Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Transpl Rep. 2025 Jan 17;10(1):100171. doi: 10.1016/j.tpr.2025.100171

Advancing Deep Variant Phenotyping of Mitochondrial Enzyme Complexes For Precision Medicine in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

Jing Dong 1,2,3,*, Michael T Zimmermann 3,4,5, Neshatul Haque 3, Shahram Arsang-Jang 1, Wael Saber 1,6, Xiaowu Gai 3, Raul Urrutia 3,4,7
PMCID: PMC13166157  NIHMSID: NIHMS2172584  PMID: 42131367

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HCT), an early developed methodology for precision medicine, remains the only curative therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, allo-HCT carries significant risks of morbidity and mortality due to relapse and transplant-related complications. Recurrent mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have been identified as significant prognostic indicators for MDS outcomes following allo-HCT. However, the biological mechanisms of mtDNA mutations remain unclear. Thus, here we performed deep variant phenotyping by integrating computational biophysics and structural genomics approaches to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying mtDNA variant dysfunction. This emerging genomics discipline employs structural models, molecular mechanic calculations, and accelerated molecular dynamic simulations to analyze gene products, focusing on their structures and motions that determine their function. We applied this methodology on the variants in the mitochondria-encoded complex I genes that are associated with MDS pathobiology and prognosis after allo-HCT. Our results demonstrate that this approach significantly outperforms conventional analytical methods, providing enhanced and more accurate information to support the potential pathogenicity of these variants and better infer their dysfunctional mechanisms. We conclude that the adoption and further expansion of computational structural genomics approaches, as applied to the mitochondrial genome, have the potential to significantly increase our understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying the disease. Our study lays a foundation for translating mitochondrial biology into clinical applications, which will advance the integration of precision medicine with allo-HCT.

INTRODUCTION

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic cell disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, leading to blood cytopenias, and by a tendency to progress to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in about 30% of patients.1 Despite advances in treatment, allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative therapy for MDS. However, mortality after HCT is high due to disease relapse and transplant-related complications. Less than 50% of patients with MDS survive for five years after transplantation.1 Identifying which MDS patients will most likely benefit from allo-HCT is challenging, given the clinical and biological heterogeneity of the disease.1 Prognostic tools defining MDS risk groups, such as the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and the revised IPSS (IPSS-R), which have varying probabilities of survival and leukemic transformation are used to predict posttransplant outcomes for clinical decision-making. Such models rely on traditional clinical and hematologic parameters and, thus, cannot accurately predict outcomes. During the past decade, sequencing technologies have dramatically improved our understanding of the genetics underlying MDS, with more than 50 recurrently mutated genes being identified, most of which also associate with unfavorable outcomes after allo-HCT.2 Incorporating somatic mutations of 31 genes, Bernard et al. developed a clinical-molecular prognostic model [IPSS-Molecular (IPSS-M)], exhibiting improved prognostic discrimination across all clinical endpoints compared to the IPSS-R.3 Around the same time, the International Consensus Classification (ICC) published a revised framework for classifying myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias, integrating genomic data.4 The shift to molecular markers may allow personalized medicine and has notably influenced clinical practice. Although it is now well recognized that genomic alterations play a central role in MDS, most studies have focused on characterizing mutations in the nuclear genome, overlooking the potential critical importance of the mitochondrial genome in achieving proper immunological competence and surveillance.

Mitochondria are critical dynamic organelles maintaining hematopoietic cell homeostasis and differentiation.5 They produce cellular energy and reactive oxygen species via oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), trigger apoptosis, and control heme biosynthesis and iron metabolism.6 Dysfunction in any of these processes is pathogenic for MDS.6 In addition, allo-HCT exacts a high metabolic demand to restore normal hematopoiesis and immunologic functions. Mitochondria are not only the “powerhouse” of the cell, but also function in innate and adaptive immune response.7 Alterations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), including genetic mutations and epigenomic modifications, could impair mitochondrial function and contribute to disease pathophysiology and survival outcomes.6,8 For instance, we conducted whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to characterize the prognostic landscape of mitochondrial genome in MDS patients receiving allo-HCT and in their matched donors, which yielded insights into prognosis.9 Our findings demonstrate that genetic variants in frequently mutated mtDNA genes, such as mitochondrial Complex I genes (e.g., MT-ND4L and MT-ND5), are highly prognostic for allo-HCT outcomes in MDS patients.9 However, large-scale experimental validation of these variants remains impractical. For this purpose, we developed a multi-parametric mechanistic-based assessment that integrates conventional two-dimensional (2D) sequence-based annotation with computational biophysics and structural genomics approaches to understand the molecular dysfunction of genetic variants at the atomic level.10–13 We have successfully validated our approach by revealing the molecular mechanisms of genetic variants in several nuclear genes (e.g., KRAS, KDM6A, KMT2C, and RAG).10–13 Here, we used our multi-parametric approaches to investigate the molecular mechanisms of mtDNA variants that were associated with posttransplant outcomes, with a specific focus on mitochondrial genes that form the OXPHOS Complex I, the largest component of the mitochondrial OXPHOS system.

METHODS

2D Sequence-based analyses using linear sequence predictors for pathogenicity

To predict the pathogenicity of mtDNA variants, we integrated information from different databases. Variants, regardless of their biotype, were classified as “pathogenic” if they (1) were listed as “confirmed” pathogenic in MITOMAP database,14 (2) had clinical significance of “pathogenic/likely pathogenic” based on the modified American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and Association of Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines for mtDNA variants (criteria provided in ClinVar),15 or (3) identified as loss of function (LoF) variants by the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP).16 According to the mtDNA specifications of the ACMG/AMP guidelines, mtDNA variants with allele frequency in the population database < 0.00002 provide evidence of pathogenicity.17 Based on this criterion, variants with AF_hom < 0.00002 in the gnomAD v3.1 database were also considered as “pathogenic” if they were non-synonymous and predicted to be deleterious from 5 of 7 prediction tools (HmtVar, SIFT, PolyPhen-2, MutPred2, PANTHER, PhD-SNP and SNPs&GO),18–24 or had MToolBox disease score > 0.4311.25

3D Structure-Based calculations for evaluation of mechanisms of dysfunction

The Cryo-EM structure of mitochondrial respiratory supercomplex, composed of three membrane-bound members of the ETC (i.e., complex I, dimeric complex III, and complex IV), were retrieved from RCSB Protein Data Bank (PDB; entry code: 5xth)26 and used in the current analysis to give the most physiologically relevant context to our 3D assessment and structure-based calculations (Figure 1). We used well-established metrics from protein structural analysis (i.e., amino acid local packing density, solvation energy, hydrogen bonds, and salt bridges) and more advanced metrics (i.e., multi-body statistical contact potentials, energetic frustration, and thermodynamic cooperativity) and made images using PyMOL v2.5.4.27–32 We performed evolutionary coupling analysis with tools from the Marks lab,33 allosteric path analysis with tools from the Bahar lab.34,35 The stability of the mutated protein were assessed by variant-induced changes in folding energy (ΔΔGfold) using FoldX.36 The explicit environment was modified for each mtDNA variant using the FoldX-generated models. Frustratometer was used to calculate residual frustration in the wildtype and mutated structures and to quantify changes in local interactions caused by each mtDNA variant.32

Figure 1: Structure of the MT super-complex.

Figure 1:

We label each selected variant with a red sphere marking its location.

RESULTS

Assembly and sequence-based evaluation of genomic variants in mitochondrial complex I that influence allo-HCT outcomes.

Our WGS data analyses of patients undergoing allo-HCT identified a total of 159 missense variants on mitochondrial Complex I genes (i.e., MT-ND1, MT-ND2, MT-ND3, MT-ND4, MT-ND4L, MT-ND5, and MT-ND6) as potentially pathogenic (Table 1).9 To test the gain of information that is generated by our deep variant phenotyping algorithms, we chose the variant that had the highest deleterious predicted score according to 2D annotation methods for each gene (i.e., MT-ND1 m.3470T>C, p.L55P; MT-ND2 m.5016T>C, p.S183P; MT-ND3 m.10176G>A, p.G40S; MT-ND4 m.11423G>A, p.E222K; MT-ND4L m.10726G>A, p.G86D; MT-ND5 m.12770A>G, p.E145G; and MT-ND6 m.14601G>A, p.P25S).

Table 1.

Potentially pathogenic missense variants on mitochodnrioal Complex I genes.

Variant Locus Amino Acid Variant Locus Amino Acid Variant Locus Amino Acid
3323TC MT-ND1 L6P 10826AG MT-ND4 I23V 12764GA MT-ND5 G143D
3326TC MT-ND1 L7P 10833TC MT-ND4 I25T 12769GA MT-ND5 E145K
3358GA MT-ND1 A18T 10869TC MT-ND4 I37T 12770AG MT-ND5 E145G
3361TC MT-ND1 F19L 11018GA MT-ND4 E87K 12772GA MT-ND5 G146S
3380GA MT-ND1 R25Q 11064TC MT-ND4 L102P 12782TC MT-ND5 I149T
3394TC MT-ND1 Y30H 11079TC MT-ND4 I107T 12800TC MT-ND5 I155T
3454GA MT-ND1 A50T 11087TC MT-ND4 F110L 12811TC MT-ND5 Y159H
3470TC MT-ND1 L55P 11126GA MT-ND4 E123K 12830AG MT-ND5 N165S
3517TC MT-ND1 Y71H 11153AG MT-ND4 I132V 12868GA MT-ND5 G178S
3526GA MT-ND1 A74T 11163GA MT-ND4 R135Q 12871GA MT-ND5 D179N
3550GC MT-ND1 A82P 11210TC MT-ND4 F151L 12875TC MT-ND5 I180T
3572TC MT-ND1 L89P 11225GA MT-ND4 G156S 13018GA MT-ND5 G228S
3578TA MT-ND1 M91K 11273GA MT-ND4 G172S 13063GA MT-ND5 V243I
3578TC MT-ND1 M91T 11276TC MT-ND4 S173P 13069GA MT-ND5 A245T
3590TA MT-ND1 L95Q 11295TC MT-ND4 L179P 13093GA MT-ND5 V253I
3599TA MT-ND1 L98H 11327TC MT-ND4 W190R 13112TC MT-ND5 L259S
3602AG MT-ND1 N99S 11354TC MT-ND4 Y199H 13129CT MT-ND5 P265S
3605TA MT-ND1 L100Q 11379TC MT-ND4 M207T 13178GA MT-ND5 G281D
3608GC MT-ND1 G101A 11423GA MT-ND4 E222K 13180GA MT-ND5 A282T
3638TC MT-ND1 L111P 11432AG MT-ND4 I225V 13201GA MT-ND5 A289T
3727TC MT-ND1 S141P 11435GA MT-ND4 A226T 13208GC MT-ND5 C291S
3737TC MT-ND1 V144A 11453GA MT-ND4 A232T 13237AG MT-ND5 I301V
3791TC MT-ND1 L162P 11480TC MT-ND4 Y241H 13238TC MT-ND5 I301T
3918GC MT-ND1 E204D 11490TC MT-ND4 M244T 13240GA MT-ND5 V302M
3929TC MT-ND1 V208A 11493GA MT-ND4 R245H 13246TC MT-ND5 F304L
3935GA MT-ND1 G210D 11535AG MT-ND4 Y259C 13247TC MT-ND5 F304S
3958GA MT-ND1 G218S 11538CT MT-ND4 P260L 13277TC MT-ND5 M314T
4028TC MT-ND1 I241T 11556TC MT-ND4 L266P 13367GA MT-ND5 G344E
4136AG MT-ND1 Y277C 11583TA MT-ND4 I275N 13369TC MT-ND5 S345P
4211TC MT-ND1 M302T 11642GA MT-ND4 A295T 13373TC MT-ND5 I346T
4600TC MT-ND2 L44P 11693GA MT-ND4 A312T 13376TC MT-ND5 I347T
4665GA MT-ND2 A66T 11790TC MT-ND4 L344P 13414GC MT-ND5 G360R
4752TC MT-ND2 S95P 11891GA MT-ND4 E378K 13499GA MT-ND5 G388D
4849GA MT-ND2 G127D 11940TC MT-ND4 L394P 13528AG MT-ND5 T398A
4903TC MT-ND2 I145T 11955AG MT-ND4 N399S 13538TC MT-ND5 M401T
4950TC MT-ND2 S161P 11988TC MT-ND4 M410T 13558GA MT-ND5 A408T
4986AG MT-ND2 T173A 10534AG MT-ND4L Y22C 13664TC MT-ND5 I443T
5016TC MT-ND2 S183P 10554TC MT-ND4L S29P 13691AG MT-ND5 N452S
5032GC MT-ND2 G188A 10663TC MT-ND4L V65A 13718GA MT-ND5 S461N
5050TC MT-ND2 L194P 10675GA MT-ND4L C69Y 13844AG MT-ND5 D503G
5055TC MT-ND2 Y196H 10726GA MT-ND4L G86D 13931TA MT-ND5 I532N
5136TC MT-ND2 S223P 10731GA MT-ND4L D88N 13952AG MT-ND5 Y539C
5148AC MT-ND2 T227P 12457GA MT-ND5 A41T 14050TC MT-ND5 S572P
5224GA MT-ND2 G252E 12524TC MT-ND5 I63T 14093TC MT-ND5 L586P
5262GC MT-ND2 A265P 12601TC MT-ND5 F89L 14180TC MT-ND6 Y165C
10138TC MT-ND3 L27P 12613GA MT-ND5 A93T 14231TC MT-ND6 Y148C
10176GA MT-ND3 G40S 12631TC MT-ND5 S99P 14424AG MT-ND6 S84P
10237TC MT-ND3 I60T 12635TC MT-ND5 I100T 14484TC MT-ND6 M64V
10282TC MT-ND3 L75P 12638TC MT-ND5 M101T 14501AG MT-ND6 I58T
10290GA MT-ND3 A78T 12650TC MT-ND5 L105P 14525TC MT-ND6 Y50C
10353GC MT-ND3 A99P 12673AG MT-ND5 N113D 14601GA MT-ND6 P25S
10360GA MT-ND3 S101N 12704TC MT-ND5 I123T 14606GA MT-ND6 P23L
10805TC MT-ND4 W16R 12731TC MT-ND5 V132A 14619AG MT-ND6 F19L

Deep variant phenotyping using computational structural genomics.

Subsequently, we performed the 3D structure-based assessment, initially of variants by examining the environments around the mtDNA variants. We found that mutations of MT-ND4:E222 (Figure 2A) and MT-ND5:E145 (Figure 2B) were likely to change the dynamics of the complex because they are internally facing charges surrounded by a mixture of positive and negative charges. The residue E222 is in a solvent exposed helix and appears to have a crucial role in holding the adjacent solvent exposed helix by hydrogen bond. Additionally, the residue E145 is located at the interface stabilizing the interaction with MT-ND4. We anticipate that such an arrangement balances architectural stability with essential flexibility. Mutation to a different charge (e.g., E222K) or that form greater internal cavities (e.g., E145G) will have dynamic effects on the structure or the electron transport process. Interestingly, these candidate variants were selected without structural data, and there are proximal relationships among them like MT-ND6:P25 being across from MT-ND4L:G86 (Figure 2C). The role of G86 is probably to provide a steric free edge at the end of helix for a sharp turn of C-terminal peptide, which could otherwise not be stabilized if placed in other direction. We anticipate that any bulky mutation at this site could be deleterious. In addition, Evolutionary coupling analysis identified all seven variants as deleterious. Allosteric path analysis identified six out of seven variants as deleterious with one neutral call (MT-ND4:E222K) but within 1% of the threshold required for assignment to this category. Structural stability analysis, which is based on molecular mechanic calculations of folding energy identified one variant with neutral (MT-ND5:E145G), one stabilizing (MT-ND4:E222K) and the remaining five variants with highly destabilizing effect (Table 2). Thus, this data indicates that the prognostic effects of these mtDNA variants on MDS patients receiving allo-HCT likely involve their deleterious impacts on mitochondrial function. Thus, when using computational biophysics and structural genomics for their analyses, mtDNA variants are a powerful prognostic tool for predicting the outcome of allo-HCT and advances the field of precision medicine for MDS.

Figure 2: 3D structure-based assessment for mtDNA variants.

Figure 2:

A) MT-ND4:E222 and B) MT-ND5:E145 are located within internal pockets that are lined with combinations of positive and negative charges, likely facilitating the flexible conformational changes that are required for electron transport. C) Selected mutations are nearby in space and typically at the ends of alpha helices where they likely modulate flexibility.

Table 2.

Structural stability analysis for mtDNA variants.

Gene Amino Acid ΔΔGfold (kcal/mol)
MT-ND1 L55P 5.9 ± 0.2
MT-ND2 S183P 5.4 ± 0.3
MT-ND3 G40S 6.9 ± 0.0
MT-ND4 E222K −1.5 ± 0.2
MT-ND4L G86D 3.6 ± 0.2
MT-ND5 E145G −0.2 ± 0.3
MT-ND6 P25S 4.3 ± 0.0

DISCUSSION

Considering the novelty of the results reported in this study, it becomes important to briefly highlight additional applications. Computational biophysics and structural genomics increase our ability to better predict pathogenicity than conventional methods due to the precision of these methods over the ones popularized by guidelines. More importantly, this approach provides explanations for mechanisms of dysfunction underlying the impact of variants, in particular because of its used of advanced methods of molecular dynamic simulations. Lastly, since many drugs have been developed using similar methodologies, the conformations that results from molecular dynamics simulation build the trajectory toward the identification of mutant-specific cavities for development of organic probes or small drugs. Therefore, we anticipate that the continue application to the deep variant characterization of both nuclear and Mt-DNA-encoded mitochondria proteins will significantly advance not only the field of MDS but other genomic diseases of importance to our field. In conclusion, in the current molecular era, mtDNA variants are a powerful prognostic tool for both predicting the outcome of allo-HCT and represent an advancing the field of precision medicine for MDS. Studies such as we illustrated here increase our ability to better predict pathogenicity, provide explanations for their mechanism of dysfunction, and yield structural conformation to help build novel therapeutic tools. In this manner, we can better leverage mtDNA genomics into the functional interpretation and actionable potential. Thus, we are optimistic that this study will serve as a useful framework for characterizing the spectrum of translational research in the field of HCT, from bedside (e.g., measuring individual’s genomics) to bench (e.g., computational structural genomics) then back to bedside (e.g., improved risk stratification and clinical outcomes), necessary for our precision medicine practice and research. Such work requires a multidisciplinary team with high level of expertise in HCT clinical management, molecular epidemiology, systems biology, mitochondrial biochemistry, computational biophysics, computational chemistry, and stem cell biology. Should such a proposed translational cycle be successful, it will be a paradigm shift in allo-HCT, from donor selection, recipient risk stratification to mitochondrial targeted therapying in HCT, MDS, and most likely to other diseases caused by alterations in this organelle.

Acknowledgements

Jing Dong is supported by the NHLBI (K01 HL164972) and the Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center. This project was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health Grant R01 DK52913, and the Linda T. and John A. Mellowes Center for Genomic Sciences and Precision Medicine at the Medical College of Wisconsin.

Footnotes

Competing interests

None

References

  • 1.Cazzola M Myelodysplastic Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(14):1358–1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kennedy JA, Ebert BL. Clinical Implications of Genetic Mutations in Myelodysplastic Syndrome. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(9):968–974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bernard E, Tuechler H, Greenberg PL, Hasserjian RP, Arango Ossa JE, Nannya Y, et al. Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System for Myelodysplastic Syndromes. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(7):EVIDoa2200008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian RP, Borowitz MJ, Calvo KR, Kvasnicka HM, et al. International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Blood. 2022;140(11):1200–1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Filippi MD, Ghaffari S. Mitochondria in the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells: new perspectives and opportunities. Blood. 2019;133(18):1943–1952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fontenay M, Cathelin S, Amiot M, Gyan E, Solary E. Mitochondria in hematopoiesis and hematological diseases. Oncogene. 2006;25(34):4757–4767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weinberg SE, Sena LA, Chandel NS. Mitochondria in the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Immunity. 2015;42(3):406–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim HR, Won SJ, Fabian C, Kang MG, Szardenings M, Shin MG. Mitochondrial DNA aberrations and pathophysiological implications in hematopoietic diseases, chronic inflammatory diseases, and cancers. Ann Lab Med. 2015;35(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dong J, Buradagunta CS, Zhang T, Spellman S, Bolon YT, DeZern AE, et al. Prognostic landscape of mitochondrial genome in myelodysplastic syndrome after stem-cell transplantation. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16(1):21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chi YI, Stodola TJ, De Assuncao TM, Leverence EN, Smith BC, Volkman BF, et al. Structural bioinformatics enhances the interpretation of somatic mutations in KDM6A found in human cancers. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022;20:2200–2211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ratnasinghe BD, Haque N, Wagenknecht JB, Jensen DR, Valdivia Esparza GK, Leverence EN, et al. Beyond structural bioinformatics for genomics with dynamics characterization of an expanded KRAS mutational landscape. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023;21:4790–4803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jorge SD, Chi YI, Mazaba JL, Haque N, Wagenknecht J, Smith BC, et al. Deep computational phenotyping of genomic variants impacting the SET domain of KMT2C reveal molecular mechanisms for their dysfunction. Front Genet. 2023;14:1291307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haque N, Kawai T, Ratnasinghe BD, Wagenknecht JB, Urrutia R, Notarangelo LD, et al. RAG genomic variation causes autoimmune diseases through specific structure-based mechanisms of enzyme dysregulation. iScience. 2023;26(10):108040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lott MT, Leipzig JN, Derbeneva O, Xie HM, Chalkia D, Sarmady M, et al. mtDNA Variation and Analysis Using Mitomap and Mitomaster. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2013;44:1 23 21–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown GR, Chao C, Chitipiralla S, et al. ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D1062–D1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GR, Thormann A, et al. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McCormick EM, Lott MT, Dulik MC, Shen L, Attimonelli M, Vitale O, et al. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP standards and guidelines for mitochondrial DNA variant interpretation. Hum Mutat. 2020;41(12):2028–2057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Preste R, Vitale O, Clima R, Gasparre G, Attimonelli M. HmtVar: a new resource for human mitochondrial variations and pathogenicity data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D1202–D1210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vaser R, Adusumalli S, Leng SN, Sikic M, Ng PC. SIFT missense predictions for genomes. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(1):1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7(4):248–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pejaver V, Urresti J, Lugo-Martinez J, Pagel KA, Lin GN, Nam HJ, et al. Inferring the molecular and phenotypic impact of amino acid variants with MutPred2. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mi H, Ebert D, Muruganujan A, Mills C, Albou LP, Mushayamaha T, et al. PANTHER version 16: a revised family classification, tree-based classification tool, enhancer regions and extensive API. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D394–D403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Capriotti E, Calabrese R, Casadio R. Predicting the insurgence of human genetic diseases associated to single point protein mutations with support vector machines and evolutionary information. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(22):2729–2734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Calabrese R, Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Martelli PL, Casadio R. Functional annotations improve the predictive score of human disease-related mutations in proteins. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(8):1237–1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Santorsola M, Calabrese C, Girolimetti G, Diroma MA, Gasparre G, Attimonelli M. A multi-parametric workflow for the prioritization of mitochondrial DNA variants of clinical interest. Hum Genet. 2016;135(1):121–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guo R, Zong S, Wu M, Gu J, Yang M. Architecture of Human Mitochondrial Respiratory Megacomplex I(2)III(2)IV(2). Cell. 2017;170(6):1247–1257 e1212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schrodinger, LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8; 2015.
  • 28.Feng Y, Kloczkowski A, Jernigan RL. Four-body contact potentials derived from two protein datasets to discriminate native structures from decoys. Proteins. 2007;68(1):57–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zimmermann MT, Leelananda SP, Gniewek P, Feng Y, Jernigan RL, Kloczkowski A. Free energies for coarse-grained proteins by integrating multibody statistical contact potentials with entropies from elastic network models. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2011;12(2):137–147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zimmermann MT, Tischer A, Whitten ST, Auton M. Structural origins of misfolding propensity in the platelet adhesive von Willebrand factor A1 domain. Biophys J. 2015;109(2):398–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ferreiro DU, Hegler JA, Komives EA, Wolynes PG. On the role of frustration in the energy landscapes of allosteric proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(9):3499–3503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Parra RG, Schafer NP, Radusky LG, Tsai MY, Guzovsky AB, Wolynes PG, et al. Protein Frustratometer 2: a tool to localize energetic frustration in protein molecules, now with electrostatics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W356–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hopf TA, Ingraham JB, Poelwijk FJ, Scharfe CP, Springer M, Sander C, et al. Mutation effects predicted from sequence co-variation. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(2):128–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ponzoni L, Penaherrera DA, Oltvai ZN, Bahar I. Rhapsody: predicting the pathogenicity of human missense variants. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(10):3084–3092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bakan A, Meireles LM, Bahar I. ProDy: protein dynamics inferred from theory and experiments. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(11):1575–1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J Mol Biol. 2002;320(2):369–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES