Skip to main content
Frontiers in Pediatrics logoLink to Frontiers in Pediatrics
. 2026 Apr 28;14:1825458. doi: 10.3389/fped.2026.1825458

Targeted next-generation sequencing-based pathogens detection in children with severe pneumonia in the pediatric intensive care unit

Ning Zhu 1,†, Yanqing Tang 2,†, Zhenjian Zhang 3, Dingjian Ye 4, Youjun Xie 5, Dongming Li 1,*, Zhikun Liang 1,*
PMCID: PMC13161149  PMID: 42130796

Abstract

Background

Severe pneumonia is predominantly caused by multiple pathogenic microorganisms. Conventional microbiological tests (CMTs) often have limited sensitivity or a narrow detection spectrum of pathogens, potentially leading to delayed diagnosis. Based on multiplex PCR and high-throughput sequencing, targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) overcomes previous limitations. However, research on the use of tNGS in severe pediatric pneumonia remains quite scarce. This study focused on comparing the effectiveness of tNGS with that of CMTs among children with severe pneumonia in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Methods

This study enrolled 344 patients with severe pneumonia, admitted to PICU at the Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Guangxi Province, China, between June 2021 and December 2024. Both tNGS and CMTs were performed to detect pathogenic microorganisms in all patients.

Results

Pathogens were identified in 343 out of 344 patients, with the detection rate by tNGS significantly higher than that of CMTs (99.71% vs. 49.71%, p < 0.05). Among these cases, 290 (84.30%) involved multiple pathogen infections. Bacterial-viral co-infection was the predominant type (31.20%, 107/343). 86 pathogens were identified, among which the four most prevalent were respiratory syncytial virus (39.24%), cytomegalovirus (28.20%), rhinovirus (24.13%), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (22.67%). Notably, tNGS detected antimicrobial resistance genes in 10.17% (35/344) of cases, including the A2063G macrolide-resistance mutation in 29.49% (23/78) of Mp and 7.69% (1/13) of Bordetella pertussis isolates. Additionally, 20% (4/20) of Staphylococcus aureus carried the mecA gene, while two bla_CTX-M and five bla_NDM resistance genes were identified among Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli. One patient died during hospitalization. In 35 patients, treatment was withdrawn per family request, and 14 of them died shortly after discharge. The length of hospital stay was 15 days.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that tNGS substantially enhances etiologic diagnosis in children in the PICU with severe pneumonia. It revealed a high burden of viral and mixed infections and identified resistance genes with potential implications for antimicrobial therapy.

Keywords: infection, pathogens, pediatric intensive care unit, severe pneumonia, targeted next-generation sequencing

1. Introduction

Pulmonary infection is the predominant cause of hospitalization and death among children aged < 5 years worldwide, involving a variety of viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens (1). Severe pneumonia is a serious condition in children, accounting for nearly 11.5% of all pneumonia-related hospitalizations and approximately 12% of deaths among children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) (2, 3). Importantly, timely and accurate identification of causative pathogens of severe pneumonia, followed by sensitive drug therapy, is essential for improving clinical outcomes (4, 5). The COVID-19 pandemic, alongside empirical antimicrobial therapy, has reshaped the epidemiology of respiratory pathogens and increased the incidence of co-infections (6, 7).

Recent studies indicate that conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), which include multiple laboratory techniques such as targeted PCR assays, serology, and culture, exhibit sensitivities ranging from 65% to 90%, primarily detecting common pathogens (8). These limitations frequently impede timely and accurate diagnosis. Several studies indicate that metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has enhanced the identification of pathogens, especially for rare or mixed infections (9–12). Nevertheless, the widespread use of mNGS is hindered by the considerable cost and complex technique. Emerging as a promising detection technology, targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) integrates multiplex PCR with high-throughput sequencing. The range of detectable pathogens is slightly narrower than that of mNGS, however, tNGS has distinct advantages regarding the diagnostic turnaround time and cost (11–13). A preliminary report confirmed that tNGS detected respiratory pathogens at approximately one-quarter of the cost of mNGS (13). Furthermore, another study showed comparable diagnostic accuracy between tNGS and mNGS in patients with lower respiratory tract infection (14). However, large-scale clinical evaluations of tNGS in pediatric severe pneumonia remain scarce.

To fill this gap, we conducted a comprehensive analysis utilizing a tNGS platform to analyze samples from 344 children admitted to the PICU, who met the criteria for severe pneumonia. Our aims were to (I) evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of tNGS with CMTs; (II) investigate the distribution of pathogens and types of infection; and (III) examine the profiles of antimicrobial resistance genes.

2. Methods

2.1. Study patients

This study retrospectively focused on 344 patients admitted to the PICU, and all were diagnosed with severe pneumonia at a pediatric tertiary center—the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Province between June 2021 and December 2024. The diagnosis of severe pediatric pneumonia met the criteria of 2013 revised guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in children (15). This study was granted a waiver of written informed consent, and the protocol received approval from the hospital's Ethics Committee.

2.2. Sample collection and conventional testing

Sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were obtained both at admission and whenever the patient's condition worsened. CMTs included culture, serology, and PCR assays. Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA; VIRCELL) targeted nine pathogens: Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Mp), influenza A and B viruses, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, parainfluenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), Coxiella burnetii, adenovirus, and Legionella pneumophila. Single-target PCR assays were performed for Epstein–Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, Mp, RSV, adenovirus, and enteroviruses. Multiplex PCR assays targeted Mp, adenovirus, RSV, influenza A/B, and rhinovirus.

2.3. Targeted next-generation sequencing

Nucleic acids were extracted using the KS118-BYTQ-24 kit (King Create Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China). Library preparation employed the KS608-100HXD96 ultra-multiplex PCR system (King Create Co., Ltd) paired with high-throughput sequencing. The assay was designed to detect up to 225 respiratory pathogens (91 bacteria, 81 viruses, 43 fungi, and 10 other species) and 20 antimicrobial resistance loci, including genes associated with resistance to cephalosporins, extended-spectrum β-lactamases, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and mutations in Mp, Bordetella pertussis, and Aspergillus fumigatus (Supplementary Table 1). The detailed methodology has been described previously (16). Sequencing data were independently analyzed by two laboratory physicians, and clinical correlation was performed by two clinicians blinded to each other's assessments.

2.4. Statistical methods

Data analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 25.0. For categorical variables, data are presented as counts and percentages, using the χ2 (chi-square) test to compare pathogen detection rates between tNGS and CMTs at a 5% significance level. For continuous variables with a non-normal distribution, data are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR).

3. Results

3.1. Clinical characteristics

Among 344 pediatric patients with severe pneumonia, 121 were female and 223 were male. The age distribution ranged between 28 days and 14 years; 318 patients were younger than 5 years, and only 26 were older than 5 years. Most patients were referred from other hospitals, followed by direct admissions via outpatient or emergency departments, with a smaller proportion transferred from general pediatric wards (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with severe pneumonia.

Characteristic Number Percentage (%)
Gender
Male 223 64.83
Female 121 35.17
Age
<1year 176 51.16
1–3years 101 29.36
3–5years 41 11.92
>5years 26 7.56
Specimen Type
Sputum 63 18.31
Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid 281 81.69
Admission mode
Outpatient/Emergency 149 43.32
General ward transfer 19 5.52
Referral from other institutions 176 51.16
Comorbidities 145 42.15

Comorbidities were present in 153 cases, including congenital heart disease (n = 75), congenital laryngomalacia (n = 28), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (n = 19), esophagotracheal fistula or esophageal atresia (n = 7), spinal muscular atrophy (n = 5), post-liver transplantation or under chemotherapy for leukemia (n = 5), hydrocephalus (n = 3), connective tissue disease (n = 2), and nephrotic syndrome (n = 1).

3.2. Pathogen spectrum

Among the 344 patients diagnosed with severe pneumonia, tNGS identified pathogens in 343 cases, achieving a detection rate of 99.71% (Figure 1). A total of 86 pathogens were detected. Among the 86 detected pathogens, viruses accounted for slightly more than half (53.49%, 46/86), with RSV being the most common at 39.24% (135/344). RSV was subclassified into RSV-A (21.80%, 75/344) and RSV-B (17.44%, 60/344), followed by cytomegalovirus (28.20%, 97/344) and rhinovirus (24.13%, 83/344). Bacteria accounted for nearly one-third (31.40%, 27/86), predominantly Haemophilus influenzae (18.31%, 63/344), Streptococcus pneumoniae (11.63%, 40/344), and Acinetobacter baumannii (8.43%, 29/344). Fungi constituted 9.30% (8/86), including Pneumocystis jirovecii (13.08%, 45/344) and Candida albicans (7.85%, 27/344). Mycoplasma and Chlamydia species together made up 5.81% (5/86), and Mp was detected in 22.67% (78/344) of samples.

Figure 1.

Horizontal bar graph categorizing pathogens detected by respiratory mNGS, grouped by viruses, bacteria, fungi, and atypical organisms, with Cytomegalovirus (97), Haemophilus influenzae (63), Pneumocystis jirovecii (45), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (18) as the most frequently detected in each respective category.

Pathogens distribution by tNGS in PICU patients with severe pneumonia.

Co-infections were frequent (84.30%; Figure 2A), with up to nine pathogens detected in a single specimen. Eighteen distinct infection patterns were identified (Figure 2B), with bacterial-viral co-infections constituting the most prevalent pattern (31.20%), followed by bacterial infections only (11.37%), bacterial-viral-fungal co-infections (11.08%), and viral-viral co-infections (10.50%) (Figure 2C).

Figure 2.

Figure contains three panels of infection data: (A) pie chart showing majority as co-infection cases (290), with fewer single infections (53) and one non-infection among 344 cases; (B) stacked bar chart classifying single and co-infections by type, including bacterial, viral, fungal, and mixed; (C) pie chart quantifying proportions of various infection combinations, largest being bacterial-viral co-infection at 31.20 percent.

Pathogen profiles in 344 pediatric patients with severe pneumonia. (A) Infection status of the cohort; (B) composition of single and co-infections; (C) distribution of pathogen combination profiles.

3.3. Comparative performance of tNGS and CMTs

CMTs detected pathogens in 49.71% (171/344) of cases, significantly lower than that of tNGS (p < 0.05). Complete concordance between CMTs and tNGS was observed in only 4.09% (7/171) of CMTs-positive cases; partial concordance, defined as at least one overlapping pathogen, occurred in 72.52% (124/171); discordance was noted in 23.39% (40/171). CMTs identified merely 20 pathogen species, whereas tNGS detected 86 (Figure 3). PCR assays recognized two enterovirus cases and one rhinovirus case not initially detected by tNGS, but repeat PCR testing of the rhinovirus-positive sample was negative. Serology identified 33 patients positive for 40 pathogens; notably, all corresponding respiratory specimens tested negative by both tNGS and PCR (Figure 3). Among serologically diagnosed Mp cases (n = 23), 78.26% (18/23) received targeted antimicrobial therapy.

Figure 3.

Horizontal stacked bar chart comparing detection methods for various pathogens, including bacteria and viruses. Three methods are shown: tNGS (pink), tNGS plus CMTs (green), and CMTs alone (blue), measured by number of detections per pathogen. For most pathogens, tNGS detects the highest number, while some such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Respiratory syncytial virus show significant contributions from all methods. Legend appears in the upper right corner.

Detection patterns of 20 pathogens by CMTs and tNGS.

3.4. Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes

A total of 35 cases (10.17% of 344) were found to carry antimicrobial resistance genes detected by tNGS. The macrolide resistance-associated A2063G mutation was identified in 29.49% (23/78) of Mp isolates. Among these patients, erythromycin was administered to one patient, and levofloxacin to two patients. The same mutation was detected in 7.69% (1/13) of Bordetella pertussis isolates. The methicillin resistance gene mecA was present in 20% (4/20) of Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Among Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, two isolates carried the β-lactamase gene bla_CTX-M, and five carried the carbapenemase gene bla_NDM.

3.5. Clinical outcomes and healthcare burden

Of the 344 patients, 202 (58.72%) attained clinical stability and were transferred to general wards, while 100 (29.07%) were discharged directly following clinical improvement. A total of 42 (12.21%) had a poor prognosis. Among these patients, six (1.74%) were transferred to specialized hospitals due to comorbidities involving other specialties. Unfortunately, one patient (0.29%) died in hospital because of multiple organ dysfunction. At the families’ request, 35 patients (10.17%) were discharged early due to an unsatisfactory prognosis, and regrettably, 14 (4.07%) of these patients died shortly after discharge. Children with severe pneumonia had an prolonged hospital stay [median, 15 (IQR, 12-21) days], and hospitalization costs were substantial [median, ¥42,347 (IQR, ¥32,231-¥61,991) (Figure 4)]. Insurance covered approximately 55% of the costs [median, 54.88% (IQR, 48.21%–63.45%)].

Figure 4.

Violin and box plots compare length of stay in days (red, left y-axis) and total costs in yen (blue, right y-axis), showing distribution, median, interquartile range, and outliers for each dataset.

Length of hospital stay and medical costs for pediatric patients with severe pneumonia in PICU.

4. Discussion

In our study, we utilized tNGS to identify pathogens in children admitted to the PICU for severe pneumonia at a pediatric tertiary center in Guangxi. Among 344 BALF and sputum samples, tNGS detected 86 underlying pathogenic microorganisms, achieving a higher positivity rate than CMTs (99.71% vs. 49.71%). Compared with previous reports, the pathogen detection rate was similar (99.71% vs. 99.01%), whereas the diversity of identified species increased significantly (86 vs. 39) (17). Another study reported that mNGS detected 78 pathogens, with a detection rate of 97.61% (3). These findings highlight the remarkable performance of tNGS, indicating that it is a sensitive and comprehensive tool for pathogen identification in patients with severe pneumonia.

Viruses represented the most frequently identified pathogens in pediatric patients with severe pneumonia, constituting 53.49% of the 86 detected species. RSV was the predominant virus detected, followed by cytomegalovirus and rhinovirus. These findings align with earlier reports (3, 4). RSV is attributed to substantial disease burden in children (18). Epidemiological investigations have indicated that respiratory symptoms caused by rhinovirus infections tend to be mild, however, it has also emerged as a prominent cause of severe pneumonia in children (19, 20). In the present study, the elevated detection rates of cytomegalovirus (28.20%) and rhinovirus (24.13%) observed may be explained by the high comorbidity (45.15%), and infants under one year old accounted for 51.16%. It is reported that reactivation of CMV is frequently observed in ICU patients and is closely associated with severe complications (21, 22). Nevertheless, the precise pathogenic role of CMV remains difficult to define.

Co-infections were frequently detected in patients with respiratory infectious, accounting for 57.80% to 76.32% of cases (3, 18). In this study, the prevalence of co-infections was high (84.30%), and the most common pattern was viral and bacterial mixed infections (31.20%). We also found that among single infection cases, 73.58% (39/53) were caused by a single bacterial pathogen. tNGS identified 27 different bacterial species, with Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii appearing most often. Jung et al. found that bacteria in viral-bacterial co-infections are mainly opportunistic pathogens (23). The Global Burden of Disease study 2016 revealed that Streptococcus pneumoniae was the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality due to lower respiratory infection, contributing to over one million deaths in children under five (24). These findings highlight the crucial role of bacterial infections in severe respiratory diseases among children. tNGS detected four key antimicrobial resistance genes—A2063G (macrolide resistance), mecA, bla_CTX-M, and bla_NDM—in 20 isolates. These findings are consistent with the research of Liu and colleagues, who reported that the presence of resistance genes does not always predict actual drug resistance phenotypes (24). Due to the low detection rate of microbial culture, we suggest that profiling resistance genes may provide guidance for empirical antibiotic therapy.

Following the COVID-19 pandemic in late 2023, Mp caused community-acquired pneumonia outbreaks worldwide (25, 26). In China, a widespread outbreak of Mp infections was also observed (27–31). In our study, Mp was detected by tNGS in approximately 23% (78 of 344 patients) of severe pneumonia cases. Nearly all these patients had co-infections with other bacteria and viruses. Yang et al. reported that 37.9% (80/211) of patients with severe Mp pneumonia (SMPP) had a significantly high co-infection in 2012 (32). A systematic review shows a significant increase in the prevalence of macrolide-resistant Mp infections globally (26). Our observation showed that approximately 30% of Mp isolates were found to carry macrolide resistance-associated A2063G mutation, and azithromycin remained the preferred treatment. Only one patient was switched to erythromycin and two to levofloxacin due to a poor prognosis. Chen et al. reported that early use of minocycline might reduce the burden of macrolide-resistant Mp, with side effects occurring in only 0.7% (n = 1) of cases (33). This suggests that second-line antibiotics should be used even in patients younger than 2 years old diagnosed with severe MPP (34).

Due to the complexity of intensive care, associated serious complications, and challenges in diagnosis and treatment, data on the medical burden of children with severe pneumonia remain limited (35–37). In our cohort, the median hospital stay was 15 days. The hospitalization costs were substantial, reaching ¥42,347, which accounted for nearly 20% of the annual disposable income (38). At the families’ request, approximately 10% (n = 35) of patients were discharged early due to an unsatisfactory prognosis. Of these, 4.07% (n = 14) died shortly after discharge. These observations underscore the urgent need to provide stronger financial support for affected families.

Although our study provided insights, it had some limitations. One limitation is that patients were mainly referred from other hospitals, while the retrospective study was conducted at a single center. Another limitation involves common empirical antimicrobial treatments possibly altering the spectrum of certain bacterial pathogens, and the correlation between resistance phenotypes and resistance genes requires further validation. Finally, although tNGS covers extensive pathogen panel, distinguishing infection from colonization and contamination remains challenging.

In conclusion, tNGS shows notable performance in identifying pathogens related to severe pneumonia in PICU. Co-infections were found in 84.3% of cases, most often involving bacterial and viral mixed infections. It also finds important genes linked to antimicrobial resistance. The treatment burden for children with severe pneumonia is substantial. These findings strongly support using tNGS as a routine tool alongside other tests to improve precision therapy and antimicrobial management in the PICU. Further multi-center research should be conducted to verify these findings.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the patients and staff who contributed to this study.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the Guangxi Clinical Key Specialty (Laboratory Medicine) Project.

Footnotes

Edited by: Qing Wei, Wuhan Kindstar Medical Laboratory Co., Ltd., China

Reviewed by: Luis Del Carpio-Orantes, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Delegación Veracruz Norte, Mexico

Kingsley Bentum, Tuskegee University, United States

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Guangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

NZ: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. YT: Resources, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Formal analysis. ZZ: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Validation. DY: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Investigation, Data curation. YX: Resources, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Validation. DL: Investigation, Data curation, Software, Methodology, Conceptualization, Resources, Visualization, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. ZL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2026.1825458/full#supplementary-material

Datasheet1.pdf (107.1KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.GBD 2021 Lower Respiratory Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence and mortality burden of non-COVID-19 lower respiratory infections and aetiologies, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2021. Lancet Infect Dis. (2024) 24(9):974–1002. 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00176-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rudan I, O'Brien KL, Nair H, Liu L, Theodoratou E, Qazi S, et al. Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia in 2010: estimates of incidence, severe morbidity, mortality, underlying risk factors and causative pathogens for 192 countries. J Glob Health. (2013) 3(1):010401. 10.7189/jogh.03.010401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li M, Wang J, Yao Z, Liao H, Su S, Yang X, et al. Metagenomic-based pathogen surveillance for children with severe pneumonia in pediatric intensive care unit. Front Public Health. (2023) 11:1177069. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1177069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Qin L, Liang M, Song J, Chen P, Zhang S, Zhou Y, et al. Utilizing targeted next-generation sequencing for rapid, accurate, and cost-effective pathogen detection in lower respiratory tract infections. Infect Drug Resist. (2025) 18:329–40. 10.2147/IDR.S494558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cui S, Guo R, Chen C, Zhang Y, Meng J, Liu L, et al. Next-Generation sequencing for characterizing respiratory tract virome and improving detection of viral pathogens in children with pneumonia. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. (2024) 18(8):e13362. 10.1111/irv.13362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khales P, Razizadeh MH, Ghorbani S, Moattari A, Saadati H, Tavakoli A. Prevalence of respiratory viruses in children with respiratory tract infections during the COVID-19 pandemic era: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. (2025) 25(1):135. 10.1186/s12890-025-03587-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li T, Long J, Li Z, Xiong Y, Feng L, Jiang M, et al. Epidemiology of human respiratory tract infection in Chongqing, China after COVID-19-based on surveillance data encompassing 17 respiratory pathogens. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2025) 15:1567341. 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1567341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cilloniz C, Dela Cruz C, Curioso WH, Vidal CH, Pneumo-Strategy. World pneumonia day 2023: the rising global threat of pneumonia and what we must do about it. Eur Respir J. (2023) 62(5):2301672. 10.1183/13993003.01672-2023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller S, Chiu C. The role of metagenomics and next-generation sequencing in infectious disease diagnosis. Clin Chem. (2021) 68(1):115–24. 10.1093/clinchem/hvab173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ruan Z, Shi H, Chang L, Zhang J, Fu M, Li R, et al. The diagnostic efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in pathogen identification of pediatric pneumonia using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Pathog. (2025) 203:107492. 10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yin Y, Zhu P, Guo Y, Li Y, Chen H, Liu J, et al. Enhancing lower respiratory tract infection diagnosis: implementation and clinical assessment of multiplex PCR-based and hybrid capture-based targeted next-generation sequencing. EBioMed. (2024) 107:105307. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gu D, Liu J, Wang J, Yi Y, Chu Y, Gao R, et al. Integrating DNA and RNA sequencing for enhanced pathogen detection in respiratory infections. J Transl Med. (2025) 23(1):325. 10.1186/s12967-025-06342-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang J, Wang Y, Yang L, Wu J. Laboratory validation of targeted next-generation sequencing assay for pathogen detection in lower respiratory infection. Microbiol Spectr. (2025) 13(7):e0175124. 10.1128/spectrum.01751-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wei M, Mao S, Li S, Gu K, Gu D, Bai S, et al. Comparing the diagnostic value of targeted with metagenomic next-generation sequencing in immunocompromised patients with lower respiratory tract infection. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. (2024) 23(1):88. 10.1186/s12941-024-00749-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Subspecialty Group of Respiratory Diseases, The Society of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association, Editorial Board, Chinese Journal of Pediatrics. Guidelines for management of community acquired pneumonia in children (the revised edition of 2013) (I). Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. (2013) 51(10):745–52. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2013.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Deng Z, Li C, Wang Y, Wu F, Liang C, Deng W, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing for pulmonary infection diagnosis in patients unsuitable for bronchoalveolar lavage. Front Med (Lausanne). (2023) 10:1321515. 10.3389/fmed.2023.1321515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tan J, Chen Y, Lu J, Lu J, Liu G, Mo L, et al. Pathogen distribution and infection patterns in pediatric severe pneumonia: a targeted next-generation sequencing study. Clin Chim Acta. (2025) 565:119985. 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mazur NI, Caballero MT, Nunes MC. Severe respiratory syncytial virus infection in children: burden, management, and emerging therapies. Lancet. (2024) 404(10458):1143–56. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01716-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Esneau C, Duff AC, Bartlett NW. Understanding rhinovirus circulation and impact on illness. Viruses. (2022) 14(1):141. 10.3390/v14010141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tran XD, Hoang VT, Goumballa N, Vu TN, Tran TK, Pham TD, et al. Viral and bacterial microorganisms in Vietnamese children with severe and non-severe pneumonia. Sci Rep. (2024) 14(1):120. 10.1038/s41598-023-50657-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Groves IJ, Jackson SE, Poole EL, Nachshon A, Rozman B, Schwartz M, et al. Bromodomain proteins regulate human cytomegalovirus latency and reactivation allowing epigenetic therapeutic intervention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2021) 118(9):e2023025118. 10.1073/pnas.2023025118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.De Groof TWM, Elder EG, Lim EY, Heukers R, Bergkamp ND, Groves IJ, et al. Targeting the latent human cytomegalovirus reservoir for T-cell-mediated killing with virus-specific nanobodies. Nat Commun. (2021) 12(1):4436. 10.1038/s41467-021-24608-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jung J, Seo E, Yoo RN, Sung H, Lee J. Clinical significance of viral-bacterial codetection among young children with respiratory tract infections: findings of RSV, influenza, adenoviral infections. Medicine (Baltimore). (2020) 99(2):e18504. 10.1097/MD.0000000000018504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.GBD 2016 Lower Respiratory Infections Collaborators. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of lower respiratory infections in 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Infect Dis. (2018) 18(11):1191–210. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30310-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu Y, Wang R, Yuan Y, Zhao C, Wang Q, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of targeted next-generation sequencing and traditional microbial culture in the diagnosis of pulmonary infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. (2024) 110(4):116534. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.ESGMAC MAPS study group. Global spatiotemporal dynamics of Mycoplasma pneumoniae re-emergence after COVID-19 pandemic restrictions: an epidemiological and transmission modelling study. Lancet Microbe. (2025) 6(4):101019. 10.1016/j.lanmic.2024.101019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shah SS, Test M, Sheffler-Collins S, Weiss AK, Hall M. Macrolide therapy and outcomes in a multicenter cohort of children hospitalized with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. J Hosp Med. (2012) 7(4):311–7. 10.1002/jhm.1904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang YS, Zhou YL, Bai GN, Li SX, Xu D, Chen LN, et al. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. World J Pediatr. (2024) 20(9):901–14. 10.1007/s12519-024-00831-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Qi R, Yang Q, Li H, Wan Z, Ruan S. Pulmonary tuberculosis versus Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a retrospective analysis of clinical and imaging characteristics. Medicine (Baltimore). (2025) 104(46):e45990. 10.1097/MD.0000000000045990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oishi T, Narita M, Matsui K, Shirai T, Matsuo M, Negishi J, et al. Clinical implications of interleukin-18 levels in pediatric patients with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. J Infect Chemother. (2011) 17(6):803–6. 10.1007/s10156-011-0265-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lee KL, Lee CM, Yang TL, Yen TY, Chang LY, Chen JM, et al. Severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia requiring intensive care in children, 2010–2019. J Formos Med Assoc. (2021) 120(1 Pt 1):281–91. 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.08.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang S, Lu S, Guo Y, Luan W, Liu J, Wang L. A comparative study of general and severe mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. BMC Infect Dis. (2024) 24(1):449. 10.1186/s12879-024-09340-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen J, Qi X, Yin Y, Zhang L, Zhang J, Yuan S. Effects of minocycline on macrolide-unresponsive Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: a single-center retrospective study. Transl Pediatr. (2021) 10(11):2997–3004. 10.21037/tp-21-356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Centrone F, Accogli M, Melilli R, Marziani A, Orlando VA, Casulli D, et al. Prevalence of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections after the COVID-19 pandemic in southern Italy, 2023−2025. Infect Dis Ther. (2025) 14(12):2733–41. 10.1007/s40121-025-01244-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ching PR, Pedersen LL. Severe pneumonia. Med Clin North Am. (2025) 109(3):705–20. 10.1016/j.mcna.2024.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pickens CI, Gao CA, Bodner J, Walter JM, Kruser JM, Donnelly HK, et al. An adjudication protocol for severe pneumonia. Open Forum Infect Dis. (2023) 10(7):ofad336. 10.1093/ofid/ofad336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wei D, Zhang L, Jin F, Liu F. Impact of early myocardial injury on patients with severe pneumonia. Intern Emerg Med. (2024) 19(8):2223–32. 10.1007/s11739-024-03743-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shi H, Wang T, Zhao Z, Norback D, Wang X, Li Y, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, impact and management of pneumonia among preschool children in Chinese seven cities: a cross-sectional study with interrupted time series analysis. BMC Med. (2023) 21(1):227. 10.1186/s12916-023-02951-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Datasheet1.pdf (107.1KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.


Articles from Frontiers in Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES