing and gene expression. The patterns of intron retention and exon skipping, along with the shifts in splice site usage, point to a global reduction in splicing efficiency rather than misrecognition of specific splice site sequences. Moreover, our findings suggest that therapies aimed at broadly enhancing spliceosome function or stabilising weak splice sites may complement SMN-targeted approaches in SMA. These findings underscore the pivotal role of SMN in maintaining transcriptome integrity and establish a foundational dataset for future investigations aimed at delineating which splicing defects contribute most directly to SMA pathogenesis.

Materials and methods

C. Elegans strains and maintenance

LM99 [smn-1(ok355)/hT2(I;III)] and HA1981 [+/hT2(I;III)] were maintained at 20°C under standard conditions [38]. HA1981 was used as the wildtype control strain to maintain a common genetic background derived from mothers harbouring the hT2 balancer.

RNA extraction and sequencing

Total RNA was isolated from synchronised populations of C. elegans using TRIzol reagent, following standard protocols. Briefly, animals were washed and pelleted by centrifugation, then lysed in TRIzol (ThermoFisher). Samples were subjected to repeated freeze–thaw cycles in liquid nitrogen and a 37°C heating block to ensure complete lysis, followed by phase separation with chloroform (ThermoFisher). The aqueous phase was collected, and RNA was precipitated with isopropanol (ThermoFisher), washed with 75% ethanol, and air-dried before resuspension in nuclease-free water. RNA concentration and purity were determined spectrophotometrically. RNA integrity was assessed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose-TBE bleach gel, and samples displaying clear 28S, 18S, and 5S rRNA bands with a 28S:18S ratio of ~ 2:1 were considered high quality. RNA sequencing was performed by Novogene. Specifically, mRNA was purified using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads, fragmented, and used for first- and second-strand cDNA synthesis. After end repair, adaptor ligation, and size selection (150–200 bp), PCR amplification was performed and library quality was verified on the Agilent Bioanalyzer. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina platform to generate paired end reads. Raw reads in FASTQ format were filtered with fastp to remove reads containing adapters, poly-N sequences, or low-quality bases. Data quality metrics (Q20, Q30, GC content) were calculated for the clean reads, which were used for all downstream analyses.

RNA-seq read preprocessing and quality assessment

Standard adapter sequences and common contaminants were removed from the 150 bp non-stranded paired-end reads using BBduk from the BBtools package [39] (version 37.62). Bases with a Phred quality score below 15 were trimmed and only reads longer than 34 bases were retained. Read quality was assessed using FastQC (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) (version 0.12.1) and summarised with MultiQC [40] (version 1.13). Reads were aligned to the C. elegans WBcel235 reference genome using STAR [41] (version 2.7.8a) using the parameters described by Shen et al. [30]. A splice junction database was generated from the Ensembl release 95 reference annotation. Strand orientation of spliced reads was inferred from intron motifs.

Transcriptome assembly, quantification and alternative splicing

Transcriptome assembly and downstream analyses followed the approach described by Parker et al. [33] and Shen et al. [30], where applicable, using the parameter settings optimised for C. elegans as described in the latter. For full methodological details, refer to the cited studies. In brief, condition-specific transcriptomes were de novo assembled using StringTie [42] (version 2.1.7) from pooled Illumina RNA-seq alignments in non-stranded mode. A unified transcript set was constructed by cross-referencing these assemblies with the reference annotation. Transcripts were quantified using Salmon [43] (version 1.10.1), with the C. elegans reference genome employed as a decoy. Alternative splicing events were annotated, and event-level inclusion (PSI) values were estimated using SUPPA2 [44] (version 2.3) with a minimum total expression of 10 per event. To evaluate the association between genotype and PSI values, generalised linear models were fitted per splicing event using Python’s statsmodels library [45–47] (version 0.11). P-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) method. Splicing events with significant PSI changes between wildtype and the smn-1(ok355) strains were identified using an FDR threshold of 0.05. Sequence logos were generated using matplotlib_logo (https://github.com/ mparker2/matplotlib_logo) and significant motif differences were identified with a likelihood-ratio test (G-test). Contingency tables for splice site classes at U5 and U6 interacting positions were created based on sequence deviations at the −2 to −1 positions from the AG consensus and the +3 to +5 positions from the RAG motif at the 5′ splice site, respectively. Gene tracks were constructed and visualised using pyBigWig [48] (version 0.3.18), pysam [49–51] (version 0.21.0), and matplotlib [52] (version 3.7.1).

Differential expression analysis between wildtype and smn-1(ok355) strains

The abundance of transcripts was estimated using Salmon [43] version 0.11.2 in non-stranded mode. Transcript abundances were aggregated to the gene level using tximport [53]. Differential gene expression analysis, comparing smn-1(ok355) and wildtype strains, was performed in R [54] version 3.5, using edgeR [55] version 3.22.5. Genes showing differences in relative expression were identified using a false discovery rate (FDR) threshold of 0.05 and a log2 fold change of 1. The resulting gene set was used to explore the overlap between alternatively spliced and differentially expressed genes (see Fig. 1A). This overlap was also examined by cross-referencing the significantly alternatively spliced genes with those that were differentially expressed, regardless of the magnitude of the expression change. In that, a gene was considered differentially expressed if its expression-level FDR value met the 0.05 threshold (see Fig. S1D–E).

Enrichment analyses for alternatively spliced genes

Phenotype, tissue, and gene ontology enrichment analyses were conducted using the WormBase Enrichment Suite [56, 57] focusing on the genes exhibiting significant (p < 0.05) splicing differences between smn-1(ok355) and wildtype animals. All C. elegans genes with annotated terms were used as background. A q-value of 0.1 was set as the significance threshold for identifying enriched terms.

Comparative analysis of splicing changes across mett-10, snrp-27, and smn-1 mutants

Illumina RNA-seq datasets for the wildtype N2 Bristol and ALP010 mett-10(ok2204)III derived from backcrossing of VC1743 (referred to as mett-10−/−) strains, and the CB936 unc-73(e936)I and SZ118 unc-73(e936)I;snrp-27(az26) (referred to as SNRP27 [M141T]) strains, were obtained from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), under accession numbers PRJEB65287 [30] and GSE113275 [29], respectively. The mett-10−/− dataset was processed following the method described by Shen et al. [30] to create a de novo transcriptome that includes splicing changes specific to mett-10−/−. These transcripts were then quantified using Salmon for the CB936 unc-73(e936)I and SZ118 unc-73(e936)I;snrp-27(az26)I strains as described in the original study [30]. Transcript quantification was also carried out for wildtype and smn-1(ok355) strains using the same custom transcriptome and following the method described earlier in this study. Splicing differences relative to control datasets were identified in SZ118 unc-73(e936)I;snrp-27(az26)I as described by Shen et al. [30], and in smn-1(ok355) animals using the method described earlier. Events detected in smn-1(ok355) were then cross-referenced with those detected in SZ118 unc-73(e936)I;snrp-27(az26)I. C. elegans and those already reported for mett-10−/− in the same study. The likelihood of concurrent splice site usage across conditions was assessed using Pearson’s chi-square test of independence.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary_Figures_ddaf176

Contributor Information

Saman Rashid, School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, United Kingdom.

Aykut Shen, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.

Amy Yong, School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, United Kingdom.

Alper Akay, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.

Maria Dimitriadi, School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, United Kingdom.

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). This work was supported by a UK Research and Innovation Future Leaders Fellowship [MR/S033769/1 and MR/X024261/1 to A.A.]; UK Research and Innovation Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Norwich Research Park Biosciences Doctoral Training Partnership [BB/T008717/1 to A.S.].

Data availability

All raw and experimental data have been deposited in ArrayExpress (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/arrayexpress) under accession E-MTAB-16084.

References

  • 1. Monani  UR, De Vivo  DC. Neurodegeneration in spinal muscular atrophy: from disease phenotype and animal models to therapeutic strategies and beyond. Future Neurol  2014;9:49–65. 10.2217/fnl.13.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wirth  B. Spinal muscular atrophy: In the challenge lies a solution. Trends Neurosci  2021;44:306–322. 10.1016/j.tins.2020.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lorson  CL, Hahnen  E, Androphy  EJ. et al.  A single nucleotide in the SMN gene regulates splicing and is responsible for spinal muscular atrophy. Genetics  1999;96:6307–6311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Monani  UR, Lorson  CL, Parsons  DW. et al.  A single nucleotide difference that alters splicing patterns distinguishes the SMA gene SMN1 from the copy gene SMN2. Hum Mol Genet  1999;8:1177–1183. 10.1093/hmg/8.7.1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kolb  SJ, Kissel  JT. Spinal muscular atrophy. Neurol Clin  2015;33:831–846. 10.1016/j.ncl.2015.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Fischer  U, Liu  Q, Dreyfuss  G. The SMN-SIP1 complex has an essential role in Spliceosomal snRNP biogenesis. Cell  1997;90:1023–1029. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80368-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Feng  W, Gubitz  AK, Wan  L. et al.  Gemins modulate the expression and activity of the SMN complex. Hum Mol Genet  2005;14:1605–1611. 10.1093/hmg/ddi168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Pellizzoni  L, Baccon  J, Rappsilber  J. et al.  Purification of native survival of motor neurons complexes and identification of Gemin6 as a novel component. J Biol Chem  2002;277:7540–7545. 10.1074/jbc.M110141200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Meister  G, Bühler  D, Pillai  R. et al.  A multiprotein complex mediates the ATP-dependent assembly of spliceosomal U snRNPs. Nat Cell Biol  2001;3:945–949. 10.1038/ncb1101-945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Huo  Q, Kayikci  M, Odermatt  P. et al.  Splicing changes in SMA mouse motoneurons and SMN-depleted neuroblastoma cells: evidence for involvement of splicing regulatory proteins. RNA Biol  2014;11:1430–1446. 10.1080/15476286.2014.996494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Boulisfane  N, Choleza  M, Rage  F. et al.  Impaired minor tri-snRNP assembly generates differential splicing defects of U12-type introns in lymphoblasts derived from a type I SMA patient. Hum Mol Genet  2011;20:641–648. 10.1093/hmg/ddq508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bäumer  D, Lee  S, Nicholson  G. et al.  Alternative splicing events are a late feature of pathology in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy. PLoS Genet  2009;5:e1000773. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Doktor  TK, Hua  Y, Andersen  HS. et al.  RNA-sequencing of a mouse-model of spinal muscular atrophy reveals tissue-wide changes in splicing of U12-dependent introns. Nucleic Acids Res  2017;45:395–416. 10.1093/nar/gkw731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Jangi  M, Fleet  C, Cullen  P. et al.  SMN deficiency in severe models of spinal muscular atrophy causes widespread intron retention and DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2017;114:114. 10.1073/pnas.1613181114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zhang  Z, Lotti  F, Dittmar  K. et al.  SMN deficiency causes tissue-specific perturbations in the repertoire of snRNAs and widespread defects in splicing. Cell  2008;133:585–600. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zhang  Z, Pinto  AM, Wan  L. et al.  Dysregulation of synaptogenesis genes antecedes motor neuron pathology in spinal muscular atrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2013;110:19348–19353. 10.1073/pnas.1319280110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Custer  SK, Gilson  TD, Li  H. et al.  Altered mRNA splicing in SMN-depleted motor neuron-like cells. PLoS One  2016;11:e0163954. 10.1371/journal.pone.0163954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Gabanella  F, Butchbach  MER, Saieva  L. et al.  Ribonucleoprotein assembly defects correlate with spinal muscular atrophy severity and preferentially affect a subset of spliceosomal snRNPs. PLoS One  2007;2:e921. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Fox-Walsh  KL, Hertel  KJ. Splice-site pairing is an intrinsically high fidelity process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2009;106:1766–1771. 10.1073/pnas.0813128106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lotti  F, Imlach  WL, Saieva  L. et al.  An SMN-dependent U12 splicing event essential for motor circuit function. Cell  2012;151:440–454. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Singh  RN, Singh  NN. Mechanism of splicing regulation of spinal muscular atrophy genes. Adv Neurobiol  2018;20:31–61. 10.1007/978-3-319-89689-2_2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Briese  M, Esmaeili  B, Fraboulet  S. et al.  Deletion of smn-1, the Caenorhabditis elegans ortholog of the spinal muscular atrophy gene, results in locomotor dysfunction and reduced lifespan. Hum Mol Genet  2008;18:97–104. 10.1093/hmg/ddn320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Dimitriadi  M, Sleigh  JN, Walker  A. et al.  Conserved genes act as modifiers of invertebrate SMN loss of function defects. PLoS Genet  2010;6:e1001172. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Dimitriadi  M, Derdowski  A, Kalloo  G. et al.  Decreased function of survival motor neuron protein impairs endocytic pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  2016;113:E4377–E4386. 10.1073/pnas.1600015113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gao  X, Xu  J, Chen  H. et al.  Defective expression of mitochondrial, Vacuolar H+-ATPase and histone genes in a C. Elegans model of SMA. Front Genet  2019;10:410. 10.3389/fgene.2019.00410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Gao  X, Teng  Y, Luo  J. et al.  The survival motor neuron gene smn-1 interacts with the U2AF large subunit gene uaf-1 to regulate Caenorhabditis elegans lifespan and motor functions. RNA Biol  2014;11:1148–1160. 10.4161/rna.36100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bean  CJ, Schaner  CE, Kelly  WG. Meiotic pairing and imprinted X chromatin assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Genet  2004;36:100–105. 10.1038/ng1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Miguel-Aliaga  I, Culetto  E, Walker  DS. et al.  The Caenorhabditis Elegans orthologue of the human gene responsible for spinal muscular atrophy is a maternal product critical for germline maturation and embryonic viability. Hum Mol Genet  1999;8:2133–2143. 10.1093/hmg/8.12.2133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Zahler  AM, Rogel  LE, Glover  ML. et al.  SNRP-27, the C. Elegans homolog of the tri-snRNP 27K protein, has a role in 5′ splice site positioning in the spliceosome. RNA  2018;24:1314–1325. 10.1261/rna.066878.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Shen  A, Hencel  K, Parker  MT. et al.  U6 snRNA m6A modification is required for accurate and efficient splicing of C. Elegans and human pre-mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res  2024;52:9139–9160. 10.1093/nar/gkae447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Sarka  K, Katzman  S, Zahler  AM. A role for SNU66 in maintaining 5′ splice site identity during spliceosome assembly. RNA  2024;30:695–709. 10.1261/rna.079971.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ishigami  Y, Ohira  T, Isokawa  Y. et al.  A single m6A modification in U6 snRNA diversifies exon sequence at the 5′ splice site. Nat Commun  2021;12:3244. 10.1038/s41467-021-23457-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Parker  MT, Soanes  BK, Kusakina  J. et al.  m6A modification of U6 snRNA modulates usage of two major classes of pre-mRNA 5′ splice site. Elife  2022;11:e78808. 10.7554/eLife.78808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lunn  MR, Wang  CH. Spinal muscular atrophy. Lancet  2008;371:2120–2133. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60921-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Monani  UR. Spinal muscular atrophy: a deficiency in a ubiquitous protein; a motor neuron-specific disease. Neuron  2005;48:885–895. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Tisdale  S, Lotti  F, Saieva  L. et al.  SMN is essential for the biogenesis of U7 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein and 3′-end formation of histone mRNAs. Cell Rep  2013;5:1187–1195. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chaytow  H, Huang  Y-T, Gillingwater  TH. et al.  The role of survival motor neuron protein (SMN) in protein homeostasis. Cell Mol Life Sci  2018;75:3877–3894. 10.1007/s00018-018-2849-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Brenner  S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics  1974;77:71–94. 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Bushnell  B. BBMap: A Fast, Accurate, Splice-Aware Aligner Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Berkeley: LBNL, 2014, CA (United States). [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Ewels  P, Magnusson  M, Lundin  S. et al.  MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics  2016;32:3047–3048. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Dobin  A, Davis  CA, Schlesinger  F. et al.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics  2013;29:15–21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kovaka  S, Zimin  AV, Pertea  GM. et al.  Transcriptome assembly from long-read RNA-seq alignments with StringTie2. Genome Biol  2019;20:278. 10.1186/s13059-019-1910-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Patro  R, Duggal  G, Love  MI. et al.  Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods  2017;14:417–419. 10.1038/nmeth.4197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Trincado  JL, Entizne  JC, Hysenaj  G. et al.  SUPPA2: fast, accurate, and uncertainty-aware differential splicing analysis across multiple conditions. Genome Biol  2018;19:40. 10.1186/s13059-018-1417-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. McKinney  W. Data structures for statistical computing in Python. In: Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. Austin, Texas: SciPy, 2010, 56–61. 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a. [DOI]
  • 46. Oliphant  TE. Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng  2007;9:10–20. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.58. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Seabold S, Perktold J. Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with Python. In: Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. Austin, Texas: SciPy, 2010, 92–96. 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-011. [DOI]
  • 48. Ramírez  F, Dündar  F, Diehl  S. et al.  deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res  2014;42:W187–W191. 10.1093/nar/gku365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Li  H, Handsaker  B, Wysoker  A. et al.  The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics  2009;25:2078–2079. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Danecek  P, Bonfield  JK, Liddle  J. et al.  Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience  2021;10:1–4. 10.1093/gigascience/giab008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Bonfield  JK, Marshall  J, Danecek  P. et al.  HTSlib: C library for reading/writing high-throughput sequencing data. Gigascience  2021;10:1–6. 10.1093/gigascience/giab007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Hunter  JD. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng  2007;9:90–95. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Soneson  C, Love  MI, Robinson  MD. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Res.  2016;4:1521. 10.12688/f1000research.7563.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. R Core Team, 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
  • 55. Robinson  MD, McCarthy  DJ, Smyth  GK. <tt>edgeR</tt> : a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics  2010;26:139–140. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Angeles-Albores  D, Lee  R, Chan  J. et al.  Two new functions in the WormBase Enrichment Suite. Biol MicroPubl  2018;2018:10.17912/W25Q2N. 10.17912/W25Q2N. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Angeles-Albores  D, N. Lee  RY, Chan  J. et al.  Tissue enrichment analysis for C. Elegans genomics. BMC Bioinformatics  2016;17:366. 10.1186/s12859-016-1229-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary_Figures_ddaf176

Data Availability Statement

All raw and experimental data have been deposited in ArrayExpress (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/arrayexpress) under accession E-MTAB-16084.


Articles from Human Molecular Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES