Abstract
Herein we report for the first time the use of isochromane-3,4-diones in a direct vinylogous aldol reaction with both aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes, affording the corresponding products in moderate to good yield and with very high diastereoselectivity in most cases. The reaction is enabled by a tertiary amine, which promotes the in situ formation of nucleophilic dienolate via γ-deprotonation of the α-ketoester functionality incorporated within the 3-isochromanone scaffold.
Keywords: Heterocycles, vinylogy, aldol reaction, lactones, isochromanones
1. Introduction
Over the past few decades, vinylogous reactions have emerged as a powerful strategy for the construction of structurally complex building blocks [1,2,3,4,5]. Two main strategies have been pursued: the classical use of silyl dienolethers in indirect-type Mukayama reactions promoted by Lewis acids [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], and more recently, the in situ generation of dienols facilitated by weak bases under catalytic conditions [5,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Successful vinylogous aldol reactions are mostly associated with the formation of dienol derivatives from enals, while the use of enones as γ-selective pronucleophiles remains less explored [5]. Achieving γ-regioselectivity in reactions involving α,β-unsaturated ketones as pronucleophiles is particularly challenging. This is primarily due to the low electron density at the γ-position of the corresponding dienolates, which tends to favour non-vinylogous α-selective reactions. The presence of further enolizable α’ carbon is another drawback that can affect the selectivity [5]. Often activated ketones such as trifluoromethyl ketones or α-keto esters are employed as electrophilic partners [18,19,20]. Therefore, one of the main challenges in expanding the scope of this concept lies in the identification of novel vinylogous nucleophiles [5].
Recently, our group reported the use of isochroman-3,4-dione 1 in [4+2] cycloadditions to afford bridged lactone 4 analogues of natural products [21,22], or in decarboxylative cycloaddition/aromatization reactions to yield functionalized naphthols 7 [22]. Mildly basic conditions were required to promote the vinylogous enolization, enabling access to highly reactive diene species 2 that could react with electron-poor alkenes 3 [21,22], allenoates 5 [23] or alkynoates 6 [23]. Based on experimental evidence, we proposed that in all cases, the cycloadditions proceeded through concerted rather than stepwise pathways [21,22]. On the other hand, the in situ-generated dienol derived from isochromane-3,4-dione could also favour vinylogous γ-reactions when the electrophilic partner is less prone to undergo cycloaddition. This strategy would allow, selectively, the functionalization at 1 position of the 3-isochromanone, a transformation that has so far proven particularly challenging (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.
Previous studies and this work.
2. Results and Discussion
With this idea in mind, we started our investigation by reacting benzaldehyde 8a with isochromane-3,4-dione 1 under basic conditions, under which the corresponding dienol species was generated in situ (Table 1). Optimization of the reaction parameters led to the formation of the vinylogous aldol adduct 9a. The conditions were properly selected to favour the isolation of the pure product as a single diastereomer directly from the reaction mixture as an insoluble white solid in the presence of two equivalents of DIPEA and when the molar concentration of the limiting reagent was equal to or exceeded 0.4 M in DCM as the solvent (Entry 1). The structure of 9a was also confirmed by X-ray structural analysis performed on single crystals (Figure 1), which allowed us to determine the relative configuration as (R*,S*).
Table 1.
Reaction condition optimization.
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Dione (Equiv.) |
Benzaldehyde (Equiv.) |
Base (Equiv.) | Solvent | Concentration Molarity |
Time (h) | Yield (%) |
| 1 | 1 | 1.3 | DIPEA (2.0) | DCM | 0.4 | 72 | 66 a |
| 2 | 1 | 1.3 | DIPEA (2.0) | DCM | 0.4 | 72 | 87 b |
| 3 | 1 | 1.3 | DIPEA (2.0) | DCM | 0.4 | 48 | 55 a |
| 4 | 2.3 | 1 | DIPEA (1.0) | DCM | 0.2 | 48 | -- |
| 5 | 2.3 | 1 | DIPEA (2.0) | DCM | 0.2 | 5 | 20 |
| 6 | 1 | 1.3 | DIPEA (2.0) | DCM | 0.6 | 72 | 70 |
| 7 | 1 | 1.3 | DIPEA (2.0) | CHCl3 | 0.4 | 72 | 65 |
| 8 | 1 | 1.3 | NaH (1.5) |
DMSO | 0.2 | 24 | -- |
| 9 | 1 | 1.3 | K2CO3
(1.5) |
ACN | 0.2 | 24 | -- |
| 10 | 2 | 1 | Li2CO3
(1.2) |
ACN | 0.2 | 24 | -- |
a Isolated as solid from reaction mixture. b Overall yield from solid isolation and column chromatography of mother solution.
Figure 1.

ORTEP drawing of compound 9a. Ellipsoids are shown at 50% probability level (CCDC code: 2529279). Crystals of 9a were obtained by slow evaporation of a solution of 9a (5 mg) in a hexane/methanol mixture (1.5 mL, v/v = 2:1).
This isolation process was facilitated by the absence of inorganic reagents and by the efficient removal of the organic base, unreacted starting materials, and by-products through an optimized protocol (see experimental procedure). Notably, this procedure eliminates the need for chromatography, which is considered a key advantage in pharmaceutical manufacturing, where avoiding chromatographic purification is highly desirable for API scale-up [24,25]. The reaction and the isolation protocol was also reproducible at 1 mmol scale with only a slight decrease in isolated yield of 55% and with similar high purity.
Analysis of the mother liquor composition proved challenging; however, following chromatographic purification, the overall isolated yield increased to 87% (Entry 2), and no other diastereomer was detected.
Further analysis of the reaction parameters highlighted that more diluted conditions, lower amounts of base or shorter reaction times gave a significantly lower conversion or decomposition products as detected by 1H NMR on the crude (Entries 3–5). The effect of concentration can be the result of the fact that the reaction under thermodynamic control does not display elevated conversion, and only when the solubility decreases is the equilibrium shifted toward the formation of the solid product according to the scheme of Table 1. More concentrated conditions led to the final products in higher yield but with lower purity (Entry 6). The use of CHCl3 led to similar results since we also observed low solubility of the final product in this solvent (Entry 7). With the aim of quantitatively generating the dienolate species, we also tried NaH as base in anhydrous DMSO, but we observed the formation of decomposition products (Entry 8). The use of other inorganic bases like K2CO3 or Li2CO3 in acetonitrile (ACN) also led to decomposition products (Entries 9 and 10).
We then analyzed the scope of the reaction, relying on similar low-solubility behaviour (Table 2). In most cases, the aldol products were obtained in moderate to good yields as single diastereomers via simple filtration. Their low solubility enabled straightforward purification by washing the obtained solid and avoiding chromatography, as previously described for 9a.
Table 2.
Analysis of the scope.
|
|---|
|
In a few cases (9f, 9n–p, 9t), increased solubility prevented efficient precipitation, and the products were isolated in lower yields by chromatography. The origin of these solubility differences may be attributed to the ortho substitution pattern, which can hinder efficient crystal packing in 9f and 9n. A similar effect may be observed for 9o and 9p, likely due to the presence of a long aliphatic chain. Minor quantities of the opposite diastereomer were occasionally observed. The analysis of the mother liquors was challenging due to their complexity and was therefore not systematically pursued.
Analyzing the scope in detail, halogenated benzaldehydes afforded products 9b–9g in good yields. If on one hand 9g (from o-iodobenzaldehyde) was obtained in very good yield (85%), 9f (from o-chlorobenzaldehyde) was more soluble and isolated in lower yield (46%) after chromatography as a mixture of diastereomers. Electron-withdrawing substituents (cyano, nitro, trifluoromethyl) provided comparable moderate yields (9h–9j). Isonicotinaldehyde (9k) and 2-naphthaldehyde (9l) were also well tolerated, although 9k revealed very little solublility even in DMSO. While 4-methoxybenzaldehyde showed poor reactivity, 4- and 2-methylbenzaldehydes afforded products 9m and 9n respectively in acceptable yields. Aliphatic aldehydes (octanal and decanal) gave moderate yields of diastereomeric mixtures after chromatography (9o, 9p). Substituted isocroman-3,4-diones with methoxy, bromo and nitro substituents delivered products 9q–9t in moderate yields upon reaction with substituted benzaldehydes. Notably, 8-nitroisochromane-3,4-dione was reactive under these conditions, in contrast to previous Diels–Alder reports [21,22,23], furnishing 9t as an inseparable diastereomeric mixture after chromatography.
Follow-up reactivity was extensively investigated in 9a through oxidation reactions using various oxidants, including Dess–Martin periodinane, MnO2, and PCC, as well as dehydration with p-TSA and reduction processes. However, the low solubility of these compounds in common solvents, such as halogenated, aromatic, and oxygenated media, significantly limited their applicability.
Oxidation of the more soluble derivatives 9o and 9p was also explored, but these attempts predominantly resulted in decomposition products.
Finally, the novel tetrol 10 with the pinacol motif, which is of great interest in further elaborations regarding the synthesis of bioactive compounds [26,27], was successfully synthesized via reductive ring opening of compound 9a. Despite its limited solubility in THF, the reaction proceeded in the presence of LiBH4 to afford the product in moderate yield as a mixture of two diastereomers in an 80:20 ratio (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2.
Reductive ring opening of 9a.
3. Materials and Methods
Unless otherwise noted, all chemicals, reagents and solvents for the performed reactions are commercially available. 3-Isochromanone was purchased from Fluorochem. Isochromane-3,4-dione and substituted isochromane-3,4-diones were prepared according to the literature procedures [21,22,23]. All the reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on precoated silica gel plates (0.25 mm) and visualized by fluorescence quenching at 254 nm. Flash chromatography was carried out using neutral activated alumina (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker DRX 600, 400, 300 and 250 MHz spectrometers (600 MHz, 1H, 150 MHz, 13C; 400 MHz, 1H, 100.6 MHz; 13C, 300 MHz, 1H, 75.5 MHz, 13C, 250 MHz, 1H, 62.5 MHz, 13C). The internal reference was set to the residual solvent signals (δH 7.26 ppm, δC 77.16 ppm for CDCl3, δH 2.50 ppm, δC 39.10 ppm for DMSO-d6). The 13C NMR spectra were recorded under broad-band proton decoupling. 1HNMR, 13CNMR and HRMS data are provided for all newly synthesized compounds. Copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra for these compounds are included in the Supplementary Materials. The following abbreviations are used to indicate the multiplicity in NMR spectra: s—singlet, d—doublet, t—triplet, q—quartet, dd—doublet of doublets, m—multiplet, br s—broad signal. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were acquired using a Bruker SolariX XR Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a 7T refrigerated actively shielded superconducting magnet. For ionization of the samples, electrospray ionization (ESI) or MALDI was applied.
3.1. General Procedure for the Reaction of Dione with Benzaldehydes
To a solution of dione 1 (35 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv.) and DIPEA (25 mg, 0.2 mmol, 1 equiv.) in DCM (0.5 mL), benzaldehyde (0.3. mmol, 1.5 equiv.) was added and the mixture was stirred until a precipitate formed (3 days). To the suspension, 0.5 mL of pentane was added, the mixture was sonicated for 30 s, and the supernatant solution was removed. The solid was then washed another two times with a mixture of pentane/DCM (8:2 ratio) and filtered off.
1-(hydroxy(phenyl)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9a)
Yield = 34 mg from solid isolation + 10 mg from chromatography (86). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. Single diastereomer. M.p. 197.5–198.8 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.84 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.15 (s, 3H), 6.92 (s, 2H), 6.79 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 6.31(d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.90 (s, 1H), 5.19 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 174.8, 159.0, 139.3, 136.5, 133.1, 132.4, 129.2, 128.1, 127.9, 127.3, 126.5, 126.4, 83.1, 73.3. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C16H12KO4]+: 307.0367; found: 307.0368.
The reaction was scaled up at 1 mmol of 1a, obtaining 147 mg of 9a (55% yield).
1-((4-bromophenyl)(hydroxy)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9b)
Yield: 42 mg (60%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. Single diastereomer. M.p. 227.1–228.4 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.91 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 2H), 7.55 (m, 3H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.49 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 5.82 (s, 1H),4.69 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 176.2, 160.1, 142.5, 141.9, 136.7, 133.31, 132.7, 130.9, 130.7, 128.4, 127.9, 122.5, 84.8, 75.1. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C16H1181BrKO4]+: 386.9453; found: 386.9486.
1-((4-chlorophenyl)(hydroxy)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9c)
Yield = 31 mg (52%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. Single diastereomer. M.p. 186.4–187.4 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.95 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (s, 2H), 7.63–7.57 (m, 1H), 7.55–7.41 (m, 4H), 6.56 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 5.87 (s, 1H), 4.76 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 174.8, 158.7, 140.7, 140.6, 135.2, 132.5, 131.9, 129.4, 128.9, 128.4, 126.9, 126.5, 83.5, 73.6. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C16H1235ClO4]+: 303.0419; found: 303.0435.
1-((4-fluorophenyl)(hydroxy)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9d)
Yield = 32 mg (56%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. Single diastereomer. M.p. 199.8–200.5 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.89 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.51–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.07–6.93 (m, 5H), 6.40 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.94 (s, 1H), 5.25 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 175.6, 162.4 (JC-F = 161.2), 159.7, 137.2, 136.4, 134.1, 133.3, 130.2, 129.6 (JC-F = 5.4), 128.1, 127.4, 115.8 (JC-F = 14.1), 83.7, 73.5. 19F{1H} NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 114.8. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C16H12FO4]+: 287.0715; found: 287.0729.
1-((3-bromophenyl)(hydroxy)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9e)
Yield: 42 mg (67%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. single diastereomer. M.p. 183.9–185.2 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.96 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.85–7.88 (m, 2H), 7.70 (s, 1H), 7.64–7.60 (m, 1H), 7.51 (d, 7.85 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (d, J = 4.8 Hz 1H), 5.92 (s, 1H), 4.77 (d, J = 4.3 Hz 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 174.8, 158.7, 144.5, 140.5, 135.2, 131.9, 130.7, 130.6, 129.8, 129.5, 126.9, 126.5, 126.1, 121.9, 83.3, 73.5. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C16H1179BrNaO4]+: 368.9733; found: 368.9744.
1-((2-chlorophenyl)(hydroxy)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9f)
Yield: 28 mg (46%). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel (Hexane/Ethyl acetate, 1:1) obtained as a white solid. Mixture of diastereomers (87/13). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.99 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 7.92 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz, major diastereomer), 7.87 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 7.70–7.62 (m, 3H, minor diastereomer), 7.54–7.47 (m, 2H, major diastereomer), 7.41–7.36 (m, 1H, major diastereomer), 7.31–7.25 (m, 1H, major diastereomer), 7.14 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 7.05 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 6.75 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 6.48–6.26 (m, 2H, major diastereomer), 5.90 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H major diastereomer), 5.81 (s, 1H, minor diastereomer), 5.41 (m, J = 5.2, 3.1 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 4.95 (d, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer). 13C NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6) (major diastereomer only): δ 174.6, 158.7, 136.3. 135.9, 133.2, 132.5, 131.0, 130.0, 129.5, 129.3, 128.8, 127.4, 127.0, 126.6, 80.4, 70.8. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C16H11ClKO4]+: 340.9977; found: 341.0012.
1-(hydroxy(2-iodophenyl)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9g)
Yield: 68 mg (85%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. M.p. 173.3–174.1 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.02 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H) 7.83 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (t, J = 7.6 Hz 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 7.5 Hz 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.6 Hz 1H), 7.14 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 5.83 (s, 1H), 4.73 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 174.2, 158.1, 141.8, 140.0, 138.7, 135.0, 131.3, 129.9, 129.2, 129.0, 128.1, 126.7, 124.9, 97.5, 80.8, 77.3. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C16H11INaO4]+: 416.9595; found: 416.9589.
4-((3,4-dioxoisochroman-1-yl)(hydroxy)methyl)benzonitrile (9h)
Yield: 28 mg (48%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (1:1), resulting in a white solid. M.p.221.5–228.7 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.99 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 4H), 7.72 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H), 7.65 (s, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 5.97 (s, 1H), 5.91 (s, 1H), 4.88 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (63 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 174.6, 158.5, 147.2, 140.2, 135.1, 132.3, 131.8, 129.4, 127.8, 126.8, 126.4, 119.2, 110.5, 83.0, 73.6. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C17H11KO4]+: 332.0320; found: 332.0334.
1-hydroxy(4-nitrophenyl) methyl) isochromanone-3,4 dione (9i)
Yield: 42 mg (67%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. Single diastereomer. M.p. 204.4–205.9 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.23 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.92 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.84–7.80 (m, 2H), 7.75 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 5.94 (s, 1H), 4.88 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 174.7, 158.6, 149.3, 147.3, 140.2, 135.2, 131.9, 129.6, 128.1, 126.9, 126.5, 123.5, 83.1, 73.6. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C16H11KNO6]+: 352.0218; found: 352.0245.
1-(hydroxy(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9j)
Yield: 38 mg (52%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. Single diastereomer. M.p. 166.5–168.7 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.98 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.9 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H), 7.81–7.68 (m, 4H), 7.68–7.58 (m, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 5.9 (s, 1H), 4.86 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 175.5, 159.3, 147.1, 141.1, 136.0, 132.7, 130.3, 129.4, 129.1, 128.5, 127.7, 127.4, 127.2, 126.1 (q, J = 3.1 Hz), 84.0, 74.5. 19F{1H} NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 60.7. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C17H12F3O4]+: 337.0683; found: 337.0691.
1-(hydroxy(pyridin-4-yl)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9k)
Yield: 46 mg (86%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. Single diastereomer. M.p.: 212.3–213.8 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD-d4/DMSO-d6): δ 8.60 (d, J = 4.3 Hz, 2H), 7.99 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H) 7.87 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 2H), 7.66–7.63 (m, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 2H), 5.98 (s, 1H), 4.81 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, MeOD-d4/DMSO-d6): δ 172.4, 158.5, 150.3, 149.6, 140.2, 135.2, 131.9, 129.4, 126.9, 126.4, 122.0, 83.0, 73.1. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C15H11NNaO4]+: 290.0787; found: 290.0798.
1-(hydroxy(naphthalen-2-yl)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9l)
Yield: 43 mg (68%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. Single diastereomer. M.p. 202.2–203.7 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, MeOD-d4): δ 7.98–7.85 (m, 7H), 7.71–7.61 (m, 2H), 7.55–7.49 (m, 2H), 6.65 (d, J = 4.4 Hz 1H), 6.03 (s, 1H), 4.94 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, MeOD-d4): δ 174.9, 158.8, 140.8, 139.2, 135.2, 133.1, 132.9, 131.9, 129.4, 128.3, 128.0, 127.9, 126.9, 126.7, 126.5, 126.4, 125.7, 125.2, 83.6, 74.4. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C20H14KO4]+: 357.0524; found: 357.0534.
1-(hydroxy(p-tolyl) methyl) isochromanone-3,4 dione (9m)
Yield: 26 mg (46%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. Single diastereomer. M.p. 206.5–207.7 °C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.88 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.80–7.75 (m, 2H), 7.57–7.52 (m, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.32 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 5.7 (s, 1H), 4.63 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.24 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 176.2, 160.2, 142.2, 133.9, 138.5, 136.6, 133.3, 130.8, 130.3, 128.4, 128.2, 127.9, 85.1, 75.6, 22.6. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C17H15O4]+: 283.0965; found: 283.0965.
1-(hydroxy(o-tolyl)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9n)
Yield: 23 mg (41%). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel (Hexane/Ethyl acetate, 8:2). Single diastereomer, obtained as a viscous oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.09 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (t, J = 7.6 Hz,1H) 7.33 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 2H), 6.97–6.92 (m, 1H), 6.52 (d, J = 7.8 Hz 1H), 6.29 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 5.68 (s, 1H), 5.63 (s, 1H), 3.88 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 174.3, 158.9, 135.4, 135.1 132.9, 132.8, 132.3, 130.2, 129.1, 128.2, 126.6, 125.8, 81.7, 72.0, 18.8. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C17H15O4]+: 283.0965; found: 283.0981.
1-(1-hydroxyoctyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (9o)
Yield: 38 mg (65%). Mixture of diastereomers (dr = 67/33). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel (Hexane/Ethyl acetate, 8:2) afforded as a white solid, dr = 2/1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.92 (d, J = 7.63 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 7.78 (m, 1H, mixture of diastereomers), 7.60 (m, 1H, mixture of diastereomers), 7.52 (d, J = 7.6 Hz 1H, major diastereomer), 6.03 (d, J = 6 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 5.73 (s, 1H, mixture of diastereomers), 5.66 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 3.88 (s, major diastereomer), 3.50 (s, minor diastereomer), 1.27–1.29 (m, 12H, mixture of diastereomers), 0.86–0.82 (m, 3H, mixture of diastereomers). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 175.0, 174.9, 159.2, 158.9, 141.5, 137.8, 135.2, 134.1, 132.5, 131.7, 129.4, 129.1, 127.4, 127.0, 126.8, 126.0, 82.3, 82.2, 73.0, 71.5, 34.3, 33.0, 31.7, 31.6, 29.4, 29.2, 29.1, 29.0, 25.8, 25.7, 22.6, 22.5, 14.3. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C17H22KO4]+: 329.1150; found: 329.1188.
1-(1hydroxydecyl) isochromanone-3,4-dione (9p)
Yield: 35 mg (55%). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel (Hexane/Ethyl acetate, 8:2) mixture of diastereomers (dr = 67/33), resulting in a white solid. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.90 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H+1H, mixture of diastereomers), 7.75 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H+1H, mixture of diastereomers), 7.58 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H+1H, mixture of diastereomers), 7.50 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H+1H, mixture of diastereomers), 6.02 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 5.70 (s, 1H+1H, mixture of diastereomers), 5.65 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 3.85 (m, 1H major diastereomer), 3.46 (m, 1H, minor diastereomer), 1.21 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 16H+8H, mixture of diastereomers), 0.83 (t, J = 11.1 Hz, 3H+3H, mixture of diastereomers). 13C NMR (63 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 174.9, 174.8, 159.1, 158.9, 141.4, 137.6, 135.0, 133.9, 132.4, 131.6, 129.3, 128.9, 127.2, 126.8, 126.6, 125.9, 82.2, 72.9, 71.4, 34.2, 32.8, 31.6, 29.2, 28.8, 25.6, 22.4, 14.2. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C19H26NaO4]+: 341.1723; found: 341.1740.
1-(hydroxy(2-ioddophenyl)methyl)-6-methoxyisochromane-3,4-dione (9q)
Yield = 44 mg (60%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid (Single diastereomer). M.p. 190.6–192.1 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.91 (d, J = 7.9 Hz 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.5 Hz 1H), 7.50–7.37 (m, 4H), 7.14–7.08 (m, 1H), 6.78 (d, J = 4.9 Hz 1H), 5.76 (s, 1H), 4.72 (d, J = 4.3 Hz 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (63 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 174.4, 159.9, 158.2, 142.2, 139.2, 133.1, 132.8, 130.3, 129.2, 128.4, 127.1, 132.2, 109.4, 97.9, 80.9, 77.5, 56.2. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C17H13INaO5]+: 446.9700; found: 446.9723.
7-bromo-1-(hydroxy(4-nitrophenyl) methyl)isochromanone (9r)
Yield: 42 mg (53%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. Mixture of diastereomers (dr = 93/7). 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.41 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H minor diastereomer), 8.36–8.19 (m, 3H, major diastereomer), 8.20–8.07 (m, 2H, minor diastereomer), 7.96–7.74 (m, 4H, major diastereomer), 7.69 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 7.30 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 3H, minor diastereomer), 6.78 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 6.54 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 6.04 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 5.96 (s, 1H, major diastereomer), 5.44 (s, 1H, minor diastereomer), 4.98 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 174.1(major), 158.4(minor), 158.1(major), 149.1(major), 147.4(major), 147.2(minor), 141.1(major), 137.8(minor), 132.7(major), 132.6(minor), 131.8(minor), 131.1(major), 130.0(minor), 129.5(major), 129.4(major), 129.1(major), 128.8(minor), 128.2(major), 128.0(minor), 127.6(minor), 123.6(major), 123.4(minor), 82.5(major), 81.5(minor), 73.4(major), 72.7(minor). HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C16H1081BrNNaO6]+: 415.9565; found: 415.9589.
1-(hydroxy(4-nitrophenyl)methyl)-6-methoxyisochromanone-3,4-dione (9s)
Yield: 36 mg (52%). Hexane (0.5 mL) was added to suspension to remove nonpolar impurities, followed by a wash with hexane/DCM (8:2), resulting in a white solid. Single diastereomer. M.p. 198.6–199.1 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.30 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.86–7.79 (m, 3H) 7.50–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 2.3 Hz 1H), 6.72 (d, J = 4.3 Hz 1H), 5.92 (s, 1H), 4.90 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 174.4, 159.9, 158.3, 149.3, 147.2, 133.0, 128.1, 123.5, 123.0, 109.1, 82.8, 73.5, 56.0. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C17H13NNaO7]+: 366.0585; found: 366.0592.
1-((3-bromophenyl)(hydroxy)methyl)-8-nitroisochromanone-3,4-dione (9t)
Yield: 30 mg (55%) Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel (Hexane/Ethyl acetate, 8:2). Mixture of diastereomers (dr = 71/29), obtained as a viscous liquid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.65 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 8.54 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 8.32 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 8.08 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 7.96 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 7.85 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 7.64 (s, 1H, major diastereomer), 7.58–7.46 (m, 2H, major diastereomer), 7.41 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 7.35 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 7.08 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 6.97 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 6.40 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 6.37 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 5.78 (d, J = 19.0 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 5.66 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 5.36 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 5.25 (t, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 168.5(major), 168.0(minor), 144.7, 144.3, 143.9, 142.3, 141.6, 141.0, 132.3, 132.2, 131.8, 131.5, 130.9, 130.8, 130.6, 130.3, 130.1, 130.0, 129.9, 129.6, 129.3, 126.4, 125.6, 121.9, 121.4, 85.3(major), 84.7(minor), 72.6(minor), 68.8(major). HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C16H1079BrNNaO6]+: 413.9584; found: 413.9597.
3.2. Synthesis of 1-(2-(1,2-Dihydroxyethyl) phenyl)-2-phenylethane-1,2-diol
LiBH4 (0.3 mmol, 160 µL of 2M solution in THF, 3 equiv.) was added dropwise to a solution of 1-(hydroxy(phenyl)methyl)isochromane-3,4-dione (0.2 mmol, 54 mg, 1 equiv.) in the anhydrous THF (1 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere at 0 °C for 1 h, and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature overnight. Then, the mixture was diluted with water (200 µL) and 2 mL of MeOH and allowed to stir for 30 min. After evaporation of the solvent, the crude was purified directly by chromatography on silica gel (chloroform/Methanol, 95:5), yielding 58% (32 mg), dr = 80/20.
1-(2-(1,2-dihydroxyethyl)phenyl)-2-phenylethane-1,2-diol: (10)
Yield: 32 mg (58%). Purification by flash chromatography on silica gel (DCM/MeOH, 95:5), obtained as white wax. Mixture of diastereomers (dr = 80/20). 1H NMR (600 MHz, MeOD-d4): δ 7.25–7.10 (m, 9H), 6.96 (td, J = 7.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 6.50 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 6.35 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 5.25 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 5.13 (s, 1H, minor diastereomer), 5.09 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 5.05 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer), 4.85 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H, minor diastereomer), 4.25 (s, 1H, minor diastereomer), 4.21 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H, major diastereomer). 13C NMR (150 MHz, MeOD-d4) δ 140.7major, 140.6minor, 136.0minor, 133.9major, 132.7minor, 132.4major, 129.4major, 129.2minor, 127.6minor, 127.5major, 127.3minor, 127.0major, 127.0minor, 126.8, 126.8, 126.7, 126.7, 126.0major, 125.7minor, 93.3major, 93.0minor, 80.3minor, 76.4major, 76.3major, 68.3mjor. HRMS (MALDI-FT ICR): m/z calcd. for [C16H18NaO4]+: 297.1098; found: 297.1109.
4. Conclusions
We have described the vinylogous aldol reaction of isochromane-3,4-diones with both aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes. The reaction is facilitated by deprotonation at the γ-position of α-ketoester functionality within the isochromane-3,4-dione heterocyclic ring, allowing the in situ generation of dienol species that act as nucleophiles toward a wide range of aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes. Isochromane-3,4-diones bearing either electron-withdrawing or electron-donating substituents also afforded the corresponding vinylogous aldol products in a good yield. In most cases, the process was driven by the low solubility of the products in the reaction medium, resulting in a very high diastereoselectivity. The low solubility of the final products in common organic solvents limited follow-up chemistry, even if a reductive ring opening was achieved, leading to a novel tetrol derivative displaying a pinacol motif.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the University of Salerno and MUR for financial support (FARB). The authors would also like to thank Patrizia Oliva for helping to process the NMR spectra and Patrizia Iannece for performing HRMS.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules31091508/s1: X-ray crystallography of 9a. Copies of 1H and 13C NMR spectra of all the new compounds. The authors have cited additional references within the Supporting Information [28,29,30,31,32,33].
Author Contributions
S.G.A.: investigation. M.S.M.: investigation. C.T.: X-ray analysis. A.M.: writing and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supplementary Material of this article. CCDC 2529279 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compound 9a of this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. See Supporting Information for further details. Available online: http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures (accessed on 10 April 2026).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Denmark S.E., Heemstra J.R., Jr., Beutner G.L. Catalytic, enantioselective, vinylogous aldol reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005;44:4682–4698. doi: 10.1002/anie.200462338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Casiraghi G., Battistini L., Curti C., Rassu G., Zanardi F. The vinylogous aldol and related addition reactions: Ten years of progress. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:3076–3154. doi: 10.1021/cr100304n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hosokawa S. Recent development of vinylogous Mukaiyama aldol reactions. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018;59:77–88. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.11.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cordes M., Kalesse M. Very recent advances in vinylogous Mukaiyama aldol reactions and their applications to synthesis. Molecules. 2019;24:3040. doi: 10.3390/molecules24173040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Curti C., Battistini L., Sartori A., Zanardi F. New developments of the principle of vinylogy as applied to π-extended enolate-type donor systems. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:2448–2612. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Denmark S.E., Beutner G.L., Wynn T., Eastgate M.D. Lewis base activation of Lewis acids: Catalytic, enantioselective addition of silyl ketene acetals to aldehydes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:3774–3789. doi: 10.1021/ja047339w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Denmark S.E., Heemstra J.R. Lewis base activation of Lewis acids: Catalytic, enantioselective vinylogous aldol addition reactions. J. Org. Chem. 2007;72:5668–5688. doi: 10.1021/jo070638u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Acocella M.R., De Rosa M., Massa A., Palombi L., Villano R., Scettri A. Silicon tetrachloride in organic synthesis: New applications for the vinylogous aldol reaction. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:4091–4097. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2005.02.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Palombi L., Acocella M.R., Celenta N., Massa A., Villano R., Scettri A. Highly enantioselective vinylogous addition of 2-trimethylsilyloxyfuran to aldehydes promoted by the SiCl4/chiral Lewis base system. Tetrahedron Asymmetry. 2006;17:3300–3303. doi: 10.1016/j.tetasy.2006.11.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Scettri A., Acocella M.R., Palombi L., Scalera C., Villano R., Massa A. Diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of trans-2,3-disubstituted 2,3-dihydropyran-4-one derivatives. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006;348:2229–2236. doi: 10.1002/adsc.200606159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tian X., Melchiorre P. Control of remote stereochemistry in the synthesis of spirocyclic oxindoles: Vinylogous organocascade catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:5360–5363. doi: 10.1002/anie.201301017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cassani C., Melchiorre P. Direct catalytic enantioselective vinylogous aldol reaction of α-branched enals with isatins. Org. Lett. 2012;14:5590–5593. doi: 10.1021/ol302711w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cuadros S., Dell’Amico L., Melchiorre P. Forging fluorine-containing quaternary stereocenters by a light-driven organocatalytic aldol desymmetrization process. Angew. Chem. 2017;129:12037–12041. doi: 10.1002/ange.201706763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Curti C., Rassu G., Zambrano V., Pinna L., Pelosi G., Sartori A., Battistini L., Zanardi F., Casiraghi G. Bifunctional cinchona alkaloid/thiourea catalyzes direct and enantioselective vinylogous Michael addition of 3-alkylidene oxindoles to nitroolefins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:6200–6204. doi: 10.1002/anie.201202027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Curti C., Battistini L., Sartori A., Rassu G., Pelosi G., Lombardo M., Zanardi F. (E)-3-(Alkoxycarbonyl-2-alkyliden)-2-oxindoles: Multidentate pronucleophiles for the organocatalytic, vinylogous Michael addition to nitroolefins. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2018;360:711–721. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201701164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hu J.Y., Fu J.H., Li T.Z., Sha F., Wu X.Y. Enantioselective vinylogous aldol reaction between β,γ-unsaturated amides and isatins. New J. Chem. 2024;48:13126–13130. doi: 10.1039/D4NJ01147C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hartwig W.T., Sammakia T. Doubly vinylogous aldol reaction of furoate esters with aldehydes and ketones. J. Org. Chem. 2017;82:759–764. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b02473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Duan J., Cheng Y., Cheng J., Li R., Li P. Organocatalytic asymmetric benzylation and aldol-hemiacetalization of α,β-unsaturated trifluoromethyl ketones: Efficient enantioselective construction of 3,4-dihydroisocoumarins. Chem. Eur. J. 2017;23:519–523. doi: 10.1002/chem.201604920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Carceller-Ferrer L., González del Campo A., Vila C., Blay G., Muñoz M.C., Pedro J.R. Catalytic diastereo-and enantioselective synthesis of tertiary trifluoromethyl carbinols through a vinylogous aldol reaction of alkylidene pyrazolones with trifluoromethyl ketones. J. Org. Chem. 2022;87:4538–4549. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.1c02817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kumar K., Jaiswal M.K., Singh R.P. Asymmetric vinylogous aldol reaction of α-ketoesters with 3-alkylidene oxindoles. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017;359:4136–4140. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201700758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mousavi M.S., Di Mola A., Pierri G., Massa A. Isochroman-3,4-dione and tandem aerobic oxidation of 4-bromoisochroman-3-one in the highly regio- and diastereoselective Diels–Alder reaction for the construction of bridged polycyclic lactones. J. Org. Chem. 2024;89:18602–18611. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.4c02522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mousavi M.S., Tedesco C., Massa A. Bifunctional organocatalysts and Brønsted bases in cooperative catalysis for the asymmetric [4+2] cycloaddition of in situ-generated dienes from isochromane-3,4-diones with nitroalkenes. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2025;367:e70039. doi: 10.1002/adsc.70039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mousavi M.S., Massa A., Waser M. Syntheses of 1,2,3-functionalized naphthols and phenols by decarboxylative cycloaddition/aromatization reactions of α-oxygenated lactones with allenoates or electron-deficient alkynes. Org. Chem. Front. 2026;13:1573–1577. doi: 10.1039/D5QO01582K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Constable D.J.C., Dunn P.J., Hayler J.D., Humphrey G.R., Leazer J.J., Jr., Linderman R.J., Lorenz K., Manley J., Pearlman B.A., Wells A., et al. Key green chemistry research areas—A perspective from pharmaceutical manufacturers. Green Chem. 2007;9:411–420. doi: 10.1039/B703488C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Carey J.S., Laffan D., Thomson C., Williams M.T. Analysis of the reactions used for the preparation of drug candidate molecules. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006;4:2337–2347. doi: 10.1039/b602413k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ieawsuwan W., Limjirawatthana S., Ploypradith P., Ruchirawat S. 4-Aryl-1H-isochromenes Synthesis from Triol Derivatives through Brønsted Acid-Catalyzed Pinacol Rearrangement/Intramolecular Cyclization Sequence. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2024;13:e202300578. doi: 10.1002/ajoc.202300578. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu T., Meng W., Feng X., Du H. Stereoselective Hydrosilylation of 1,2-Diketones Catalyzed by Chiral Frustrated Lewis Pairs. Angew. Chem. 2024;63:e202313957. doi: 10.1002/anie.202313957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.APEX3. Bruker AXS Inc.; Madison, WI, USA: 2016. Version 2015.5-2. [Google Scholar]
- 29.SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc.; Madison, WI, USA: 2013. Version 8.34A. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sheldrick G.M. SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc.; Madison, WI, USA: 2014. Version 2014/5. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sheldrick G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A. 2008;64:112–122. doi: 10.1107/S0108767307043930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sheldrick G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C. 2015;71:3–8. doi: 10.1107/S2053229614024218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dolomanov O.V., Bourhis L.J., Gildea R.J., Howard J.A.K., Puschmann H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Cryst. 2009;42:339–341. doi: 10.1107/S0021889808042726. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supplementary Material of this article. CCDC 2529279 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for compound 9a of this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. See Supporting Information for further details. Available online: http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures (accessed on 10 April 2026).


