Skip to main content
BMC Infectious Diseases logoLink to BMC Infectious Diseases
. 2026 Mar 30;26:920. doi: 10.1186/s12879-026-13199-5

Incidence of Post-cesarean wound infections, bacterial profiles, resistant patterns, and associated costs among women delivering at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia: multi center study

Akera Fekade 1,✉, Biruk Zerfu 1, Abebe Dawud 2, Mandie Maru 2, Afewerk Habtamu 3, Kassu Desta 1
PMCID: PMC13159249  PMID: 41913128

Abstract

Background

Surgical site infection following cesarean section remains a serious public health issue worldwide, particularly in low and middle income countries. The global incidence of post-CS SSI recorded 5.63%.

Objective

To determine the incidence of post-cesarean wound infections, bacterial profiles, resistant patterns, and associated costs among women delivering at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia.

Methods

A hospital-based prospective study conducted at Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Dil Chora Referral Hospital, Dechatu Health center and Sabian General Hospital from January 01 to March 2025. Out of 427 mothers who underwent cesarean section were included. Socio-demographic data was gathered by personal interviews using a pre-tested questionnaire. Pus samples were collected using sterile cotton swab and inoculated in appropriate culture media. The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion technique was employed to determine the antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacterial isolates. SPSS version 26 used to enter and analyze the data.

Results

From a total of 427 CS delivered mothers, 56 (13.1%) developed Post-CS SSI. Out of 56 isolates, 31 (55.3%) isolates were gram-positive organism and 25 (44.4%) isolates were gram-negative organisms. The predominant bacteria isolates were S. aureus (48.21%), K. pneumonia (17.8%), and E.coli (14.2%). The majority of isolates were resistant to tetracycline (83.3%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (88.8%), and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (46.5%). Previous CS (p = 0.001), type of CS (p = 0.007), obesity (p < 0.001), hospital stay (p < 0.001), post-operative hemoglobin level (p = 0.015), residence (p = 0.006), and premature rupture of membrane (p < 0.001), showed statistically significant association with post-cesarean surgical site infection. The median(IQR) cost for laboratory, treatment, and hospital admission with and without post-cesarean surgical site infection were 894(126), 6161.50(551), and 3073(357) :540(219), 3334(1757), and 1600 (579) respectively.

Conclusion

The incidence of post cesarean surgical site infection was 13.1% and extra costs incurred on patients and health facilities. Implementation of a regular infection control policy along with microbiological work could reduce the incidence of post-CS SSI.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-026-13199-5.

Keywords: Surgical site infection, Cesarean section, Post-CS SSI, Pregnant women

Background

Surgical site infection following cesarean section remains a serious public health issue worldwide, particularly in low and middle income countries. The global incidence of post-CS SSI recorded 5.63% [1]. In Africa, the estimated pooled prevalence is 11%, with substantial variation across the region, ranging from 5.03% in Tunisia to 34.1% in Tanzania [2]. The pooled prevalence of surgical site infection following cesarean section in Ethiopia was 11.13% which is higher than the global incidence [3]. Post–cesarean section surgical site infections contribute to maternal mortality and adversely affect neonatal health, interfere with breastfeeding, prolong hospital stay, and reduce mother–child interaction [4].

Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure that is applied to deliver the fetus through an incision in the mother’s abdomen [5]. Based on the WHO report in 2021, cesarean section has increased worldwide and recorded more than 1 in 5 (21%) of all childbirths. Due to this, a continuous rise of infection is expected [6].

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria, Post cesarean section surgical site infection is an infection that takes place at the surgery site and occurs within 30 days following cesarean section. It is a serious public health issue which causes maternal morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stays, readmission, re-operation and high excess hospital costs [7]. Predisposing risk factors are classified into two types: intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic risk factors include age, body mass index (BMI), premature rupture of membranes, and host immune status. Extrinsic risk factors include previous cesarean section, antibiotic prophylaxis, type of cesarean section (elective or emergency), prolonged hospital stay, anemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, all of which increase the risk of Post-CS SSI [8].

The incidence of surgical site infection raises because of emergence antibiotic resistant pathogens like multi drug-resistant pathogens and methicillin-resistant S.aures. The risk of bacterial infection is five to twenty times higher for mothers who had cesarean delivery than for those who gave birth vaginally [9]. Standard criteria are used to identify patients with post–cesarean section surgical site infection (Post-CS SSI). These include purulent discharge from the incision site and the presence of clinical signs and symptoms, such as redness, swelling, pain around the surgical site, and fever [10].

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) was the most frequently isolated pathogen from post–cesarean section surgical site infections (30.4%). Other commonly identified organisms included coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (11.7%), Escherichia coli (9.4%), Enterococcus faecalis (5.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.5%), Enterobacter species (4.0%), and Klebsiella species (4.0%) [11]. Post-CS SSI contributes to infection-associated costs result from prolonged hospitalization, treatment and other medical expenses [12].

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the most critical public health challenge and 1.27 million global deaths occurred due to the bacterial AMR and contributed to 4.95 million deaths in 2019 [13]. Most bacteria develop a resistance to antimicrobial agents; this is because of the misuse of drugs and the bacteria’s nature, which enable them to survive exposure to antibiotics and continue grow [14]. Infections caused by antimicrobial resistant organisms require the use second and third line drugs for treatment, which can negatively affect patient outcomes, lead to organ failure, and prolonged recovery periods lasting several months [15].

There are major gaps in the study area, including a lack of adequate data; major bacterial pathogens responsible for post–cesarean section surgical site infection (Post-CS SSI) and the patterns of antimicrobial resistance are not well identified. In addition, the contributing risk factors have not been adequately documented. As a result, empirical and blind antibiotic therapies are very common in clinical practice. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify major microorganisms that are responsible for Post-CS SSI, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern, assess associated risk factors and evaluate the cost expenditure related to Post-CS SSI.

Methods and materials

Study design, setting, period and population

Multi center hospital-based prospective study was conducted from January 01 to March 01, 2025 in two cities found in the Eastern region of Ethiopia. All pregnant women who underwent cesarean section at Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Dil Chora Referral Hospital, Sabian General Hospital, and Dechatu Health center were study participants. All pregnant women who delivered by cesarean section were included and followed to determine whether they developed surgical site infection while, pregnant women who were not volunteered to participate, took antibiotics within 7 days before surgery and those with evidence of pre-existing infections at the time of cesarean section were excluded from our study.

Study variables

Dependent variables were Post-cesarean surgical site infection (post-CS SSI). Secondary outcomes included bacterial isolates, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and costs. Independent variables were age, residence educational status, marital status, occupation, monthly income, Body Mass index (BMI), anemia, pregnancy induced hypertension, gestational DM, urinary tract Infection, post-operative hemoglobin, hospital stays, parity, antenatal care, follow up, previous CS, fetal weight, and type of CS.

Sample size calculation and sampling technique

Sample size is determined by using a single population proportion sample size calculation, with a value of P taken (50%).

n= (z ∞∕2)²*p (1-p)/d² were n=sample size, z = statistic for level of confidence interval 95%.z score = 1.96, p= estimated prevalence 50%, d= precision 5% = z² p*(1-P)/d² = 1.96²x 0.5(1-0.5)/0.05²=384 and to get the final sample size: Assuming 10% non-response rate: n/(1–10% non-respondent) 384/ (1-0.1) = 384/0.9 = 426.6 ~ 427. This study used a convenient sampling technique and proportional allocation formula was used to allocate sample size based on the average monthly number of pregnant women delivered by CS in each hospital (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic presentation of sampling procedure and sample size allocation for Health Facilities in Eastern, Ethiopia, 2025

Data collection and interpretation

8 Nurse and 4 physicians were trained for data collection and data was collected following written consent from each participant. Participants were asked to give their consent if they are willing to participate in the research after we explained the aim of the study to them. Next, a nurse employed a semi-structured questionnaire to gather clinical and socio-demographic data from all pregnant women delivered by cesarean section and were followed up by structured telephone interviews at 7, 14, and 30 days post-cesarean section, with a maximum of three contact attempts during the 30 day follow-up period. The follow-up completion rate was 100%. After that, patients with post-CS SSI were diagnosed by attending obstetrician based on the presence of purulent discharge from the incision site or a clinical diagnosis of infection within 30 days after surgery. A wound sample taken by physician and midwife nurses using sterile cotton swabs. It was gathered prior to wound cleansing, labeled, and delivered to the lab for further analysis in less than an hour. We took care to prevent cross-contamination at every turn. Then information’s regarding financial costs was collected from the hospital finance and hospital liaisons. The financial cost of mothers who had not developed Post-CS SSI was compared with the financial loss of due to Post-CS SSI. The samples were transported by STUART media to Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital (HFSUH).

Isolation and identification of bacteria

Pus sample was collected using a sterile swab from the infected site. The swab samples were inoculated in MacConkey and blood agar medium. A candle jar was used to incubate the culture media at 37 °C for 24 h. The microorganisms were isolated based on colony morphology and gram stain. The obtained pure colonies were used for biochemical tests, antibiotic sensitivity test, and implementing the suggested standard operating procedures.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests (AST)

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) were done by using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M100, 34th edition (2024). Bacterial inoculum was standardized to 0.5 McFarland turbidity and incubated at 35–37 °C for 16–18 h. Zone diameters were measured in millimeters and interpreted as Susceptible (S), Intermediate (I), or Resistant (R) according to CLSI 2024 breakpoints.

According to the CLSI M100, 34th edition (2024) guidelines, for Enterobacterales isolates the following antibiotic discs were used: AMP–Ampicillin (10 µg), CZ–Cefazolin (30 µg), CRO–Ceftriaxone (30 µg) or CTX–Cefotaxime (30 µg), AMC–Amoxicillin–clavulanate (20/10 µg), SAM–Ampicillin–sulbactam (10/10 µg), CN–Gentamicin (10 µg), TOB–Tobramycin (10 µg), CIP–Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), SXT–Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg), TE–Tetracycline (30 µg), MEM–Meropenem (10 µg), and IPM–Imipenem (10 µg). For Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, the following antibiotic discs were used: CAZ–Ceftazidime (30 µg), CPM–Cefepime (30 µg), CIP–Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), MEM–Meropenem (10 µg), and IPM–Imipenem (10 µg). For Staphylococcus spp isolates, the following antibiotic discs were used: P–Penicillin (10 units), E–Erythromycin (15 µg), CD–Clindamycin (2 µg), DO–Doxycycline (30 µg), TE–Tetracycline (30 µg), and SXT–Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg). For Enterococcus spp. isolates, the following antibiotic discs were used: CIP-Ciprofloxacin(5 µg), AMP–Ampicillin (10 µg), P–Penicillin (10 units), LVX–Levofloxacin (5 µg), and TE–Tetracycline (30 µg) [16].

Data quality assurance and quality control

CLSI quality control requirements were followed to confirm that media fulfills Standard Operating Procedure [SOP]. Visual examinations for contamination, uneven fill, hemolysis, bubbles, freezing evidence, and fractures in the media or plastic Petri dishes were carried out. Quality control was carried out to verify the quality of mediums. Before being used, every fresh lot were undergo quality control testing using standard strains of E. coli [ATCC 25922], P. aeruginosa [ATCC 27853], K.peumoniae [ATCC 700603], E. faecalis [ATCC 29212 or 33186], and, S. aureus [ATCC 25923]. A pretest that was given to 5% of participants was used to evaluate a questioner for completeness, readability, and ease of understanding. The SOP’s were followed for collecting the samples. Data quality was carefully followed prior to analysis.

Before analysis, the data was entered into IBM-SPSS version 26. The descriptive data, like frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation were calculated. Mann–Whitney U test were applied to compare median (IQR) of costs for treatment, laboratory and hospital admission. Bi-variate and multivariate logistic regression analyses using forward conditional method were used to assess the possible risk factors of post-cesarean surgical site infection.

The level of significance P value < 0.25 in bi-variate analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression [17]. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was calculated to determine degree of association between dependent and independent variables. A P-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all cases. The research outcomes reported in words, charts, graphs, and tables.

Operational definitions

Post-cesarean surgical site infection

the presence of purulent discharge from the incision site or a clinical diagnosis of infection by the attending physician within 30 days after surgery.

Cesarean delivery

an operational procedure used to give birth via an incision in the abdomen and uterus.

Multi-drug resistance

is defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories.

Financial cost

The total amount of cost needed from the hospital to treat SSI infection following CS delivery.

Cesarean section infection

presence of infection at the site of surgery following cesarean delivery.

Results

Descriptive characteristics of study participants

The research was carried out on a total of 427 pregnant women who gave birth by cesarean section were included. Of these, 56 (13.1%) developed post cesarean wound infection. Most of the participants were in the age group of 18–27 years (250, 58.5%) with a mean age of 26.9 (SD ± 5.34) years. Many of the respondents 277 (64.9%) lived in urban area. A total of 172 (40.3%) participants have completed higher education, 335 (78.5%) married and 220 (51.5%) housewives. Most of the participants, 229 (53.6%), had monthly income ranging from 1501 to 5000 birr. More than half of the respondents 267 (62.5%) didn’t engage in physical exercise, 285 (66.7%) had never consumed alcohol and 305 (71.4%) never smoked cigarettes (Table 1).

Table 1.

Sociology-demographic characteristics of women who gave birth by cesarean section at public hospitals in Eastern, Ethiopia 2025, n = 427

Variable Category Frequency Percent (%)
Age group in years 18–27 250 58.5
28–37 163 38.2
> 37 14 3.3
Residence Urban 277 64.9
Rural 150 35.1
Occupation Housewife 220 51.5
Government employee 101 23.7
Private business owner 66 15.5
Student 40 9.4
Educational background No formal education 56 13.1
Primary education 67 15.7
Second education 132 30.9
Higher education 172 40.3
Marital status Married 335 78.5
Divorced 35 8.2
Single 51 11.9
Widowed 6 1.4
Monthly income in birr ($) < 1500 (11) 48 11.2
1501–5000 (11-36.6) 229 53.6
5001–10,000 (36.6–73.5) 132 30.9
> 100,001 (73.5) 18 4.2
Habit of physical exercise Never 267 62.5
Sometimes 130 30.4
Regularly 30 7
Alcohol drinking habit Never 285 66.7
Occasionally 126 29.5
Regularly 16 3.7
Smoking habit Never 305 71.4
Occasionally 108 25.3
Regularly 14 3.3

Most of the respondents, 220 (51.5%), had BMI greater than 25 kg/ m2. Among the study participants, 139 (32.6%) had anemia and only 36 mothers (8.4%) had gestational diabetic mellitus. Forty (9.4%) of participants had pregnancy induced hypertension and 74 (17.3%) had a history of urinary tract infection. More than half of the respondents, 239 (56%), had hemoglobin levels less than 11gm/dl after operation, and 76 (17.8%) of mothers had a prolonged hospital stay of more than 7 days (Table 2).

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics of women who gave birth by cesarean section at public hospitals in Eastern, Ethiopia 2025, n = 427

Variable Category Frequency Percent%
Body mass index > 25 Kg/ m2 220 51.5
< 25 kg/ m2 207 48.5
Anemia Yes 139 32.6
No 288 67.4
Pregnancy induced hypertension Yes 40 9.4
No 387 90.6
Gestational DM Yes 36 8.4
No 391 91.6

Urinary tract

Infection

Yes 74 17.3
No 353 82.7
Post-operative hemoglobin < 11gm/dl 239 56
> 11gm/dl 188 44
Hospital stays < 7days 351 82.2
> 7days 76 17.8

Out of 427 mothers, 238 were multi-para, 180(42.2%) primipara and 9(2.1%) were grand multi-para. Majority of the participants 373(87.3%) had a follow up care in health facilities and 240(56.2%) had a previous CS scar. The mean fetal weight was 3400 gm. The minimum and maximum birth weights were 1700 gm and 5200 gm. About 251(58.8%) of mothers had emergency surgery and 176(41.2%) had elective surgery. Based on the type of abdominal incision, 292(68.4%) was transverse incision and 135(31.6%) was vertical incision. Less than half of the respondents 146(34.2%) had rupture of membrane before CS (Table 3).

Table 3.

Obstetric characteristics of women who gave birth Cesarean section at public hospitals in Eastern, Ethiopia 2025, n = 427

Variable Category Frequency Percent%
Parity Primipara 180 42.2
Multipara 238 55.7
Grand multipara 9 2.1

Antenatal care

follow up

Yes 373 87.4
No 54 12.6
Previous CS Yes 240 56.2
No 187 43.8
Fetal weight < 2400 gm 15 3.5
2400-4000gm 386 90.4
> 4000gm 26 6.1
Type of CS Emergency 251 58.8
Elective 176 41.2
Incision type Transverse 292 68.4
Vertical 135 31.6
Premature rupture of membrane Yes 146 34.2
No 281 65.8

Isolation of pathogenic bacteria from post-CS SSI

A total of 60 pus specimens were collected from the wound site and processed during the study period. Of these, 56 pathogenic bacteria were isolated and the remaining 4 specimens had no bacteria growth. Out of 56, 31 (55.35%) were gram-positive and 25 (44.9%) were gram-negative. Among gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus 27 (48.2%) was a predominant bacteria. The most common bacteria isolated from gram-negative was 10(17.8%) k.pneumonia, 8 (14.02%) E.coli, and 6 (10.71%) Citrobacter spp. The least isolated bacteria were Enterococcus spp, and Pseudomonas spp were 4 (7.4%), 1 (1.78%) respectively (Table 4).

Table 4.

Isolation of pathogenic bacteria from post-CS SSI at public hospitals in Eastern, Ethiopia 2025, n = 56

Category Bacterial isolate Frequency Percent (%)
Gram-positive S, aureus 27 48.21
Enterococus spp 4 7.14
Total 31 55.35
Gram-negative k.pneumoniae 10 17.8
Pseudomonas spp 1 1.78
E.coli 8 14.2
Citrobacter spp 6 10.71
Total 25 44.49

Cost analysis for post-CS SSI

The result indicated that the overall median costs (Ethiopian Birr) of patients with post-CC SSI were 10,071(738) compared to patients without post-CS SSI 5,583 (1,446). The median (IQR) value of medication costs among women who had developed SSI was 6161.50(551), laboratory costs 894(126), and hospital admission costs 3073(357). Based on the independent sample Mann-Whitney U test, the distribution of treatment costs, laboratory costs, and hospital admission costs among women who developed SSI and those who had not developed SSI were statistically significant (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2) (Table 5).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Box plot of cost among mothers who had SSI and who had not at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia 2025, n = 427

Table 5.

Cost analysis for post-CS SSI at public hospitals in Eastern, Ethiopia 2025, n = 427

Cost for SSI P value
Yes (N = 56), Median(IQR) No (N = 371), Median ( IQR)
Laboratory 894(126) 540 (219) < 0.001
Treatment 6161.50 (551) 3334 (1757) < 0.001
Hospital admission 3073 (357) 1600 (579) < 0.001
Total cost 10,071 (738) 5583 (1,446) < 0.001

Factors associated with post-CS SSI

The level of significance P value < 0.25 in bi-variate analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression. Multivariate logistic regression contained residence, BMI, prior CS, type of CS, rupture of membrane before surgery, anemia after surgery, and extended hospital stays were strong association with post-CS SSI at p ≤ 0.05. Mothers from rural areas were 2.37 times more likely to acquire SSI compared to those mothers from urban areas (AOR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.308, 4.96). Mothers with previous CS scar were 3.916 times more likely to have SSI than mothers with no scar (AOR = 3.916, 95% CI: 1.78, 8.54). Mothers who stayed in the hospital for more than 7 days were significantly associated with post-CS SSI by 5.86 in contrast to those who hadn’t (AOR = 5.86, 95% CI: 2.56, 13.43). A two-fold association of post-CS SSI was observed in women who had post-operative hemoglobin less than 11 g/dL. Post-operative hemoglobin and length of hospital stay were measured immediately after surgery and prior to SSI onset. Model fitness and multi-col-linearity coefficient were performed and overall p value was 0.362 and VIF value close to 1.00 (Table 6).

Table 6.

Factor associated with post- CS SSI at public hospitals in Eastern, Ethiopia 2025, n = 427

Covariates Category SSI Bi-variate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
Yes No COR (95% CI) P AOR(95% CI) P
Residence Rural 30 120 2.41 (1.36–4.26) 0.002 2.537(1.308–4.96) 0.006
Urban 26 251 1 1
BMI > 25Kg/m2 41 179 2.93(1.57–5.48) 0.001 3.99(1.92–8.30) < 0.001
< 25 kg/m2 15 192 1 1
Previous CS Yes 45 195 3.69(1.852–7.361) < 0.001 3.915(1.78–8.54) 0.001
No 11 176 1 1
Type of CS Emergency 42 201 2.54(1.472–4.53) 0.002 2.745(1.32–5.71) 0.007
Elective 14 170 1 1
Premature ROM Yes 33 104 3.68(2.0-6.78) < 0.001 3.55(1.8–7.03) < 0.001
No 23 267 1 1
Post-OR Hg < 11 mg/dl 43 184 3.35(1.72–6.52) < 0.001 2.53(1.19–5.361) 0.015
> 11 mg/dl 13 187 1 1
Hospital stay < 7 days 40 334 1 1
> 7 days 16 37 3.61(1.98–6.56) < 0.001 5.86(2.56–13.43) < 0.001

Antibacterial resistance pattern for Gram-positive bacteria

Gram-positive organism highly resistant to penicillin, tetracycline, cefotaxime, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin were 71.4%, 58.3%, 73.6%, 63.6% and 50% respectively. In contrast, clindamycin (55%), and linezolid (100%) were susceptible to gram-positive organism (Table 7).

Table 7.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test for Gram-positive bacteria among women with post-cesarean surgical site infections at public hospitals in Eastern, Ethiopia 2025, n = 56

List of antibiotics AST Isolated Gram-positive bacteria from post-CS wound infections N (%)
S.aureus N (%) Enterococus Spp. N (%) Total N (%)
CTX S 5(26.3) NA 5(26.3)
I NA NA NA
R 14(73.6) NA 14(73.6)
CIP S 9(40.9) 3(75) 12(46.1)
I 1(4.5) NA 1(3.8)
R 12(54.5) 1(25) 13(50)
CD S 11(55) NA 11(55)
I NA NA NA
R 9(45) NA 9(45)
GEN S 1(50) NA 1(33.3)
I NA NA NA
R 1(50) 1(100) 2(66.6)
P S 4(21.5) 2(100) 6(28.5)
I NA NA NA
R 15(78.9) NA 15(71.4)
TE S 8(38.9) NA 8(33.3)
I NA 2(66.6) 2(8.3)
R 13(61.9) 1(33.3) 14(58.3)
LNZ S 3(100) NA 3(100)
I NA NA NA
R NA NA NA
LVX S 3(21.4) 2(66.6) 5(29.4)
I 2(14.2) NA 2(11.7)
R 9(64.2) 1(33.3) 10(58.8)
SXT S 7(33.3) NA 7(31.81)
I NA 1(100) 1(4.54)
R 14(66.6) NA 14(63.6)

*CIP: ciprofloxacin, GEN: gentamycin, TE: tetracycline, LZ: linezolid, SXT: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, LVX: levofloxacin, CTX: cefotaxime CD: clindamycin, P: penicillin and NA: Not applicable.

Antibacterial resistance pattern for Gram-negative bacteria

Gram-negative bacteria isolates susceptible to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, Imipenem, Ertapenem, and Meropenem were 53.8%, 64.2%, 92.8%, 94.4%, and 95% respectively. In contrast, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (88.8%), tetracycline (83.3%), ceftriaxone (88.8%), cefotaxime (66.6%), and cefuroxime (66.6%) Amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid (46.6%), cefepime (47.1%) were highly resistant to gram-negative bacteria (Table 8).

Table 8.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test for Gram-negative bacteria among women with post-cesarean surgical site infections at public hospitals in Eastern, Ethiopia 2025, n = 56

Antibiotics AST Isolated Gram-negative bacteria from post-CS wound infections N (%)
Klebsella spp. N (%) Enterobacter spp N (%) Citrobacter spp
N (%)
Pseudomonas spp
N (%)
Total
N (%)
AMC S 1(12.5) 3(60) 1(33.3) NA 5(33.3)
I 1(12.5) 1(20) 2(66.6) NA 4(26.6)
R 6(75) 1(20) NA NA 7(46.6)
CAZ S 7(77.7) NA 1(25) 1(100) 9(64.2)
I NA NA 2(50) NA 2(14.2)
R 2(22.2) NA 1(25) NA 3(21.4)
CPM S 5(71.4) NA 1(16.6) NA 6(35.2)
I 1(14.2) NA 2(33.3) NA 3(17.6)
R 1(14.2) 3(100) 3(50) 1(100) 8(47.01)
CTR S 1(11.1) NA 1(16.6) NA 2(11.1)
I NA NA NA NA NA
R 8(88.8) 3(100) 5(83.3) NA 16(88.8)
CTX S 1(33.3) 3(60) NA NA 4(33.3)
I NA NA NA NA NA
R 2(66.6) 2(40) 4(100) NA 8(66.6)
CXM S 1(50) 2(40) NA NA 3(33.3)
I NA NA NA NA NA
R 1(50) 3(60) 2(100) NA 6(66.6)
CIP S 6(66.6) NA NA 1(100) 7(53.8)
I 2(22.2) NA NA NA 2(15.3)
R 1(11.1) 3(100) NA NA 4(30.7)
IPM S 5(83.3) 4(100) 4(100) NA 13(92.8)
I NA NA NA NA NA
R 1(16.6) NA NA NA 1(7.14)
MEM S 5(83.3) 7(100) 7(100) 1(100) 19(95)
I NA NA NA NA NA
R 1(16.6) NA NA NA 1(5)
LVX S 6(85.7) 3(60) 1(50) NA 10(71.4)
I NA NA NA NA NA
R 1(14.2) 2(40) 1(50) NA 4(28.5
SXT S 1(25) NA NA NA 1(11.1)
I NA NA NA NA NA
R 3(75) 3(100) 2(100) NA 8(88.8)
EPM S 6(85.7) 7(100) 4(100) NA 17(94.4)
I NA NA NA NA NA
R 1(14.2) NA NA NA 1(5.5)
TE S 1(25) NA NA NA 1(16.6)
I NA NA NA NA NA
R 3(75) 2(100) NA NA 5(83.3)

*CTR: ceftriaxone, CAZ: ceftazidime, CIP: ciprofloxacin, AMC: amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, CPM: cefepime, IPM: imipenem, CTX: cefotaxime, CXM: cefuroxime, MEM: meropenem, TE: tetracycline, LVX: levofloxacin, SXT: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, EPM: Ertapenem and NA: Not applicable.

Discussion

Post cesarean wound infection rise maternal mortality, morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and increase health care cost [7]. In this study the major etiologic agent that significantly contributes to the cause the maternal mortality and morbidity were isolated. This will help to decrease the occurrence and effect of post cesarean wound infection.

The incidence of Post-CS SSI in this study was 56 (13.1%). It is aligned with previous researches undertaken in Harar, Ethiopia (12.3%), Nigeria (12.5%), and Dhulikhel Hospital, Nepal (12.6%) [18–20]. The WHO surgical site infection rate guidelines were up to 20% in Africa, which is in line with this study [21]. According to this study, the incidence of post-CS SSI was higher in comparison to previous research undertaken in Assela, Ethiopia (9.4%), Hawassa University Teaching Hospital, Ethiopia (11%), Estonian University Hospital (6.2%), and Regional Referral Hospital, Oman (2.66%) [22–25]. This variation in the incidence of post-CS SSI might result from socioeconomic status, study area, health care delivery system, and study population. The difference may arise from lack of adequate sterilization technique, and quality of surgical care provision.

Premature rupture of membrane was significantly associated (p < 0.001) with post-CS SSI. Mothers who had rupture of membrane before CS contribute to high chance of developing SSI by three times more than who had not (AOR = 3.55, CI: 1.8–7.03). It is aligned with previous research done in Nigeria (AOR = 4.45) and US (AOR = 3.0; 95% CI, (3.24–3.5) [26, 27]. The amniotic fluid in pregnant women played as a barrier for pathogenic bacteria but if the fetal membrane ruptured early, the protective effect of the fluid gradually decreases over time.The pathogenic bacteria get access to enter in amniotic cavity through cervical canal may result in SSI.

Mothers from rural areas were 2.537 times more likely to acquire SSI compared to those mothers from urban areas (AOR = 2.537, 95% CI: 1.308, 4.96). There was a study undertaken in Tigray and US also shown significant association [26, 28]. This may be caused by limited access to health care and poor hygiene affects a good practice throughout the surgery process.

This study showed that the risk of developing Post-CS SSI after CS were 2.7 times higher among women who had emergency CS compared to those had elective CS (AOR = 2.745, 95% CI: 1.32–5.71). Similar findings were reported from Nigeria showed that 11% who had emergency procedure got post-CS SSI than elective CS [29]. This could be caused by limited time for preparation can lead to poor sterility condition and imposing the patient at greater risk of bacterial contamination and high number of cesarean section procedures were performed daily.

A significant correlation was found between post-CS SSI and obesity. The study revealed that having a body mass index more than 25 kg/m2 has four times higher risk for having post-CS SSI (AOR = 3.99, 95% CI: 1.92–8.30). Current study align with a prospective study performed in Iraq [30]. This might be due to thick subcutaneous tissue, impaired immunity, and limited penetration of prophylactic antibiotics in adipose tissue.

This study also found that mothers with post-operative hemoglobin level < 11 g/dl were significantly associated with post-CS SSI (AOR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.19–5.361). This research supported by the studies undertaken in Nigeria and Ethiopia [19, 31]. This is because decrease amount of hemoglobin results impaired transportation of oxygen which leads to hinder wound healing and weakened immune system.

A hospital stay longer than 7 days was significantly associated with post-CS SSI (AOR = 5.86, 95% CI: 2.56–13.43). This study aligns with research done in different settings [18, 32, 33]. This might be due to the long the mothers stay the more to get infection because hospital areas assumed to be contaminated by medical staff, patients, and attendants. In addition, women’s who had previous scar is more likely to develop post-CS SSI than those had not [34, 35]. This might be due to presence of prior scars had intraoperative adhesion, weaker scar and poor healing.

Previous studies showed that hospitalization was prolonged for mothers who developed post-CS SSI compared to those who had not [36]. This cause significant increase in cost of the following medications, laboratory, and hospital admissions. The median cost of treatment with post-CS SSI was 6161.5 birr and 3334 birr for patients without SSI. Likewise, Median cost on hospital admission were 3073 birr with SSI compare to 1600 birr patients without SSI. Laboratory cost median differed in mothers with SSI 894 birr to mothers without SSI 540 birr. The cost of treatment, laboratory, and hospital admission cost were significantly associated with post-CS SSI p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001 respectively. It agrees with a study done in Germany [36]. The overall median cost for patients who had post-CS SSI was 10,071 birr and was therefore higher than for mothers without SSI 5583 birr( p < 0.001).This findings consistent with a study in Berlin and others [36, 37]. This could be due to patient need additional analysis and care to treat the infection. The increased cost associated with post-cesarean surgical site infections places an additional financial burden on the government.

In current study, Gram-positive organisms were 56.1% and 42.1% were Gram-negative organisms. S.aureus is a predominant from gram-positive organisms by (47.3%) subsequent to K.pneumonia were (17.5%), E.coli (14.3%), Citrobacter (10.5%), Enterococus spp(7.01%), CoNs and Pseudomonas spp were similar(1.75%).

This is supported by the research done in Ethiopia, the most frequently isolated bacteria were S. aureus (41.6%), E. coli (19.8%), K. pneumoniae (13.9%), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (12.9%), and Enterobacter spp (4%) [38]. Based on research conducted in Pakistan, A total of 153 organisms were identified, of which Staphylococcus aureus (50.32%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.3%), Escherichia coli (14.37%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.76%) [39].

In other previous study, revealed that a high proportion of Gram-negative organism than Gram-positive organisms. According to study done in Ethiopia, 55.9% were accounted for gram negative organisms and 44.1% for gram positive bacteria. Escherichia coli was the major bacteria isolate from gram negatives (24.3%) subsequent to Staphylococcus aureus (23.4%) in gram positives [40]. This difference in the pattern of distribution of bacterial isolates in different setups may be due to diversity of the study participants and inappropriate usage of local antimicrobial agent lead to emergence of bacteria that resist to commonly used antibiotics.

In present study, linezolid (100%), and clindamycin (55%) were susceptible for gram-positive bacteria. The current research is consistent to studies in Ethiopia, and India [41, 42]. Levofloxacin (71.4%), ciprofloxacin (53.8%), Imipenem (92.8%), and ceftazidime (64.2%) were susceptible for isolated bacteria from gram-negative. This aligns with research conducted in India, Nepal, and Ethiopia [42–44]. Many of the gram-negative bacteria were resistant to ceftriaxone(88.8%), cefuroxime(66.6%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid(46.6%), cefotaxime(66.6%), cefepime(47.01%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole(88.8%), and tetracycline(83.3%), which are consistent with different studies worldwide [10, 45, 46]. This could be due to empirical therapy, improper dosing, and non-prescribed antibiotic use causes the antibiotic to be ineffective for pathogens.

Staphylococcus aureus was the number one bacteria isolated from wound site, which was resistant to Tetracycline, Peniciliin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were 61.9%, 78.9%, and 66.6% respectively. This findings is consistent with study undertaken in Bahirdar, Ethiopia showed that the overall resistance rate of Tetracycline, Chloramphenicol, Penicillin and Ampicillin were 62% [47].

E. coli was highly resistant to cefepime (100%), ceftriaxone (100%), ciprofloxacin (100%), and tetracycline (100%). This is in agreement to study done in Oman [25]. K.pneumonia was resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (75%), ceftriaxone (88.8%), and Tetracycline (75%). This aligns with a study conducted in Tanzania [48]. High incidence of antibiotic resistant occurred because frequent usage of drug without prescription.

Strength and limitation of the study

The data had adequate representation of the study because it was conducted in 3 hospitals and 1 health center, while the limitations were that the study had a one-month follow-up, making it difficult to show cause-and-effect association; exclusion of mothers who did not seek health support despite having mild post-cesarean section infection; and failure to isolate strict anaerobic bacteria and fungi, which could have increased the number of bacterial isolates reported as negative cultures and underestimated the magnitude of post-cesarean section surgical site infection. The use of convenience sampling over a short two-month data collection period may limit the generalization of the findings and introduce potential selection bias.

Conclusion and recommendation

The incidence of post-cesarean wound infection was 13.1%, which is relatively higher in the study area. The most frequently isolated organisms were S.aureus and Enterobacter spp among Gram-positive bacteria, and E.coli, K. pneumoniae, and Citrobacter spp among Gram-negative bacteria. Both gram positive and gram negative bacteria have developed resistant to widely used antibiotics such as tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Patients with multi-drug resistance infections cause an increase in hospital stays and health care costs.

The authors strongly urge strict adherence with post-CS SSI prevention strategies at hospitals and health centers as strict administration of pre and post-operative antibiotics reduce the incidence of SSI. The observed resistance patterns underscore the urgent need for rational antibiotic use, culture-guided therapy, and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs to limit inappropriate prescribing and slow the emergence of drug resistance.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (98.4KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

First of all, we would like to acknowledge Addis Ababa University College of Health Sciences Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences for giving us the chance to know more about the subject matter by referring to different types of books and journals. We want to all the staff of Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized Hospital for their cooperation and willingness to answer any question we had. Finally, we have appreciation for our study participants, being a volunteer to be included in the study.

Abbreviations

AAU

Addis Ababa University

AMR

Antimicrobial Resistance

AST

Antimicrobial sensitivity test

BMI

Body mass index

CDC

Center of Disease Control

CS

Cesarean section

CLSI

Clinical laboratory Standards Institute

CSI

Cesarean section infection

DRERC

Departmental research and ethical review committee

LSCS

Lower segment Cesarean section

MHA

Muller Hinton agar

MOH

Ministry of Health

Post-CS SSI

Post cesarean section surgical site infection

SOP

Standard Operating Procedure

IQR

Interquartile range

Author contributions

AF was the principal investigator who participated in project coordination, data quality assurance, method validation, conceptualization of the study, drafted the manuscript, performed statistical analysis and participated in the data collection and laboratory testing of samples; BZ, AD and MM participated in method validation, writing and statistical analysis, reviewing and editing the study; and AH and KD participated in data collection, statistical analysis and writing.

Funding

Addis Ababa University provided funding for this study, which was utilized for data collection and laboratory testing of samples. The study design, statistical analysis, conceptualization and manuscript preparation were performed without the funder’s input.

Data availability

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Before data collection, written consent was obtained from the Research and Ethics Review Committee (RERC) of Addis Ababa University College of Health Science, Department of Medical Laboratory Science (DRERC/778/24/MLS), and permission letter was submitted to Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Dil Chora Referral Hospital, Dechatu Health center and Sabian General Hospital. Furthermore, informed written consent was obtained from each study participant before the actual data collection and the purpose of the study was explained to the study participant and they were informed about the information obtained in course investigation will be kept confidential using codes and they do have right to get their results without payment. The test results of study participants were communicated to their attending physician. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Mojtahedi MF, Sepidarkish M, Almukhtar M, Eslami Y, Mohammadianamiri F, Moghadam KB, et al. Global incidence of surgical site infections following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2023;139:82–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Baklola M, Terra M, Elsehrawy MG, Alali H, Aljohani SS, Alomireeni AA, et al. Epidemiology of surgical site infections post-cesarean section in Africa: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25(1):465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lake ES, Alamrew A, Belay WS, Yilak G, Berihun Erega B, Abita Z, et al. Surgical site infection following cesarean section and its predictors in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(3):e0296767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smorti M, Ponti L, Tani F. The effect of maternal depression and anxiety on labour and the well-being of the newborn. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39(4):492–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Charoenboon C, Srisupundit K, Tongsong T. Rise in cesarean section rate over a 20-year period in a public sector hospital in northern Thailand. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;287:47–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Organization WH. Caesarean section rates continue to rise, amid growing inequalities in access. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rose AF, Fekad B, Moore JN, Graham WJ. Post-caesarean section surgical site infections: a retrospective audit and case note review at an Ethiopian referral hospital. Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2018.
  • 8.Jain AK, Patidar H, Nayak V, Agrawal R. Prevalence, risk factors and microbial profile of surgical site infection after cesarean section in a tertiary care center in western India. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2022;16(1):700–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Conroy K, Koenig AF, Yu Y-H, Courtney A, Lee HJ, Norwitz ER. Infectious morbidity after cesarean delivery: 10 strategies to reduce risk. Reviews Obstet Gynecol. 2012;5(2):69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dessie W, Mulugeta G, Fentaw S, Mihret A, Hassen M, Abebe E. Pattern of bacterial pathogens and their susceptibility isolated from surgical site infections at selected referral hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol. 2016;2016(1):2418902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Birhanu Y, Endalamaw A. Surgical site infection and pathogens in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patient Saf Surg. 2020;14(1):7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Getaneh T, Negesse A, Dessie G. Prevalence of surgical site infection and its associated factors after cesarean section in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shibabaw A. Antimicrobial resistance: the most critical bacteria. Glob Infect Prev Manag Healthc.147.
  • 14.Llor C, Bjerrum L. Antimicrobial resistance: risk associated with antibiotic overuse and initiatives to reduce the problem. Therapeutic Adv drug Saf. 2014;5(6):229–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dadgostar P. Antimicrobial resistance: implications and costs. Infect Drug Resist. 2019:3903–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.CLSI M100™. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 2024.
  • 17.Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression: Wiley; 2013.
  • 18.Alemye T, Oljira L, Fekadu G, Mengesha MM. Post cesarean section surgical site infection and associated factors among women who delivered in public hospitals in Harar city, Eastern Ethiopia: A hospital-based analytic cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(6):e0253194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Onyegbule OA, Akujobi CN, Ezebialu IU, Nduka AC, Anahalu IC, Okolie V, et al. Determinants of post-caesarean wound infection in Nnewi, Nigeria. Br J Med Med Res. 2015;5(6):767. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shrestha S, Shrestha R, Shrestha B, Dongol A. Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection following cesarean section at Dhulikhel Hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2014;12(2):113–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/infection-prevention-control/surgical-site-infection
  • 22.Mamo T, Abebe TW, Chichiabellu TY, Anjulo AA. Risk factors for surgical site infections in obstetrics: a retrospective study in an Ethiopian referral hospital. Patient Saf Surg. 2017;11:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wodajo S, Belayneh M, Gebremedhin S. Magnitude and factors associated with post-cesarean surgical site infection at Hawassa University teaching and referral hospital, southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Ethiop J health Sci. 2017;27(3):283–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mitt P, Lang K, Peri A, Maimets M. Surgical-site infections following cesarean section in an Estonian university hospital: postdischarge surveillance and analysis of risk factors. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005;26(5):449–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dhar H, Al-Busaidi I, Rathi B, Nimre EA, Sachdeva V, Hamdi I. A study of post-caesarean section wound infections in a regional referral hospital, Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2014;14(2):e211. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Goff SL, Pekow PS, Avrunin J, Lagu T, Markenson G, Lindenauer PK. Patterns of obstetric infection rates in a large sample of US hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(6):456. e1-. e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ezechi OC, Edet A, Akinlade H, Gab-Okafor CV, Herbertson E. Incidence and risk factors for caesarean wound infection in Lagos Nigeria. BMC Res Notes. 2009;2:1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wendmagegn TA, Abera GB, Tsehaye WT, Gebresslasie KB, Tella BG. Magnitude and determinants of surgical site infecion among women underwent cesarean section in Ayder comprehensive specialized hospital Mekelle City, Tigray region, Northern Ethiopia, 2016. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Njoku CO, Njoku AN. Microbiological pattern of surgical site infection following caesarean section at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital. Open access Macedonian J Med Sci. 2019;7(9):1430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jasim SK. Post cesareansection surgical site infection; incidence and risk factors. Int J Sci Res. 2017;6(7):1864–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ghuman M, Rohlandt D, Joshy G, Lawrenson R. Post-caesarean section surgical site infection: rate and risk factors. New Z Med J (Online). 2011;124(1339). [PubMed]
  • 32.Gedefaw G, Asires A, Shiferaw S, Addisu D. Factors associated with surgical site infection among women undergoing obstetrics surgery at Felegehiwot referral hospital, Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Saf Health. 2018;4:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mezemir R, Olayemi O, Dessie Y. Incidence, bacterial profile and predictors of surgical site infection after cesarean section in Ethiopia, a prospective cohort study. Int J Women’s Health. 2023:1547–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 34.Bharatnur S, Agarwal V. Surgical site infection among gynecological group: risk factors and postoperative effect. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):966–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dessu S, Samuel S, Gebremeskel F, Basazin A, Tariku Z, Markos M. Determinants of post cesarean section surgical site infection at public hospitals in Dire Dawa administration, Eastern Ethiopia: Case control study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(4):e0250174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Strobel RM, Leonhardt M, Förster F, Neumann K, Lobbes LA, Seifarth C, et al. The impact of surgical site infection—a cost analysis. Langenbeck’s Archives Surg. 2022:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Alfonso JL, Pereperez SB, Canoves JM, Martinez MM, Martinez IM, Martin-Moreno JM. Are we really seeing the total costs of surgical site infections? A Spanish study. Wound repair regeneration. 2007;15(4):474–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bitew Kifilie A, Dagnew M, Tegenie B, Yeshitela B, Howe R, Abate E. Bacterial profile, antibacterial resistance pattern, and associated factors from women attending postnatal health service at University of Gondar Teaching Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol. 2018;2018(1):3165391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mahmood A. Bacteriology of surgical site infections and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi. JPMA J Pakistan Med Association. 2000;50(8):256–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Amare B, Abdurrahman Z, Moges B, Ali J, Muluken L, Alemayehu M, et al. Postoperative surgical site bacterial infections and drug susceptibility patterns at Gondar University Teaching Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. J Bacteriol Parasitol. 2011;2(8):1000126. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pradeep M, Rao KVV. A Study on surgical Site Infections, their bacteriological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. IP Int J Med Microbiol Trop Dis. 2023;5(1):9–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Goswami NN, Trivedi HR, Goswami APP, Patel TK, Tripathi C. Antibiotic sensitivity profile of bacterial pathogens in postoperative wound infections at a tertiary care hospital in Gujarat, India. J Pharmacol pharmacotherapeutics. 2011;2(3):158–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pal N, Guhathakurta R. Surgical site infection in surgery ward at a tertiary care hospital: the infection rate and the bacteriological profile. 2012.
  • 44.Mama M, Abdissa A, Sewunet T. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infection and their sensitivity to alternative topical agents at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, South-West Ethiopia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sohn AH, Tien NP, Mai VTC, Van Nho V, Hanh TNT, Ewald B, et al. Microbiology of surgical site infections and associated antimicrobial use among Vietnamese orthopedic and neurosurgical patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27(8):855–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shriyan A, Sheetal R, Nayak N. Aerobic micro-organisms in post-operative wound infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. J Clin Diagn Res. 2010;4(6):3392–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Biadglegne F, Abera B, Alem A, Anagaw B. Bacterial isolates from wound infection and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in Felege Hiwot referral Hospital North West Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2009;19(3).
  • 48.Mpogoro FJ, Mshana SE, Mirambo MM, Kidenya BR, Gumodoka B, Imirzalioglu C. Incidence and predictors of surgical site infections following caesarean sections at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. Antimicrob Resist Infect control. 2014;3:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (98.4KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES